Proper execution of share sale transactions

20 February 2024 | Knowledge, News

An overlooked key issue in the pre-transaction sale of shares is the need to obtain relevant consents to the transaction. We analyse examples of the most common solutions in this regard.

Companies & Partnerships Code, Articles of Association

The disposal of all or part of an entity’s shares may be subject to company consent or otherwise restricted. The co-owners may therefore delegate this power to another body, such as the general meeting or the supervisory board, if appointed.

If a shareholder decides to sell some or all of their shares to a third party that is not a shareholder, the articles of association may also contain provisions granting the other shareholders the preemptive right (Polish: prawo pierwokupu) to acquire these shares.

Change of control clause

One of the conditions precedent to the transaction, i.e. the fulfilment of which will make it impossible to conclude the final share transfer agreement, is the requirement to obtain written consents from the company’s key customers or counterparties to intended changes in its shareholding structure (change of control clause).

If such a key counterparty or customer is not informed of a planned change of control, there is a risk that the agreement may be terminated immediately, i.e. without any obligation to give notice.

KOWR’s preemptive right

The National Agricultural Support Centre (KOWR) has the pre-emptive right to purchase the shares sold if a single agricultural plot or the total area of agricultural land owned by the company is at least 5 hectares.

This right may be exercised within 2 months of the effective notification of an intended transaction. Any sale of shares that does not follow the above procedure is invalid.[1]

UOKiK President’s approval and regulated market

In the case of a transaction involving the acquisition of control over a third party (as defined in the Competition and Consumer Protection Act), the President of the Office of Competition and Consumer Protection (UOKiK) must also be notified of the intended concentration in order for the sale of shares to be valid. The UOKiK President’s approval is given in the form of a decision.[2]

Depending on the specifics of the transaction and the industry (banking or energy are good examples), it may be necessary to file an additional notification with the public administration authorities, e.g. the Polish Financial Supervision Authority (KNF), in order for the transaction to be valid.

To avoid any risks and, in the worst case scenario, to avoid the transaction being annulled, it is advisable to consult a lawyer and check whether the parties to the transaction have definitely obtained all the necessary consents.

Source: Rzeczpospolita

Date: 05.01.2024

Any questions? Contact

Patrycja Wakuluk

[1] Article 9 of the Agricultural System Formation Act;

[2] Article 13 of the Competition and Consumer Protection Act.

Latest Knowledge

What EU businesses need to know about foreign subsidies

Just two months after the Regulation came into force, the Commission launched a high-profile investigation into a contract awarded by the Bulgarian Ministry of Transport and Communications for the purchase of electric trains from a major Chinese manufacturer. This was intended to emphasise the EU’s stance on unfair competition and its determination to combat this phenomenon.

Labour law: what lies ahead in 2026?

Changes to the way the length of service is determined, new executive ordinances for foreigners, and new powers for the National Labour Inspectorate are just some of the changes in labour law that will come into force in 2026.

Protecting designs exhibited at trade fairs

How can intellectual property and designs that have already been presented to the public, for example at trade fairs, be protected? All you need to do is exercise your exhibition priority right. This mechanism allows you to file an application for such a design at a later date without affecting its novelty. Let’s see how it works in practice.

Contractual practices prohibited under the Data Act 

One of the key aspects of the Data Act is the introduction of provisions on prohibited contractual practices. These provisions are intended to protect businesses operating within the broadly understood digital industry that have a weaker contractual position.

Those who have data have power. The Data Act redistributes this power

The EU Data Act, which came into force in September 2025, represents a breakthrough in the regulation of data access and use. Data generated by devices, ranging from agricultural tractors and industrial machinery to solar panels and transport fleets, is no longer the sole property of manufacturers. Other market participants now have the opportunity to access and use this data to develop new, innovative products and services. The Data Act marks a departure from business models based on data monopolisation, to one requiring data to be shared in accordance with its rules. We are therefore entering a completely new reality.

KSeF and transfer pricing: a new era of transparency and operational challenges

The introduction of the National e-Invoice System (KSeF) represents one of the most significant challenges for group companies in recent years. Although the KSeF is intended to simplify the invoicing process and reduce tax abuse, it also has a significant impact on transfer pricing, particularly with regard to the documentation and settlement of TP adjustments.

Contributing assets to a family foundation – what to keep in mind

A family foundation is a legal entity whose purpose is to manage wealth effectively and ensure its succession without the risk of dispersing assets accumulated over generations. Therefore, a key issue related to the activities of such an organisation is the contribution of this wealth to the foundation in the form of various types of assets that will work for the beneficiaries. Let’s take a look at what this process involves in practice.

Cloud migration after the Data Act: new rights, lower costs and greater freedom

The Data Act requires a significant change in approach to cloud services. Companies should review their contracts and start planning updates immediately. It is crucial to introduce appropriate switching provisions and remove or renegotiate exit fees. Companies must also prepare their infrastructure, both technically and organisationally, for interoperability and migration in accordance with the new regulations.

Contact us:

Rafał Rapala

Rafał Rapala

Attorney-at-law / Partner / Head of Corporate Law and Corporate Litigation / M&A and Private Equity Transactions

+48 608 444 650

r.rapala@kochanski.pl