Supervisory Board member performing the duties of Management Board members in a joint stock company

28 July 2023 | Knowledge, News

Supervisory Boards in joint stock companies have broad powers to supervise the activities of the Management Board. One of these powers is the option to delegate members to temporarily perform the duties of board members who have been dismissed, resigned or are otherwise unable to perform their duties.

Conditions for the delegation of a Supervisory Board member to the Management Board

The delegation of a Supervisory Board member is possible when there are not enough members on the company’s Management Board to enable it to operate effectively and the immediate appointment of another person is impracticable or difficult (for example, if there are no candidates meeting the company’s requirements or a competition for the position would need to be held).

Most often, this occurs when a board member is dismissed, resigns, dies or their health deteriorates preventing them from performing management functions.

As a result of the delegation, a Supervisory Board member temporarily assumes the rights and duties of the Management Board member whose mandate has expired or who is unable to act. However, upon delegation to the Management Board and until the end of such delegation, the former’s rights and duties as a member of the Supervisory Board are suspended.

Delegation of a Supervisory Board member to the Management Board – what to bear in mind

In order to delegate a member of the Supervisory Board to perform management duties, the Supervisory Board must adopt a relevant resolution and the consent of the delegate must be obtained. Such a resolution (unless the company’s Articles of Association provide otherwise) is passed by an absolute majority of votes and the delegation takes effect either upon adoption of the resolution or on the date specified therein.

Nature of delegation to the Management Board of the company

A Supervisory Board member is delegated to perform the duties of a specific person, thus the distribution of duties within the company’s Management Board remains unchanged. In most cases, the delegate enters into all the rights and duties of the substituted person.

However, a literal interpretation of the provision in question, confirmed in legal doctrine, leads to the conclusion that a person may also be delegated to perform only selected duties and thus their rights and obligations may be restricted.

Originally, the Commercial Companies Code provided that a delegation was temporary, without specifying its maximum duration. Eventually, however, the lawmakers ruled on the maximum duration of the delegation, which may not exceed three months, with any delegation exceeding the statutory term expiring by operation of law. This means that if the Supervisory Board’s resolution in this regard does not specify the duration of the delegation, it must be assumed that it will last for three months, the maximum period allowed by law.

Remuneration of the delegated Supervisory Board member

The delegation entails a change in remuneration. According to the prevailing view, from the moment specified in the Supervisory Board’s resolution on the delegation of its member to temporarily perform the duties of a Management Board member, that person ceases to be entitled to their previous remuneration for their function on the Supervisory Board and will be entitled to receive the remuneration appropriate to a Management Board member, in accordance with the company’s rules in this respect.

Non-competition

It is generally accepted that while acting as a member of the Management Board, a delegated Supervisory Board member is prohibited from engaging in activities that are in competition with those of the company (as Article 380 § 1 of the Commercial Companies Code applies accordingly). The delegate may also be exempted from the non-competition obligation.

Delegation of a Supervisory Board member to the Management Board in limited liability companies

The lawmakers have not introduced a similar solution for Supervisory Boards of limited liability companies. However, the Supervisory Board may be granted such power by introducing appropriate provisions into the Articles of Association.

Summary

In order to avoid the risk of the Management Board of a joint stock company being incomplete due to the removal of a member of the Management Board from office, their resignation or the occurrence of other reasons preventing them from performing their duties, the delegation of a member of the Supervisory Board to act as a member of the Management Board may prove to be a helpful remedy for an emergency situation in the company.

Questions? Contact us

Adam Czarnota

Patrycja Wakuluk

Source: Rzeczpospolita

Date: 21.07.2023

Latest Knowledge

Announcement of Income Tax Reform

On 19 August, during a press conference, the Prime Minister announced a package of tax changes planned for next year. According to the announcement, the reform is intended, on the one hand, to ease the burden on the middle class and, on the other, to shift a greater fiscal burden onto the wealthiest individuals and the largest companies. We take a look at the proposals included in the announced package and explain what they might mean for taxpayers.

