Nda Eng

Information worth more than gold: a few words about NDAs

25 April 2023 | Knowledge, News, The Right Focus

Time is money. Information is also money, and access to information can save a lot of time and costs. This is evident in every M&A transaction.

Non-disclosure agreement or NDA in practice

One of the first actions taken in virtually every transaction is to conclude a confidentiality agreement between the parties.

Usually, the scope of confidential information includes all data relating to the proposed transaction and the parties involved, including information on the status of ongoing negotiations.

The confidentiality obligation may take the form of a separate agreement – a non-disclosure agreement (NDA). It can also be incorporated into another document, such as a term sheet or preliminary agreement.

Normally, an NDA sets out how confidential information is to be protected. It also includes an obligation to return documents containing such information should the transaction not be effected.

Alternatively, an NDA may oblige the party receiving confidential data to delete it (as not every document can be easily returned, such as for example email communications).

Financial penalties in NDAs

The confidentiality obligation may also be secured by a contractual penalty, i.e. an obligation to pay a certain amount in the event of a breach by the recipient of the information.

The contractual penalty clause facilitates the enforcement of the penalty, as the party in whose favour the penalty is stipulated does not have to prove the value of the damage suffered as a result of the breach of the NDA.

Permitted use of information, or what not to forget in an NDA

An often overlooked, yet equally important element of an NDA, is the clause defining the permitted use of information by the recipient.

The idea is to secure that confidential information will only be used to assess the viability, negotiate the terms and conditions of and then execute the transaction.

In that case, confidential information may not be used for any other purpose, in particular for competing activities. Indeed, we can imagine a case where a buyer, who is a strategic industry investor, obtains information from a seller operating in the same market segment and thus being the buyer’s direct competitor. The buyer has obtained confidential information, but the transaction does not take place.

Another example. A transaction is carried out via an auction in which several competing buyers make their bid to acquire another company operating in the same industry. Naturally, the seller may choose only one of them. Those whose bids have been rejected still had access to confidential information, as each of them was invited to the auction process in which they made a due diligence investigation of the company being sold.

High risk for technology and innovation-based companies

In a situation where the buyer does not proceed to close the deal, either because he withdraws himself or his offer is rejected, the risk of confidential information being used for a purpose other than originally intended seems particularly significant.

This is particularly true for those business sectors and activities that rely on new technologies and other innovative solutions.

Indeed, in the rapidly changing market of products and services based on innovative concepts that require special protection against disclosure, access to non-public technological information can be crucial to the success or failure of an entire business project.

How we help protect important information

We help our Clients to protect themselves against disclosing their important information, but also to secure the data they share against unauthorised use.

We also know how to effectively counter attempts to build unfair competitive advantage based on the information that Clients choose to share in M&A transactions. Because we know that information is money, so there are many people eager to get it.

Questions? Contact us

Paweł Mardas

View more articles

The seller’s R&Ws in M&A: how to avoid buying “a pig in a poke”

Information Worth More Than Gold: A Few Words About NDAs

 

Latest Knowledge

Dual-use items: how broad will the CJEU’s definition be?

A training aircraft designed for civilian purposes can also qualify as a military item. That’s a conclusion emerging from the Advocate General’s Opinion in Case C-538/25 (Flugzeugherstellerin) before the Court of Justice of the European Union. What does this mean for companies exporting goods from the EU?

Workplace harassment and discrimination: new regulations for employers

The Sejm has passed an amendment to the Labour Code concerning workplace harassment and discrimination. The changes introduce a broader definition of the concept itself, new forms of harassment, clearer definitions of what constitutes, for example, sexual harassment, and new rules governing the handling of such cases, including the reversal of the burden of proof, higher compensation awards, and the jurisdiction of district courts. The provisions will enter into force on 5 November 2026. We examine what will change and how much time remains to adapt company documents, policies, and the organisation as a whole.

ESG Roadmap. How to identify which regulations apply to your business and build a strategy

As we know, ESG in business is a roadmap made up of numerous obligations arising from different regulatory frameworks. That is why the right question is not “how do I meet all the requirements?” but rather “which of them apply to my business?”. This is a crucial distinction. We explain how to correctly diagnose your regulatory profile and build an effective ESG strategy – one that actually works and gives you a competitive edge.

Announcement of Income Tax Reform

On 19 August, during a press conference, the Prime Minister announced a package of tax changes planned for next year. According to the announcement, the reform is intended, on the one hand, to ease the burden on the middle class and, on the other, to shift a greater fiscal burden onto the wealthiest individuals and the largest companies. We take a look at the proposals included in the announced package and explain what they might mean for taxpayers.

Family foundations and the tax authorities: what draft bill UD447 proposes and why this is not the end of the troubles

Family foundations were intended to provide entrepreneurs with a stable framework for intergenerational wealth management. Yet not even four years have passed since the first such foundations were established, and the rules governing their taxation are set to be changed once again. This is because the scale of interest and the practical problems uncovered have overwhelmed the drafters of the legislation, as best illustrated by the figures – 927 applications for individual tax rulings and 77 opinions issued from the Head of the National Revenue Administration. This does not, however, mean that family foundations are being used on a massive scale for aggressive tax optimisation. A significant proportion of the queries concerned simply how to correctly apply the complex regulations.

Banking today and tomorrow | Financial sector overview | August 2026

Poland’s banking sector has reacted with concern to recent remarks by Katarzyna Pełczyńska-Nałęcz, the Minister of Development Funds and Regional Policy, who announced plans to put forward a proposal for a further increase in CIT levied on banks. The Minister’s reasoning, however, rests on a flawed conflation of the sector’s liquidity with its profitability, revealing a fundamental misunderstanding of how the banking sector operates and how its financial health is assessed. What is more, it feeds into a worrying trend of replacing substantive debate with simplistic, populist messaging which may be politically appealing but is not underpinned by either facts or economic analysis.

NIS2 and the National Cybersecurity System Act in transport: what you need to do before October 2026

The amended Act on the National Cybersecurity System (UKSC) has been in force since 3 April 2026. For transport sector undertakings, this means a specific compliance timeline, including an obligation to register with the National Cybersecurity System (KSC) registry by 3 October 2026. Failure to do so may result in substantial financial penalties, coupled with the risk of personal liability for senior management. Not every undertaking, however, automatically falls within the scope of the new regime. Read on to find out whether your organisation is affected and what you need to do before the deadline for preparation.

Family foundations: the government has done the maths and presented the bill

Three years. That’s how long we’ve been waiting for what the Council of Ministers had seen in the data from the outset – and has now disclosed in its review of the Family Foundation Act. The document not only diagnoses the problems, but also previews substantial changes to rules that founders and their advisers treated as settled and stable. And therein lies a problem that goes far beyond tax matters. If the rules of the game are changed while the game is being played, there can be neither planning stability nor trust in the law. It is no coincidence that one of the greatest concerns among entrepreneurs considering setting up a foundation is not the level of taxation, but the stability of the legal framework – which today is once again being called into question.