How to recapitalise a limited liability company

28 July 2023 | Knowledge, News

There are at least several ways in which a limited liability company can be recapitalised. The increase in the company’s share capital seems to be a standard and well-known form of recapitalisation, but there are also alternatives including additional payments and a shareholder loan.

Additional payments – an effective way to recapitalise the company

This can be an effective way to recapitalise a limited liability company. However, this is only possible where the shareholders have allowed for additional payments to be made by a separate provision in the Articles of Association. If the Articles of Association contain no provisions permitting the making of additional payments, then, in accordance with the Commercial Companies Code, no monetary contribution made by a shareholder to the company will qualify as an additional payment.

Additional payments to the capital of a limited liability company

Additional payments are allocated to the company’s legal reserve (and not to the share capital, as in the case of shareholders’ contributions increasing the share capital).

The funds may be used by the company to make planned investments, finance current operations, increase creditworthiness or cover losses[1].

The principle of proportionality and the reimbursement of additional payments

A company may not levy additional payments in an arbitrary manner, as, in accordance with the principle of proportionality, such payments should be imposed on and made by all shareholders equally, in proportion to their shareholding. Additional contributions may be reimbursed to the shareholders to the extent that they are not necessary to cover the loss shown in the company’s financial statements.

Loan agreements

By a loan agreement, the lender (in this case, a shareholder) agrees to transfer to the borrower (in this case, the company) a certain amount of money or things specified as to their kind only, and the borrower agrees to repay the same amount of money or return the same number/quantity of things of the same kind and quality. The agreement should contain provisions specifying the amount of the loan, the amount of interest and the terms and date of repayment.

Considerations when granting loans by shareholders who are also Management Board members

The conclusion of a loan agreement by a shareholder who is also a member of the Management Board of a limited liability company will require:

  • Consent of the Shareholders’ Meeting in the form of a resolution
  • A shareholders resolution consenting to the assumption of an obligation to provide a performance with a value of twice the amount of share capital, unless the Articles of Association exclude the application of Article 230 of the Commercial Companies Code
  • The appointment, via a Shareholders’ Meeting resolution, of an attorney for the company, or the representation of the company in the loan agreement by the Supervisory Board
  • In the case of a sole shareholder who is also a member of the Management Board – the loan agreement to be in the form of a notarial deed

 Key differences between additional payments and loan agreements

  • Apart from money, the subject of the loan agreement may also be things specified as to their kind (i.e. things specified by their generic characteristics, without individualising features)
  • Additional payments are made on the basis of a relevant provision in the Articles of Association and a resolution of the Shareholders’ Meeting
  • The loan agreement may be concluded in any form, unless the loan is granted by the sole shareholder who is also a Management Board member, in which case a notarial deed will be required for the agreement to be valid
  • Additional payments are made by all shareholders, subject to the principle of proportionality
  • A loan may be granted by either by one shareholder or several or all of them
  • The loan should be repayable and bear interest at market rates
  • The making of additional payments implies an obligation on the part of the shareholders to make a monetary contribution to the company, which may be refundable

Summary

When deciding to recapitalise a limited liability company, it is essential to be aware of the potential implications of the various forms of recapitalisation.

For company shareholders participating in both the company’s profits and losses, knowledge of these mechanisms is therefore crucial.

Questions? Contact us

Patrycja Wakuluk

Adam Czarnota

Source: Rzeczpospolita

Date: 7.07.2023

 

[1] Cf. resolution of the Supreme Court of 12 January 2010, III CZP 117/09, OSNC 2010, Nos. 7 to 8, item 103

Latest Knowledge

Protecting yourself against tax risks in the deposit-return system

The deposit-return system has been in place since October 2025, raising significant tax concerns from the outset. Although the regulations came into force, it was unclear for a long time how to apply them in practice. Some of the regulations needed clarification, some solutions were missing and the published explanations did not cover all the key issues. Consequently, the market began to develop its own operating standards.

Banking sector overview | Banking today and tomorrow | March 2026

On 12 February 2026, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) issued a judgment concerning the use of the WIBOR index in loan agreements. The CJEU judges confirmed that, in consumer cases, courts cannot examine the correctness of the WIBOR calculation. The banks had correctly informed their clients about the reference rate in accordance with national and EU law.

The issue of the National Labour Inspectorate reform has resurfaced

A new draft law proposing changes to the way the National Labour Inspectorate operates has been submitted to the Sejm. During its first reading on 25 February, the draft was not rejected and was therefore referred to the Social Policy and Family Committee for further consideration. Despite the concerns and controversies raised so far, including by businesses, the legislature continues to pursue the thorough modernisation of Poland’s employment model, which involves increased supervision of the labour market and curbing the abuse of civil law contracts. In this article, we will take a look at the proposals included in the new draft and explain what they mean for businesses.

Polish AI boom

According to the latest data, nearly 15,000 companies dealing with artificial intelligence were registered in Poland in 2025.[1] This testifies to an undoubted boom in AI, as well as to the dynamic changes related to the development of this technology. However, amid the rush to implement AI, do companies consider the most important issue: securing the outcomes of their work and protecting themselves against competitors? In this article, we explore this issue and suggest ways to avoid costly problems.

Length of service now includes periods of self-employment

The length of service no longer depends solely on work carried out under a contract of employment. The amendment to the Labour Code introduces significant changes, as work carried out under civil law contracts or as part of business activity will now also be included when calculating service, which affects employees’ rights. What will this mean for employees and employers?

Banking sector overview | Banking today and tomorrow | February 2026

The Polish banking sector is undergoing intense reshuffling on a scale not seen for years. Large banks are changing owners, foreign players are shifting their strategies and new investors are entering the market. The question is whether these are just temporary shifts in capital or the beginning of lasting change in the industry’s balance of power.

31 January. Don’t forget about the DAC7 Directive

The deadline for meeting the obligations under the DAC7 directive and the Polish regulations implementing it is fast approaching. Online platform operators must fulfil their reporting obligations by 31 January 2026 at the latest with regard to 2025 data. For many, this is the final opportunity not only to prepare the required information, but also to verify whether DAC7 obligations apply to them and, if so, to what extent.

Contact us:

Rafał Rapala

Rafał Rapala

Attorney-at-law / Partner / Head of Corporate Law and Corporate Litigation / M&A and Private Equity Transactions

+48 608 444 650

r.rapala@kochanski.pl

Adam Czarnota

Adam Czarnota

Advocate / Senior Associate / Corporate Law / Mergers & Acquisitions

+48 787 389 207

a.czarnota@kochanski.pl