Proper execution of share sale transactions

20 February 2024 | Knowledge, News

An overlooked key issue in the pre-transaction sale of shares is the need to obtain relevant consents to the transaction. We analyse examples of the most common solutions in this regard.

Companies & Partnerships Code, Articles of Association

The disposal of all or part of an entity’s shares may be subject to company consent or otherwise restricted. The co-owners may therefore delegate this power to another body, such as the general meeting or the supervisory board, if appointed.

If a shareholder decides to sell some or all of their shares to a third party that is not a shareholder, the articles of association may also contain provisions granting the other shareholders the preemptive right (Polish: prawo pierwokupu) to acquire these shares.

Change of control clause

One of the conditions precedent to the transaction, i.e. the fulfilment of which will make it impossible to conclude the final share transfer agreement, is the requirement to obtain written consents from the company’s key customers or counterparties to intended changes in its shareholding structure (change of control clause).

If such a key counterparty or customer is not informed of a planned change of control, there is a risk that the agreement may be terminated immediately, i.e. without any obligation to give notice.

KOWR’s preemptive right

The National Agricultural Support Centre (KOWR) has the pre-emptive right to purchase the shares sold if a single agricultural plot or the total area of agricultural land owned by the company is at least 5 hectares.

This right may be exercised within 2 months of the effective notification of an intended transaction. Any sale of shares that does not follow the above procedure is invalid.[1]

UOKiK President’s approval and regulated market

In the case of a transaction involving the acquisition of control over a third party (as defined in the Competition and Consumer Protection Act), the President of the Office of Competition and Consumer Protection (UOKiK) must also be notified of the intended concentration in order for the sale of shares to be valid. The UOKiK President’s approval is given in the form of a decision.[2]

Depending on the specifics of the transaction and the industry (banking or energy are good examples), it may be necessary to file an additional notification with the public administration authorities, e.g. the Polish Financial Supervision Authority (KNF), in order for the transaction to be valid.

To avoid any risks and, in the worst case scenario, to avoid the transaction being annulled, it is advisable to consult a lawyer and check whether the parties to the transaction have definitely obtained all the necessary consents.

Source: Rzeczpospolita

Date: 05.01.2024

Any questions? Contact

Patrycja Wakuluk

[1] Article 9 of the Agricultural System Formation Act;

[2] Article 13 of the Competition and Consumer Protection Act.

Latest Knowledge

Dual-use items: how broad will the CJEU’s definition be?

A training aircraft designed for civilian purposes can also qualify as a military item. That’s a conclusion emerging from the Advocate General’s Opinion in Case C-538/25 (Flugzeugherstellerin) before the Court of Justice of the European Union. What does this mean for companies exporting goods from the EU?

Workplace harassment and discrimination: new regulations for employers

The Sejm has passed an amendment to the Labour Code concerning workplace harassment and discrimination. The changes introduce a broader definition of the concept itself, new forms of harassment, clearer definitions of what constitutes, for example, sexual harassment, and new rules governing the handling of such cases, including the reversal of the burden of proof, higher compensation awards, and the jurisdiction of district courts. The provisions will enter into force on 5 November 2026. We examine what will change and how much time remains to adapt company documents, policies, and the organisation as a whole.

ESG Roadmap. How to identify which regulations apply to your business and build a strategy

As we know, ESG in business is a roadmap made up of numerous obligations arising from different regulatory frameworks. That is why the right question is not “how do I meet all the requirements?” but rather “which of them apply to my business?”. This is a crucial distinction. We explain how to correctly diagnose your regulatory profile and build an effective ESG strategy – one that actually works and gives you a competitive edge.

Announcement of Income Tax Reform

On 19 August, during a press conference, the Prime Minister announced a package of tax changes planned for next year. According to the announcement, the reform is intended, on the one hand, to ease the burden on the middle class and, on the other, to shift a greater fiscal burden onto the wealthiest individuals and the largest companies. We take a look at the proposals included in the announced package and explain what they might mean for taxpayers.

Family foundations and the tax authorities: what draft bill UD447 proposes and why this is not the end of the troubles

Family foundations were intended to provide entrepreneurs with a stable framework for intergenerational wealth management. Yet not even four years have passed since the first such foundations were established, and the rules governing their taxation are set to be changed once again. This is because the scale of interest and the practical problems uncovered have overwhelmed the drafters of the legislation, as best illustrated by the figures – 927 applications for individual tax rulings and 77 opinions issued from the Head of the National Revenue Administration. This does not, however, mean that family foundations are being used on a massive scale for aggressive tax optimisation. A significant proportion of the queries concerned simply how to correctly apply the complex regulations.

Banking today and tomorrow | Financial sector overview | August 2026

Poland’s banking sector has reacted with concern to recent remarks by Katarzyna Pełczyńska-Nałęcz, the Minister of Development Funds and Regional Policy, who announced plans to put forward a proposal for a further increase in CIT levied on banks. The Minister’s reasoning, however, rests on a flawed conflation of the sector’s liquidity with its profitability, revealing a fundamental misunderstanding of how the banking sector operates and how its financial health is assessed. What is more, it feeds into a worrying trend of replacing substantive debate with simplistic, populist messaging which may be politically appealing but is not underpinned by either facts or economic analysis.

NIS2 and the National Cybersecurity System Act in transport: what you need to do before October 2026

The amended Act on the National Cybersecurity System (UKSC) has been in force since 3 April 2026. For transport sector undertakings, this means a specific compliance timeline, including an obligation to register with the National Cybersecurity System (KSC) registry by 3 October 2026. Failure to do so may result in substantial financial penalties, coupled with the risk of personal liability for senior management. Not every undertaking, however, automatically falls within the scope of the new regime. Read on to find out whether your organisation is affected and what you need to do before the deadline for preparation.

Family foundations: the government has done the maths and presented the bill

Three years. That’s how long we’ve been waiting for what the Council of Ministers had seen in the data from the outset – and has now disclosed in its review of the Family Foundation Act. The document not only diagnoses the problems, but also previews substantial changes to rules that founders and their advisers treated as settled and stable. And therein lies a problem that goes far beyond tax matters. If the rules of the game are changed while the game is being played, there can be neither planning stability nor trust in the law. It is no coincidence that one of the greatest concerns among entrepreneurs considering setting up a foundation is not the level of taxation, but the stability of the legal framework – which today is once again being called into question.

Contact us:

Rafał Rapala

Rafał Rapala

Attorney-at-law / Partner / Head of Corporate Law and Corporate Litigation / M&A, Private Equity

+48 608 444 650

r.rapala@kochanski.pl