Zamowienia_publiczne_en

New Supreme Court resolution – are we facing a slowdown in the operation of the Public Procurement Court

10 May 2023 | Knowledge, News, The Right Focus

On 26 April 2023, the Labour Chamber of the Supreme Court issued a resolution stating that the hearing of a civil case by a single judge in a court of second instance as allowed under the so-called Anti-Covid Act, restricts the right to a fair trial, as it is not necessary for the protection of public health, and will render the proceedings invalid. The resolution has the force of a legal rule and is effective from the date of its adoption.

What should be the composition of the court of second instance

In accordance with the Code of Civil Procedure, in appeal proceedings, cases are heard by a panel of three judges. An exception to this rule was only established by the Anti-Covid Act, which – due to the threats posed by the pandemic – allowed for single judges to hear cases.

Supreme Court resolution and the public procurement market

Apparently, the Supreme Court’s resolution might seem to have no particular relevance to the public procurement market.

This is because the Public Procurement Law has established a separate institution which examines disputes arising in the context of public procurement procedures, namely the National Appeal Chamber (Krajowa Izba Odwoławcza, KIO).

However, judgments rendered by the National Appeal Chamber may be appealed to the Public Procurement Court, i.e. the Regional Court in Warsaw, which applies the provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure on appeals and thus, also those concerning the composition of the court. In other words, the rule here is a panel of three judges.

Consequences of the new Supreme Court resolution

At present, it is difficult to clearly foresee the effects of the new resolution of the Supreme Court.

According to publicly available information, the Regional Court in Warsaw (and therefore also the 23rd Commercial Appeals and Public Procurement Division, which handles appeals) intends to comply with the resolution.

The immediate consequence of this decision has been the cancellation of some scheduled hearings and the addition of judges to adjudicating panels. In the future, this may also mean that appeal proceedings will be lengthened.

How do we assist in proceedings before the Public Procurement Court?

  • Review documents relating to public contract procedures and appeal proceedings before the National Appeal Chamber
  • Analyse the grounds of lodging an appeal against decisions of the National Appeal Chamber
  • Draft appeals against decisions of the National Appeal Chamber or replies to appeals, and represent parties before the Public Procurement Court

Questions? Contact the authors

Jakub Krysa, Ph.D.

Michał Waraksa

Latest Knowledge

Workplace harassment and discrimination: new regulations for employers

The Sejm has passed an amendment to the Labour Code concerning workplace harassment and discrimination. The changes introduce a broader definition of the concept itself, new forms of harassment, clearer definitions of what constitutes, for example, sexual harassment, and new rules governing the handling of such cases, including the reversal of the burden of proof, higher compensation awards, and the jurisdiction of district courts. The provisions will enter into force on 5 November 2026. We examine what will change and how much time remains to adapt company documents, policies, and the organisation as a whole.

ESG Roadmap. How to identify which regulations apply to your business and build a strategy

As we know, ESG in business is a roadmap made up of numerous obligations arising from different regulatory frameworks. That is why the right question is not “how do I meet all the requirements?” but rather “which of them apply to my business?”. This is a crucial distinction. We explain how to correctly diagnose your regulatory profile and build an effective ESG strategy – one that actually works and gives you a competitive edge.

Announcement of Income Tax Reform

On 19 August, during a press conference, the Prime Minister announced a package of tax changes planned for next year. According to the announcement, the reform is intended, on the one hand, to ease the burden on the middle class and, on the other, to shift a greater fiscal burden onto the wealthiest individuals and the largest companies. We take a look at the proposals included in the announced package and explain what they might mean for taxpayers.

Family foundations and the tax authorities: what draft bill UD447 proposes and why this is not the end of the troubles

Family foundations were intended to provide entrepreneurs with a stable framework for intergenerational wealth management. Yet not even four years have passed since the first such foundations were established, and the rules governing their taxation are set to be changed once again. This is because the scale of interest and the practical problems uncovered have overwhelmed the drafters of the legislation, as best illustrated by the figures – 927 applications for individual tax rulings and 77 opinions issued from the Head of the National Revenue Administration. This does not, however, mean that family foundations are being used on a massive scale for aggressive tax optimisation. A significant proportion of the queries concerned simply how to correctly apply the complex regulations.

Banking today and tomorrow | Financial sector overview | August 2026

Poland’s banking sector has reacted with concern to recent remarks by Katarzyna Pełczyńska-Nałęcz, the Minister of Development Funds and Regional Policy, who announced plans to put forward a proposal for a further increase in CIT levied on banks. The Minister’s reasoning, however, rests on a flawed conflation of the sector’s liquidity with its profitability, revealing a fundamental misunderstanding of how the banking sector operates and how its financial health is assessed. What is more, it feeds into a worrying trend of replacing substantive debate with simplistic, populist messaging which may be politically appealing but is not underpinned by either facts or economic analysis.

NIS2 and the National Cybersecurity System Act in transport: what you need to do before October 2026

The amended Act on the National Cybersecurity System (UKSC) has been in force since 3 April 2026. For transport sector undertakings, this means a specific compliance timeline, including an obligation to register with the National Cybersecurity System (KSC) registry by 3 October 2026. Failure to do so may result in substantial financial penalties, coupled with the risk of personal liability for senior management. Not every undertaking, however, automatically falls within the scope of the new regime. Read on to find out whether your organisation is affected and what you need to do before the deadline for preparation.

Family foundations: the government has done the maths and presented the bill

Three years. That’s how long we’ve been waiting for what the Council of Ministers had seen in the data from the outset – and has now disclosed in its review of the Family Foundation Act. The document not only diagnoses the problems, but also previews substantial changes to rules that founders and their advisers treated as settled and stable. And therein lies a problem that goes far beyond tax matters. If the rules of the game are changed while the game is being played, there can be neither planning stability nor trust in the law. It is no coincidence that one of the greatest concerns among entrepreneurs considering setting up a foundation is not the level of taxation, but the stability of the legal framework – which today is once again being called into question.

What the new swiss franc act means for banks

We now have a new Act on Special Measures for the Adjudication of Cases Concerning Loan Agreements Denominated in or Indexed to the Swiss Franc. The provisions come into force 14 days after publication. So now is a good time to look at what lies ahead and what banks should be doing today.