Family foundations and the tax authorities: what draft bill UD447 proposes and why this is not the end of the troubles

Family foundations were intended to provide entrepreneurs with a stable framework for intergenerational wealth management. Yet not even four years have passed since the first such foundations were established, and the rules governing their taxation are set to be changed once again. This is because the scale of interest and the practical problems uncovered have overwhelmed the drafters of the legislation, as best illustrated by the figures – 927 applications for individual tax rulings and 77 opinions issued from the Head of the National Revenue Administration. This does not, however, mean that family foundations are being used on a massive scale for aggressive tax optimisation. A significant proportion of the queries concerned simply how to correctly apply the complex regulations.

NIS2 and the National Cybersecurity System Act in transport: what you need to do before October 2026

The amended Act on the National Cybersecurity System (UKSC) has been in force since 3 April 2026. For transport sector undertakings, this means a specific compliance timeline, including an obligation to register with the National Cybersecurity System (KSC) registry by 3 October 2026. Failure to do so may result in substantial financial penalties, coupled with the risk of personal liability for senior management. Not every undertaking, however, automatically falls within the scope of the new regime. Read on to find out whether your organisation is affected and what you need to do before the deadline for preparation.

Family foundations: the government has done the maths and presented the bill

Three years. That’s how long we’ve been waiting for what the Council of Ministers had seen in the data from the outset – and has now disclosed in its review of the Family Foundation Act. The document not only diagnoses the problems, but also previews substantial changes to rules that founders and their advisers treated as settled and stable. And therein lies a problem that goes far beyond tax matters. If the rules of the game are changed while the game is being played, there can be neither planning stability nor trust in the law. It is no coincidence that one of the greatest concerns among entrepreneurs considering setting up a foundation is not the level of taxation, but the stability of the legal framework – which today is once again being called into question.

What the new swiss franc act means for banks

We now have a new Act on Special Measures for the Adjudication of Cases Concerning Loan Agreements Denominated in or Indexed to the Swiss Franc. The provisions come into force 14 days after publication. So now is a good time to look at what lies ahead and what banks should be doing today.

New draft Pay Transparency Act – what has changed since December 2025?

A second version of the draft act on strengthening the application of the right to equal pay for equal work or work of equal value between men and women has now been published. It refines procedures and deadlines and introduces a new supervisory body. We have already discussed the changes affecting the recruitment stage and the three pillars of the forthcoming pay transparency framework, noting that Poland will miss the EU transposition deadline of 7 June 2026. Now, we take a closer look at the further changes, new developments and risks that have emerged in the latest, April version of the draft.

Payment Services Regulation (PSR) – between consumer protection and due diligence

The draft Payment Services Regulation (PSR) is one of the most significant elements of the reform of the EU legal framework for payment services. Its principal aim is to enhance the security of cashless transactions and to reduce the scale of financial fraud, in particular that arising from the growth of digital channels. At the same time, the new rules are intended to introduce a liability model that will not result in risk being transferred entirely to financial institutions, whilst retaining an important role for independent due diligence on the part of the user.

Energy deregulation – key changes for businesses and energy consumers

The President has now signed the Energy Deregulation Act (UDER92). The new provisions cover both the relationships between energy undertakings and consumers, and matters relating to investment, district heating, and the administrative obligations of energy market participants. The Act introduces changes in the areas of billing, communication with consumers, grid connection, and the operations of undertakings in the energy and district heating sectors. We set out the key points to note.

Banking sector overview | Banking today and tomorrow | July 2026

Under the draft legislation, banks will be required to offer existing borrowers a switch from WIBOR-based to POLSTR-based interest rates, a mechanism intended to speed up the voluntary transition of financial instruments to the new benchmark. The banking sector has responded positively to the proposal, according to Tadeusz Białek, President of the Polish Bank Association.

Contact us:

Rafał Rapala

Rafał Rapala

Attorney-at-law / Partner / Head of Corporate Law and Corporate Litigation / M&A, Private Equity

+48 608 444 650

r.rapala@kochanski.pl

Adam Czarnota

Adam Czarnota

Advocate / Senior Associate / Corporate Law / Mergers & Acquisitions

+48 787 389 207

a.czarnota@kochanski.pl