1

A revolution in the existing rules for alternative investment companies (AICs)

20 November 2023 | Knowledge, News, The Right Focus

We have already written about the law commonly referred to as ‘Warzywniak’ and discussed in detail some of its most interesting solutions. However, due to dynamic developments, we have not touched on the regulations already in force, which seem to be having a negative impact on the functioning of alternative investment companies. Let us therefore examine how AICs are operating under the new law.

What are alternative investment companies

Alternative investment companies (AICs) are entities that carry on business in the form of:

  • A partnership (i.e. a limited partnership or a partnership limited by shares where the sole general partner is a capital company, including a European company); or
  • A capital company (i.e. a limited liability company, a joint stock company, including a European company)

The essence of an AIC is to raise funds from at least several investors who recognise that they will get a better return on their investment than they would on their own. The AIC charges the investors a fee for managing the funds they have entrusted and, if it makes a profit, a commission (carried interest). From a legal point of view, AICs are still professional investment funds, but with slightly less stringent obligations under law, which allows for more flexibility in the conduct of investment business in this form.

Warzywniak – the unfortunate consequences of the amendment for alternative investment companies

With the adoption of the Warzywniak act, the lawmakers introduced both minor and significant changes to the regulations governing investment funds and the management of alternative investment funds, which had unfortunate consequences for the operation of AICs, the Polish capital market and the very institutions that create this market.

At the same time, it is worth recalling that investor confidence in the domestic capital market was already damaged before these changes were adopted, and the new regulations have not improved the situation at all.

Warzywniak – key changes to the operation of AICs

The most significant change is the amended Article 70k of the Act, which defines the minimum contribution of a professional client to an alternative investment company. From 29 September this year, this amount should be at least the equivalent of EUR 60,000, calculated on the basis of the average euro exchange rate announced by the National Bank of Poland on the date of the contribution to the company.

The problem is that the legislator has created a situation where the rules governing AICs conflict with the Rules of the Stock Exchange (i.e. of the main market of the Warsaw Stock Exchange) and the Rules of the Alternative Trading System (i.e. the NewConnect market), which require that there be no trading restrictions on a company’s shares in order for them to be listed.  With nine AICs registered on the two trading floors, the WSE had to carry out a detailed analysis of the new rules and take appropriate action in accordance with generally applicable law.

The problem with AICs and the Stock Exchange’s reaction

Immediately prior to the entry into force of the amendments to the Investment Funds Act, the WSE had to intervene and consider three solutions:

  • Suspend trading in AIC shares until the current rules in this respect are ‘re-liberalised’
  • Fully exclude AIC shares from both the WSE Main Market and NewConnect
  • Continue to process transactions that may be invalidated by common court judgments under the current provisions of the Investment Funds Act

Ultimately, the WSE Management Board opted for the first of these options, acting contrary to the adopted rules.

Reaction from JR Holding AIC S.A.

It did not take long for those affected by the unfavourable amendments to the Investment Funds Act to react. The very next day, JR Holding AIC S.A. published an announcement that January Ciszewski, the company’s main shareholder and President of the Management Board, had taken steps to restore the possibility of further trading in the company’s shares on NewConnect. Details were not released until two weeks later.

JRH’s idea for resuming trading in its shares on NewConnect

January Ciszewski contributed the 23,450,000 JRH shares he holds to Onvestor AIC (of which he is the sole shareholder) as a contribution in kind to cover the newly issued shares in Onvestor’s share capital.

As a result of this transaction, Onvestor holds more than 53% of JRH’s share capital and voting rights at JRH’s general meeting and, consequently, Article 70k(3) to (6) of the Act (i.e. the provisions introducing restrictions on stock exchange trading that are problematic for AIC, as added by the amendment) will not apply to it.

As a result of meeting the statutory requirements, on 21 November 2023 JHR and the WSE entered into a bilateral agreement to restore trading of JHR shares on NewConnect as of 6 December 2023. It is therefore highly likely that other AICs will have entered into similar agreements by the time legislative changes favourable to the operation of AICs are enacted.

Legislative stalemate on AICs

Due to the end of the ninth term of the Sejm and Senate and the principle of the discontinuation of parliamentary work, the legislature has not had sufficient time to adopt the changes in law necessary for the correct functioning of AICs. The issue of correcting the above-mentioned regulations will be dealt with by the Parliament of the current term.

