Crowdfunding Inwestycyjny En

Prohibition of equity crowdfunding in limited liability companies  

7 November 2023 | Knowledge, News

On 10 November 2023, Article 48 of the Crowdfunding for Business Ventures and Borrowers Assistance Act will come into force. From then on, limited liability companies will no longer be able to use equity crowdfunding, which was previously available without restrictions. Let’s look at what changes businesses can expect in the Commercial Companies Code (KSH) with regard to crowdfunding.

Equity crowdfunding in limited liability companies

One form of crowdfunding is equity crowdfunding. An entrepreneur, in exchange for shares in the limited company they run, raises a certain amount of money from private investors in a public offering. This allows them to carry out specific projects and the backers become owners of a certain number of shares in the company they are backing.

Typically, these funds are raised through online crowdfunding platforms that are open to an unlimited number of private investors.

Prohibitions on equity crowdfunding in the amendments to the Commercial Companies Code

The amendments to the KSH prohibit shareholders of limited liability companies from offering:

  • the acquisition of existing shares (Article 1821 of the KSH)
  • subscriptions of newly created shares (Article 2571 of the KSH)

Most importantly, the regulations also prohibit the promotion of the acquisition and subscription of shares in a limited liability company.

Entrepreneurs are therefore not permitted to actively advertise or carry out other activities aimed at encouraging investors to financially support the planned project, such as organising events to promote start-ups or business breakfasts.

Investment crowdfunding – criminal consequences for offering to acquire both new and existing shares in a limited liability company and for violating the advertising ban

In accordance with the new Articles 5951 and 5952 of the KSH, anyone failing to comply with the above prohibitions is liable to a fine, a community sentence or imprisonment for up to six months. It is clear that the legislator has adopted a rather strict approach in this respect. Indeed, the list of sanctions includes not only fines but also community sentences and imprisonment.

Limited liability companies still able to issue bonds and borrow money

It’s worth noting that despite the introduction of the bans, entrepreneurs operating as limited liability companies will still be able to raise funds for projects by issuing bonds or taking out loans using crowdfunding.

No provision of the Commercial Companies Code prohibits such activities, nor will it do so in the near future. The legislator deliberately left a certain loophole in this respect in order not to deprive entrepreneurs of the possibility of obtaining external financing.

Source: Prawo.pl

Date: 7.11.2023

Questions? Contact us

Kamil Szczygieł

Latest Knowledge

Dual-use items: how broad will the CJEU’s definition be?

A training aircraft designed for civilian purposes can also qualify as a military item. That’s a conclusion emerging from the Advocate General’s Opinion in Case C-538/25 (Flugzeugherstellerin) before the Court of Justice of the European Union. What does this mean for companies exporting goods from the EU?

Workplace harassment and discrimination: new regulations for employers

The Sejm has passed an amendment to the Labour Code concerning workplace harassment and discrimination. The changes introduce a broader definition of the concept itself, new forms of harassment, clearer definitions of what constitutes, for example, sexual harassment, and new rules governing the handling of such cases, including the reversal of the burden of proof, higher compensation awards, and the jurisdiction of district courts. The provisions will enter into force on 5 November 2026. We examine what will change and how much time remains to adapt company documents, policies, and the organisation as a whole.

ESG Roadmap. How to identify which regulations apply to your business and build a strategy

As we know, ESG in business is a roadmap made up of numerous obligations arising from different regulatory frameworks. That is why the right question is not “how do I meet all the requirements?” but rather “which of them apply to my business?”. This is a crucial distinction. We explain how to correctly diagnose your regulatory profile and build an effective ESG strategy – one that actually works and gives you a competitive edge.

Announcement of Income Tax Reform

On 19 August, during a press conference, the Prime Minister announced a package of tax changes planned for next year. According to the announcement, the reform is intended, on the one hand, to ease the burden on the middle class and, on the other, to shift a greater fiscal burden onto the wealthiest individuals and the largest companies. We take a look at the proposals included in the announced package and explain what they might mean for taxpayers.

Family foundations and the tax authorities: what draft bill UD447 proposes and why this is not the end of the troubles

Family foundations were intended to provide entrepreneurs with a stable framework for intergenerational wealth management. Yet not even four years have passed since the first such foundations were established, and the rules governing their taxation are set to be changed once again. This is because the scale of interest and the practical problems uncovered have overwhelmed the drafters of the legislation, as best illustrated by the figures – 927 applications for individual tax rulings and 77 opinions issued from the Head of the National Revenue Administration. This does not, however, mean that family foundations are being used on a massive scale for aggressive tax optimisation. A significant proportion of the queries concerned simply how to correctly apply the complex regulations.

Banking today and tomorrow | Financial sector overview | August 2026

Poland’s banking sector has reacted with concern to recent remarks by Katarzyna Pełczyńska-Nałęcz, the Minister of Development Funds and Regional Policy, who announced plans to put forward a proposal for a further increase in CIT levied on banks. The Minister’s reasoning, however, rests on a flawed conflation of the sector’s liquidity with its profitability, revealing a fundamental misunderstanding of how the banking sector operates and how its financial health is assessed. What is more, it feeds into a worrying trend of replacing substantive debate with simplistic, populist messaging which may be politically appealing but is not underpinned by either facts or economic analysis.

NIS2 and the National Cybersecurity System Act in transport: what you need to do before October 2026

The amended Act on the National Cybersecurity System (UKSC) has been in force since 3 April 2026. For transport sector undertakings, this means a specific compliance timeline, including an obligation to register with the National Cybersecurity System (KSC) registry by 3 October 2026. Failure to do so may result in substantial financial penalties, coupled with the risk of personal liability for senior management. Not every undertaking, however, automatically falls within the scope of the new regime. Read on to find out whether your organisation is affected and what you need to do before the deadline for preparation.

Family foundations: the government has done the maths and presented the bill

Three years. That’s how long we’ve been waiting for what the Council of Ministers had seen in the data from the outset – and has now disclosed in its review of the Family Foundation Act. The document not only diagnoses the problems, but also previews substantial changes to rules that founders and their advisers treated as settled and stable. And therein lies a problem that goes far beyond tax matters. If the rules of the game are changed while the game is being played, there can be neither planning stability nor trust in the law. It is no coincidence that one of the greatest concerns among entrepreneurs considering setting up a foundation is not the level of taxation, but the stability of the legal framework – which today is once again being called into question.