Payment gridlock and commercial transactions between companies in the same group

26 July 2024 | Knowledge, News, The Right Focus

A major risk associated with business activity, especially for companies with a significant volume of purchases of goods and services, is the risk of the President of the Office of Competition and Consumer Protection (UOKiK) initiating proceedings for excessive delays in payment in commercial transactions. This risk arises, on the one hand, from the possibility of the President of the UOKiK imposing a fine on the company and, on the other hand, from the obligation to provide the President of the UOKiK with a range of information on concluded commercial transactions, which requires a significant amount of work on the part of the company.

We check whether transactions between companies in the same group are also at risk from investigation in connection with the existence of payment gridlocks, potentially leading to the initiation of proceedings and the imposition of a penalty.

What is payment gridlock?

Payment gridlocks are cases in which companies fail to pay suppliers of goods or services or pay them late. However, not every case of payment gridlock can lead to the President of the UOKiK initiating proceedings. The President of the UOKiK can impose a penalty on a company if it is ‘excessively’ late in meeting its financial obligations.

An ‘excessive’ delay in the fulfilment of financial obligations occurs when a company fails to pay or pays late and the sum of such unpaid or late financial liabilities amounts to at least PLN 2 million over a period of three consecutive months.

Will the President of the UOKiK investigate non-payment or late payment in commercial transactions where the counterparty is a company in the same group?

No, as of 8 December 2022, the President of the UOKiK will not investigate commercial transactions in which companies belonging to the same group are the sole parties when determining whether a non-payment or late payment has occurred.

A group of companies consists of all companies under the direct or indirect control of a single entity. This controlling entity is also part of the group.

This means that in the course of such proceedings, the President of the UOKiK will not investigate transactions between:

  • Subsidiaries belonging to the same group
  • A subsidiary and a parent company belonging to the same group

It is worth noting that, from 8 December 2022, intra-group transactions are also not included in reports on the applied payment periods, which certain entrepreneurs (tax groups and taxable persons whose revenues in the tax year exceeded the equivalent of EUR 50,000,000) are required to submit annually.

What if one of the parties to the transaction is an entity from outside the group, in addition to companies from the same group? Will such a transaction also be reviewed by the President of the UOKiK?

Such a transaction may also be examined by the President of the UOKiK. Only commercial transactions where the only parties are members of the same group are exempt from review by the President of the UOKiK.

For example, if the parties to a framework agreement are several group companies and an external supplier, the purchase transactions concluded on the basis of such a framework agreement will be subject to reporting in proceedings conducted by the President of the UOKiK, and a fine may also be imposed for possible late payments in such transactions. This is because the most common ‘transaction’ effected under such a framework agreement is a specific supply contract concluded on the basis of an order placed by a particular group company. However, the counterparty to such a transaction is a third-party supplier.

Fines for failure to provide information

It should also be remembered that a company (even if it is not a party to a commercial transaction) that has been requested by the President of the UOKiK to provide information and fails to do so risks paying an administrative fine.

This fine may amount to up to 5% of the revenue generated by the enterprise in the previous tax year, but may not exceed the equivalent of EUR 50,000,000.

Want to know how to liaise with the President of the UOKiK during payment gridlock proceedings? Contact us

Iwona Sowa-Dorda

Latest Knowledge

Protecting designs exhibited at trade fairs

How can intellectual property and designs that have already been presented to the public, for example at trade fairs, be protected? All you need to do is exercise your exhibition priority right. This mechanism allows you to file an application for such a design at a later date without affecting its novelty. Let’s see how it works in practice.

Contractual practices prohibited under the Data Act 

One of the key aspects of the Data Act is the introduction of provisions on prohibited contractual practices. These provisions are intended to protect businesses operating within the broadly understood digital industry that have a weaker contractual position.

Those who have data have power. The Data Act redistributes this power

The EU Data Act, which came into force in September 2025, represents a breakthrough in the regulation of data access and use. Data generated by devices, ranging from agricultural tractors and industrial machinery to solar panels and transport fleets, is no longer the sole property of manufacturers. Other market participants now have the opportunity to access and use this data to develop new, innovative products and services. The Data Act marks a departure from business models based on data monopolisation, to one requiring data to be shared in accordance with its rules. We are therefore entering a completely new reality.

KSeF and transfer pricing: a new era of transparency and operational challenges

The introduction of the National e-Invoice System (KSeF) represents one of the most significant challenges for group companies in recent years. Although the KSeF is intended to simplify the invoicing process and reduce tax abuse, it also has a significant impact on transfer pricing, particularly with regard to the documentation and settlement of TP adjustments.

Contributing assets to a family foundation – what to keep in mind

A family foundation is a legal entity whose purpose is to manage wealth effectively and ensure its succession without the risk of dispersing assets accumulated over generations. Therefore, a key issue related to the activities of such an organisation is the contribution of this wealth to the foundation in the form of various types of assets that will work for the beneficiaries. Let’s take a look at what this process involves in practice.

Cloud migration after the Data Act: new rights, lower costs and greater freedom

The Data Act requires a significant change in approach to cloud services. Companies should review their contracts and start planning updates immediately. It is crucial to introduce appropriate switching provisions and remove or renegotiate exit fees. Companies must also prepare their infrastructure, both technically and organisationally, for interoperability and migration in accordance with the new regulations.

A decade of sustainable development

Ten years ago, the international community adopted the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development with 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). As a signatory, Poland committed itself to implementing measures in the areas of economy, society and the environment. A decade on, and it is a good time to summarise our achievements and the key ESG regulations that have shaped the legal landscape in Poland and throughout the European Union.

Banking sector overview | Banking today and tomorrow | October 2025

According to estimates by the Polish Bank Association (ZBP), the last four months of 2025 may bring banks operating in Poland another PLN 10 billion in profits. This would set a new record, probably marking the last such good year. Forecasts for 2026 suggest that bank profits will decline to PLN 35 billion.

Contact us:

Krzysztof Zięba

Krzysztof Zięba

Attorney-at-law / Partner / Head of FMCG, Retail & Automotive, Trade & Distribution Practices

+48 660 765 928

k.zieba@kochanski.pl

Iwona Sowa-Dorda

Iwona Sowa-Dorda

Advocate / Senior Associate / Commercial Contracts / FMCG

+48 539 057 345

i.sowa-dorda@kochanski.pl