Well-known brands prepare to enter the Metaverse

28 September 2022 | Knowledge, News

What do brands such as Maserati, Yves Saint Laurent, Coco Chanel, Master Card and Volkswagen have in common? It is that their owners are filing trademark applications for goods and services to be protected in the Metaverse.

Why you need to protect brands and trademarks in the Metaverse

Trademark protection in the Metaverse has been discussed for a long time, but only in recent months has it become apparent how brands can be safely and securely present in the virtual world whilst being protected against any infringement.

The virtual world appears to be a fresh, almost idyllic place, but contrary to appearances, trademark infringements can occur even in the Metaverse.

This was recently seen by the manufacturer of the luxury brand Hermès, which took legal action against artist Mason Rothschild, the creator of ‘Metabirkin’ NFTs (non-fungible tokens), alleging that the NFT version of the famous Birkin handbags infringed the rights of the Hermès fashion house.

As such it is clear that cases of trademark infringement, not only of Premium brands, will increase in proportion with the number of users of the new platform.

Metaverse and Premium brands – who secures their brand rights

In order to secure their rights, brand owners, in virtually every industry, are filing an increasing number of trademark applications for NFT and Metaverse goods and services.

In recent months, the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) has received applications from the owners of brands such as:

  • Yves Saint Laurent,
  • Coco Chanel,
  • Pizza Hut,
  • Valentino,
  • Master Card,
  • Maserati,
  • Volkswagen.

Interestingly, a significant group of entities seeking protection in the digital world are football clubs and federations, such as:

  • Manchester City,
  • Paris Saint-Germain,
  • West Ham United,
  • Liverpool,
  • The Football Association Premier League Limited.

How to protect your brand in the virtual world

The primary issue is to review your trademarks for further use in the Metaverse.

As the protection of registered marks may not automatically be extended to additional classes of goods and services, new applications must be filed.

Currently, such applications are most often filed with the EUIPO.

The Polish Patent Office has also recently received applications for trademarks to protect goods and services in the virtual world. In this case, the applicant was Louis Vuitton Malletier.

Does protecting brands in the Metaverse only pay off for the big players?

If anyone thinks that only big brands are filing trademark applications, they are wrong.

Our analysis shows that a significant number of applicants are owners of less well-known and not so popular brands, who are taking appropriate measures in advance to protect their rights.

In view of the numerous applications, the EUIPO is currently working on guidelines on trademarks in the context of their use in NFTs and in the Metaverse.

Therefore, it is very likely that the Polish Patent Office will also apply these guidelines in its practice.

Nowadays, we are certain that the failure to adequately update trademark applications and adjust the list of goods and services to their use in the Metaverse may lead to a serious limitation of trademark protection.

Find out how to effectively secure your brand for entry into the Metaverse, by contacting me directly:

Tomasz Szambelan

Latest Knowledge

Banking in 2026: technology, regulation and the new market landscape

The year 2026 will see the banking sector undergo its most dynamic transformation in a decade. The trends identified in Accenture’s Top Banking Trends FY26 report suggest that the sector is entering a phase in which technology and regulation will be inseparable, driving all aspects of change. However, it is regulation that determines the boundaries, pace and manner of implementation for new solutions. We take a look at what else the experts are focusing on.

The new National Cybersecurity System

The amendment to the Act on the National Cybersecurity System (UKSC) is one of the most significant regulatory reforms in recent years. Its main objective is to align Polish law with Directive (EU) 2022/2555 of the European Parliament and of the Council. The directive, also known as NIS2, substantially raises digital security requirements across the Union. The Polish Act on the National Cybersecurity System has undergone a thorough overhaul, covering more organisations (with estimates suggesting nearly 40,000 entities), introducing more demanding obligations, statutory personal liability for management board members, and even more stringent rules for imposing financial penalties. In the case of the most serious violations, these penalties can reach 100 million PLN.

‘Made in Europe’ is no longer just a slogan. It is becoming law

Until recently, ‘Made in Europe’ was just a label. While it was useful for marketing purposes, it lacked any hard, normative content. This may soon change. On 4 March, the European Commission published a proposal for the Industrial Accelerator Act, stipulating that, from 2027 onwards, the Union origin of components will be a prerequisite for participating in renewable energy auctions, accessing public funding, and for being eligible to participate in public procurement procedures. The slogan ‘Buy European’ could become a concrete instrument for supporting local production and controlling foreign investment.

Non-obvious cases of transferring an establishment to a new employer

The transfer of all or part of an establishment (zakład pracy) is a special concept in labour law relating to changes in ownership. Put simply, it is the automatic transfer of all the rights and obligations of the employer from one entity to another, without the need for any additional actions or consents from the parties involved. However, this must be preceded by the fulfilment of a range of informing obligations by both the new and former employers. Let’s take a look at what the process should involve.

Protecting yourself against tax risks in the deposit-return system

The deposit-return system has been in place since October 2025, raising significant tax concerns from the outset. Although the regulations came into force, it was unclear for a long time how to apply them in practice. Some of the regulations needed clarification, some solutions were missing and the published explanations did not cover all the key issues. Consequently, the market began to develop its own operating standards.

Banking sector overview | Banking today and tomorrow | March 2026

On 12 February 2026, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) issued a judgment concerning the use of the WIBOR index in loan agreements. The CJEU judges confirmed that, in consumer cases, courts cannot examine the correctness of the WIBOR calculation. The banks had correctly informed their clients about the reference rate in accordance with national and EU law.

The issue of the National Labour Inspectorate reform has resurfaced

A new draft law proposing changes to the way the National Labour Inspectorate operates has been submitted to the Sejm. During its first reading on 25 February, the draft was not rejected and was therefore referred to the Social Policy and Family Committee for further consideration. Despite the concerns and controversies raised so far, including by businesses, the legislature continues to pursue the thorough modernisation of Poland’s employment model, which involves increased supervision of the labour market and curbing the abuse of civil law contracts. In this article, we will take a look at the proposals included in the new draft and explain what they mean for businesses.

Contact us:

Tomasz Szambelan

Tomasz Szambelan

Advocate / Counsel / Intellectual and Industrial Property Law

+48 608 593 042

t.szambelan@kochanski.pl