Dividend advances

12 April 2024 | Knowledge, News, The Right Focus

Limited liability companies often exercise the option to pay dividend advances. This allows shareholders to receive funds before the current accounts have been approved and a profit distribution resolution has been passed. However – provided, of course, that the company has sufficient funds – it is important to bear in mind the conditions that must be met for dividend advances to be paid.

When can companies pay dividend advances

The first condition for the payment of advances is the authorisation of the management board. This can only be given in the articles of association, which can be tailored to the needs of a particular company – either by using general wording or by specifying the scope of the board’s discretion. For example, by limiting the amount of advances.

If no such authorisation is given in the current articles of association, these may be amended. In such a case, a shareholders’ resolution is required, which should generally be recorded in the minutes drawn up in the form of a notarial deed (one exception being companies established using model articles of association in the S-24 ICT system). It should be noted that amendments to the articles of association become effective only upon registration in the National Court Register (KRS).

Another condition for payment is that the company’s approved accounts for the previous financial year must show a profit.

The company must also have sufficient funds to make the payment and its projected financial results must show the prospect of making a profit for a particular financial year. If they clearly show a loss, no advance can be paid.

Maximum dividend advance

The Companies & Partnerships Code does not allow complete freedom in determining the amount of such advances, providing that an advance may not exceed half of the profits made since the end of the previous financial year, plus any reserve capital created from profits, which the management board may use to make advance payments, less any uncovered losses and treasury shares. Importantly, the articles of association may reduce the maximum advance amount provided for by law.

Before deciding to make the payment, the company’s management board must carefully analyse the financial results to ensure that the amount of advances to be paid is in line with the legislation.

Need to repay the advance

Payment should be made with awareness of the risk that the funds may have to be returned to the company. This may be the case if advances have been paid to shareholders in a particular financial year and the company subsequently makes a loss or the profit made was less than the advances paid.

In such a case, shareholders are obliged to repay:

  • Full advances – if the company has made a loss
  • The part corresponding to the excess of the profit attributable to a shareholder for a particular financial year – if the company’s profit is lower than the advances paid

Similarly, shareholders are obliged to repay the advance received if it has not been paid in accordance with the articles of association or the Act.

Any questions? Contact:

Adam Czarnota

Latest Knowledge

Payment Services Regulation (PSR) – between consumer protection and due diligence

The draft Payment Services Regulation (PSR) is one of the most significant elements of the reform of the EU legal framework for payment services. Its principal aim is to enhance the security of cashless transactions and to reduce the scale of financial fraud, in particular that arising from the growth of digital channels. At the same time, the new rules are intended to introduce a liability model that will not result in risk being transferred entirely to financial institutions, whilst retaining an important role for independent due diligence on the part of the user.

Energy deregulation – key changes for businesses and energy consumers

The President has now signed the Energy Deregulation Act (UDER92). The new provisions cover both the relationships between energy undertakings and consumers, and matters relating to investment, district heating, and the administrative obligations of energy market participants. The Act introduces changes in the areas of billing, communication with consumers, grid connection, and the operations of undertakings in the energy and district heating sectors. We set out the key points to note.

Banking sector overview | Banking today and tomorrow | July 2026

Under the draft legislation, banks will be required to offer existing borrowers a switch from WIBOR-based to POLSTR-based interest rates, a mechanism intended to speed up the voluntary transition of financial instruments to the new benchmark. The banking sector has responded positively to the proposal, according to Tadeusz Białek, President of the Polish Bank Association.

“Withdraw from contract here” – what next for the new button in online shops, on trading platforms and in mobile apps?

From 19 June, national legislation was to require businesses in the European Union entering into distance contracts with consumers via an online interface to provide consumers with the option to withdraw from the contract via a dedicated function/button. However, due to Poland’s delay in transposing Directive 2023/2673, which requires the use of such a button, this obligation has been postponed in our country. We look at what remote contract withdrawal entails and which transactions the new feature will apply to.

Municipal master plans – new deadline, same old challenges

On 11 June 2026, the President signed into law a bill extending the deadline for municipalities to adopt their master plans (plany ogólne). The key deadline for adopting master plans was moved from 30 June to 31 August 2026. We examine the reasons behind this change and consider what the absence of a master plan might mean for potential investors and their future projects.

Record fines and the upcoming 21st sanctions package – what should businesses expect?

The past year has brought a series of enforcement actions that clearly signal a tightening approach by the Polish customs and revenue authorities towards breaches of the sanctions regime. Importantly, businesses should already be preparing for further changes, as the European Union has announced its 21st sanctions package and updated the list of designated persons and entities. We examine the key developments and offer guidance on how to minimise the risk of non-compliance.

A sea change in the rules governing board members’ liability for a company’s tax arrears

The bill amending the General Tax Code (No. UC138) fundamentally overhauls the rules governing the tax liability of third parties for capital companies’ tax arrears.  It comes in response to recent CJEU judgments, the Ombudsman’s February statement and the post-audit report of the Supreme Chamber of Audit (NIK) of December 2025. We examine what’s changing, who will be affected by the new rules and what steps are worth taking right now.

Partner in name, but only if male: the linguistic trap in Polish corporate law

One of the structures available under Polish law is the ‘spółka partnerska’ (professional partnership), modelled on the Anglo-Saxon Limited Liability Partnership. As defined in the Polish Commercial Companies Code, this is a vehicle for individuals practising liberal professions, such as doctors, architects and accountants. And yet, the provisions governing professional partnerships make no mention of their applicability to women. We therefore examine whether there is no room for female partners, feminine-gendered forms, or simply linguistic empathy.

Can you sue over words aimed at an entire community?

A damaging public statement does not necessarily refer to a specific individual. Sometimes, the author attributes negative characteristics to a whole group of people, portrays them as a threat or uses language that could be seen as demeaning. Statements of this kind frequently concern LGBTQ+ people. This raises the question: can a member of the targeted community bring a lawsuit seeking compensation or an apology, even if they were not named directly? We decided to look into this.

Contact us:

Adam Czarnota

Adam Czarnota

Advocate / Senior Associate / Corporate Law / Mergers & Acquisitions

+48 787 389 207

a.czarnota@kochanski.pl

Rafał Rapala

Rafał Rapala

Attorney-at-law / Partner / Head of Corporate Law and Corporate Litigation / M&A, Private Equity

+48 608 444 650

r.rapala@kochanski.pl