Corporate governance in the age of AI and Big Data: What should companies be aware of

12 April 2024 | Knowledge, News, The Right Focus

AI and Big Data offer significant opportunities when it comes to supporting companies, their boards, officers and other employees. People and technology working hand in hand can deliver substantial business growth. The capabilities here are definitely broad and the tech industry is not slowing down in terms of development.

However, we should also consider the other side of the coin, namely the considerable legal risks associated with new technologies. A real-life example of this occurred when an employee used AI to create website materials. It turned out that AI proposed text that was already available on the Internet, and the company was subsequently accused of plagiarism.

Given the above, companies must be careful about allowing the use of new technologies at different levels of the corporate ladder. Relevant internal policies should be developed in close consultation with IT specialists and lawyers. In addition, companies should be sensitive to liability issues in contracts with providers of AI-based solutions.

How do AI and Big Data affect the due diligence process for boards of directors

Due diligence involves the review and assessment of a wealth of documents from different perspectives (for instance: commercial, technical, accounting, tax, legal, etc.). Of course, to a certain extent, boards can assist themselves with the help of external advisors. Nevertheless, it is still the responsibility of the company itself to deal with what can be a considerable amount of data or documents.

Modern software allows scanning by keywords or specific parameters. In addition, AI-based software can tag and profile documents, including: contracts, reports, emails, etc.

This makes it much easier to find specific documents, and  can also support and speed up the analysis of large collections, in particular those of a similar nature. For instance, AI-based tools can detect and summarise differences or changes in documents created from templates. Finally, AI helps automate certain tasks, such as data cleaning, classification, clustering or anomaly detection, allowing for a huge increase in efficiency. This allows board members’ time and skills to be used more efficiently.

How do AI and Big Data affect a board’s fiduciary duties

Companies should pursue the objectives set by their owners. In the vast majority of cases, a major goal will be to grow the business, generate income and ultimately profits at expected levels, and thereby deliver value to shareholders.

Of course, businesses also have individual goals, follow different business models with different industry specifics, including pricing mechanisms and margin levels. However, every organisation has numerous processes that can be supported by AI and Big Data to achieve greater efficiency and effectiveness.

From the perspective of board members, in addition to pure business operations, it is crucial to manage companies in line with corporate governance rules, to have appropriate compliance procedures in place, and to supervise particular companies’ officers subordinated to them. There is no doubt that AI can streamline processes and automate repetitive tasks, such as keeping meticulous records and ensuring corporate governance or general legal compliance. In this way, AI enables board members to devote more time and resources to their core responsibilities, such as strategic planning and business decision-making.

We also see AI reshaping decision-making processes across industries. The potential here may be limitless. With the ability to process large amounts of data quickly and efficiently, AI can assist directors in making business-related decisions.

How do AI and Big Data affect communication plans involving shareholders, vendors, etc.

The use of Big Data and AI is definitely changing strategic communication in companies.

It is a truism that today, information is key. At the same time, we are inundated with data. As a result, particular stakeholders expect to be provided with precisely selected data, presented in an easy-to-understand manner, within the agreed or regulatory frequency basis.

It is clear that Big Data and AI have an impact on traditional corporate communication tools, increasing the requirements of particular stakeholders. Companies cannot ignore these demands if they do not want to jeopardise their business models. They therefore need to keep pace with developments in the world of digital technology.

AI is also helping to create interactive data visualisations that make it easier to understand the results of analytics. In addition, AI combined with automation can prepare draft reports to be presented to particular stakeholders, aggregating data from different sources and using agreed templates. Finally, AI can manage the communication process so that deadlines are met and particular stakeholders are satisfied.

In order to maintain a high level of dialogue with them, corporate communication must be based on Big Data and AI. The future of corporate communication will be even more data-driven and automated, and this is something that boards will increasingly need to consider.

