Legal Project Management: why you need a legal project manager  

16 October 2023 | Knowledge, News, The Right Focus

The globalisation of legal services, changing market realities and increasing competition have led to a project-based approach in the delivery of legal services, i.e. Legal Project Management (LPM), a standard in law firms around the world. This is particularly evident in the UK and the US, but LPM is also gaining ground in continental Europe.

Legal Project Management

LPM involves the application of project management principles and practices to enhance the delivery of legal services.[1]

LPM is a necessary response of modern law firms to the changing business expectations of clients, particularly in multi-faceted disputes, including international arbitration. Why?

The answer is simple: LPM brings tangible benefits to clients.

LPM: benefits for clients in their dispute resolution process

Legal services deliver real value by meeting expectations on price, time and quality of work, with clients receiving ongoing progress and budget utilisation information. Today’s businesses are looking to mitigate the risk of high legal costs and make more informed decisions about whether to proceed with legal action. In times of crisis and spiralling inflation, LPM provides stability and predictability in the cost of quality legal services.

LPM involves a professional expert, a legal project manager, who combines substantive knowledge and experience in a particular area of law with innovative project management techniques, often using the latest technological tools.

Such a manager works within or alongside project teams, ensuring that they adopt best management practices to maximise their efficiency and productivity.

Legal project managers reduce the administrative burden on their teams by carefully planning and monitoring schedules, milestones and risks to ensure operational efficiency.

LPM enables lawyers to work on the most strategic aspects of a case and focus on the elements that create real value for clients and the firm.

The legal project manager: a great asset to clients and their cases

The involvement of a legal project manager ensures a proactive approach to the client’s case and needs, with the procedural objectives being agreed with the client and monitored throughout the proceedings. From the legal project manager’s perspective, it is not the verdict that is of most value, but the business rationale and importance of the case to the client and its business interests. For this reason, great emphasis is placed on the transparency and quality of communication throughout the project.

Another benefit is the budget transparency referred to above. Using LPM techniques, the scope of work and the required budget can be more precisely defined, and following from this, processes can be planned to allow an efficiently changing of this scope as the project progresses and the expectations of the parties involved evolve in real time.

LPM guarantees clients continuous budget and resource monitoring throughout the project (dispute) cycle, as well as influence over any changes to the scope of work and risk allocation. This is particularly important in adaptive disputes, such as international arbitration, where procedural flexibility and the will of parties often lead to changes in the original scope of work or even in the key assumptions agreed with the client.

Similar benefits can be seen in any multi-faceted dispute that is cross-border, involves a number of stakeholders (often from different jurisdictions) or requires the active involvement of the client and its law firm or the cooperation of lawyers from different law firms.

In addition, shared familiarity with project methods and techniques facilitates mutual communication and increases the efficiency of working with clients and other organisations. This is particularly appreciated by clients for whom project work is an organisational standard.

Every dispute, including international arbitration, should be viewed as a project that requires a full assessment of the expectations and objectives of parties and other stakeholders, whose proper management, including appropriate project team leadership, will enable those objectives to be achieved most effectively.

LPM at Kochański & Partners

The use of LPM techniques and methods in disputes enables real time and cost savings to be made during proceedings (whether litigation or arbitration). It also ensures that the objectives of the proceedings and the expectations of the client, who is a party to the proceedings, are met.

As one of the first in the market, our Dispute Resolution Practice offers a comprehensive management of pending litigation and arbitration proceedings with a project-based approach. The team includes Magdalena Papiernik-König, an advocate and certified Legal Project PractitionerTM, accredited by the International Institute of Legal Project Management.

 

Any questions? Contact us

Magdalena Papiernik-König

 

[1] This definition is most often referred to by the International Institute of Legal Project Management; “IILPM”.

Latest Knowledge

Dual-use items: how broad will the CJEU’s definition be?

