How to recapitalise a limited liability company

28 July 2023 | Knowledge, News

There are at least several ways in which a limited liability company can be recapitalised. The increase in the company’s share capital seems to be a standard and well-known form of recapitalisation, but there are also alternatives including additional payments and a shareholder loan.

Additional payments – an effective way to recapitalise the company

This can be an effective way to recapitalise a limited liability company. However, this is only possible where the shareholders have allowed for additional payments to be made by a separate provision in the Articles of Association. If the Articles of Association contain no provisions permitting the making of additional payments, then, in accordance with the Commercial Companies Code, no monetary contribution made by a shareholder to the company will qualify as an additional payment.

Additional payments to the capital of a limited liability company

Additional payments are allocated to the company’s legal reserve (and not to the share capital, as in the case of shareholders’ contributions increasing the share capital).

The funds may be used by the company to make planned investments, finance current operations, increase creditworthiness or cover losses[1].

The principle of proportionality and the reimbursement of additional payments

A company may not levy additional payments in an arbitrary manner, as, in accordance with the principle of proportionality, such payments should be imposed on and made by all shareholders equally, in proportion to their shareholding. Additional contributions may be reimbursed to the shareholders to the extent that they are not necessary to cover the loss shown in the company’s financial statements.

Loan agreements

By a loan agreement, the lender (in this case, a shareholder) agrees to transfer to the borrower (in this case, the company) a certain amount of money or things specified as to their kind only, and the borrower agrees to repay the same amount of money or return the same number/quantity of things of the same kind and quality. The agreement should contain provisions specifying the amount of the loan, the amount of interest and the terms and date of repayment.

Considerations when granting loans by shareholders who are also Management Board members

The conclusion of a loan agreement by a shareholder who is also a member of the Management Board of a limited liability company will require:

  • Consent of the Shareholders’ Meeting in the form of a resolution
  • A shareholders resolution consenting to the assumption of an obligation to provide a performance with a value of twice the amount of share capital, unless the Articles of Association exclude the application of Article 230 of the Commercial Companies Code
  • The appointment, via a Shareholders’ Meeting resolution, of an attorney for the company, or the representation of the company in the loan agreement by the Supervisory Board
  • In the case of a sole shareholder who is also a member of the Management Board – the loan agreement to be in the form of a notarial deed

 Key differences between additional payments and loan agreements

  • Apart from money, the subject of the loan agreement may also be things specified as to their kind (i.e. things specified by their generic characteristics, without individualising features)
  • Additional payments are made on the basis of a relevant provision in the Articles of Association and a resolution of the Shareholders’ Meeting
  • The loan agreement may be concluded in any form, unless the loan is granted by the sole shareholder who is also a Management Board member, in which case a notarial deed will be required for the agreement to be valid
  • Additional payments are made by all shareholders, subject to the principle of proportionality
  • A loan may be granted by either by one shareholder or several or all of them
  • The loan should be repayable and bear interest at market rates
  • The making of additional payments implies an obligation on the part of the shareholders to make a monetary contribution to the company, which may be refundable

Summary

When deciding to recapitalise a limited liability company, it is essential to be aware of the potential implications of the various forms of recapitalisation.

For company shareholders participating in both the company’s profits and losses, knowledge of these mechanisms is therefore crucial.

Questions? Contact us

Patrycja Wakuluk

Adam Czarnota

Source: Rzeczpospolita

Date: 7.07.2023

 

[1] Cf. resolution of the Supreme Court of 12 January 2010, III CZP 117/09, OSNC 2010, Nos. 7 to 8, item 103

Latest Knowledge

Whistleblower bill back in the Sejm

On 23 May, the Sejm (the lower house of the Polish Parliament) passed a bill on the protection of whistleblowers. We summarise what has changed from the previous versions, what needs special attention and what amendments the Senate has made.

Belka tax cut and what this means for companies

The Minister of Finance has announced a plan to reduce the Belka tax, to come into effect on 1 January 2025. And although he has said that the groundwork is already being laid, he has not yet revealed all the details of the proposed changes.

Liability of management board members

The liability of management board members is a complex and multifaceted issue. It is therefore worth taking a closer look at these issues, especially in light of recent developments.

Effectively managing collective redundancies

The labour market is seeing an increased number of collective redundancies. We check what rules govern collective redundancies and what obligations must be fulfilled in order to carry them out effectively.

SME Fund – Tomasz Szambelan accredited IP Scan provider

Tomasz Szambelan has been included in the list of accredited IP Scan providers maintained by the Polish Patent Office. The IP Scan service is part of the grant scheme for the filing of trade marks, designs and inventions from the European SME Fund.

New rules for setting fines for businesses by the President of UOKiK

At the beginning of April 2024, the President of the Office of Competition and Consumer Protection (UOKiK) published new clarifications on the determination of the amount of fines in cases related to the conclusion of agreements restrictive of competition and the abuse of dominant position.

Contact us:

Rafał Rapala

Rafał Rapala

Attorney at Law, Partner, Head of Corporate Practice, Shareholders Conflicts

+48 608 444 650

r.rapala@kochanski.pl

Adam Czarnota

Adam Czarnota

Advocate, Senior Associate

+48 787 389 207

a.czarnota@kochanski.pl