Spory En

EMFA: how Europe is setting its sights on protecting media freedom and pluralism

15 January 2024 | Knowledge, News, The Right Focus

Work on the European Media Freedom Act (EMFA) is nearing completion. Member States have already reached an informal agreement, which is expected to be formally adopted by the EU Parliament and Council in the near future. The aim is to increase the level of protection of media freedom and pluralism in the European market and to harmonise the regulations in force in individual Member States. Publishers and journalists have high hopes for the EMFA, but there is no shortage of critical voices.

Why the idea of the European Media Freedom Act

The increasing politicisation of the media observed in various Member States has focused the EU legislator on the need for greater protection of the independence of the media, including of media companies.

In response, the EMFA aims to protect the independence of journalists and the public media, to ensure transparency in the ownership structure of media companies and to prevent concentration in the media market via a so-called ‘media pluralism test’.

Safeguarding journalistic independence

The protection of journalistic independence under the EMFA is primarily manifested in the restriction of Member States’ ability to interfere with and to influence the functioning of editorial offices.

The EMFA also prohibits those in power from taking sovereign action to expose a journalistic source and from using spyware against publishers, editors or journalists.

But these restrictions are very limited. In fact, the listed activities can be carried out if they are justified by an ‘overriding reason of public interest’ (in the case of refusal to reveal the source) or on grounds of national security (in the case of spyware).

Concerns are therefore justified that such restrictions, expressed in the form of vague general clauses, may in practice result in a significant weakening of the protection of journalistic independence, which was intended to be one of the main values protected by the new regulation.

EMFA vs. the public media

The EMFA emphasises the public service nature of state-owned media, which are therefore obliged to provide audiences with access to pluralistic information and opinion.

They should also ensure transparent and objective procedures and criteria for the selection of management board members of state-owned media companies. National law should also limit the possibility of the early dismissal of a board member to exceptional situations.

European Board for Media Services to fight media monopolies

The EMFA is also to set up the European Board for Media Services, a new independent body composed of representatives of national authorities or regulators.

The main purpose of this specialised body is to assist the European Commission with implementing the EMFA. However, it seems that one of the most important tasks of the Board will be to give opinions on national cases of concentration in the media market that may affect its functioning, media pluralism and editorial independence.

The EMFA requires Member States to ensure that their national legislation allows for a transparent and objective assessment of concentrations in the media market. National authorities will be obliged to consult the Board and take its views into account as far as possible when their decisions are likely to affect the functioning of the EU internal market.

One might be tempted to theorise that one of the main objectives of the EU legislator under the EMFA is to prevent the emergence of media monopolies in the EU. The introduction of the new regulations can also be linked to the current situation in individual Member States, where there is an increasing concentration of such entities.

Will the EMFA guarantee media freedom and pluralism in the EU

The assumptions behind the EMFA and the desire to strengthen pluralism and media freedom at the level of EU legislation are undoubtedly correct.

However, the EMFA has been criticised for attempting to harmonise national legislation too far in an area which, due to history and tradition, is often unique in a given Member State. Doubts have also been expressed about the vague restrictions on the protection of journalistic independence, which could be open to abuse.

Given the large number of regulations referring to general clauses, the EMFA’s real impact on media freedom and pluralism will only be known once it enters into force. The CJEU will undoubtedly play an important role in its interpretation, as cases concerning the application of the EMFA in individual Member States will be referred to it.

Any questions? Contact

Olga Senator

Latest Knowledge

The new National Cybersecurity System

The amendment to the Act on the National Cybersecurity System (UKSC) is one of the most significant regulatory reforms in recent years. Its main objective is to align Polish law with Directive (EU) 2022/2555 of the European Parliament and of the Council. The directive, also known as NIS2, substantially raises digital security requirements across the Union. The Polish Act on the National Cybersecurity System has undergone a thorough overhaul, covering more organisations (with estimates suggesting nearly 40,000 entities), introducing more demanding obligations, statutory personal liability for management board members, and even more stringent rules for imposing financial penalties. In the case of the most serious violations, these penalties can reach 100 million PLN.

‘Made in Europe’ is no longer just a slogan. It is becoming law

Until recently, ‘Made in Europe’ was just a label. While it was useful for marketing purposes, it lacked any hard, normative content. This may soon change. On 4 March, the European Commission published a proposal for the Industrial Accelerator Act, stipulating that, from 2027 onwards, the Union origin of components will be a prerequisite for participating in renewable energy auctions, accessing public funding, and for being eligible to participate in public procurement procedures. The slogan ‘Buy European’ could become a concrete instrument for supporting local production and controlling foreign investment.

Non-obvious cases of transferring an establishment to a new employer

The transfer of all or part of an establishment (zakład pracy) is a special concept in labour law relating to changes in ownership. Put simply, it is the automatic transfer of all the rights and obligations of the employer from one entity to another, without the need for any additional actions or consents from the parties involved. However, this must be preceded by the fulfilment of a range of informing obligations by both the new and former employers. Let’s take a look at what the process should involve.

Protecting yourself against tax risks in the deposit-return system

The deposit-return system has been in place since October 2025, raising significant tax concerns from the outset. Although the regulations came into force, it was unclear for a long time how to apply them in practice. Some of the regulations needed clarification, some solutions were missing and the published explanations did not cover all the key issues. Consequently, the market began to develop its own operating standards.

Banking sector overview | Banking today and tomorrow | March 2026

On 12 February 2026, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) issued a judgment concerning the use of the WIBOR index in loan agreements. The CJEU judges confirmed that, in consumer cases, courts cannot examine the correctness of the WIBOR calculation. The banks had correctly informed their clients about the reference rate in accordance with national and EU law.

The issue of the National Labour Inspectorate reform has resurfaced

A new draft law proposing changes to the way the National Labour Inspectorate operates has been submitted to the Sejm. During its first reading on 25 February, the draft was not rejected and was therefore referred to the Social Policy and Family Committee for further consideration. Despite the concerns and controversies raised so far, including by businesses, the legislature continues to pursue the thorough modernisation of Poland’s employment model, which involves increased supervision of the labour market and curbing the abuse of civil law contracts. In this article, we will take a look at the proposals included in the new draft and explain what they mean for businesses.

Polish AI boom

According to the latest data, nearly 15,000 companies dealing with artificial intelligence were registered in Poland in 2025.[1] This testifies to an undoubted boom in AI, as well as to the dynamic changes related to the development of this technology. However, amid the rush to implement AI, do companies consider the most important issue: securing the outcomes of their work and protecting themselves against competitors? In this article, we explore this issue and suggest ways to avoid costly problems.

Length of service now includes periods of self-employment

The length of service no longer depends solely on work carried out under a contract of employment. The amendment to the Labour Code introduces significant changes, as work carried out under civil law contracts or as part of business activity will now also be included when calculating service, which affects employees’ rights. What will this mean for employees and employers?