The environmental impact of AI, or the climate cost of artificial intelligence

15 December 2023 | Knowledge, News, The Right Focus

At a time when artificial intelligence is becoming increasingly popular and widespread, it is worth considering its impact on the environment. Although we associate AI mainly with the digital dimension, the development of machines is inevitably associated with a huge demand for energy, requires increasingly efficient cooling systems and therefore large amounts of water, and is responsible for significant carbon dioxide emissions. The climate cost of artificial intelligence is a fact that fortunately more and more AI leaders are becoming aware of. As a result, they are planning and taking steps to reduce the negative impact of AI on the environment.

AI on the rise

We are undoubtedly living in a time of rapid development in artificial intelligence. Our daily lives are increasingly being accompanied by new and innovative solutions to make our lives easier. It has never been easier or more accessible to create ‘tailor-made’ content. In just a few years, AI has become an integral part of our lives and the number of users of solutions such as ChatGPT or Microsoft Bing’s Image Wizard is growing exponentially.

As a result, the industry is booming and making record profits. The scale and speed of this phenomenon can be seen in the huge success of ChatGPT, which celebrated its first official anniversary a few days ago.

Not so long ago, few people were interested in the potential of large language models. Today, it could be said that the world has gone mad for the omniscient e-companion. According to the latest figures available, ChatGPT now has around 180.5 million users; OpenAI’s chief executive, Sam Altman, estimates that it receives 100 million visitors a week. In October alone, the site had a whopping 1.7 billion page views.[1]

Development at the expense of the environment

However, the range of opportunities offered by artificial intelligence should not overshadow the cost of implementing the innovation. AI is being developed in huge research and development complexes that use an equally huge amount of electricity.

A study by the University of California, Riverside, found that training GPT-3, the predecessor of ChatGPT, consumed 1287 MWh and resulted in the emission of the equivalent of more than 550 tonnes of carbon dioxide.[2]

This is roughly equal to 550 round trips between New York and San Francisco.[3]

By comparison, GPT-4, the successor to the current version of Chat, is reported to be trained on about 570 times more parameters than GPT-3. This does not indicate a proportional increase in energy consumption, but it does suggest that Chat’s learning process is becoming more energy intensive.

The figures for water consumption for cooling the server rooms are also interesting. GPT-3 training at Microsoft’s state-of-the-art data centres in the US can consume a total of 5.4 million litres of water, of which 700,000 litres is used to cool the servers on site.

In addition, the GPT-3 needs to ‘drink’ about a 500ml bottle of water for about 10-50 generated responses, depending on when and where it is used. These numbers may increase with the newly launched GPT-4 due to the aforementioned greater number of parameters used to train the language model.[4]

Staying on the subject of Big Tech’s water consumption, this issue is addressed in Google’s latest Environmental Report, which shows that the tech giant consumed 21.2 billion litres of water in 2022.

This represents an increase of almost 5 billion litres compared to 2021 and 8.3 billion litres compared to 2020. The 2022 figure can be compared to the water consumption of London, a city of nine million people, for 10 full days.[5]

Carbon-free and Big Tech’s green plans

While the figures above are essentially bleak, they should not obscure the changes being made by major players in the technology industry.

To reduce their environmental impact, scientists and engineers are looking at ways to make AI models more energy efficient, develop algorithms that require less computing power, or reduce CO2 emissions by powering data centres with green energy.

In September, Apple unveiled a new range of watches that it claims will be the first carbon-neutral products. To reduce the carbon footprint of these products, Apple has relied on the partial use of recycled materials and reduced air transport. The giant also announced an update to its environmental commitment to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 90 % by 2050.[6]

Similar climate action is being taken by Microsoft, which has pledged to become carbon-free by 2030 [7] and to produce more water than it consumes.

Finally, there is Googles promising investment in geothermal energy. At the end of November, Google announced the launch of a geothermal project in partnership with Fervo, which has resulted in carbon-free electricity (CFE) being supplied to the local grid for the company’s data centres in Nevada.

Google, like the rest of the Big Five, has big plans for decarbonisation. By 2030, it aims to operate all of its data centres and office campuses on 24/7 carbon-free energy.[8]

The regulations currently under consideration to reduce the negative impact of AI on the environment should also not be overlooked.

For data-driven companies, concern for the environment is already part of the activities regulated under ESG requirements. This includes, for example, energy efficiency or the use of renewable energy sources in data centres.

With the number of AI models growing every day at a rate unmatched by any other technology developed to date, there is no denying that the climate costs associated with AI will become increasingly important.

When weighing the opportunities and benefits of AI against the potential risks that are so often discussed, for example in relation to jobs, the environmental costs cannot be overlooked.

As artificial intelligence becomes an integral part of our lives, it is important that its development is accompanied by a commitment to sustainability and minimising any associated impact on the environment. The leading companies responsible for AI-based solutions are showing awareness and initiative in this area. This gives us hope for a future where we can enjoy the benefits of technological progress without further damaging our planet.

Questions? Contact us

Natalia Kotłowska-Wochna      

Wojciech Aleksandrowicz

[1] https://explodingtopics.com/blog/chatgpt-users.

