Conversion of the right of perpetual usufruct into ownership upon request

25 July 2023 | Knowledge, News, The Right Focus

On 25 July, the President signed the amendment to the Act on Real Estate Management and Certain Other which will make it significantly easier for existing perpetual usufructuaries to acquire ownership of these properties. Under the reform, usufructuaries of commercial land and business entities will also have the right to request the sale of a real property. This is a further stage of the elimination of perpetual usufruct from the Polish legal system.

Amendment to the Act on Real Estate Management: New rules for the purchase of land

The general rule is that land may not be sold to its perpetual usufructuary before the expiry of 10 years from the date of the agreement to grant perpetual usufruct.

The bill provides for enfranchisement upon request and not by operation of law, as was the case with residential land.

Within 12 months from the date of entry into force of the Act, a perpetual usufructuary will be entitled to request the sale of the property to them from the State Treasury or local government bodies.

If the perpetual usufructuary submits the request within the prescribed deadline, the public authorities may not refuse to sell the land to them. If the sale is refused, despite the usufructuary’s fulfilment of all the conditions under the Act, the usufructuary will be entitled to bring an action to court for a so-called substitute declaration of intent to sell.

Currently, the decision to sell the property is made at the discretion of the owner.

Properties excluded from the request for sale

Perpetual usufructuaries will not be allowed to make a request for sale in respect of a property:

  • Let for perpetual usufruct after 31 December 1997
  • In relation to which the perpetual usufructuary failed to perform a contractual obligation
  • Used as a family allotment garden
  • Located within harbours and marinas
  • In respect of which proceedings are pending for the termination of the agreement to let it for perpetual usufruct

In addition, undeveloped land will be available for purchase with the consent of the provincial governor (wojewoda), local government or head of the district (starosta), provided, of course, that the perpetual usufruct agreement has continued for a minimum of 10 years.

The claim will also not be applicable to land owned by the National Agricultural Support Centre (Krajowy Ośrodek Wsparcia Rolnictwa), the Military Property Agency (Agencja Mienia Wojskowego), the State Forests, national parks, and the State Water Management Authority ‘Polish Waters’ (Wody Polskie) – due to the vital importance of such land for the state economy.

High costs of purchasing property under perpetual usufruct

The amendment provides for the following payment schemes:

  • Single payment: 20 times the existing annual perpetual usufruct fee; or
  • Payment in instalments: 25 times the existing annual perpetual usufruct fee

Local governments will be able to either adopt the above payment rules or determine them themselves and may also grant discounts, e.g. due to the duration of perpetual usufruct or no arrears in payment of perpetual usufruct fees.

As a result, a perpetual usufructuary who pays an annual fee of 3% will have to pay 60% of the value of the land to own it. The remaining 40% should be covered under the de minimis aid limit (permitted state aid), regulated by EU law. However, taking into account the rather low aid limits and high property prices, businesses will often need to pay more if the value of the land does not fall within the applicable limit, and consequently pay more than 60% of the market value of the property.

Too short a time limit for the purchase

The bill provides for a 12-month deadline for the perpetual usufructuary to request the sale of the property, starting from the Act’s entry into force. An amendment in this respect was tabled by the Senate, which proposed a three-year deadline, however, was not passed by the Sejm.

According to the explanatory memorandum to the bill, the request procedure is intended to allow perpetual usufructuaries to take a decision on land purchase taking into account their current financial condition and investment plans.

However, according to experts and representatives of businesses, the deadline proposed by the lawmaker is too short to make such a decision and verify whether one meets the relevant conditions. Especially considering that public aid must be settled within three years.

Questions? Contact us

Weronika Duda

Malwina Jagiełło

Latest Knowledge

Payment Services Regulation (PSR) – between consumer protection and due diligence

The draft Payment Services Regulation (PSR) is one of the most significant elements of the reform of the EU legal framework for payment services. Its principal aim is to enhance the security of cashless transactions and to reduce the scale of financial fraud, in particular that arising from the growth of digital channels. At the same time, the new rules are intended to introduce a liability model that will not result in risk being transferred entirely to financial institutions, whilst retaining an important role for independent due diligence on the part of the user.

Energy deregulation – key changes for businesses and energy consumers

The President has now signed the Energy Deregulation Act (UDER92). The new provisions cover both the relationships between energy undertakings and consumers, and matters relating to investment, district heating, and the administrative obligations of energy market participants. The Act introduces changes in the areas of billing, communication with consumers, grid connection, and the operations of undertakings in the energy and district heating sectors. We set out the key points to note.

Banking sector overview | Banking today and tomorrow | July 2026

Under the draft legislation, banks will be required to offer existing borrowers a switch from WIBOR-based to POLSTR-based interest rates, a mechanism intended to speed up the voluntary transition of financial instruments to the new benchmark. The banking sector has responded positively to the proposal, according to Tadeusz Białek, President of the Polish Bank Association.

“Withdraw from contract here” – what next for the new button in online shops, on trading platforms and in mobile apps?

From 19 June, national legislation was to require businesses in the European Union entering into distance contracts with consumers via an online interface to provide consumers with the option to withdraw from the contract via a dedicated function/button. However, due to Poland’s delay in transposing Directive 2023/2673, which requires the use of such a button, this obligation has been postponed in our country. We look at what remote contract withdrawal entails and which transactions the new feature will apply to.

Municipal master plans – new deadline, same old challenges

On 11 June 2026, the President signed into law a bill extending the deadline for municipalities to adopt their master plans (plany ogólne). The key deadline for adopting master plans was moved from 30 June to 31 August 2026. We examine the reasons behind this change and consider what the absence of a master plan might mean for potential investors and their future projects.

Record fines and the upcoming 21st sanctions package – what should businesses expect?

The past year has brought a series of enforcement actions that clearly signal a tightening approach by the Polish customs and revenue authorities towards breaches of the sanctions regime. Importantly, businesses should already be preparing for further changes, as the European Union has announced its 21st sanctions package and updated the list of designated persons and entities. We examine the key developments and offer guidance on how to minimise the risk of non-compliance.

A sea change in the rules governing board members’ liability for a company’s tax arrears

The bill amending the General Tax Code (No. UC138) fundamentally overhauls the rules governing the tax liability of third parties for capital companies’ tax arrears.  It comes in response to recent CJEU judgments, the Ombudsman’s February statement and the post-audit report of the Supreme Chamber of Audit (NIK) of December 2025. We examine what’s changing, who will be affected by the new rules and what steps are worth taking right now.

Partner in name, but only if male: the linguistic trap in Polish corporate law

One of the structures available under Polish law is the ‘spółka partnerska’ (professional partnership), modelled on the Anglo-Saxon Limited Liability Partnership. As defined in the Polish Commercial Companies Code, this is a vehicle for individuals practising liberal professions, such as doctors, architects and accountants. And yet, the provisions governing professional partnerships make no mention of their applicability to women. We therefore examine whether there is no room for female partners, feminine-gendered forms, or simply linguistic empathy.

Can you sue over words aimed at an entire community?

A damaging public statement does not necessarily refer to a specific individual. Sometimes, the author attributes negative characteristics to a whole group of people, portrays them as a threat or uses language that could be seen as demeaning. Statements of this kind frequently concern LGBTQ+ people. This raises the question: can a member of the targeted community bring a lawsuit seeking compensation or an apology, even if they were not named directly? We decided to look into this.

Contact us:

Weronika Duda

Weronika Duda

Attorney-at-law / Counsel / Transactional Practice Group / Real Estate / Head of the German Desk

+48 888 736 561

w.duda@kochanski.pl