How to recapitalise a limited liability company

28 July 2023 | Knowledge, News

There are at least several ways in which a limited liability company can be recapitalised. The increase in the company’s share capital seems to be a standard and well-known form of recapitalisation, but there are also alternatives including additional payments and a shareholder loan.

Additional payments – an effective way to recapitalise the company

This can be an effective way to recapitalise a limited liability company. However, this is only possible where the shareholders have allowed for additional payments to be made by a separate provision in the Articles of Association. If the Articles of Association contain no provisions permitting the making of additional payments, then, in accordance with the Commercial Companies Code, no monetary contribution made by a shareholder to the company will qualify as an additional payment.

Additional payments to the capital of a limited liability company

Additional payments are allocated to the company’s legal reserve (and not to the share capital, as in the case of shareholders’ contributions increasing the share capital).

The funds may be used by the company to make planned investments, finance current operations, increase creditworthiness or cover losses[1].

The principle of proportionality and the reimbursement of additional payments

A company may not levy additional payments in an arbitrary manner, as, in accordance with the principle of proportionality, such payments should be imposed on and made by all shareholders equally, in proportion to their shareholding. Additional contributions may be reimbursed to the shareholders to the extent that they are not necessary to cover the loss shown in the company’s financial statements.

Loan agreements

By a loan agreement, the lender (in this case, a shareholder) agrees to transfer to the borrower (in this case, the company) a certain amount of money or things specified as to their kind only, and the borrower agrees to repay the same amount of money or return the same number/quantity of things of the same kind and quality. The agreement should contain provisions specifying the amount of the loan, the amount of interest and the terms and date of repayment.

Considerations when granting loans by shareholders who are also Management Board members

The conclusion of a loan agreement by a shareholder who is also a member of the Management Board of a limited liability company will require:

  • Consent of the Shareholders’ Meeting in the form of a resolution
  • A shareholders resolution consenting to the assumption of an obligation to provide a performance with a value of twice the amount of share capital, unless the Articles of Association exclude the application of Article 230 of the Commercial Companies Code
  • The appointment, via a Shareholders’ Meeting resolution, of an attorney for the company, or the representation of the company in the loan agreement by the Supervisory Board
  • In the case of a sole shareholder who is also a member of the Management Board – the loan agreement to be in the form of a notarial deed

 Key differences between additional payments and loan agreements

  • Apart from money, the subject of the loan agreement may also be things specified as to their kind (i.e. things specified by their generic characteristics, without individualising features)
  • Additional payments are made on the basis of a relevant provision in the Articles of Association and a resolution of the Shareholders’ Meeting
  • The loan agreement may be concluded in any form, unless the loan is granted by the sole shareholder who is also a Management Board member, in which case a notarial deed will be required for the agreement to be valid
  • Additional payments are made by all shareholders, subject to the principle of proportionality
  • A loan may be granted by either by one shareholder or several or all of them
  • The loan should be repayable and bear interest at market rates
  • The making of additional payments implies an obligation on the part of the shareholders to make a monetary contribution to the company, which may be refundable

Summary

When deciding to recapitalise a limited liability company, it is essential to be aware of the potential implications of the various forms of recapitalisation.

For company shareholders participating in both the company’s profits and losses, knowledge of these mechanisms is therefore crucial.

Questions? Contact us

Patrycja Wakuluk

Adam Czarnota

Source: Rzeczpospolita

Date: 7.07.2023

 

[1] Cf. resolution of the Supreme Court of 12 January 2010, III CZP 117/09, OSNC 2010, Nos. 7 to 8, item 103

Latest Knowledge

Payment Services Regulation (PSR) – between consumer protection and due diligence

The draft Payment Services Regulation (PSR) is one of the most significant elements of the reform of the EU legal framework for payment services. Its principal aim is to enhance the security of cashless transactions and to reduce the scale of financial fraud, in particular that arising from the growth of digital channels. At the same time, the new rules are intended to introduce a liability model that will not result in risk being transferred entirely to financial institutions, whilst retaining an important role for independent due diligence on the part of the user.

