13

CJEU order: Penalties imposed by the President of the Energy Regulatory Office in relation to certificates of origin are unlawful and companies may seek reimbursement

14 March 2024 | Knowledge, News, The Right Focus

The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) has ruled that the penalties imposed by the President of the Energy Regulatory Office (ERO) on undertakings for breaching the obligation to purchase and submit for redemption certificates of origin or pay a replacement fee (this obligation was introduced in Poland in 2005 to support renewable energy producers) are unlawful. The order in this case was published on 4 March this year. According to the wording of the order, the penalties for the above-mentioned breaches which occurred prior to the EC’s decision to approve the state aid (i.e. before 2 August 2016), are contrary to the EU Treaties.

The value of unduly paid penalties can amount to hundreds of millions of zlotys. In fact, in 2016 alone, the President of the ERO issued 18,021 certificates of origin from RES with a total capacity of 18,618,037.970 MWh for production in 2013-2016 and 1,707 certificates of origin from cogeneration with a total capacity of 28,110,148.736 MWh, which shows the scale of the case.

The order was issued in response to a request for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Appeal in Warsaw, which heard an appeal against a judgment of the Court of Competition and Consumer Protection annulling a penalty imposed by the President of the ERO on an electricity trading company. The case concerned a penalty imposed for the period during which the system of redemption of certificates of origin operated without a relevant EC decision declaring it to be state aid compliant with Article 107 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU). The period in question is from 1 October 2005 (when the system was introduced) to 1 August 2016.

In fact, on 2 August 2016, the EC adopted a decision declaring the scheme as state aid compatible with EU law. Similar principles also apply to the provisions imposing an obligation to redeem cogeneration certificates of origin or pay a replacement fee for the period prior to the relevant EC decision of 28 September 2016.

In the order, the CJEU stated that:

  • The Polish legislation on the redemption of certificates of origin in the period prior to the EC’s decision declaring the scheme to be state aid breached the obligation to notify state aid and is invalid.
  • The EC’s decision does not have retroactive effect and therefore does not convalidate the obligation to redeem certificates of origin up to the date of its adoption.
  • The imposition of the penalty violates the obligation to notify state aid and is therefore contrary to EU law.

Effect of the CJEU order

The ECJ’s order opens the way for the reversing or varying of all decisions of the President of the ERO imposing penalties for failure to comply with the obligation to purchase and submit for redemption certificates of origin or to pay a replacement fee in the period between 1 October 2005 and 1 August 2016. However, in determining the temporal scope, the date of the alleged breach should be taken into account, not the date on which the decision was issued.

This means that in practice, decisions of the President of the ERO issued after 2 August 2016 may also be reversed or varied. It cannot be ruled out that the order may also be the basis for a claim for reimbursement of replacement fees paid for the aforementioned period.

Given the variety of remedies available in the context of the CJEU Order, the choice of remedy will depend on the nature and facts of each case and the content of the ERO President’s decision. However, it should be noted that, as a result of the announcement of the Order on 4 March 2024, the deadline for certain administrative actions by companies already expires on 4 April 2024. Therefore, it is necessary for companies to take immediate action to obtain the reimbursement of funds for unduly paid penalties. It is therefore worth making good use of this time by carefully analysing the details of each case and preparing the most appropriate strategy.

Questions? Contact us

Milena Kazanowska-Kędzierska

Aleksandra Pinkas

Latest Knowledge

Announcement of Income Tax Reform

On 19 August, during a press conference, the Prime Minister announced a package of tax changes planned for next year. According to the announcement, the reform is intended, on the one hand, to ease the burden on the middle class and, on the other, to shift a greater fiscal burden onto the wealthiest individuals and the largest companies. We take a look at the proposals included in the announced package and explain what they might mean for taxpayers.

Family foundations and the tax authorities: what draft bill UD447 proposes and why this is not the end of the troubles

Family foundations were intended to provide entrepreneurs with a stable framework for intergenerational wealth management. Yet not even four years have passed since the first such foundations were established, and the rules governing their taxation are set to be changed once again. This is because the scale of interest and the practical problems uncovered have overwhelmed the drafters of the legislation, as best illustrated by the figures – 927 applications for individual tax rulings and 77 opinions issued from the Head of the National Revenue Administration. This does not, however, mean that family foundations are being used on a massive scale for aggressive tax optimisation. A significant proportion of the queries concerned simply how to correctly apply the complex regulations.

NIS2 and the National Cybersecurity System Act in transport: what you need to do before October 2026

The amended Act on the National Cybersecurity System (UKSC) has been in force since 3 April 2026. For transport sector undertakings, this means a specific compliance timeline, including an obligation to register with the National Cybersecurity System (KSC) registry by 3 October 2026. Failure to do so may result in substantial financial penalties, coupled with the risk of personal liability for senior management. Not every undertaking, however, automatically falls within the scope of the new regime. Read on to find out whether your organisation is affected and what you need to do before the deadline for preparation.

Family foundations: the government has done the maths and presented the bill

Three years. That’s how long we’ve been waiting for what the Council of Ministers had seen in the data from the outset – and has now disclosed in its review of the Family Foundation Act. The document not only diagnoses the problems, but also previews substantial changes to rules that founders and their advisers treated as settled and stable. And therein lies a problem that goes far beyond tax matters. If the rules of the game are changed while the game is being played, there can be neither planning stability nor trust in the law. It is no coincidence that one of the greatest concerns among entrepreneurs considering setting up a foundation is not the level of taxation, but the stability of the legal framework – which today is once again being called into question.

What the new swiss franc act means for banks

We now have a new Act on Special Measures for the Adjudication of Cases Concerning Loan Agreements Denominated in or Indexed to the Swiss Franc. The provisions come into force 14 days after publication. So now is a good time to look at what lies ahead and what banks should be doing today.

New draft Pay Transparency Act – what has changed since December 2025?

A second version of the draft act on strengthening the application of the right to equal pay for equal work or work of equal value between men and women has now been published. It refines procedures and deadlines and introduces a new supervisory body. We have already discussed the changes affecting the recruitment stage and the three pillars of the forthcoming pay transparency framework, noting that Poland will miss the EU transposition deadline of 7 June 2026. Now, we take a closer look at the further changes, new developments and risks that have emerged in the latest, April version of the draft.

Payment Services Regulation (PSR) – between consumer protection and due diligence

The draft Payment Services Regulation (PSR) is one of the most significant elements of the reform of the EU legal framework for payment services. Its principal aim is to enhance the security of cashless transactions and to reduce the scale of financial fraud, in particular that arising from the growth of digital channels. At the same time, the new rules are intended to introduce a liability model that will not result in risk being transferred entirely to financial institutions, whilst retaining an important role for independent due diligence on the part of the user.

Energy deregulation – key changes for businesses and energy consumers

The President has now signed the Energy Deregulation Act (UDER92). The new provisions cover both the relationships between energy undertakings and consumers, and matters relating to investment, district heating, and the administrative obligations of energy market participants. The Act introduces changes in the areas of billing, communication with consumers, grid connection, and the operations of undertakings in the energy and district heating sectors. We set out the key points to note.

Banking sector overview | Banking today and tomorrow | July 2026

Under the draft legislation, banks will be required to offer existing borrowers a switch from WIBOR-based to POLSTR-based interest rates, a mechanism intended to speed up the voluntary transition of financial instruments to the new benchmark. The banking sector has responded positively to the proposal, according to Tadeusz Białek, President of the Polish Bank Association.