Error as a defect in a declaration of intent

17 November 2023 | Knowledge, News, The Right Focus

The Civil Code provides for a number of situations in which a defective declaration of intent is invalid or its effects can be avoided. These include ignorance or lack of freedom when making the declaration of intent, the ostensible nature of the declaration or a situation in which the declaration was made as a result of an error, deception or threat.

The conditions for the occurrence of a specific defect are strictly defined in the regulations and, depending on them, the declaration of intent will either be invalid or the person making the declaration of intent will be able to avoid its effects. Below is a brief analysis of the reasons why a declaration of intent may be considered to have been made in error.

No legal definition of error

The law does not provide a legal definition of error, but refers to the colloquial understanding of the word. An error as a defect in a declaration of intent consists in a misconception or lack of understanding on the part of the person making the declaration of intent, whether as to the content of the declaration of intent made or as to the actual state of affairs.

An error therefore means a discrepancy between reality and its reflection in the mind of the person making the declaration of intent.

For an error to be considered a defect in a declaration of intent, two conditions must be met: the error must be material and it must relate to the content of the transaction.

The right to avoid a declaration of intent does not apply to every type of error, but only to subjectively and objectively material errors.

Subjective and objective assessment of the materiality of errors

The subjective materiality of an error is assessed by considering how material the provision to which the error relates is to the person making the declaration (in most cases, an error relating to the characteristics of the subject matter of the performance will be material). The objective assessment of materiality boils down to a consideration of whether, in the same circumstances, a reasonable person would have made a declaration of intent with the same content if they had not acted under the influence of the error.

It is irrelevant whether the error relates to facts preceding or accompanying the transaction or to its effects. The misconception of the person making the declaration of intent may therefore relate to any element of the transaction. It may be an error as to the facts or an error as to the law. In order for the error to have legal significance, the person making the declaration of intent must be under its influence at the time of making the declaration.

It is important to note that an error may not be invoked if the person making the declaration of intent did so in a reckless manner, i.e. did not exercise due diligence in examining the factual circumstances, e.g. did not read the contents of the documents to be signed.

Declarations to third parties

The rule providing for the possibility of avoiding a declaration of intent made under the influence of an error is, however, subject to limitations in a situation where the declaration of intent was made to another person. In such a case, its legal effects can only be avoided if the error was caused by that person (even if it was not their fault), or if that person was aware of the error or could easily have noticed it.

It should be noted that if a declaration of intent is made to a third party, the avoidance must be made in writing. It is also important to observe the statutory time limit, i.e. one year after the discovery of the error at the latest.

Questions? Contact us

Adam Czarnota

Latest Knowledge

Belka tax cut and what this means for companies

The Minister of Finance has announced a plan to reduce the Belka tax, to come into effect on 1 January 2025. And although he has said that the groundwork is already being laid, he has not yet revealed all the details of the proposed changes.

Liability of management board members

The liability of management board members is a complex and multifaceted issue. It is therefore worth taking a closer look at these issues, especially in light of recent developments.

Effectively managing collective redundancies

The labour market is seeing an increased number of collective redundancies. We check what rules govern collective redundancies and what obligations must be fulfilled in order to carry them out effectively.

SME Fund – Tomasz Szambelan accredited IP Scan provider

Tomasz Szambelan has been included in the list of accredited IP Scan providers maintained by the Polish Patent Office. The IP Scan service is part of the grant scheme for the filing of trade marks, designs and inventions from the European SME Fund.

New rules for setting fines for businesses by the President of UOKiK

At the beginning of April 2024, the President of the Office of Competition and Consumer Protection (UOKiK) published new clarifications on the determination of the amount of fines in cases related to the conclusion of agreements restrictive of competition and the abuse of dominant position.

Contact us:

Adam Czarnota

Adam Czarnota

Advocate, Senior Associate

+48 787 389 207

a.czarnota@kochanski.pl