The environmental impact of AI, or the climate cost of artificial intelligence

15 December 2023 | Knowledge, News, The Right Focus

At a time when artificial intelligence is becoming increasingly popular and widespread, it is worth considering its impact on the environment. Although we associate AI mainly with the digital dimension, the development of machines is inevitably associated with a huge demand for energy, requires increasingly efficient cooling systems and therefore large amounts of water, and is responsible for significant carbon dioxide emissions. The climate cost of artificial intelligence is a fact that fortunately more and more AI leaders are becoming aware of. As a result, they are planning and taking steps to reduce the negative impact of AI on the environment.

AI on the rise

We are undoubtedly living in a time of rapid development in artificial intelligence. Our daily lives are increasingly being accompanied by new and innovative solutions to make our lives easier. It has never been easier or more accessible to create ‘tailor-made’ content. In just a few years, AI has become an integral part of our lives and the number of users of solutions such as ChatGPT or Microsoft Bing’s Image Wizard is growing exponentially.

As a result, the industry is booming and making record profits. The scale and speed of this phenomenon can be seen in the huge success of ChatGPT, which celebrated its first official anniversary a few days ago.

Not so long ago, few people were interested in the potential of large language models. Today, it could be said that the world has gone mad for the omniscient e-companion. According to the latest figures available, ChatGPT now has around 180.5 million users; OpenAI’s chief executive, Sam Altman, estimates that it receives 100 million visitors a week. In October alone, the site had a whopping 1.7 billion page views.[1]

Development at the expense of the environment

However, the range of opportunities offered by artificial intelligence should not overshadow the cost of implementing the innovation. AI is being developed in huge research and development complexes that use an equally huge amount of electricity.

A study by the University of California, Riverside, found that training GPT-3, the predecessor of ChatGPT, consumed 1287 MWh and resulted in the emission of the equivalent of more than 550 tonnes of carbon dioxide.[2]

This is roughly equal to 550 round trips between New York and San Francisco.[3]

By comparison, GPT-4, the successor to the current version of Chat, is reported to be trained on about 570 times more parameters than GPT-3. This does not indicate a proportional increase in energy consumption, but it does suggest that Chat’s learning process is becoming more energy intensive.

The figures for water consumption for cooling the server rooms are also interesting. GPT-3 training at Microsoft’s state-of-the-art data centres in the US can consume a total of 5.4 million litres of water, of which 700,000 litres is used to cool the servers on site.

In addition, the GPT-3 needs to ‘drink’ about a 500ml bottle of water for about 10-50 generated responses, depending on when and where it is used. These numbers may increase with the newly launched GPT-4 due to the aforementioned greater number of parameters used to train the language model.[4]

Staying on the subject of Big Tech’s water consumption, this issue is addressed in Google’s latest Environmental Report, which shows that the tech giant consumed 21.2 billion litres of water in 2022.

This represents an increase of almost 5 billion litres compared to 2021 and 8.3 billion litres compared to 2020. The 2022 figure can be compared to the water consumption of London, a city of nine million people, for 10 full days.[5]

Carbon-free and Big Tech’s green plans

While the figures above are essentially bleak, they should not obscure the changes being made by major players in the technology industry.

To reduce their environmental impact, scientists and engineers are looking at ways to make AI models more energy efficient, develop algorithms that require less computing power, or reduce CO2 emissions by powering data centres with green energy.

In September, Apple unveiled a new range of watches that it claims will be the first carbon-neutral products. To reduce the carbon footprint of these products, Apple has relied on the partial use of recycled materials and reduced air transport. The giant also announced an update to its environmental commitment to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 90 % by 2050.[6]

Similar climate action is being taken by Microsoft, which has pledged to become carbon-free by 2030 [7] and to produce more water than it consumes.

Finally, there is Googles promising investment in geothermal energy. At the end of November, Google announced the launch of a geothermal project in partnership with Fervo, which has resulted in carbon-free electricity (CFE) being supplied to the local grid for the company’s data centres in Nevada.

Google, like the rest of the Big Five, has big plans for decarbonisation. By 2030, it aims to operate all of its data centres and office campuses on 24/7 carbon-free energy.[8]

The regulations currently under consideration to reduce the negative impact of AI on the environment should also not be overlooked.

For data-driven companies, concern for the environment is already part of the activities regulated under ESG requirements. This includes, for example, energy efficiency or the use of renewable energy sources in data centres.

