Implementation of the Directives concerning contracts for the supply of digital content and contracts for the sale of goods

11 August 2022 | Knowledge, News

On 29 June 2022, the draft new legislation was submitted to the Sejm with a view to implement Directive 2019/770 on certain aspects concerning contracts for the supply of digital content and services, and Directive 2019/771 on certain aspects concerning contracts for the sale of goods. It is likely that the changes will enter into force nearly one year after the deadlines set in the Directives, since the new legislation should have been implemented into the Polish legal regime by 1 July 2021 and should have applied from 1 January 2022.

On 6 July 2022, the draft was referred to the first reading, but the related legislative work may take several more weeks or even months. The envisaged changes are expected to enter into force within 14 days of the implementing act being published.

Possible deterioration in the status of consumers

The draft provides for a number of changes to the current legislation. The Directives are based – with some exceptions – on the principle of maximum harmonisation. This means that national provisions may not be stricter or more lenient than those provided for in the implemented legislation. The drafters anticipate that some of the envisaged changes may result in an actual worsening of the status of consumers in their relations with companies.

Major changes

The draft provides for the exclusion of warranty (pl. rękojmia) and guarantee (pl. gwarancja) provisions in relations with consumers from the Civil Code and their transfer to the Consumer Rights Act.

It further provides for a number of changes to the hitherto binding provisions on the liability of traders towards consumers for defects of sold goods.

In adapting the Polish provisions to the wording of the Directives, the detailed conditions that goods must meet in order not to be deemed incompatible with the contract have been defined. The term “defective” is to be replaced by the phrase “not in conformity with the contract”, which is a return to the terminology used in consumer legislation several years ago.

The new legislation defines the temporal limits of traders’ liability under warranty and the scope of the shift of the burden of proof, also clarifying from which point in time traders are liable for the lack of conformity of its goods with the contract, which lack of conformity existed at the time of supply and became apparent within two years of supply.

The draft provides for significant changes to the regulations concerning consumer rights under warranty, as well as traders’ obligations related to those rights. In particular, this relates to the hierarchy of remedies available to consumers, who will have the right to first demand the restoration of the conformity of goods with the contract by repair or replacement, and only later – if the repair or replacement prove, for example, uneconomic – will they be able to exercise further rights, i.e. demand a price reduction or withdraw from the contract.

New regulations for consumers of digital services

The Consumer Rights Act is also to include new provisions on the rules and procedures for the exercise of the rights of consumers who are a party to a digital content or digital service contract. The draft provides, inter alia, for introducing a number of definitions of terms related to digital services (such as: goods with digital elements, digital environment, integration, compatibility, functionality, i.e. the ability of digital content, a digital service or goods to perform their functions having regard to their purpose, and interoperability), as well as the definition of the digital service itself.

The most significant provisions to be introduced into the Consumer Rights Act under the draft lay down:

  • The manner in which the obligation to provide digital content or digital services is to be fulfilled, and consumer rights in the event of non-performance,
  • Criteria for the conformity of digital content or digital services and the extent of traders’ liability for non-conformity,
  • The time limit within which the non-conformity of digital content or digital services gives rise to traders’ liability: according to the draft, traders will be liable for the non-conformity with the contract of digital content or digital services, delivered either in one go or in parts, when such non-conformity existed at the time of supply and became apparent within two years of supply. The new legislation introduces a presumption that the lack of conformity existed at the time of supply of digital content or digital services if such lack of conformity became apparent for up to one year following the supply of digital content or digital services, and
  • Rules for modifying digital content or digital services at the time of supply.

Mandatory guarantee elements

The draft further provides for the introduction of a list of mandatory elements that must be included by traders in their guarantee statements, including a clear statement that, in the event of non-conformity of sold items with the contract, the buyer is legally entitled to remedies from and at the expense of the seller, and that these remedies are not affected by the guarantee. The statement must also include the name and address of the guarantor, the procedure to be followed to use the guarantee and a list of items to which the guarantee applies and the guarantee terms.

