Kochanski Environment

High penalties for polluting the environment

28 September 2022 | Knowledge, News

Since the beginning of September, legislation significantly increasing penalties for environmental pollution has been in force. On 1 September 2022, after a relatively short 14-day vacatio legis, the Act Amending Certain Acts to Prevent Environmental Crime of 22 July 2022 (Journal of Laws, item 1726) entered into force.

The new act will help protect nature

The new act has amended the Criminal Code, the Misdemeanours Code, the Act on Liability of Collective Entities for Criminal Offences and the Act on Nature Protection by increasing the penalties for environmental pollution.

The most important changes include tougher penalties for the following offences:

  • Causing damage to nature such as destroying plants, animals, natural habitats – the minimum prison sentence has been increased to 3 months and the maximum has increased from 2 to 5 years,
  • Polluting the environment (air, water, and land surfaces) to a significant extent – both minimum and maximum prison sentences have increased (the latter: from 5 to 8 years), and the prison term has been extended up to 10 years in the case of damage caused by a system which requires a permit in order to be operated in an industrial plant,
  • Inadequate handling of waste (storage, disposal, processing, collection, transport, and recycling) in a manner causing threat to people or the environment – the maximum prison sentence has now been increased from 5 to 10 years and, in the case of cross-border import or export of waste, to 12 years,
  • Failure to maintain facilities to protect nature (water, air or land surface) from pollution or contamination – the minimum prison sentence has been increased to 3 months and the maximum increased from 2 to 5 years.

Tougher penalties for offences against the environment if people are also affected

In addition, the penalties for the said offences have been increased where there is significant environmental pollution, serious damage to human health, or fatalities.

In addition:

  • The amounts of fines for collective entities whose management commits an offence against the environment have been set (from PLN 10,000 to PLN 5,000,000), and the liability of a collective entity is no longer conditional on a prior final conviction of a manager,
  • The amounts of exemplary damages to be paid to the National Fund for Environmental Protection and Water Management (NFOŚiGW) have been set from PLN 10,000 to PLN 10,000,000. Such damages may (and in some cases must) be ordered by the court in the event of a conviction for an environmental crime.
  • Sanctions have also been extended to attempts or instigations to commit certain misdemeanours (littering in public, dumping debris, waste or scrap metal on forest or agricultural land, polluting a forest),
  • The penalty for burning vegetation has been significantly raised – the fine is now PLN 30,000,
  • The possibility of ordering a restoration obligation has been added,
  • Another addition is that a conviction for a crime against the environment has become a basis for excluding a contractor from a procedure for a public works concession contract.

How can you ensure full environmental compliance at your plant and avoid potential heavy fines? Please do not hesitate to contact us on any matters related to environmental law.

Wojciech Wrochna

Latest Knowledge

Dual-use items: how broad will the CJEU’s definition be?

A training aircraft designed for civilian purposes can also qualify as a military item. That’s a conclusion emerging from the Advocate General’s Opinion in Case C-538/25 (Flugzeugherstellerin) before the Court of Justice of the European Union. What does this mean for companies exporting goods from the EU?

Workplace harassment and discrimination: new regulations for employers

The Sejm has passed an amendment to the Labour Code concerning workplace harassment and discrimination. The changes introduce a broader definition of the concept itself, new forms of harassment, clearer definitions of what constitutes, for example, sexual harassment, and new rules governing the handling of such cases, including the reversal of the burden of proof, higher compensation awards, and the jurisdiction of district courts. The provisions will enter into force on 5 November 2026. We examine what will change and how much time remains to adapt company documents, policies, and the organisation as a whole.

ESG Roadmap. How to identify which regulations apply to your business and build a strategy

As we know, ESG in business is a roadmap made up of numerous obligations arising from different regulatory frameworks. That is why the right question is not “how do I meet all the requirements?” but rather “which of them apply to my business?”. This is a crucial distinction. We explain how to correctly diagnose your regulatory profile and build an effective ESG strategy – one that actually works and gives you a competitive edge.

Announcement of Income Tax Reform

On 19 August, during a press conference, the Prime Minister announced a package of tax changes planned for next year. According to the announcement, the reform is intended, on the one hand, to ease the burden on the middle class and, on the other, to shift a greater fiscal burden onto the wealthiest individuals and the largest companies. We take a look at the proposals included in the announced package and explain what they might mean for taxpayers.

Family foundations and the tax authorities: what draft bill UD447 proposes and why this is not the end of the troubles

Family foundations were intended to provide entrepreneurs with a stable framework for intergenerational wealth management. Yet not even four years have passed since the first such foundations were established, and the rules governing their taxation are set to be changed once again. This is because the scale of interest and the practical problems uncovered have overwhelmed the drafters of the legislation, as best illustrated by the figures – 927 applications for individual tax rulings and 77 opinions issued from the Head of the National Revenue Administration. This does not, however, mean that family foundations are being used on a massive scale for aggressive tax optimisation. A significant proportion of the queries concerned simply how to correctly apply the complex regulations.

Banking today and tomorrow | Financial sector overview | August 2026

Poland’s banking sector has reacted with concern to recent remarks by Katarzyna Pełczyńska-Nałęcz, the Minister of Development Funds and Regional Policy, who announced plans to put forward a proposal for a further increase in CIT levied on banks. The Minister’s reasoning, however, rests on a flawed conflation of the sector’s liquidity with its profitability, revealing a fundamental misunderstanding of how the banking sector operates and how its financial health is assessed. What is more, it feeds into a worrying trend of replacing substantive debate with simplistic, populist messaging which may be politically appealing but is not underpinned by either facts or economic analysis.

NIS2 and the National Cybersecurity System Act in transport: what you need to do before October 2026

The amended Act on the National Cybersecurity System (UKSC) has been in force since 3 April 2026. For transport sector undertakings, this means a specific compliance timeline, including an obligation to register with the National Cybersecurity System (KSC) registry by 3 October 2026. Failure to do so may result in substantial financial penalties, coupled with the risk of personal liability for senior management. Not every undertaking, however, automatically falls within the scope of the new regime. Read on to find out whether your organisation is affected and what you need to do before the deadline for preparation.

Family foundations: the government has done the maths and presented the bill

Three years. That’s how long we’ve been waiting for what the Council of Ministers had seen in the data from the outset – and has now disclosed in its review of the Family Foundation Act. The document not only diagnoses the problems, but also previews substantial changes to rules that founders and their advisers treated as settled and stable. And therein lies a problem that goes far beyond tax matters. If the rules of the game are changed while the game is being played, there can be neither planning stability nor trust in the law. It is no coincidence that one of the greatest concerns among entrepreneurs considering setting up a foundation is not the level of taxation, but the stability of the legal framework – which today is once again being called into question.