Well-known brands prepare to enter the Metaverse

28 September 2022 | Knowledge, News

What do brands such as Maserati, Yves Saint Laurent, Coco Chanel, Master Card and Volkswagen have in common? It is that their owners are filing trademark applications for goods and services to be protected in the Metaverse.

Why you need to protect brands and trademarks in the Metaverse

Trademark protection in the Metaverse has been discussed for a long time, but only in recent months has it become apparent how brands can be safely and securely present in the virtual world whilst being protected against any infringement.

The virtual world appears to be a fresh, almost idyllic place, but contrary to appearances, trademark infringements can occur even in the Metaverse.

This was recently seen by the manufacturer of the luxury brand Hermès, which took legal action against artist Mason Rothschild, the creator of ‘Metabirkin’ NFTs (non-fungible tokens), alleging that the NFT version of the famous Birkin handbags infringed the rights of the Hermès fashion house.

As such it is clear that cases of trademark infringement, not only of Premium brands, will increase in proportion with the number of users of the new platform.

Metaverse and Premium brands – who secures their brand rights

In order to secure their rights, brand owners, in virtually every industry, are filing an increasing number of trademark applications for NFT and Metaverse goods and services.

In recent months, the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) has received applications from the owners of brands such as:

  • Yves Saint Laurent,
  • Coco Chanel,
  • Pizza Hut,
  • Valentino,
  • Master Card,
  • Maserati,
  • Volkswagen.

Interestingly, a significant group of entities seeking protection in the digital world are football clubs and federations, such as:

  • Manchester City,
  • Paris Saint-Germain,
  • West Ham United,
  • Liverpool,
  • The Football Association Premier League Limited.

How to protect your brand in the virtual world

The primary issue is to review your trademarks for further use in the Metaverse.

As the protection of registered marks may not automatically be extended to additional classes of goods and services, new applications must be filed.

Currently, such applications are most often filed with the EUIPO.

The Polish Patent Office has also recently received applications for trademarks to protect goods and services in the virtual world. In this case, the applicant was Louis Vuitton Malletier.

Does protecting brands in the Metaverse only pay off for the big players?

If anyone thinks that only big brands are filing trademark applications, they are wrong.

Our analysis shows that a significant number of applicants are owners of less well-known and not so popular brands, who are taking appropriate measures in advance to protect their rights.

In view of the numerous applications, the EUIPO is currently working on guidelines on trademarks in the context of their use in NFTs and in the Metaverse.

Therefore, it is very likely that the Polish Patent Office will also apply these guidelines in its practice.

Nowadays, we are certain that the failure to adequately update trademark applications and adjust the list of goods and services to their use in the Metaverse may lead to a serious limitation of trademark protection.

Find out how to effectively secure your brand for entry into the Metaverse, by contacting me directly:

Tomasz Szambelan

Latest Knowledge

Payment Services Regulation (PSR) – between consumer protection and due diligence

The draft Payment Services Regulation (PSR) is one of the most significant elements of the reform of the EU legal framework for payment services. Its principal aim is to enhance the security of cashless transactions and to reduce the scale of financial fraud, in particular that arising from the growth of digital channels. At the same time, the new rules are intended to introduce a liability model that will not result in risk being transferred entirely to financial institutions, whilst retaining an important role for independent due diligence on the part of the user.

Energy deregulation – key changes for businesses and energy consumers

The President has now signed the Energy Deregulation Act (UDER92). The new provisions cover both the relationships between energy undertakings and consumers, and matters relating to investment, district heating, and the administrative obligations of energy market participants. The Act introduces changes in the areas of billing, communication with consumers, grid connection, and the operations of undertakings in the energy and district heating sectors. We set out the key points to note.

Banking sector overview | Banking today and tomorrow | July 2026

Under the draft legislation, banks will be required to offer existing borrowers a switch from WIBOR-based to POLSTR-based interest rates, a mechanism intended to speed up the voluntary transition of financial instruments to the new benchmark. The banking sector has responded positively to the proposal, according to Tadeusz Białek, President of the Polish Bank Association.

“Withdraw from contract here” – what next for the new button in online shops, on trading platforms and in mobile apps?

From 19 June, national legislation was to require businesses in the European Union entering into distance contracts with consumers via an online interface to provide consumers with the option to withdraw from the contract via a dedicated function/button. However, due to Poland’s delay in transposing Directive 2023/2673, which requires the use of such a button, this obligation has been postponed in our country. We look at what remote contract withdrawal entails and which transactions the new feature will apply to.

Municipal master plans – new deadline, same old challenges

On 11 June 2026, the President signed into law a bill extending the deadline for municipalities to adopt their master plans (plany ogólne). The key deadline for adopting master plans was moved from 30 June to 31 August 2026. We examine the reasons behind this change and consider what the absence of a master plan might mean for potential investors and their future projects.

Record fines and the upcoming 21st sanctions package – what should businesses expect?

The past year has brought a series of enforcement actions that clearly signal a tightening approach by the Polish customs and revenue authorities towards breaches of the sanctions regime. Importantly, businesses should already be preparing for further changes, as the European Union has announced its 21st sanctions package and updated the list of designated persons and entities. We examine the key developments and offer guidance on how to minimise the risk of non-compliance.

A sea change in the rules governing board members’ liability for a company’s tax arrears

The bill amending the General Tax Code (No. UC138) fundamentally overhauls the rules governing the tax liability of third parties for capital companies’ tax arrears.  It comes in response to recent CJEU judgments, the Ombudsman’s February statement and the post-audit report of the Supreme Chamber of Audit (NIK) of December 2025. We examine what’s changing, who will be affected by the new rules and what steps are worth taking right now.

Partner in name, but only if male: the linguistic trap in Polish corporate law

One of the structures available under Polish law is the ‘spółka partnerska’ (professional partnership), modelled on the Anglo-Saxon Limited Liability Partnership. As defined in the Polish Commercial Companies Code, this is a vehicle for individuals practising liberal professions, such as doctors, architects and accountants. And yet, the provisions governing professional partnerships make no mention of their applicability to women. We therefore examine whether there is no room for female partners, feminine-gendered forms, or simply linguistic empathy.

Can you sue over words aimed at an entire community?

A damaging public statement does not necessarily refer to a specific individual. Sometimes, the author attributes negative characteristics to a whole group of people, portrays them as a threat or uses language that could be seen as demeaning. Statements of this kind frequently concern LGBTQ+ people. This raises the question: can a member of the targeted community bring a lawsuit seeking compensation or an apology, even if they were not named directly? We decided to look into this.

Contact us:

Tomasz Szambelan

Tomasz Szambelan

Advocate / Counsel / Intellectual and Industrial Property Law

+48 608 593 042

t.szambelan@kochanski.pl