Legal status of NFTs and VAT consequences of NFT disposal

2 November 2022 | Knowledge, News, Tax Focus

When trying to determine the VAT consequences of NFT disposal, the first question to be answered is what type of an NFT are we dealing with?

The transfer of an NFT being a kind of a certificate of “ownership” or embodying a specific digital good will have different tax consequences than the transfer of an NFT representing an entitlement to a benefit of some kind.

Notwithstanding the differences, however, we recognise that the disposal of an NFT for consideration by a VAT taxpayer will be subject to VAT (even if it would be considered as an exempt sale).

This is addressed in more detail in the “Taxation of Cryptocurrencies and NFTs, and Tax Challenges in the Metaverse” report prepared by our Tax Team, which was released on 27 October.

NFTs vs. VAT

Nevertheless, the latest position of the Director of National Revenue Information System, expressed in the advance tax ruling of 23 September 2022 (No. 0114-KDIP4-2.4012.315.2022.1.KS), indicates that not every disposal of NFT for consideration should be treated as such.

The ruling was requested by a public benefit foundation who is VAT taxpayer and whose primary objective is to help people affected by cancer. The foundation held a fundraising campaign, with the funds raised going to charity. As part of the campaign, prize donations were auctioned off and the winners were confirmed by receiving an NFT linked to a specially created graphic. The foundation’s intention was that the NFTs handed out would be some kind of a digital diploma only, confirming the winning of the auction, with the transfer of NFTs to the auction winners not involving the transfer of the author’s economic rights to the graphic (linked to the NFT).

Are all supplies of services subject to VAT

The questions raised by the foundation related to three issues, i.e.:

  • Does the foundation’s transfer of the NFT rights to the auction winners constitute a paid supply of services within the meaning of VAT regulations?
  • Does the foundation’s activity of organising an auction involving the transfer of NFTs in exchange for a donation constitute an economic activity within the meaning of VAT regulations?
  • Should the transfer of the NFT rights to the auction winners be documented with an invoice?

In its position, the authority indicated that the activities undertaken by the foundation would not be subject to VAT, arguing that the supply of services is only subject to VAT if it is made for consideration, with “consideration” meaning an economic benefit for the seller: “The supply of services is treated as a VAT-taxable activity if it is made for consideration, and if there is an explicit or implicit legal relationship (agreement) between the service provider and the beneficiary (service recipient) under which mutual consideration is provided. An activity consisting in the supply of services is therefore subject to VAT if it is performed for consideration.”According to the authority, when dealing with a donation of NFTs in a charity auction, the condition of the service being provided for consideration is not fulfilled. The donation paid in the auction is intended to finance the operations of the foundation and not to compensate for the service provided by the foundation (sale of the NFT).

From the perspective of the bidder, the rights to the NFT acquired as a form of gratitude are of secondary importance, as they have no real economic value, and only an emotional or symbolic value for the bidder themself. Additionally, which the authority considers important, the donation is not made by the auction participant ‘in exchange’ for any services. The recipient of the NFT rights must therefore be seen as a donor and the foundation as the beneficiary of the donation.

Such reasoning means that the transfer of NFT rights to the bidder, as part of the charity auction, will not constitute a supply of services for consideration within the meaning of Article 8(1) of the VAT Act. In the authority’s view, the foundation’s activities in this respect also do not qualify as economic activities for VAT purposes, since the purpose of the foundation’s activities in this case is not to generate turnover from the supply of services for consideration, but to raise funds for its charitable activities.

As a result, since the foundation is neither providing services for consideration nor carrying out its activities in the context of a business activity in terms of VAT, it is also not obliged to issue a VAT invoice for the transfer of the NFT to the auction winner.

It should be emphasised that in the case of a ‘standard’ sale or transfer of an NFT together with the copyright to the related asset in exchange for a cash consideration, the foundation, being a VAT payer, would be obliged to treat such action as a supply of services for consideration within the meaning of Article 8(1)(1) of the VAT Act, subject to 23% VAT.

The ruling in question demonstrates the remarkable ‘flexibility’ of the NFT legal structure. Giving the token appropriate characteristics, such as serving solely as proof of participation in a charitable event or proof of donation, may change its tax treatment.

Any questions? Contact the authors

Wojciech Śliż

Sławomir Wnuczek


See other Tax Focus issues

Polish Deal 3.0 adopted by the Sejm | Tax Focus

Latest Knowledge

GLI – AI, Machine Learning & Big Data 2026: The Polish perspective on artificial intelligence law

Global Legal Insights (GLI) is a series of international publications by the Global Legal Group (GLG), authored by legal practitioners from around the world. It offers an up-to-date and highly practical guide to the applicable regulatory landscape, complemented by expert commentary on specific areas of law across different jurisdictions. In short: legislation and actionable know-how in one place.

Banking sector overview | Banking today and tomorrow | May 2026

“The end of the dream of free housing” – this is how the Polish Bank Association (Związek Banków Polskich) has characterised Thursday’s judgments of the Court of Justice of the European Union in cases concerning whether the claims of financial institutions against CHF mortgage borrowers have become time-barred.

Return deposits like VAT? The elephant in the room: the risks of the deposit-return system

The deposit-return system was supposed to be simple. Eco-friendly. Leak-proof. Tax-neutral. However, it took just a few months for serious doubts to emerge. The first loopholes are no longer just theoretical, they are in plain sight. The mechanisms for abuse can be described quite precisely, and the scale of potential losses may be much greater than anticipated. Below, we examine where the system is losing control and how this can be addressed.

NZIA – “Made in Europe” becomes a condition of market participation in the energy sector

The European Union has adopted a strategic course aimed at building its own production capacity in key technology sectors, including energy technologies. This policy is embodied in the Net-Zero Industry Act (NZIA), which redefines the rules of competitiveness, inter alia, in the renewable energy sector. In tenders, auctions and public support schemes, price is no longer the sole criterion for selecting a supplier. The NZIA imposes on contracting authorities and entities administering support schemes an obligation to evaluate bids also on the basis of the origin of the technology and other criteria specified in the Regulation. This change is systemic in nature and will affect all market participants – both producers and purchasers of energy technologies. In this article, I analyse how the new EU regulations will translate into business practice for companies operating in the European market.

WHT – Obligation to verify the beneficial owner status when paying dividends. An advance tax ruling by the Director of the National Revenue Administration Information Centre vs. explanations by the Minister of Finance

A Polish company paying dividends to a foreign parent company based in the EU may be exempt from withholding tax (WHT). When verifying eligibility for this exemption, is the company required to check whether the recipient of the dividend is its beneficial owner (BO)? It transpires that the Director of the National Revenue Administration Information Centre (KIS) and the Minister of Finance offer completely different answers to this question. What does this mean in practice? Let’s take a look.

Banking in 2026: technology, regulation and the new market landscape

The year 2026 will see the banking sector undergo its most dynamic transformation in a decade. The trends identified in Accenture’s Top Banking Trends FY26 report suggest that the sector is entering a phase in which technology and regulation will be inseparable, driving all aspects of change. However, it is regulation that determines the boundaries, pace and manner of implementation for new solutions. We take a look at what else the experts are focusing on.

Contact us:

Wojciech Śliż

Wojciech Śliż

Tax Advisor / Partner / Tax Law

+48 539 110 037

w.sliz@kochanski.pl

Sławomir Wnuczek

Sławomir Wnuczek

Advocate / Associate / Tax Law

+48 784 084 522

s.wnuczek@kochanski.pl