A training aircraft designed for civilian purposes can also qualify as a military item. That’s a conclusion emerging from the Advocate General’s Opinion in Case C-538/25 (Flugzeugherstellerin) before the Court of Justice of the European Union. What does this mean for companies exporting goods from the EU?

Workplace harassment and discrimination: new regulations for employers

The Sejm has passed an amendment to the Labour Code concerning workplace harassment and discrimination. The changes introduce a broader definition of the concept itself, new forms of harassment, clearer definitions of what constitutes, for example, sexual harassment, and new rules governing the handling of such cases, including the reversal of the burden of proof, higher compensation awards, and the jurisdiction of district courts. The provisions will enter into force on 5 November 2026. We examine what will change and how much time remains to adapt company documents, policies, and the organisation as a whole.

ESG Roadmap. How to identify which regulations apply to your business and build a strategy

As we know, ESG in business is a roadmap made up of numerous obligations arising from different regulatory frameworks. That is why the right question is not “how do I meet all the requirements?” but rather “which of them apply to my business?”. This is a crucial distinction. We explain how to correctly diagnose your regulatory profile and build an effective ESG strategy – one that actually works and gives you a competitive edge.

Announcement of Income Tax Reform

On 19 August, during a press conference, the Prime Minister announced a package of tax changes planned for next year. According to the announcement, the reform is intended, on the one hand, to ease the burden on the middle class and, on the other, to shift a greater fiscal burden onto the wealthiest individuals and the largest companies. We take a look at the proposals included in the announced package and explain what they might mean for taxpayers.

Family foundations and the tax authorities: what draft bill UD447 proposes and why this is not the end of the troubles

Family foundations were intended to provide entrepreneurs with a stable framework for intergenerational wealth management. Yet not even four years have passed since the first such foundations were established, and the rules governing their taxation are set to be changed once again. This is because the scale of interest and the practical problems uncovered have overwhelmed the drafters of the legislation, as best illustrated by the figures – 927 applications for individual tax rulings and 77 opinions issued from the Head of the National Revenue Administration. This does not, however, mean that family foundations are being used on a massive scale for aggressive tax optimisation. A significant proportion of the queries concerned simply how to correctly apply the complex regulations.

Banking today and tomorrow | Financial sector overview | August 2026

Poland’s banking sector has reacted with concern to recent remarks by Katarzyna Pełczyńska-Nałęcz, the Minister of Development Funds and Regional Policy, who announced plans to put forward a proposal for a further increase in CIT levied on banks. The Minister’s reasoning, however, rests on a flawed conflation of the sector’s liquidity with its profitability, revealing a fundamental misunderstanding of how the banking sector operates and how its financial health is assessed. What is more, it feeds into a worrying trend of replacing substantive debate with simplistic, populist messaging which may be politically appealing but is not underpinned by either facts or economic analysis.

NIS2 and the National Cybersecurity System Act in transport: what you need to do before October 2026

The amended Act on the National Cybersecurity System (UKSC) has been in force since 3 April 2026. For transport sector undertakings, this means a specific compliance timeline, including an obligation to register with the National Cybersecurity System (KSC) registry by 3 October 2026. Failure to do so may result in substantial financial penalties, coupled with the risk of personal liability for senior management. Not every undertaking, however, automatically falls within the scope of the new regime. Read on to find out whether your organisation is affected and what you need to do before the deadline for preparation.

Family foundations: the government has done the maths and presented the bill

Three years. That’s how long we’ve been waiting for what the Council of Ministers had seen in the data from the outset – and has now disclosed in its review of the Family Foundation Act. The document not only diagnoses the problems, but also previews substantial changes to rules that founders and their advisers treated as settled and stable. And therein lies a problem that goes far beyond tax matters. If the rules of the game are changed while the game is being played, there can be neither planning stability nor trust in the law. It is no coincidence that one of the greatest concerns among entrepreneurs considering setting up a foundation is not the level of taxation, but the stability of the legal framework – which today is once again being called into question.