New rules for setting fines for businesses by the President of UOKiK

13 May 2024 | Knowledge, News, The Right Focus

At the beginning of April 2024, the President of the Office of Competition and Consumer Protection (UOKiK) published new clarifications on the determination of the amount of fines in cases related to the conclusion of agreements restrictive of competition and the abuse of dominant position. This is the result of legislative changes made in connection with the implementation of the ECN+ Directive on increasing the effectiveness of competition law enforcement. The Clarifications are not legally binding, but the President of UOKiK has stated that he will determine the amount of fines in accordance with the Clarifications and that any deviation will be justified. Thus, in practice, the Clarifications will be an important point of reference when setting fines.

The Clarifications apply to cases in which antitrust proceedings were initiated after 1 January 2024.

Total fine for companies

In accordance with the regulations, the President of UOKiK may impose a fine of up to 10 % of a company’s turnover in the financial year preceding the year in which the fine is imposed if the company has, inter alia, engaged in practices that restrict competition, even if these are unintentional.

However, if it is established that an undertaking which has engaged in a practice restricting competition was subject to the determining influence of another undertaking or undertakings, the President of UOKiK may impose a joint fine on that undertaking and the undertaking(s) which exercised such influence over it. If proceedings are conducted against the undertaking which exercised determining influence and the undertaking over which that influence was exercised, a joint fine will be imposed on them, unless the circumstances of the case justify the imposition of two or more fines instead of a joint fine.

When calculating the above-mentioned 10% of the turnover, if the infringing undertaking was under the decisive influence of one or more other undertakings, the President of UOKiK will also take into account the turnover of the undertaking(s) exercising such influence and of those over whom the influence is exercised. This means that the maximum amount of the fine can be up to 10% of the turnover not only of a single company, but also, for example, of another company in its group which exercised a decisive influence on the former.

Method of calculating fines

In determining the amount of the fine, the President of UOKiK will take into account factors such as the circumstances of the violation of the Competition and Consumer Protection Act of 16 February 2007, previous violations of the Act, the duration, gravity and market consequences of the violation, as well as mitigating and aggravating circumstances.

In accordance with the Clarifications, in determining the amount of the fine, the President of UOKiK will set a starting amount and then a base amount. These amounts relate to one year of the infringement.

The starting amount will be a percentage of the ‘relevant turnover’ of the undertaking(s) to be fined. This amount will be determined by indicating a percentage between 0.01 % and 3 % of the relevant turnover. When determining the starting amount from this percentage range, the President of UOKiK will set its value closer to the upper limit for the most serious infringements (in particular, agreements between competitors and abuses of a dominant position aimed at excluding competitors from the market). This amount will be a kind of a ‘starting point’ for the calculation of the final fine, after mitigating and aggravating circumstances have been taken into account.

The starting amount may be further increased or decreased by up to 75 % (the previous 2021 clarifications provided for an increase of 50 % or a decrease of 90 %), taking into account, inter alia, the low revenue earned from the affected products by the undertaking directly involved in the infringement in relation to its total turnover. The amount thus determined becomes the base amount.

For infringements lasting longer than one year, the base amount will be increased accordingly. The President of UOKiK will multiply the base amount by the number of full years of involvement in the infringement for which the fine is imposed. If, in the last commenced year of the infringement, the duration of the infringement exceeds six months, the multiplier will be increased by 0.5.

Mitigating and aggravating circumstances

In determining the amount of the fine, the President of UOKiK will also take into account the mitigating circumstances specified in the Clarifications and in the Act. Consideration of these may result in an increase or decrease of the base amount determined at an earlier stage of the analysis (taking into account the duration of the infringement) by a maximum of 25% (which was 50% in the previous 2021 clarifications).

Discretion

If the President of UOKiK is of the opinion that the amount determined according to the guidelines of the Clarifications is inadequate and would not serve its purpose, a higher or lower fine may be imposed (this will be further justified). However, this amount may not exceed the maximum fine specified in the Act.

