The environmental impact of AI, or the climate cost of artificial intelligence

15 December 2023 | Knowledge, News, The Right Focus

At a time when artificial intelligence is becoming increasingly popular and widespread, it is worth considering its impact on the environment. Although we associate AI mainly with the digital dimension, the development of machines is inevitably associated with a huge demand for energy, requires increasingly efficient cooling systems and therefore large amounts of water, and is responsible for significant carbon dioxide emissions. The climate cost of artificial intelligence is a fact that fortunately more and more AI leaders are becoming aware of. As a result, they are planning and taking steps to reduce the negative impact of AI on the environment.

AI on the rise

We are undoubtedly living in a time of rapid development in artificial intelligence. Our daily lives are increasingly being accompanied by new and innovative solutions to make our lives easier. It has never been easier or more accessible to create ‘tailor-made’ content. In just a few years, AI has become an integral part of our lives and the number of users of solutions such as ChatGPT or Microsoft Bing’s Image Wizard is growing exponentially.

As a result, the industry is booming and making record profits. The scale and speed of this phenomenon can be seen in the huge success of ChatGPT, which celebrated its first official anniversary a few days ago.

Not so long ago, few people were interested in the potential of large language models. Today, it could be said that the world has gone mad for the omniscient e-companion. According to the latest figures available, ChatGPT now has around 180.5 million users; OpenAI’s chief executive, Sam Altman, estimates that it receives 100 million visitors a week. In October alone, the site had a whopping 1.7 billion page views.[1]

Development at the expense of the environment

However, the range of opportunities offered by artificial intelligence should not overshadow the cost of implementing the innovation. AI is being developed in huge research and development complexes that use an equally huge amount of electricity.

A study by the University of California, Riverside, found that training GPT-3, the predecessor of ChatGPT, consumed 1287 MWh and resulted in the emission of the equivalent of more than 550 tonnes of carbon dioxide.[2]

This is roughly equal to 550 round trips between New York and San Francisco.[3]

By comparison, GPT-4, the successor to the current version of Chat, is reported to be trained on about 570 times more parameters than GPT-3. This does not indicate a proportional increase in energy consumption, but it does suggest that Chat’s learning process is becoming more energy intensive.

The figures for water consumption for cooling the server rooms are also interesting. GPT-3 training at Microsoft’s state-of-the-art data centres in the US can consume a total of 5.4 million litres of water, of which 700,000 litres is used to cool the servers on site.

In addition, the GPT-3 needs to ‘drink’ about a 500ml bottle of water for about 10-50 generated responses, depending on when and where it is used. These numbers may increase with the newly launched GPT-4 due to the aforementioned greater number of parameters used to train the language model.[4]

Staying on the subject of Big Tech’s water consumption, this issue is addressed in Google’s latest Environmental Report, which shows that the tech giant consumed 21.2 billion litres of water in 2022.

This represents an increase of almost 5 billion litres compared to 2021 and 8.3 billion litres compared to 2020. The 2022 figure can be compared to the water consumption of London, a city of nine million people, for 10 full days.[5]

Carbon-free and Big Tech’s green plans

While the figures above are essentially bleak, they should not obscure the changes being made by major players in the technology industry.

To reduce their environmental impact, scientists and engineers are looking at ways to make AI models more energy efficient, develop algorithms that require less computing power, or reduce CO2 emissions by powering data centres with green energy.

In September, Apple unveiled a new range of watches that it claims will be the first carbon-neutral products. To reduce the carbon footprint of these products, Apple has relied on the partial use of recycled materials and reduced air transport. The giant also announced an update to its environmental commitment to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 90 % by 2050.[6]

Similar climate action is being taken by Microsoft, which has pledged to become carbon-free by 2030 [7] and to produce more water than it consumes.

Finally, there is Googles promising investment in geothermal energy. At the end of November, Google announced the launch of a geothermal project in partnership with Fervo, which has resulted in carbon-free electricity (CFE) being supplied to the local grid for the company’s data centres in Nevada.

Google, like the rest of the Big Five, has big plans for decarbonisation. By 2030, it aims to operate all of its data centres and office campuses on 24/7 carbon-free energy.[8]

The regulations currently under consideration to reduce the negative impact of AI on the environment should also not be overlooked.

For data-driven companies, concern for the environment is already part of the activities regulated under ESG requirements. This includes, for example, energy efficiency or the use of renewable energy sources in data centres.

With the number of AI models growing every day at a rate unmatched by any other technology developed to date, there is no denying that the climate costs associated with AI will become increasingly important.

