Ma Eng

Non-solicitation clauses in M&A transactions

11 October 2023 | Knowledge, News, The Right Focus

Every manager and business owner knows the importance of people and talent in an organisation. In M&A (mergers & acquisitions), the human factor also plays a crucial role. One of the main motivations for M&A transactions is to gain value from the acquisition. And behind this are usually the people who are guaranteed to further enhance the performance and value of the business.

People: the most valuable asset in business

Among the risks that can arise in an M&A transaction is the risk of poaching key employees and other individuals critical to the operation of the acquired business. This risk is all the greater as the deal may ultimately fail and the potential buyer, having access to the critical personnel of the divested business, may seek to persuade them to consider cooperation, thereby inducing them to leave the current business.

The seller, left with an unsold business that has lost its most valuable employees, may therefore have a very serious problem. Both in running the business and in attracting new buyers.

What you need to know about non-solicitation clauses

One way to mitigate this risk is via a non-solicitation clause, which provides that the buyer will not solicit or encourage the employees and associates of the divested business to terminate their relationship with the seller. For such clauses to be effective, they must be properly incorporated into the contract and properly secured, e.g. via liquidated damages for any breach.

Non-solicitation clauses should be carefully drafted, with their manner of incorporation in the contract depending on which party has more influence over the final content.

From the seller’s point of view, a non-solicitation clause should have a broad scope, i.e. it should restrict the potential solicitation of employees and associates of the seller’s business to join the buyer or its related parties.

On the other hand, from the buyer’s perspective, it is important that any non-solicitation clauses do not prohibit instances where the employees of the divested business themselves terminate their existing relationship with the business on their own initiative and either approach the buyer for employment or respond to a general recruitment advertisement.

Non-solicitation & non-compete

Non-solicitation clauses may also include a prohibition on soliciting customers, suppliers and other business partners of the divested business or the seller and in this respect are closely related to non-compete clauses concerning the non-competition of the buyer.

In the case of non-compete clauses, it is important to draft the relevant contractual provisions carefully and to ensure that they are respected.

Any questions? Contact us

Paweł Mardas

Latest Knowledge

Dual-use items: how broad will the CJEU’s definition be?

A training aircraft designed for civilian purposes can also qualify as a military item. That’s a conclusion emerging from the Advocate General’s Opinion in Case C-538/25 (Flugzeugherstellerin) before the Court of Justice of the European Union. What does this mean for companies exporting goods from the EU?

Workplace harassment and discrimination: new regulations for employers

The Sejm has passed an amendment to the Labour Code concerning workplace harassment and discrimination. The changes introduce a broader definition of the concept itself, new forms of harassment, clearer definitions of what constitutes, for example, sexual harassment, and new rules governing the handling of such cases, including the reversal of the burden of proof, higher compensation awards, and the jurisdiction of district courts. The provisions will enter into force on 5 November 2026. We examine what will change and how much time remains to adapt company documents, policies, and the organisation as a whole.

ESG Roadmap. How to identify which regulations apply to your business and build a strategy

As we know, ESG in business is a roadmap made up of numerous obligations arising from different regulatory frameworks. That is why the right question is not “how do I meet all the requirements?” but rather “which of them apply to my business?”. This is a crucial distinction. We explain how to correctly diagnose your regulatory profile and build an effective ESG strategy – one that actually works and gives you a competitive edge.

Announcement of Income Tax Reform

On 19 August, during a press conference, the Prime Minister announced a package of tax changes planned for next year. According to the announcement, the reform is intended, on the one hand, to ease the burden on the middle class and, on the other, to shift a greater fiscal burden onto the wealthiest individuals and the largest companies. We take a look at the proposals included in the announced package and explain what they might mean for taxpayers.

Family foundations and the tax authorities: what draft bill UD447 proposes and why this is not the end of the troubles

Family foundations were intended to provide entrepreneurs with a stable framework for intergenerational wealth management. Yet not even four years have passed since the first such foundations were established, and the rules governing their taxation are set to be changed once again. This is because the scale of interest and the practical problems uncovered have overwhelmed the drafters of the legislation, as best illustrated by the figures – 927 applications for individual tax rulings and 77 opinions issued from the Head of the National Revenue Administration. This does not, however, mean that family foundations are being used on a massive scale for aggressive tax optimisation. A significant proportion of the queries concerned simply how to correctly apply the complex regulations.

Banking today and tomorrow | Financial sector overview | August 2026

Poland’s banking sector has reacted with concern to recent remarks by Katarzyna Pełczyńska-Nałęcz, the Minister of Development Funds and Regional Policy, who announced plans to put forward a proposal for a further increase in CIT levied on banks. The Minister’s reasoning, however, rests on a flawed conflation of the sector’s liquidity with its profitability, revealing a fundamental misunderstanding of how the banking sector operates and how its financial health is assessed. What is more, it feeds into a worrying trend of replacing substantive debate with simplistic, populist messaging which may be politically appealing but is not underpinned by either facts or economic analysis.

NIS2 and the National Cybersecurity System Act in transport: what you need to do before October 2026

The amended Act on the National Cybersecurity System (UKSC) has been in force since 3 April 2026. For transport sector undertakings, this means a specific compliance timeline, including an obligation to register with the National Cybersecurity System (KSC) registry by 3 October 2026. Failure to do so may result in substantial financial penalties, coupled with the risk of personal liability for senior management. Not every undertaking, however, automatically falls within the scope of the new regime. Read on to find out whether your organisation is affected and what you need to do before the deadline for preparation.

Family foundations: the government has done the maths and presented the bill

Three years. That’s how long we’ve been waiting for what the Council of Ministers had seen in the data from the outset – and has now disclosed in its review of the Family Foundation Act. The document not only diagnoses the problems, but also previews substantial changes to rules that founders and their advisers treated as settled and stable. And therein lies a problem that goes far beyond tax matters. If the rules of the game are changed while the game is being played, there can be neither planning stability nor trust in the law. It is no coincidence that one of the greatest concerns among entrepreneurs considering setting up a foundation is not the level of taxation, but the stability of the legal framework – which today is once again being called into question.