Payment gridlock and commercial transactions between companies in the same group

26 July 2024 | Knowledge, News, The Right Focus

A major risk associated with business activity, especially for companies with a significant volume of purchases of goods and services, is the risk of the President of the Office of Competition and Consumer Protection (UOKiK) initiating proceedings for excessive delays in payment in commercial transactions. This risk arises, on the one hand, from the possibility of the President of the UOKiK imposing a fine on the company and, on the other hand, from the obligation to provide the President of the UOKiK with a range of information on concluded commercial transactions, which requires a significant amount of work on the part of the company.

We check whether transactions between companies in the same group are also at risk from investigation in connection with the existence of payment gridlocks, potentially leading to the initiation of proceedings and the imposition of a penalty.

What is payment gridlock?

Payment gridlocks are cases in which companies fail to pay suppliers of goods or services or pay them late. However, not every case of payment gridlock can lead to the President of the UOKiK initiating proceedings. The President of the UOKiK can impose a penalty on a company if it is ‘excessively’ late in meeting its financial obligations.

An ‘excessive’ delay in the fulfilment of financial obligations occurs when a company fails to pay or pays late and the sum of such unpaid or late financial liabilities amounts to at least PLN 2 million over a period of three consecutive months.

Will the President of the UOKiK investigate non-payment or late payment in commercial transactions where the counterparty is a company in the same group?

No, as of 8 December 2022, the President of the UOKiK will not investigate commercial transactions in which companies belonging to the same group are the sole parties when determining whether a non-payment or late payment has occurred.

A group of companies consists of all companies under the direct or indirect control of a single entity. This controlling entity is also part of the group.

This means that in the course of such proceedings, the President of the UOKiK will not investigate transactions between:

  • Subsidiaries belonging to the same group
  • A subsidiary and a parent company belonging to the same group

It is worth noting that, from 8 December 2022, intra-group transactions are also not included in reports on the applied payment periods, which certain entrepreneurs (tax groups and taxable persons whose revenues in the tax year exceeded the equivalent of EUR 50,000,000) are required to submit annually.

What if one of the parties to the transaction is an entity from outside the group, in addition to companies from the same group? Will such a transaction also be reviewed by the President of the UOKiK?

Such a transaction may also be examined by the President of the UOKiK. Only commercial transactions where the only parties are members of the same group are exempt from review by the President of the UOKiK.

For example, if the parties to a framework agreement are several group companies and an external supplier, the purchase transactions concluded on the basis of such a framework agreement will be subject to reporting in proceedings conducted by the President of the UOKiK, and a fine may also be imposed for possible late payments in such transactions. This is because the most common ‘transaction’ effected under such a framework agreement is a specific supply contract concluded on the basis of an order placed by a particular group company. However, the counterparty to such a transaction is a third-party supplier.

Fines for failure to provide information

It should also be remembered that a company (even if it is not a party to a commercial transaction) that has been requested by the President of the UOKiK to provide information and fails to do so risks paying an administrative fine.

This fine may amount to up to 5% of the revenue generated by the enterprise in the previous tax year, but may not exceed the equivalent of EUR 50,000,000.

Want to know how to liaise with the President of the UOKiK during payment gridlock proceedings? Contact us

Iwona Sowa-Dorda

Latest Knowledge

Banking sector overview | Banking today and tomorrow | July 2026

Under the draft legislation, banks will be required to offer existing borrowers a switch from WIBOR-based to POLSTR-based interest rates, a mechanism intended to speed up the voluntary transition of financial instruments to the new benchmark. The banking sector has responded positively to the proposal, according to Tadeusz Białek, President of the Polish Bank Association.

“Withdraw from contract here” – what next for the new button in online shops, on trading platforms and in mobile apps?

From 19 June, national legislation was to require businesses in the European Union entering into distance contracts with consumers via an online interface to provide consumers with the option to withdraw from the contract via a dedicated function/button. However, due to Poland’s delay in transposing Directive 2023/2673, which requires the use of such a button, this obligation has been postponed in our country. We look at what remote contract withdrawal entails and which transactions the new feature will apply to.

Municipal master plans – new deadline, same old challenges

On 11 June 2026, the President signed into law a bill extending the deadline for municipalities to adopt their master plans (plany ogólne). The key deadline for adopting master plans was moved from 30 June to 31 August 2026. We examine the reasons behind this change and consider what the absence of a master plan might mean for potential investors and their future projects.

Record fines and the upcoming 21st sanctions package – what should businesses expect?

The past year has brought a series of enforcement actions that clearly signal a tightening approach by the Polish customs and revenue authorities towards breaches of the sanctions regime. Importantly, businesses should already be preparing for further changes, as the European Union has announced its 21st sanctions package and updated the list of designated persons and entities. We examine the key developments and offer guidance on how to minimise the risk of non-compliance.

A sea change in the rules governing board members’ liability for a company’s tax arrears

The bill amending the General Tax Code (No. UC138) fundamentally overhauls the rules governing the tax liability of third parties for capital companies’ tax arrears.  It comes in response to recent CJEU judgments, the Ombudsman’s February statement and the post-audit report of the Supreme Chamber of Audit (NIK) of December 2025. We examine what’s changing, who will be affected by the new rules and what steps are worth taking right now.

Partner in name, but only if male: the linguistic trap in Polish corporate law

One of the structures available under Polish law is the ‘spółka partnerska’ (professional partnership), modelled on the Anglo-Saxon Limited Liability Partnership. As defined in the Polish Commercial Companies Code, this is a vehicle for individuals practising liberal professions, such as doctors, architects and accountants. And yet, the provisions governing professional partnerships make no mention of their applicability to women. We therefore examine whether there is no room for female partners, feminine-gendered forms, or simply linguistic empathy.

Can you sue over words aimed at an entire community?

A damaging public statement does not necessarily refer to a specific individual. Sometimes, the author attributes negative characteristics to a whole group of people, portrays them as a threat or uses language that could be seen as demeaning. Statements of this kind frequently concern LGBTQ+ people. This raises the question: can a member of the targeted community bring a lawsuit seeking compensation or an apology, even if they were not named directly? We decided to look into this.

Banking sector overview | Banking today and tomorrow | June 2026

According to a statement published by GPW Benchmark, the reference rate administrator, and the Polish Financial Supervision Authority (KNF), which oversees the administrator, 31 December 2036 will be the last day on which the WIBID and WIBOR rates will be provided for all key fixing periods: 1 month (1M), 3 months (3M) and 6 months (6M).

How to correctly calculate length of service from 1 May 2026

New rules for calculating length of service have applied to private sector employers since the beginning of May 2026. With companies continuing to express concerns about the new framework, the Ministry of Family, Labour and Social Policy has addressed the most common questions. We look at the issues that are (still) troubling employers and how we can help.

Contact us:

Iwona Sowa-Dorda

Iwona Sowa-Dorda

Advocate / Senior Associate / Commercial Contracts / FMCG

+48 539 057 345

i.sowa-dorda@kochanski.pl