The need to obtain the consent of the company’s bodies for a legal transaction

14 February 2024 | Knowledge, News, The Right Focus

Obtaining the consent of the company’s bodies (e.g. the General Meeting or the Supervisory Board) is one of the obligations that is most often overlooked by company representatives in the course of doing business. Why is this so important? In some cases, failing to obtain the appropriate consent may render a transaction invalid.

The Commercial Companies Code provides for two different consequences in the event of a breach of this obligation, depending on whether the obligation arises from statutory provisions or from the company’s articles of association.

Consent required by law

Where the obligation is imposed by law, the consequences of failing to obtain consent for a transaction are far-reaching, namely that the transaction is invalid.

For example, in a limited liability company, the consent of the shareholders, expressed in the form of a resolution, is required for, but not limited to:

  • The disposal or lease of the enterprise or an organised part thereof and the establishment of a limited right in rem thereon (Article 228(3) of the Commercial Companies Code, KSH)
  • The acquisition or disposal of real property, perpetual usufruct or an interest in real property, unless the articles of association provide otherwise (Article 228(4) of KSH)
  • The reimbursement of additional payments (Article 228(5) of KSH)

It should be noted that the consent may be given before the company makes a declaration, or subsequently, but not later than two months after the declaration is made. Consent given after the declaration has been made has retroactive effect from the date of the transaction.

Importantly, the requirement to obtain the appropriate consent to act extends to all representatives of the company, not just its management board. Therefore, such consent will also be required if the company is represented in some other way, e.g. by an attorney or a holder of a commercial power of attorney.

Consent required by the Articles of Association

The situation is different in the event of a breach of the obligation to obtain consent arising from the company’s articles of association. In such a case, the legal transaction is valid, but this does not exclude the liability of the management board members to the company for breach of the articles of association.

In capital companies, a relatively common procedure is to include in the articles of association a list of matters requiring consent of the shareholders or the company’s supervisory board.

This solution allows shareholders to exercise ongoing control over, for example, significant agreements that the management board intends to enter into. In such a case, the list of matters should be adapted to the nature of the company’s business, its size and its ownership structure.

In practice, it is very common for consent to be required if the value of a particular transaction exceeds a certain threshold or is outside the ordinary course of the company’s business.

Company representatives must be aware that if they carry out a transaction without the consent required by the articles of association and this results in a loss/damage to the company’s assets, they may be held liable for damages to the company.

Questions? Contact us

Adam Czarnota

Latest Knowledge

The new National Cybersecurity System

The amendment to the Act on the National Cybersecurity System (UKSC) is one of the most significant regulatory reforms in recent years. Its main objective is to align Polish law with Directive (EU) 2022/2555 of the European Parliament and of the Council. The directive, also known as NIS2, substantially raises digital security requirements across the Union. The Polish Act on the National Cybersecurity System has undergone a thorough overhaul, covering more organisations (with estimates suggesting nearly 40,000 entities), introducing more demanding obligations, statutory personal liability for management board members, and even more stringent rules for imposing financial penalties. In the case of the most serious violations, these penalties can reach 100 million PLN.

‘Made in Europe’ is no longer just a slogan. It is becoming law

Until recently, ‘Made in Europe’ was just a label. While it was useful for marketing purposes, it lacked any hard, normative content. This may soon change. On 4 March, the European Commission published a proposal for the Industrial Accelerator Act, stipulating that, from 2027 onwards, the Union origin of components will be a prerequisite for participating in renewable energy auctions, accessing public funding, and for being eligible to participate in public procurement procedures. The slogan ‘Buy European’ could become a concrete instrument for supporting local production and controlling foreign investment.

Non-obvious cases of transferring an establishment to a new employer

The transfer of all or part of an establishment (zakład pracy) is a special concept in labour law relating to changes in ownership. Put simply, it is the automatic transfer of all the rights and obligations of the employer from one entity to another, without the need for any additional actions or consents from the parties involved. However, this must be preceded by the fulfilment of a range of informing obligations by both the new and former employers. Let’s take a look at what the process should involve.

Protecting yourself against tax risks in the deposit-return system

The deposit-return system has been in place since October 2025, raising significant tax concerns from the outset. Although the regulations came into force, it was unclear for a long time how to apply them in practice. Some of the regulations needed clarification, some solutions were missing and the published explanations did not cover all the key issues. Consequently, the market began to develop its own operating standards.

Banking sector overview | Banking today and tomorrow | March 2026

On 12 February 2026, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) issued a judgment concerning the use of the WIBOR index in loan agreements. The CJEU judges confirmed that, in consumer cases, courts cannot examine the correctness of the WIBOR calculation. The banks had correctly informed their clients about the reference rate in accordance with national and EU law.

The issue of the National Labour Inspectorate reform has resurfaced

A new draft law proposing changes to the way the National Labour Inspectorate operates has been submitted to the Sejm. During its first reading on 25 February, the draft was not rejected and was therefore referred to the Social Policy and Family Committee for further consideration. Despite the concerns and controversies raised so far, including by businesses, the legislature continues to pursue the thorough modernisation of Poland’s employment model, which involves increased supervision of the labour market and curbing the abuse of civil law contracts. In this article, we will take a look at the proposals included in the new draft and explain what they mean for businesses.

Polish AI boom

According to the latest data, nearly 15,000 companies dealing with artificial intelligence were registered in Poland in 2025.[1] This testifies to an undoubted boom in AI, as well as to the dynamic changes related to the development of this technology. However, amid the rush to implement AI, do companies consider the most important issue: securing the outcomes of their work and protecting themselves against competitors? In this article, we explore this issue and suggest ways to avoid costly problems.

Length of service now includes periods of self-employment

The length of service no longer depends solely on work carried out under a contract of employment. The amendment to the Labour Code introduces significant changes, as work carried out under civil law contracts or as part of business activity will now also be included when calculating service, which affects employees’ rights. What will this mean for employees and employers?

Contact us:

Adam Czarnota

Adam Czarnota

Advocate / Senior Associate / Corporate Law / Mergers & Acquisitions

+48 787 389 207

a.czarnota@kochanski.pl

Rafał Rapala

Rafał Rapala

Attorney-at-law / Partner / Head of Corporate Law and Corporate Litigation / M&A and Private Equity Transactions

+48 608 444 650

r.rapala@kochanski.pl