With the number of AI models growing every day at a rate unmatched by any other technology developed to date, there is no denying that the climate costs associated with AI will become increasingly important.

When weighing the opportunities and benefits of AI against the potential risks that are so often discussed, for example in relation to jobs, the environmental costs cannot be overlooked.

As artificial intelligence becomes an integral part of our lives, it is important that its development is accompanied by a commitment to sustainability and minimising any associated impact on the environment. The leading companies responsible for AI-based solutions are showing awareness and initiative in this area. This gives us hope for a future where we can enjoy the benefits of technological progress without further damaging our planet.

Questions? Contact us

Natalia Kotłowska-Wochna      

Wojciech Aleksandrowicz

[1] https://explodingtopics.com/blog/chatgpt-users.

[2] P. Li et al., Making AI Less “Thirsty”: Uncovering and Addressing the Secret Water Footprint of AI Models, p. 7.

[3] https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2023/aug/01/techscape-environment-cost-ai-artificial-intelligence.

[4] P. Li et al., Making AI Less “Thirsty”: Uncovering and Addressing the Secret Water Footprint of AI Models, s. 3.

[5] https://www.eco-business.com/news/what-are-the-environmental-costs-of-ai/.

[6] https://newclimate.org/news/reaction-apple-unveils-its-first-carbon-neutral-products.

[7][7] https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/corporate-responsibility/sustainability.

[8] https://spidersweb.pl/2023/11/google-energia-geotermalna.html.

Latest Knowledge

Length of service now includes periods of self-employment

The length of service no longer depends solely on work carried out under a contract of employment. The amendment to the Labour Code introduces significant changes, as work carried out under civil law contracts or as part of business activity will now also be included when calculating service, which affects employees’ rights. What will this mean for employees and employers?

Banking sector overview | Banking today and tomorrow | February 2026

The Polish banking sector is undergoing intense reshuffling on a scale not seen for years. Large banks are changing owners, foreign players are shifting their strategies and new investors are entering the market. The question is whether these are just temporary shifts in capital or the beginning of lasting change in the industry’s balance of power.

31 January. Don’t forget about the DAC7 Directive

The deadline for meeting the obligations under the DAC7 directive and the Polish regulations implementing it is fast approaching. Online platform operators must fulfil their reporting obligations by 31 January 2026 at the latest with regard to 2025 data. For many, this is the final opportunity not only to prepare the required information, but also to verify whether DAC7 obligations apply to them and, if so, to what extent.

The New Consumer Credit Act – extensive regulation with a broad market impact

In 2025, the Polish financial market entered another phase of adjustments to EU legislation. The draft new Consumer Credit Act implementing the CCD2 Directive, alongside the regulations on distance financial services, represents one of the most comprehensive attempts to standardise the rules for providing finance to consumers. The changes are so extensive that they cover all stages, from advertising and customer acquisition to the assessment of creditworthiness, the structure of agreements, the scope of the lender’s liability, withdrawal rules and the detailed organisation of remote sales.

Energy Radar 2026: Your roadmap to energy transition

Energy is no longer the exclusive domain of engineers and politicians; it is becoming the foundation of the business strategy of any company that wants to remain competitive. And 2026 will see a multitude of legislative changes that will fundamentally alter the current approach to the rules for grid connection, energy trading and reporting obligations.

Banking sector overview | Banking today and tomorrow | January 2026

On 1 January, new regulations came into force that increased the income tax rate paid by banks. The rate will be 30% in 2026. However, entities starting their business, credit and savings unions (SKOKs), small entities, and banks undergoing restructuring will pay less.

2025 in the banking sector: legal and tax changes, and strategic challenges

The Polish banking sector underwent profound reforms and new regulatory obligations in 2025. Despite achieving record financial results, banks were faced with mounting tax pressures and changes in benchmarks, as well as the implementation of EU regulations concerning operational security, anti-money laundering, digital payments, the use of artificial intelligence, environmental issues, ESG reporting and green transformation. Against this backdrop, we also observed market consolidation, partly driven by growing competition from new banks. In this article, we explore how these factors have transformed the Polish financial institution market.

Contact us:

Natalia Kotłowska-Wochna

Natalia Kotłowska-Wochna

Attorney-at-Law / New Tech, IP, Trade & Logistics Practice Group / Head of New Tech M&A

+48 606 689 185

n.kotlowska@kochanski.pl