Energy deregulation – key changes for businesses and energy consumers

The President has now signed the Energy Deregulation Act (UDER92). The new provisions cover both the relationships between energy undertakings and consumers, and matters relating to investment, district heating, and the administrative obligations of energy market participants. The Act introduces changes in the areas of billing, communication with consumers, grid connection, and the operations of undertakings in the energy and district heating sectors. We set out the key points to note.

Banking sector overview | Banking today and tomorrow | July 2026

Under the draft legislation, banks will be required to offer existing borrowers a switch from WIBOR-based to POLSTR-based interest rates, a mechanism intended to speed up the voluntary transition of financial instruments to the new benchmark. The banking sector has responded positively to the proposal, according to Tadeusz Białek, President of the Polish Bank Association.

“Withdraw from contract here” – what next for the new button in online shops, on trading platforms and in mobile apps?

From 19 June, national legislation was to require businesses in the European Union entering into distance contracts with consumers via an online interface to provide consumers with the option to withdraw from the contract via a dedicated function/button. However, due to Poland’s delay in transposing Directive 2023/2673, which requires the use of such a button, this obligation has been postponed in our country. We look at what remote contract withdrawal entails and which transactions the new feature will apply to.

Municipal master plans – new deadline, same old challenges

On 11 June 2026, the President signed into law a bill extending the deadline for municipalities to adopt their master plans (plany ogólne). The key deadline for adopting master plans was moved from 30 June to 31 August 2026. We examine the reasons behind this change and consider what the absence of a master plan might mean for potential investors and their future projects.

Record fines and the upcoming 21st sanctions package – what should businesses expect?

The past year has brought a series of enforcement actions that clearly signal a tightening approach by the Polish customs and revenue authorities towards breaches of the sanctions regime. Importantly, businesses should already be preparing for further changes, as the European Union has announced its 21st sanctions package and updated the list of designated persons and entities. We examine the key developments and offer guidance on how to minimise the risk of non-compliance.

A sea change in the rules governing board members’ liability for a company’s tax arrears

The bill amending the General Tax Code (No. UC138) fundamentally overhauls the rules governing the tax liability of third parties for capital companies’ tax arrears.  It comes in response to recent CJEU judgments, the Ombudsman’s February statement and the post-audit report of the Supreme Chamber of Audit (NIK) of December 2025. We examine what’s changing, who will be affected by the new rules and what steps are worth taking right now.

Partner in name, but only if male: the linguistic trap in Polish corporate law

One of the structures available under Polish law is the ‘spółka partnerska’ (professional partnership), modelled on the Anglo-Saxon Limited Liability Partnership. As defined in the Polish Commercial Companies Code, this is a vehicle for individuals practising liberal professions, such as doctors, architects and accountants. And yet, the provisions governing professional partnerships make no mention of their applicability to women. We therefore examine whether there is no room for female partners, feminine-gendered forms, or simply linguistic empathy.

Can you sue over words aimed at an entire community?

A damaging public statement does not necessarily refer to a specific individual. Sometimes, the author attributes negative characteristics to a whole group of people, portrays them as a threat or uses language that could be seen as demeaning. Statements of this kind frequently concern LGBTQ+ people. This raises the question: can a member of the targeted community bring a lawsuit seeking compensation or an apology, even if they were not named directly? We decided to look into this.

Contact us:

Rafał Rapala

Rafał Rapala

Attorney-at-law / Partner / Head of Corporate Law and Corporate Litigation / M&A, Private Equity

+48 608 444 650

r.rapala@kochanski.pl

Adam Czarnota

Adam Czarnota

Advocate / Senior Associate / Corporate Law / Mergers & Acquisitions

+48 787 389 207

a.czarnota@kochanski.pl