[2] P. Li et al., Making AI Less “Thirsty”: Uncovering and Addressing the Secret Water Footprint of AI Models, p. 7.

[3] https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2023/aug/01/techscape-environment-cost-ai-artificial-intelligence.

[4] P. Li et al., Making AI Less “Thirsty”: Uncovering and Addressing the Secret Water Footprint of AI Models, s. 3.

[5] https://www.eco-business.com/news/what-are-the-environmental-costs-of-ai/.

[6] https://newclimate.org/news/reaction-apple-unveils-its-first-carbon-neutral-products.

[7][7] https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/corporate-responsibility/sustainability.

[8] https://spidersweb.pl/2023/11/google-energia-geotermalna.html.

Latest Knowledge

Announcement of Income Tax Reform

On 19 August, during a press conference, the Prime Minister announced a package of tax changes planned for next year. According to the announcement, the reform is intended, on the one hand, to ease the burden on the middle class and, on the other, to shift a greater fiscal burden onto the wealthiest individuals and the largest companies. We take a look at the proposals included in the announced package and explain what they might mean for taxpayers.

Family foundations and the tax authorities: what draft bill UD447 proposes and why this is not the end of the troubles

Family foundations were intended to provide entrepreneurs with a stable framework for intergenerational wealth management. Yet not even four years have passed since the first such foundations were established, and the rules governing their taxation are set to be changed once again. This is because the scale of interest and the practical problems uncovered have overwhelmed the drafters of the legislation, as best illustrated by the figures – 927 applications for individual tax rulings and 77 opinions issued from the Head of the National Revenue Administration. This does not, however, mean that family foundations are being used on a massive scale for aggressive tax optimisation. A significant proportion of the queries concerned simply how to correctly apply the complex regulations.

NIS2 and the National Cybersecurity System Act in transport: what you need to do before October 2026

The amended Act on the National Cybersecurity System (UKSC) has been in force since 3 April 2026. For transport sector undertakings, this means a specific compliance timeline, including an obligation to register with the National Cybersecurity System (KSC) registry by 3 October 2026. Failure to do so may result in substantial financial penalties, coupled with the risk of personal liability for senior management. Not every undertaking, however, automatically falls within the scope of the new regime. Read on to find out whether your organisation is affected and what you need to do before the deadline for preparation.

Family foundations: the government has done the maths and presented the bill

Three years. That’s how long we’ve been waiting for what the Council of Ministers had seen in the data from the outset – and has now disclosed in its review of the Family Foundation Act. The document not only diagnoses the problems, but also previews substantial changes to rules that founders and their advisers treated as settled and stable. And therein lies a problem that goes far beyond tax matters. If the rules of the game are changed while the game is being played, there can be neither planning stability nor trust in the law. It is no coincidence that one of the greatest concerns among entrepreneurs considering setting up a foundation is not the level of taxation, but the stability of the legal framework – which today is once again being called into question.

What the new swiss franc act means for banks

We now have a new Act on Special Measures for the Adjudication of Cases Concerning Loan Agreements Denominated in or Indexed to the Swiss Franc. The provisions come into force 14 days after publication. So now is a good time to look at what lies ahead and what banks should be doing today.

New draft Pay Transparency Act – what has changed since December 2025?

A second version of the draft act on strengthening the application of the right to equal pay for equal work or work of equal value between men and women has now been published. It refines procedures and deadlines and introduces a new supervisory body. We have already discussed the changes affecting the recruitment stage and the three pillars of the forthcoming pay transparency framework, noting that Poland will miss the EU transposition deadline of 7 June 2026. Now, we take a closer look at the further changes, new developments and risks that have emerged in the latest, April version of the draft.

Payment Services Regulation (PSR) – between consumer protection and due diligence

The draft Payment Services Regulation (PSR) is one of the most significant elements of the reform of the EU legal framework for payment services. Its principal aim is to enhance the security of cashless transactions and to reduce the scale of financial fraud, in particular that arising from the growth of digital channels. At the same time, the new rules are intended to introduce a liability model that will not result in risk being transferred entirely to financial institutions, whilst retaining an important role for independent due diligence on the part of the user.

Energy deregulation – key changes for businesses and energy consumers

The President has now signed the Energy Deregulation Act (UDER92). The new provisions cover both the relationships between energy undertakings and consumers, and matters relating to investment, district heating, and the administrative obligations of energy market participants. The Act introduces changes in the areas of billing, communication with consumers, grid connection, and the operations of undertakings in the energy and district heating sectors. We set out the key points to note.

Banking sector overview | Banking today and tomorrow | July 2026

Under the draft legislation, banks will be required to offer existing borrowers a switch from WIBOR-based to POLSTR-based interest rates, a mechanism intended to speed up the voluntary transition of financial instruments to the new benchmark. The banking sector has responded positively to the proposal, according to Tadeusz Białek, President of the Polish Bank Association.

Contact us:

Natalia Kotłowska-Wochna

Natalia Kotłowska-Wochna

Attorney-at-Law / Partner/ New Tech, IP, Trade & Logistics Practice Group / Head of New Tech M&A

+48 606 689 185

n.kotlowska@kochanski.pl