The case of Hermès trademark infringement in the Metaverse is gaining momentum

9 January 2023 | Knowledge, News

We previously wrote about the dispute over trademark infringement in the Metaverse concerning the luxury brand Hermès, and the brand’s owner taking legal action against artist Mason Rothschild, the creator of “MetaBirkin” non-fungible tokens (NFTs). Hermès alleges that the NFT version of their famous Birkin handbags violates the rights of the Hermès design house.

How it happened: the anatomy of the conflict over NFTs

The year end is a good time for summaries, so let’s take a further look at the status of the Hermès brand case, how the litigation pending before the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York emerged, and examine recent decisions taken in this case to see what conclusions can be drawn for future brands entering the Metaverse.


Hermès files a trademark infringement lawsuit against NFT creator Mason Rothschild, claiming that his digital version of the famous Birkin handbags violates the rights of the Hermès fashion house.

In their complaint, Hermès claims that “MetaBirkins” infringe upon their famous “Birkin” trademark and are likely to cause confusion among consumers, who may believe that Rothschild’s artistic creations were authorised, sponsored or approved by Hermès.


Rothschild disagrees with Hermès’ claims, considering that the NFTs are merely an artistic modification of the famous Hermès fashion house handbag, and in his view do not mislead the public as to the origin of the goods bearing the disputed mark.


The Court denies Rothschild’s motion to dismiss the claim and confirms that an NFT can violate trademark rights. The Court argues that an NFT is simply a code pointing to where a digital image is located and authenticating the image, so using an NFT to authenticate an image and enable its subsequent resale and transfer does not make the image a commodity without legal protection.


Hermès files a motion for summary judgment, asking for the application of the similarity analysis test (Gruner test), which it believes is appropriate. The Court rules that the Rogers test will be employed, as it balances freedom of speech against trademark rights and, in the Court’s view, is applicable to the analysis of trademark infringement involving the NFTs in question.

Brand protection in the Metaverse

The case has not yet been resolved, but one can already see some very interesting implications for further NFT- and Metaverse-related litigations, which will certainly also take place in Europe.

Indeed, the fact that more such cases will follow was demonstrated by the recently discussed litigation initiated by the Juventus football club. The U.S. Court’s confirmation that the use of an NFT to authenticate an image and allow for its subsequent resale and transfer, does not make the image a commodity without legal protection, is also significant in this context.

This only confirms our earlier observations on how important it is to adequately secure the rights of any business seeking a presence in the Metaverse. Indeed, we have to assume that the number of disputes will only increase, pro-rata with the number of users of this new platform.

Now we know with certainty that any failure to properly update trademark applications and adjust the list of goods and services for operation in the Metaverse may seriously limit or prevent effective trademark protection.

Any questions? Contact the author.

Tomasz Szambelan

See also:
Well-known brands prepare to enter the Metaverse

Latest Knowledge

Compulsory redemption of shares in a limited liability company

Shareholders who obstruct cooperation or do not fulfil their obligations may be excluded from company operations by an internal decision of the remaining shareholders, e.g. through the compulsory redemption of shares under Article 199 of the Commercial Companies Code.

A wave of NFT-related trademark applications

We have followed the trend in trademark applications for NFT-related protection and the conclusions are clear: what started as a trickle has become a flood, with tycoons from virtually every industry jumping on the bandwagon.

Why is it worth Polish companies seeking capital in foreign markets

For Polish companies, a dual listing brings prestige, money and opportunities for international growth. It is a chance to build global brands and achieve the best competitive position, but also to enhance liquidity and raise money for bold investments and necessary acquisitions.

Non-existent company resolutions

In order to protect shareholders against defective resolutions being used in transactions, the Commercial Companies Code provides, in principle, for a closed list of legal instruments.

An Overview of 2022 Tech Regulations

Before embarking on any New Year’s resolutions, it is worth starting with a moment of reflection on the year gone by. In the EU, 2022 brought a number of new regulations in the new technology market, so let’s take a closer look at them. The following is our selection of the most important developments and legislative initiatives to emerge in 2022, which will significantly influence further international and national IP/IT regulations.

Contact us:

Tomasz Szambelan

Tomasz Szambelan

Advocate, Senior Associate

+48 608 593 042