Any questions? Contact

Karol Połosak

Latest Knowledge

NIS2 and the National Cybersecurity System Act in transport: what you need to do before October 2026

The amended Act on the National Cybersecurity System (UKSC) has been in force since 3 April 2026. For transport sector undertakings, this means a specific compliance timeline, including an obligation to register with the National Cybersecurity System (KSC) registry by 3 October 2026. Failure to do so may result in substantial financial penalties, coupled with the risk of personal liability for senior management. Not every undertaking, however, automatically falls within the scope of the new regime. Read on to find out whether your organisation is affected and what you need to do before the deadline for preparation.

Family foundations: the government has done the maths and presented the bill

Three years. That’s how long we’ve been waiting for what the Council of Ministers had seen in the data from the outset – and has now disclosed in its review of the Family Foundation Act. The document not only diagnoses the problems, but also previews substantial changes to rules that founders and their advisers treated as settled and stable. And therein lies a problem that goes far beyond tax matters. If the rules of the game are changed while the game is being played, there can be neither planning stability nor trust in the law. It is no coincidence that one of the greatest concerns among entrepreneurs considering setting up a foundation is not the level of taxation, but the stability of the legal framework – which today is once again being called into question.

What the new swiss franc act means for banks

We now have a new Act on Special Measures for the Adjudication of Cases Concerning Loan Agreements Denominated in or Indexed to the Swiss Franc. The provisions come into force 14 days after publication. So now is a good time to look at what lies ahead and what banks should be doing today.

New draft Pay Transparency Act – what has changed since December 2025?

A second version of the draft act on strengthening the application of the right to equal pay for equal work or work of equal value between men and women has now been published. It refines procedures and deadlines and introduces a new supervisory body. We have already discussed the changes affecting the recruitment stage and the three pillars of the forthcoming pay transparency framework, noting that Poland will miss the EU transposition deadline of 7 June 2026. Now, we take a closer look at the further changes, new developments and risks that have emerged in the latest, April version of the draft.

Payment Services Regulation (PSR) – between consumer protection and due diligence

The draft Payment Services Regulation (PSR) is one of the most significant elements of the reform of the EU legal framework for payment services. Its principal aim is to enhance the security of cashless transactions and to reduce the scale of financial fraud, in particular that arising from the growth of digital channels. At the same time, the new rules are intended to introduce a liability model that will not result in risk being transferred entirely to financial institutions, whilst retaining an important role for independent due diligence on the part of the user.

Energy deregulation – key changes for businesses and energy consumers

The President has now signed the Energy Deregulation Act (UDER92). The new provisions cover both the relationships between energy undertakings and consumers, and matters relating to investment, district heating, and the administrative obligations of energy market participants. The Act introduces changes in the areas of billing, communication with consumers, grid connection, and the operations of undertakings in the energy and district heating sectors. We set out the key points to note.

Banking sector overview | Banking today and tomorrow | July 2026

Under the draft legislation, banks will be required to offer existing borrowers a switch from WIBOR-based to POLSTR-based interest rates, a mechanism intended to speed up the voluntary transition of financial instruments to the new benchmark. The banking sector has responded positively to the proposal, according to Tadeusz Białek, President of the Polish Bank Association.

“Withdraw from contract here” – what next for the new button in online shops, on trading platforms and in mobile apps?

From 19 June, national legislation was to require businesses in the European Union entering into distance contracts with consumers via an online interface to provide consumers with the option to withdraw from the contract via a dedicated function/button. However, due to Poland’s delay in transposing Directive 2023/2673, which requires the use of such a button, this obligation has been postponed in our country. We look at what remote contract withdrawal entails and which transactions the new feature will apply to.

Municipal master plans – new deadline, same old challenges

On 11 June 2026, the President signed into law a bill extending the deadline for municipalities to adopt their master plans (plany ogólne). The key deadline for adopting master plans was moved from 30 June to 31 August 2026. We examine the reasons behind this change and consider what the absence of a master plan might mean for potential investors and their future projects.

Contact us:

Karol Połosak

Karol Połosak

Advocate / Partner / Transactional Practice Group / Mergers and Acquisitions / Corporate Law / Restructuring and Insolvency / Private Equity

+48 608 377 788

k.polosak@kochanski.pl