The full text of the Clarifications is available here.

Questions? Contact us

Monika Urban-Piotrowska

Latest Knowledge

Banking sector overview | Banking today and tomorrow | June 2026

According to a statement published by GPW Benchmark, the reference rate administrator, and the Polish Financial Supervision Authority (KNF), which oversees the administrator, 31 December 2036 will be the last day on which the WIBID and WIBOR rates will be provided for all key fixing periods: 1 month (1M), 3 months (3M) and 6 months (6M).

How to correctly calculate length of service from 1 May 2026

New rules for calculating length of service have applied to private sector employers since the beginning of May 2026. With companies continuing to express concerns about the new framework, the Ministry of Family, Labour and Social Policy has addressed the most common questions. We look at the issues that are (still) troubling employers and how we can help.

Tax settlement agreement: A new tool in the General Tax Code

A draft bill amending the General Tax Code (No. UDER110) has been submitted for consideration by the Council of Ministers. The bill introduces the tax settlement agreement, a new form of amicable dispute resolution between taxpayers and the tax authority. The draft is open for inter-ministerial review and public consultation until 19 June, with the proposed date of entry into force being 1 January 2028. Below, we examine who may apply for a settlement agreement, when, and on what terms, and how the process may work in practice.

A revolutionary reform of Poland’s capital market – ETFs and the Qualified Investment Fund

Poland’s capital market is on the cusp of one of the most significant reforms in recent years, which will fundamentally reshape the regulatory framework for ETFs and introduce an entirely new investment vehicle: the Qualified Investment Fund (QIF/KFI). This is a response to market demands and presents an opportunity for Poland to close the gap with countries such as Luxembourg and Ireland, with the overarching objective of boosting competitiveness and stemming the outflow of investment capital abroad. The new regulations aim to deliver greater flexibility for investors and fund managers alike, while also aligning with current market trends and European standards. We examine what is changing in practice and what it means for all market participants.

Directive 2024/825 – the European Union’s response to greenwashing

Greenwashing poses one of the most significant challenges to the consumer protection framework in the European Union. As customers become increasingly environmentally conscious, brands are ever more inclined to leverage this interest by invoking the language of environmental protection, sustainable development and climate neutrality. Yet these claims do not always reflect the actual characteristics of their products or services. The EU has sought to bring systemic order to this area by clarifying the information obligations of traders and broadening the list of practices deemed unfair. We consider what these changes mean for businesses in practice.

GLI – AI, Machine Learning & Big Data 2026: The Polish perspective on artificial intelligence law

Global Legal Insights (GLI) is a series of international publications by the Global Legal Group (GLG), authored by legal practitioners from around the world. It offers an up-to-date and highly practical guide to the applicable regulatory landscape, complemented by expert commentary on specific areas of law across different jurisdictions. In short: legislation and actionable know-how in one place.

Banking sector overview | Banking today and tomorrow | May 2026

“The end of the dream of free housing” – this is how the Polish Bank Association (Związek Banków Polskich) has characterised Thursday’s judgments of the Court of Justice of the European Union in cases concerning whether the claims of financial institutions against CHF mortgage borrowers have become time-barred.

Return deposits like VAT? The elephant in the room: the risks of the deposit-return system

The deposit-return system was supposed to be simple. Eco-friendly. Leak-proof. Tax-neutral. However, it took just a few months for serious doubts to emerge. The first loopholes are no longer just theoretical, they are in plain sight. The mechanisms for abuse can be described quite precisely, and the scale of potential losses may be much greater than anticipated. Below, we examine where the system is losing control and how this can be addressed.

Contact us:

Monika Urban-Piotrowska

Monika Urban-Piotrowska

Advocate / Senior Associate / Competition & Antitrust / Consumer Law

+48 660 765 924

m.urban-piotrowska@kochanski.pl