When weighing the opportunities and benefits of AI against the potential risks that are so often discussed, for example in relation to jobs, the environmental costs cannot be overlooked.

As artificial intelligence becomes an integral part of our lives, it is important that its development is accompanied by a commitment to sustainability and minimising any associated impact on the environment. The leading companies responsible for AI-based solutions are showing awareness and initiative in this area. This gives us hope for a future where we can enjoy the benefits of technological progress without further damaging our planet.

Questions? Contact us

Natalia Kotłowska-Wochna      

Wojciech Aleksandrowicz

[1] https://explodingtopics.com/blog/chatgpt-users.

[2] P. Li et al., Making AI Less “Thirsty”: Uncovering and Addressing the Secret Water Footprint of AI Models, p. 7.

[3] https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2023/aug/01/techscape-environment-cost-ai-artificial-intelligence.

[4] P. Li et al., Making AI Less “Thirsty”: Uncovering and Addressing the Secret Water Footprint of AI Models, s. 3.

[5] https://www.eco-business.com/news/what-are-the-environmental-costs-of-ai/.

[6] https://newclimate.org/news/reaction-apple-unveils-its-first-carbon-neutral-products.

[7][7] https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/corporate-responsibility/sustainability.

[8] https://spidersweb.pl/2023/11/google-energia-geotermalna.html.

Latest Knowledge

GLI – AI, Machine Learning & Big Data 2026: The Polish perspective on artificial intelligence law

Global Legal Insights (GLI) is a series of international publications by the Global Legal Group (GLG), authored by legal practitioners from around the world. It offers an up-to-date and highly practical guide to the applicable regulatory landscape, complemented by expert commentary on specific areas of law across different jurisdictions. In short: legislation and actionable know-how in one place.

Banking sector overview | Banking today and tomorrow | May 2026

“The end of the dream of free housing” – this is how the Polish Bank Association (Związek Banków Polskich) has characterised Thursday’s judgments of the Court of Justice of the European Union in cases concerning whether the claims of financial institutions against CHF mortgage borrowers have become time-barred.

Return deposits like VAT? The elephant in the room: the risks of the deposit-return system

The deposit-return system was supposed to be simple. Eco-friendly. Leak-proof. Tax-neutral. However, it took just a few months for serious doubts to emerge. The first loopholes are no longer just theoretical, they are in plain sight. The mechanisms for abuse can be described quite precisely, and the scale of potential losses may be much greater than anticipated. Below, we examine where the system is losing control and how this can be addressed.

NZIA – “Made in Europe” becomes a condition of market participation in the energy sector

The European Union has adopted a strategic course aimed at building its own production capacity in key technology sectors, including energy technologies. This policy is embodied in the Net-Zero Industry Act (NZIA), which redefines the rules of competitiveness, inter alia, in the renewable energy sector. In tenders, auctions and public support schemes, price is no longer the sole criterion for selecting a supplier. The NZIA imposes on contracting authorities and entities administering support schemes an obligation to evaluate bids also on the basis of the origin of the technology and other criteria specified in the Regulation. This change is systemic in nature and will affect all market participants – both producers and purchasers of energy technologies. In this article, I analyse how the new EU regulations will translate into business practice for companies operating in the European market.

WHT – Obligation to verify the beneficial owner status when paying dividends. An advance tax ruling by the Director of the National Revenue Administration Information Centre vs. explanations by the Minister of Finance

A Polish company paying dividends to a foreign parent company based in the EU may be exempt from withholding tax (WHT). When verifying eligibility for this exemption, is the company required to check whether the recipient of the dividend is its beneficial owner (BO)? It transpires that the Director of the National Revenue Administration Information Centre (KIS) and the Minister of Finance offer completely different answers to this question. What does this mean in practice? Let’s take a look.

Banking in 2026: technology, regulation and the new market landscape

The year 2026 will see the banking sector undergo its most dynamic transformation in a decade. The trends identified in Accenture’s Top Banking Trends FY26 report suggest that the sector is entering a phase in which technology and regulation will be inseparable, driving all aspects of change. However, it is regulation that determines the boundaries, pace and manner of implementation for new solutions. We take a look at what else the experts are focusing on.

Contact us:

Natalia Kotłowska-Wochna

Natalia Kotłowska-Wochna

Attorney-at-Law / Partner/ New Tech, IP, Trade & Logistics Practice Group / Head of New Tech M&A

+48 606 689 185

n.kotlowska@kochanski.pl