New rules for setting fines for businesses by the President of UOKiK

13 May 2024 | Knowledge, News, The Right Focus

At the beginning of April 2024, the President of the Office of Competition and Consumer Protection (UOKiK) published new clarifications on the determination of the amount of fines in cases related to the conclusion of agreements restrictive of competition and the abuse of dominant position. This is the result of legislative changes made in connection with the implementation of the ECN+ Directive on increasing the effectiveness of competition law enforcement. The Clarifications are not legally binding, but the President of UOKiK has stated that he will determine the amount of fines in accordance with the Clarifications and that any deviation will be justified. Thus, in practice, the Clarifications will be an important point of reference when setting fines.

The Clarifications apply to cases in which antitrust proceedings were initiated after 1 January 2024.

Total fine for companies

In accordance with the regulations, the President of UOKiK may impose a fine of up to 10 % of a company’s turnover in the financial year preceding the year in which the fine is imposed if the company has, inter alia, engaged in practices that restrict competition, even if these are unintentional.

However, if it is established that an undertaking which has engaged in a practice restricting competition was subject to the determining influence of another undertaking or undertakings, the President of UOKiK may impose a joint fine on that undertaking and the undertaking(s) which exercised such influence over it. If proceedings are conducted against the undertaking which exercised determining influence and the undertaking over which that influence was exercised, a joint fine will be imposed on them, unless the circumstances of the case justify the imposition of two or more fines instead of a joint fine.

When calculating the above-mentioned 10% of the turnover, if the infringing undertaking was under the decisive influence of one or more other undertakings, the President of UOKiK will also take into account the turnover of the undertaking(s) exercising such influence and of those over whom the influence is exercised. This means that the maximum amount of the fine can be up to 10% of the turnover not only of a single company, but also, for example, of another company in its group which exercised a decisive influence on the former.

Method of calculating fines

In determining the amount of the fine, the President of UOKiK will take into account factors such as the circumstances of the violation of the Competition and Consumer Protection Act of 16 February 2007, previous violations of the Act, the duration, gravity and market consequences of the violation, as well as mitigating and aggravating circumstances.

In accordance with the Clarifications, in determining the amount of the fine, the President of UOKiK will set a starting amount and then a base amount. These amounts relate to one year of the infringement.

The starting amount will be a percentage of the ‘relevant turnover’ of the undertaking(s) to be fined. This amount will be determined by indicating a percentage between 0.01 % and 3 % of the relevant turnover. When determining the starting amount from this percentage range, the President of UOKiK will set its value closer to the upper limit for the most serious infringements (in particular, agreements between competitors and abuses of a dominant position aimed at excluding competitors from the market). This amount will be a kind of a ‘starting point’ for the calculation of the final fine, after mitigating and aggravating circumstances have been taken into account.

The starting amount may be further increased or decreased by up to 75 % (the previous 2021 clarifications provided for an increase of 50 % or a decrease of 90 %), taking into account, inter alia, the low revenue earned from the affected products by the undertaking directly involved in the infringement in relation to its total turnover. The amount thus determined becomes the base amount.

For infringements lasting longer than one year, the base amount will be increased accordingly. The President of UOKiK will multiply the base amount by the number of full years of involvement in the infringement for which the fine is imposed. If, in the last commenced year of the infringement, the duration of the infringement exceeds six months, the multiplier will be increased by 0.5.

Mitigating and aggravating circumstances

In determining the amount of the fine, the President of UOKiK will also take into account the mitigating circumstances specified in the Clarifications and in the Act. Consideration of these may result in an increase or decrease of the base amount determined at an earlier stage of the analysis (taking into account the duration of the infringement) by a maximum of 25% (which was 50% in the previous 2021 clarifications).

Discretion

If the President of UOKiK is of the opinion that the amount determined according to the guidelines of the Clarifications is inadequate and would not serve its purpose, a higher or lower fine may be imposed (this will be further justified). However, this amount may not exceed the maximum fine specified in the Act.

The full text of the Clarifications is available here.

Questions? Contact us

Monika Urban-Piotrowska

Latest Knowledge

Announcement of Income Tax Reform

On 19 August, during a press conference, the Prime Minister announced a package of tax changes planned for next year. According to the announcement, the reform is intended, on the one hand, to ease the burden on the middle class and, on the other, to shift a greater fiscal burden onto the wealthiest individuals and the largest companies. We take a look at the proposals included in the announced package and explain what they might mean for taxpayers.

