Error as a defect in a declaration of intent

17 November 2023 | Knowledge, News, The Right Focus

The Civil Code provides for a number of situations in which a defective declaration of intent is invalid or its effects can be avoided. These include ignorance or lack of freedom when making the declaration of intent, the ostensible nature of the declaration or a situation in which the declaration was made as a result of an error, deception or threat.

The conditions for the occurrence of a specific defect are strictly defined in the regulations and, depending on them, the declaration of intent will either be invalid or the person making the declaration of intent will be able to avoid its effects. Below is a brief analysis of the reasons why a declaration of intent may be considered to have been made in error.

No legal definition of error

The law does not provide a legal definition of error, but refers to the colloquial understanding of the word. An error as a defect in a declaration of intent consists in a misconception or lack of understanding on the part of the person making the declaration of intent, whether as to the content of the declaration of intent made or as to the actual state of affairs.

An error therefore means a discrepancy between reality and its reflection in the mind of the person making the declaration of intent.

For an error to be considered a defect in a declaration of intent, two conditions must be met: the error must be material and it must relate to the content of the transaction.

The right to avoid a declaration of intent does not apply to every type of error, but only to subjectively and objectively material errors.

Subjective and objective assessment of the materiality of errors

The subjective materiality of an error is assessed by considering how material the provision to which the error relates is to the person making the declaration (in most cases, an error relating to the characteristics of the subject matter of the performance will be material). The objective assessment of materiality boils down to a consideration of whether, in the same circumstances, a reasonable person would have made a declaration of intent with the same content if they had not acted under the influence of the error.

It is irrelevant whether the error relates to facts preceding or accompanying the transaction or to its effects. The misconception of the person making the declaration of intent may therefore relate to any element of the transaction. It may be an error as to the facts or an error as to the law. In order for the error to have legal significance, the person making the declaration of intent must be under its influence at the time of making the declaration.

It is important to note that an error may not be invoked if the person making the declaration of intent did so in a reckless manner, i.e. did not exercise due diligence in examining the factual circumstances, e.g. did not read the contents of the documents to be signed.

Declarations to third parties

The rule providing for the possibility of avoiding a declaration of intent made under the influence of an error is, however, subject to limitations in a situation where the declaration of intent was made to another person. In such a case, its legal effects can only be avoided if the error was caused by that person (even if it was not their fault), or if that person was aware of the error or could easily have noticed it.

It should be noted that if a declaration of intent is made to a third party, the avoidance must be made in writing. It is also important to observe the statutory time limit, i.e. one year after the discovery of the error at the latest.

Questions? Contact us

Adam Czarnota

Latest Knowledge

Act Amending the Labour Code or Poland’s response to the Equal Pay Directive

On 3 April 2025, a new draft Act Amending the Labour Code appeared on the website of the Sejm. Prepared by the Extraordinary Committee for Codification Amendments, it differs significantly from the original parliamentary draft implementing the Directive (print no. 934), the first reading of which took place on 6 February 2025. On 9 May 2025, the Sejm adopted the bill without amendments.

How a family foundation can protect itself from ‘black sheep’

Every family may unfortunately have members who can be confrontational, aggressive and uncooperative, who are in addition convinced that they are always right and that the world is always against them. They can create chaos and confusion, are a source of constant conflict or simply do not fit into the overall harmony. Sometimes we call them ‘black sheep’ because they cause difficult situations, place stress on relations or fail to meet expectations.

Key changes in tax scheme reporting (MDR)

The significant changes in the tax environment and the growing expectations for fiscal transparency have prompted the legislature to streamline the existing provisions on the system for reporting tax schemes (MDR), thereby eliminating some procedural ambiguities. According to ministerial announcements, the main aim of the amendments is to improve the readability, clarity and consistency of the reporting system and more closely align it with that in force in the wider EU.

Amendments to the General Tax Code

The Polish tax system could be in for a revolution. The Ministry of Finance has announced draft changes aimed at simplifying, streamlining and, in some areas, tightening the rules for dealing with the tax authorities.

Contact us:

Adam Czarnota

Adam Czarnota

Advocate / Senior Associate / Corporate Law / Mergers & Acquisitions

+48 787 389 207

a.czarnota@kochanski.pl