Questions? Contact us

Kamil Szczygieł

Latest Knowledge

Announcement of Income Tax Reform

On 19 August, during a press conference, the Prime Minister announced a package of tax changes planned for next year. According to the announcement, the reform is intended, on the one hand, to ease the burden on the middle class and, on the other, to shift a greater fiscal burden onto the wealthiest individuals and the largest companies. We take a look at the proposals included in the announced package and explain what they might mean for taxpayers.

Family foundations and the tax authorities: what draft bill UD447 proposes and why this is not the end of the troubles

Family foundations were intended to provide entrepreneurs with a stable framework for intergenerational wealth management. Yet not even four years have passed since the first such foundations were established, and the rules governing their taxation are set to be changed once again. This is because the scale of interest and the practical problems uncovered have overwhelmed the drafters of the legislation, as best illustrated by the figures – 927 applications for individual tax rulings and 77 opinions issued from the Head of the National Revenue Administration. This does not, however, mean that family foundations are being used on a massive scale for aggressive tax optimisation. A significant proportion of the queries concerned simply how to correctly apply the complex regulations.

NIS2 and the National Cybersecurity System Act in transport: what you need to do before October 2026

The amended Act on the National Cybersecurity System (UKSC) has been in force since 3 April 2026. For transport sector undertakings, this means a specific compliance timeline, including an obligation to register with the National Cybersecurity System (KSC) registry by 3 October 2026. Failure to do so may result in substantial financial penalties, coupled with the risk of personal liability for senior management. Not every undertaking, however, automatically falls within the scope of the new regime. Read on to find out whether your organisation is affected and what you need to do before the deadline for preparation.

Family foundations: the government has done the maths and presented the bill

Three years. That’s how long we’ve been waiting for what the Council of Ministers had seen in the data from the outset – and has now disclosed in its review of the Family Foundation Act. The document not only diagnoses the problems, but also previews substantial changes to rules that founders and their advisers treated as settled and stable. And therein lies a problem that goes far beyond tax matters. If the rules of the game are changed while the game is being played, there can be neither planning stability nor trust in the law. It is no coincidence that one of the greatest concerns among entrepreneurs considering setting up a foundation is not the level of taxation, but the stability of the legal framework – which today is once again being called into question.

What the new swiss franc act means for banks

We now have a new Act on Special Measures for the Adjudication of Cases Concerning Loan Agreements Denominated in or Indexed to the Swiss Franc. The provisions come into force 14 days after publication. So now is a good time to look at what lies ahead and what banks should be doing today.

New draft Pay Transparency Act – what has changed since December 2025?

A second version of the draft act on strengthening the application of the right to equal pay for equal work or work of equal value between men and women has now been published. It refines procedures and deadlines and introduces a new supervisory body. We have already discussed the changes affecting the recruitment stage and the three pillars of the forthcoming pay transparency framework, noting that Poland will miss the EU transposition deadline of 7 June 2026. Now, we take a closer look at the further changes, new developments and risks that have emerged in the latest, April version of the draft.

Payment Services Regulation (PSR) – between consumer protection and due diligence

The draft Payment Services Regulation (PSR) is one of the most significant elements of the reform of the EU legal framework for payment services. Its principal aim is to enhance the security of cashless transactions and to reduce the scale of financial fraud, in particular that arising from the growth of digital channels. At the same time, the new rules are intended to introduce a liability model that will not result in risk being transferred entirely to financial institutions, whilst retaining an important role for independent due diligence on the part of the user.

Energy deregulation – key changes for businesses and energy consumers

The President has now signed the Energy Deregulation Act (UDER92). The new provisions cover both the relationships between energy undertakings and consumers, and matters relating to investment, district heating, and the administrative obligations of energy market participants. The Act introduces changes in the areas of billing, communication with consumers, grid connection, and the operations of undertakings in the energy and district heating sectors. We set out the key points to note.

Banking sector overview | Banking today and tomorrow | July 2026

Under the draft legislation, banks will be required to offer existing borrowers a switch from WIBOR-based to POLSTR-based interest rates, a mechanism intended to speed up the voluntary transition of financial instruments to the new benchmark. The banking sector has responded positively to the proposal, according to Tadeusz Białek, President of the Polish Bank Association.