Family foundations and the tax authorities: what draft bill UD447 proposes and why this is not the end of the troubles

Family foundations were intended to provide entrepreneurs with a stable framework for intergenerational wealth management. Yet not even four years have passed since the first such foundations were established, and the rules governing their taxation are set to be changed once again. This is because the scale of interest and the practical problems uncovered have overwhelmed the drafters of the legislation, as best illustrated by the figures – 927 applications for individual tax rulings and 77 opinions issued from the Head of the National Revenue Administration. This does not, however, mean that family foundations are being used on a massive scale for aggressive tax optimisation. A significant proportion of the queries concerned simply how to correctly apply the complex regulations.

NIS2 and the National Cybersecurity System Act in transport: what you need to do before October 2026

The amended Act on the National Cybersecurity System (UKSC) has been in force since 3 April 2026. For transport sector undertakings, this means a specific compliance timeline, including an obligation to register with the National Cybersecurity System (KSC) registry by 3 October 2026. Failure to do so may result in substantial financial penalties, coupled with the risk of personal liability for senior management. Not every undertaking, however, automatically falls within the scope of the new regime. Read on to find out whether your organisation is affected and what you need to do before the deadline for preparation.

Family foundations: the government has done the maths and presented the bill

Three years. That’s how long we’ve been waiting for what the Council of Ministers had seen in the data from the outset – and has now disclosed in its review of the Family Foundation Act. The document not only diagnoses the problems, but also previews substantial changes to rules that founders and their advisers treated as settled and stable. And therein lies a problem that goes far beyond tax matters. If the rules of the game are changed while the game is being played, there can be neither planning stability nor trust in the law. It is no coincidence that one of the greatest concerns among entrepreneurs considering setting up a foundation is not the level of taxation, but the stability of the legal framework – which today is once again being called into question.

What the new swiss franc act means for banks

We now have a new Act on Special Measures for the Adjudication of Cases Concerning Loan Agreements Denominated in or Indexed to the Swiss Franc. The provisions come into force 14 days after publication. So now is a good time to look at what lies ahead and what banks should be doing today.

New draft Pay Transparency Act – what has changed since December 2025?

A second version of the draft act on strengthening the application of the right to equal pay for equal work or work of equal value between men and women has now been published. It refines procedures and deadlines and introduces a new supervisory body. We have already discussed the changes affecting the recruitment stage and the three pillars of the forthcoming pay transparency framework, noting that Poland will miss the EU transposition deadline of 7 June 2026. Now, we take a closer look at the further changes, new developments and risks that have emerged in the latest, April version of the draft.

Payment Services Regulation (PSR) – between consumer protection and due diligence

The draft Payment Services Regulation (PSR) is one of the most significant elements of the reform of the EU legal framework for payment services. Its principal aim is to enhance the security of cashless transactions and to reduce the scale of financial fraud, in particular that arising from the growth of digital channels. At the same time, the new rules are intended to introduce a liability model that will not result in risk being transferred entirely to financial institutions, whilst retaining an important role for independent due diligence on the part of the user.

Energy deregulation – key changes for businesses and energy consumers

The President has now signed the Energy Deregulation Act (UDER92). The new provisions cover both the relationships between energy undertakings and consumers, and matters relating to investment, district heating, and the administrative obligations of energy market participants. The Act introduces changes in the areas of billing, communication with consumers, grid connection, and the operations of undertakings in the energy and district heating sectors. We set out the key points to note.

Banking sector overview | Banking today and tomorrow | July 2026

Under the draft legislation, banks will be required to offer existing borrowers a switch from WIBOR-based to POLSTR-based interest rates, a mechanism intended to speed up the voluntary transition of financial instruments to the new benchmark. The banking sector has responded positively to the proposal, according to Tadeusz Białek, President of the Polish Bank Association.

Contact us:

Monika Urban-Piotrowska

Monika Urban-Piotrowska

Advocate / Senior Associate / Competition & Antitrust / Consumer Law

+48 660 765 924

m.urban-piotrowska@kochanski.pl