Influencers – be careful who you promote on Instagram! There are heavy fines for promoting alcohol on social media

12 April 2023 | Knowledge, News, The Right Focus

The turn of 2022 was the time when the promotion of alcoholic beverages on social media began to attract huge public interest.

High-proof spirits are particularly emotive. These cannot be advertised or promoted according to the Act on Education in Sobriety and Alcoholism Prevention. However, despite the ban, the Internet is flooded with content featuring spirit names, trademarks and graphic images.

How influencers ‘get around’ bans

Interestingly, alcohol is not the main theme in most related posts, and internet users are often confronted with content that cannot be clearly classified as advertising or promotion.

In fact, in the public space, creators often state that they are not encouraging anyone to drink alcohol and completely deny that the content they create can be considered as advertising or promotion.

On the contrary, they are keen to explain their activities as ‘spreading the word’, e.g. about non-obvious uses of alcohol in the kitchen, or telling other related stories. Alcohol also appears in random locations, often without proper labelling of the advertising collaboration, which deviates from the UOKiK guidelines and violates the same Act.

Influencers flooding us with alcohol advertisements face stiff sanctions in Poland

Under the current legal regime, such actions can expose influencers to serious consequences, of which having to remove a post or terminate cooperation with a particular client is just a drop in the ocean.

In France, for example, Instagram was ‘only’ forced to remove the content of influencers promoting alcoholic beverages, and the ruling obliged the site’s owner, Meta, to provide the Addictions France Association with data containing the real identities of the influencers (full names, dates and places of birth and telephone numbers).

What’s more, sanctions can be targeted directly – i.e. not at a site owner or specific alcohol producer, but at the influencers themselves, or simply at individuals whose social media activity is considered ‘promotion’ or ‘advertising’.

A fine of PLN 10,000 to PLN 500,000 may be imposed on anyone who, in breach of the ban on advertising set out in Article 131 of the Act on Education for Sobriety and Alcoholism Prevention, advertises or promotes alcoholic beverages or provides information about the sponsorship of a mass event, subject to Article 131(5) and (6).

Fines of up to half a million for breaking the alcohol advertising ban

Despite the fact that the legislation came into force at the end of 1997, it is still difficult to find case law imposing heavy fines on promoters.

However, technological change has breathed new life into this legislation.

A well-known social activist filed a lawsuit on this basis with the District Public Prosecutor’s Office in Warsaw-Śródmieście, which resulted in the public prosecutor filing criminal charges against three people who maintain public profiles with significant reach on social media.

The issue is therefore becoming topical and the situation shows that those who share their content on social media have a responsibility they may not have previously been aware of.

Want to share content online safely?

Want to know your rights and responsibilities in social media?

Contact us

Bartłomiej Galos

Mateusz Ostrowski

Latest Knowledge

Payment Services Regulation (PSR) – between consumer protection and due diligence

The draft Payment Services Regulation (PSR) is one of the most significant elements of the reform of the EU legal framework for payment services. Its principal aim is to enhance the security of cashless transactions and to reduce the scale of financial fraud, in particular that arising from the growth of digital channels. At the same time, the new rules are intended to introduce a liability model that will not result in risk being transferred entirely to financial institutions, whilst retaining an important role for independent due diligence on the part of the user.

Energy deregulation – key changes for businesses and energy consumers

The President has now signed the Energy Deregulation Act (UDER92). The new provisions cover both the relationships between energy undertakings and consumers, and matters relating to investment, district heating, and the administrative obligations of energy market participants. The Act introduces changes in the areas of billing, communication with consumers, grid connection, and the operations of undertakings in the energy and district heating sectors. We set out the key points to note.

Banking sector overview | Banking today and tomorrow | July 2026

Under the draft legislation, banks will be required to offer existing borrowers a switch from WIBOR-based to POLSTR-based interest rates, a mechanism intended to speed up the voluntary transition of financial instruments to the new benchmark. The banking sector has responded positively to the proposal, according to Tadeusz Białek, President of the Polish Bank Association.

“Withdraw from contract here” – what next for the new button in online shops, on trading platforms and in mobile apps?

From 19 June, national legislation was to require businesses in the European Union entering into distance contracts with consumers via an online interface to provide consumers with the option to withdraw from the contract via a dedicated function/button. However, due to Poland’s delay in transposing Directive 2023/2673, which requires the use of such a button, this obligation has been postponed in our country. We look at what remote contract withdrawal entails and which transactions the new feature will apply to.

Municipal master plans – new deadline, same old challenges

On 11 June 2026, the President signed into law a bill extending the deadline for municipalities to adopt their master plans (plany ogólne). The key deadline for adopting master plans was moved from 30 June to 31 August 2026. We examine the reasons behind this change and consider what the absence of a master plan might mean for potential investors and their future projects.

Record fines and the upcoming 21st sanctions package – what should businesses expect?

The past year has brought a series of enforcement actions that clearly signal a tightening approach by the Polish customs and revenue authorities towards breaches of the sanctions regime. Importantly, businesses should already be preparing for further changes, as the European Union has announced its 21st sanctions package and updated the list of designated persons and entities. We examine the key developments and offer guidance on how to minimise the risk of non-compliance.

A sea change in the rules governing board members’ liability for a company’s tax arrears

The bill amending the General Tax Code (No. UC138) fundamentally overhauls the rules governing the tax liability of third parties for capital companies’ tax arrears.  It comes in response to recent CJEU judgments, the Ombudsman’s February statement and the post-audit report of the Supreme Chamber of Audit (NIK) of December 2025. We examine what’s changing, who will be affected by the new rules and what steps are worth taking right now.

Partner in name, but only if male: the linguistic trap in Polish corporate law

One of the structures available under Polish law is the ‘spółka partnerska’ (professional partnership), modelled on the Anglo-Saxon Limited Liability Partnership. As defined in the Polish Commercial Companies Code, this is a vehicle for individuals practising liberal professions, such as doctors, architects and accountants. And yet, the provisions governing professional partnerships make no mention of their applicability to women. We therefore examine whether there is no room for female partners, feminine-gendered forms, or simply linguistic empathy.

Can you sue over words aimed at an entire community?

A damaging public statement does not necessarily refer to a specific individual. Sometimes, the author attributes negative characteristics to a whole group of people, portrays them as a threat or uses language that could be seen as demeaning. Statements of this kind frequently concern LGBTQ+ people. This raises the question: can a member of the targeted community bring a lawsuit seeking compensation or an apology, even if they were not named directly? We decided to look into this.

Contact us:

Bartłomiej Galos

Bartłomiej Galos

Advocate trainee / Associate / Litigation & Media

+48 22 326 9600

b.galos@kochanski.pl