5

Preventing disinformation or SLAPP, or what election lawsuits look like in practice

26 June 2024 | Knowledge, News, The Right Focus

The parliamentary, local government and European Parliament elections are behind us. Each was preceded by an election campaign – a period when candidates present their manifestos and the public is more interested in them. This is a time when information about people seeking votes spreads extremely quickly, which can contribute to the dissemination of disinformation or untruths.

Spreading disinformation – what does the Election Code say

Article 111 of the Election Code is intended to prevent the spread of false information during an election campaign.

It gives candidates or representatives of electoral committees the right to bring such cases to court.

In the petition (Polish: “wniosek w trybie wyborczym”) they can, inter alia, ask the court to:

  • Prohibit the dissemination of such information
  • Order the rectification of such information
  • Order the publication of a response to the disseminated information infringing personal rights
  • Order the publication of an apology
  • Order the contribution of up to PLN 100,000 to a public benefit organization

This wide range of claims can only be made by a candidate during the election campaign, i.e. from the day the election is announced until 24 hours before polling day.

The regulations provide that the petition is to be examined expeditiously, i.e. within 24 hours of its receipt by the court, which will immediately deliver a decision concluding the proceedings in the case together with a statement of reasons. The parties have a further 24 hours to file an appeal, which should also be heard within 24 hours of receipt by the appeal court.

Election lawsuits – what are the rights of the other party

Petitions to bring an action under the Election Code are heard by the court in non-contentious  proceedings. The candidate’s opponent is not called a defendant, but a participant. However, this does not deprive them of the right to defend and present their position in the case.

Although Article 111 of the Election Code does not explicitly mention the participant’s right to file a reply, in practice the courts oblige the participant to present their position in writing. However, this does not extend the time limit for hearing the case, which, as a reminder, is 24 hours.

Therefore, a participant against whom allegations of dissemination of false information are made may be given only a few hours by the court to read the petition, collect evidence and present it, together with relevant arguments, in a pleading.

Can the action relate to press articles

According to the literal wording of the regulation, an action brought under the Election Code may relate to campaign material and statements or other forms of campaigning containing false information.

In practice, such actions are often brought by politicians standing for election to counter information unfavourable to them in press material published in print or online. The question therefore arises as to whether press material can be considered campaign material or a form of campaigning.

During the European Parliament elections campaign, in a case brought by a well-known politician, the Regional Court in Krakow held that a press article was neither campaign material nor a form of campaigning and that the press were not obliged to refrain from publishing information about politicians during the campaign. The publication of materials on candidates during this period does not make the journalist or press publisher a campaigner, but rather constitutes the fulfilment of the function of the press, which, in a democratic state under the rule of law, is to fulfil the citizens’ right to information about public life. The Regional Court therefore agreed with the argumentation of the law firm representing the publisher and dismissed the politician’s claims in their entirety.

Is any election lawsuit a SLAPP

Each case has its own peculiarities and it cannot be ruled out that a press publication in specific circumstances may constitute campaigning.

Irrespective of the outcome, however, taking legal action forces the press to devote time, personnel and financial resources to rapidly engage in the proceedings and present their position.

In this context, the instrumental use of the mechanism under Article 111 of the Election Code can be classified as SLAPPs, i.e. strategic lawsuits against public participation aimed at suppressing debate, which are increasingly criticised by freedom of speech and press freedom activists.

Any questions? Contact us

Olga Senator

Latest Knowledge

Announcement of Income Tax Reform

On 19 August, during a press conference, the Prime Minister announced a package of tax changes planned for next year. According to the announcement, the reform is intended, on the one hand, to ease the burden on the middle class and, on the other, to shift a greater fiscal burden onto the wealthiest individuals and the largest companies. We take a look at the proposals included in the announced package and explain what they might mean for taxpayers.

Family foundations and the tax authorities: what draft bill UD447 proposes and why this is not the end of the troubles

Family foundations were intended to provide entrepreneurs with a stable framework for intergenerational wealth management. Yet not even four years have passed since the first such foundations were established, and the rules governing their taxation are set to be changed once again. This is because the scale of interest and the practical problems uncovered have overwhelmed the drafters of the legislation, as best illustrated by the figures – 927 applications for individual tax rulings and 77 opinions issued from the Head of the National Revenue Administration. This does not, however, mean that family foundations are being used on a massive scale for aggressive tax optimisation. A significant proportion of the queries concerned simply how to correctly apply the complex regulations.

NIS2 and the National Cybersecurity System Act in transport: what you need to do before October 2026

The amended Act on the National Cybersecurity System (UKSC) has been in force since 3 April 2026. For transport sector undertakings, this means a specific compliance timeline, including an obligation to register with the National Cybersecurity System (KSC) registry by 3 October 2026. Failure to do so may result in substantial financial penalties, coupled with the risk of personal liability for senior management. Not every undertaking, however, automatically falls within the scope of the new regime. Read on to find out whether your organisation is affected and what you need to do before the deadline for preparation.

Family foundations: the government has done the maths and presented the bill

Three years. That’s how long we’ve been waiting for what the Council of Ministers had seen in the data from the outset – and has now disclosed in its review of the Family Foundation Act. The document not only diagnoses the problems, but also previews substantial changes to rules that founders and their advisers treated as settled and stable. And therein lies a problem that goes far beyond tax matters. If the rules of the game are changed while the game is being played, there can be neither planning stability nor trust in the law. It is no coincidence that one of the greatest concerns among entrepreneurs considering setting up a foundation is not the level of taxation, but the stability of the legal framework – which today is once again being called into question.

What the new swiss franc act means for banks

We now have a new Act on Special Measures for the Adjudication of Cases Concerning Loan Agreements Denominated in or Indexed to the Swiss Franc. The provisions come into force 14 days after publication. So now is a good time to look at what lies ahead and what banks should be doing today.

New draft Pay Transparency Act – what has changed since December 2025?

A second version of the draft act on strengthening the application of the right to equal pay for equal work or work of equal value between men and women has now been published. It refines procedures and deadlines and introduces a new supervisory body. We have already discussed the changes affecting the recruitment stage and the three pillars of the forthcoming pay transparency framework, noting that Poland will miss the EU transposition deadline of 7 June 2026. Now, we take a closer look at the further changes, new developments and risks that have emerged in the latest, April version of the draft.

Payment Services Regulation (PSR) – between consumer protection and due diligence

The draft Payment Services Regulation (PSR) is one of the most significant elements of the reform of the EU legal framework for payment services. Its principal aim is to enhance the security of cashless transactions and to reduce the scale of financial fraud, in particular that arising from the growth of digital channels. At the same time, the new rules are intended to introduce a liability model that will not result in risk being transferred entirely to financial institutions, whilst retaining an important role for independent due diligence on the part of the user.

Energy deregulation – key changes for businesses and energy consumers

The President has now signed the Energy Deregulation Act (UDER92). The new provisions cover both the relationships between energy undertakings and consumers, and matters relating to investment, district heating, and the administrative obligations of energy market participants. The Act introduces changes in the areas of billing, communication with consumers, grid connection, and the operations of undertakings in the energy and district heating sectors. We set out the key points to note.

Banking sector overview | Banking today and tomorrow | July 2026

Under the draft legislation, banks will be required to offer existing borrowers a switch from WIBOR-based to POLSTR-based interest rates, a mechanism intended to speed up the voluntary transition of financial instruments to the new benchmark. The banking sector has responded positively to the proposal, according to Tadeusz Białek, President of the Polish Bank Association.