Don’t miss CRBR notification and update deadlines

18 March 2024 | Knowledge, News, The Right Focus

The Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing Act (Act) requires the notification and updating of information on the beneficial owners of partnerships and companies (and other entities referred to in Article 58 of the Act) to the Central Register of Beneficial Owners (CRBR).

Any natural person exercising control over such an entity (directly or indirectly), with such control being conferred by the power to exercise decisive influence over the acts or activities of that entity, should be identified in the notification as a beneficial owner, i.e. any person who:

  • Is a shareholder with the rights of ownership to more than 25% of the total number of shares
  • Holds more than 25% of the total number of votes in the governing body of that entity
  • Controls one or more legal persons which together hold more than 25% of the total number of shares or votes in their governing bodies
  • Exercises control over a legal entity by holding the powers referred to in Article 3(1) (37) of the Accounting Act of 29 September 1994 (Journal of Laws 2023, items 120 and 295)

In exceptional cases where beneficial owners cannot be identified or where their identity is in doubt, a natural person holding a senior management position (e.g. a management board member) should be identified in the notification as a substitute beneficial owner.

CRBR notification deadline

New entities should notify the CRBR no later than 14 days after their registration in the National Court Register (KRS). For subsequent notifications, the deadline is calculated from the actual date on which the event triggering the need to notify the CRBR occurred.

The date on which the event occurs will differ, depending on whether registration in the KRS is required for a change in information to become effective (e.g. constitutive changes, such as an increase in share capital and subscription of new shares) or whether an action becomes effective at the moment it is performed (e.g. changes in the management board, sale of shares) – being the date of registration in the KRS in the first case and the date of the specific action in the second. The deadline for making an update notification is 14 days after that date.

Penalties for failure to notify

Non-compliance with the CRBR notification requirements is subject to severe sanctions.

A fine of up to PLN 1 million may be imposed for:

  • Failure to notify or update information in a timely manner, or
  • Submitting factually inaccurate information

The initial notification and all subsequent updates must be made by electronic means at https://crbr.podatki.gov.pl

The notification should be signed with a qualified or trusted signature by a person authorised to represent the entity concerned, in accordance with the rules of representation.

Any questions? Contact

Adam Czarnota

Latest Knowledge

GLI – AI, Machine Learning & Big Data 2026: The Polish perspective on artificial intelligence law

Global Legal Insights (GLI) is a series of international publications by the Global Legal Group (GLG), authored by legal practitioners from around the world. It offers an up-to-date and highly practical guide to the applicable regulatory landscape, complemented by expert commentary on specific areas of law across different jurisdictions. In short: legislation and actionable know-how in one place.

Banking sector overview | Banking today and tomorrow | May 2026

“The end of the dream of free housing” – this is how the Polish Bank Association (Związek Banków Polskich) has characterised Thursday’s judgments of the Court of Justice of the European Union in cases concerning whether the claims of financial institutions against CHF mortgage borrowers have become time-barred.

Return deposits like VAT? The elephant in the room: the risks of the deposit-return system

The deposit-return system was supposed to be simple. Eco-friendly. Leak-proof. Tax-neutral. However, it took just a few months for serious doubts to emerge. The first loopholes are no longer just theoretical, they are in plain sight. The mechanisms for abuse can be described quite precisely, and the scale of potential losses may be much greater than anticipated. Below, we examine where the system is losing control and how this can be addressed.

NZIA – “Made in Europe” becomes a condition of market participation in the energy sector

The European Union has adopted a strategic course aimed at building its own production capacity in key technology sectors, including energy technologies. This policy is embodied in the Net-Zero Industry Act (NZIA), which redefines the rules of competitiveness, inter alia, in the renewable energy sector. In tenders, auctions and public support schemes, price is no longer the sole criterion for selecting a supplier. The NZIA imposes on contracting authorities and entities administering support schemes an obligation to evaluate bids also on the basis of the origin of the technology and other criteria specified in the Regulation. This change is systemic in nature and will affect all market participants – both producers and purchasers of energy technologies. In this article, I analyse how the new EU regulations will translate into business practice for companies operating in the European market.

WHT – Obligation to verify the beneficial owner status when paying dividends. An advance tax ruling by the Director of the National Revenue Administration Information Centre vs. explanations by the Minister of Finance

A Polish company paying dividends to a foreign parent company based in the EU may be exempt from withholding tax (WHT). When verifying eligibility for this exemption, is the company required to check whether the recipient of the dividend is its beneficial owner (BO)? It transpires that the Director of the National Revenue Administration Information Centre (KIS) and the Minister of Finance offer completely different answers to this question. What does this mean in practice? Let’s take a look.

Banking in 2026: technology, regulation and the new market landscape

The year 2026 will see the banking sector undergo its most dynamic transformation in a decade. The trends identified in Accenture’s Top Banking Trends FY26 report suggest that the sector is entering a phase in which technology and regulation will be inseparable, driving all aspects of change. However, it is regulation that determines the boundaries, pace and manner of implementation for new solutions. We take a look at what else the experts are focusing on.

Contact us:

Adam Czarnota

Adam Czarnota

Advocate / Senior Associate / Corporate Law / Mergers & Acquisitions

+48 787 389 207

a.czarnota@kochanski.pl