Actions to be taken by traders

The new legislation implies changes to the rules of sale of goods, digital content and services. The content of the guarantees provided and the procedures relating to the handling and exercise of consumer claims will need to be reviewed and will likely be amended.

Any questions? Contact us

Latest Knowledge

Payment Services Regulation (PSR) – between consumer protection and due diligence

The draft Payment Services Regulation (PSR) is one of the most significant elements of the reform of the EU legal framework for payment services. Its principal aim is to enhance the security of cashless transactions and to reduce the scale of financial fraud, in particular that arising from the growth of digital channels. At the same time, the new rules are intended to introduce a liability model that will not result in risk being transferred entirely to financial institutions, whilst retaining an important role for independent due diligence on the part of the user.

Energy deregulation – key changes for businesses and energy consumers

The President has now signed the Energy Deregulation Act (UDER92). The new provisions cover both the relationships between energy undertakings and consumers, and matters relating to investment, district heating, and the administrative obligations of energy market participants. The Act introduces changes in the areas of billing, communication with consumers, grid connection, and the operations of undertakings in the energy and district heating sectors. We set out the key points to note.

Banking sector overview | Banking today and tomorrow | July 2026

Under the draft legislation, banks will be required to offer existing borrowers a switch from WIBOR-based to POLSTR-based interest rates, a mechanism intended to speed up the voluntary transition of financial instruments to the new benchmark. The banking sector has responded positively to the proposal, according to Tadeusz Białek, President of the Polish Bank Association.

“Withdraw from contract here” – what next for the new button in online shops, on trading platforms and in mobile apps?

From 19 June, national legislation was to require businesses in the European Union entering into distance contracts with consumers via an online interface to provide consumers with the option to withdraw from the contract via a dedicated function/button. However, due to Poland’s delay in transposing Directive 2023/2673, which requires the use of such a button, this obligation has been postponed in our country. We look at what remote contract withdrawal entails and which transactions the new feature will apply to.

Municipal master plans – new deadline, same old challenges

On 11 June 2026, the President signed into law a bill extending the deadline for municipalities to adopt their master plans (plany ogólne). The key deadline for adopting master plans was moved from 30 June to 31 August 2026. We examine the reasons behind this change and consider what the absence of a master plan might mean for potential investors and their future projects.

Record fines and the upcoming 21st sanctions package – what should businesses expect?

The past year has brought a series of enforcement actions that clearly signal a tightening approach by the Polish customs and revenue authorities towards breaches of the sanctions regime. Importantly, businesses should already be preparing for further changes, as the European Union has announced its 21st sanctions package and updated the list of designated persons and entities. We examine the key developments and offer guidance on how to minimise the risk of non-compliance.

A sea change in the rules governing board members’ liability for a company’s tax arrears

The bill amending the General Tax Code (No. UC138) fundamentally overhauls the rules governing the tax liability of third parties for capital companies’ tax arrears.  It comes in response to recent CJEU judgments, the Ombudsman’s February statement and the post-audit report of the Supreme Chamber of Audit (NIK) of December 2025. We examine what’s changing, who will be affected by the new rules and what steps are worth taking right now.

Partner in name, but only if male: the linguistic trap in Polish corporate law

One of the structures available under Polish law is the ‘spółka partnerska’ (professional partnership), modelled on the Anglo-Saxon Limited Liability Partnership. As defined in the Polish Commercial Companies Code, this is a vehicle for individuals practising liberal professions, such as doctors, architects and accountants. And yet, the provisions governing professional partnerships make no mention of their applicability to women. We therefore examine whether there is no room for female partners, feminine-gendered forms, or simply linguistic empathy.

Can you sue over words aimed at an entire community?

A damaging public statement does not necessarily refer to a specific individual. Sometimes, the author attributes negative characteristics to a whole group of people, portrays them as a threat or uses language that could be seen as demeaning. Statements of this kind frequently concern LGBTQ+ people. This raises the question: can a member of the targeted community bring a lawsuit seeking compensation or an apology, even if they were not named directly? We decided to look into this.