Definition of a ‘structure’ declared unconstitutional

17 July 2023 | Knowledge, News

On 4 July, the Constitutional Tribunal (CT) issued a landmark judgment (ref. SK 14/21) declaring the definition of a ‘structure’ in the Local Taxes and Levies Act unconstitutional.

The CT also stated that the current definition of a ‘structure’ in Article 1a(1) (2) of the Act will not be invalidated until 18 months after the judgment. Will this ruling have a significant impact on corporate finance? Let’s find out.

How the new definition will affect tax regulations

It is expected that the new definition of a ‘structure’ will lead to changes not only in the Local Taxes Act but also in the Income Taxes Acts. The most profound reform could also introduce solutions based on ad valorem property tax (Polish: “podatek katastralny”).

However, the question will inevitably arise as to whether it is worthwhile taking action with respect to both pending and closed proceedings under Article 1a(1) (2) of the Act.

This is because unconstitutionality is a ground for reopening proceedings that have been closed by a final decision. Therefore, in January 2025, when the CT ruling comes into force, taxable persons will be able to file for reopening such proceedings if the lawmakers do not amend the provision in question.

When it comes to pending proceedings, taxable persons should rely on the published ruling. If the CT declares a legal provision unconstitutional, this should be taken into account in the course of ongoing proceedings.

Summary

We need to wait and see the reasons for the judgment, which may provide guidance to the lawmakers in redefining the term ‘structure’, making it easier to draft possible amendments to the Act.

Our tax team can help your business prepare quickly and confidently for the property tax changes, and find the best solution for your case, whether pending or closed.

Any questions? Contact us

Wojciech Śliż

Jan Janukowicz

Source: Rzeczpospolita

Date:17.07.2023

Latest Knowledge

Banking sector overview | Banking today and tomorrow | May 2026

“The end of the dream of free housing” – this is how the Polish Bank Association (Związek Banków Polskich) has characterised Thursday’s judgments of the Court of Justice of the European Union in cases concerning whether the claims of financial institutions against CHF mortgage borrowers have become time-barred.

Return deposits like VAT? The elephant in the room: the risks of the deposit-return system

The deposit-return system was supposed to be simple. Eco-friendly. Leak-proof. Tax-neutral. However, it took just a few months for serious doubts to emerge. The first loopholes are no longer just theoretical, they are in plain sight. The mechanisms for abuse can be described quite precisely, and the scale of potential losses may be much greater than anticipated. Below, we examine where the system is losing control and how this can be addressed.

NZIA – “Made in Europe” becomes a condition of market participation in the energy sector

The European Union has adopted a strategic course aimed at building its own production capacity in key technology sectors, including energy technologies. This policy is embodied in the Net-Zero Industry Act (NZIA), which redefines the rules of competitiveness, inter alia, in the renewable energy sector. In tenders, auctions and public support schemes, price is no longer the sole criterion for selecting a supplier. The NZIA imposes on contracting authorities and entities administering support schemes an obligation to evaluate bids also on the basis of the origin of the technology and other criteria specified in the Regulation. This change is systemic in nature and will affect all market participants – both producers and purchasers of energy technologies. In this article, I analyse how the new EU regulations will translate into business practice for companies operating in the European market.

WHT – Obligation to verify the beneficial owner status when paying dividends. An advance tax ruling by the Director of the National Revenue Administration Information Centre vs. explanations by the Minister of Finance

A Polish company paying dividends to a foreign parent company based in the EU may be exempt from withholding tax (WHT). When verifying eligibility for this exemption, is the company required to check whether the recipient of the dividend is its beneficial owner (BO)? It transpires that the Director of the National Revenue Administration Information Centre (KIS) and the Minister of Finance offer completely different answers to this question. What does this mean in practice? Let’s take a look.

Banking in 2026: technology, regulation and the new market landscape

The year 2026 will see the banking sector undergo its most dynamic transformation in a decade. The trends identified in Accenture’s Top Banking Trends FY26 report suggest that the sector is entering a phase in which technology and regulation will be inseparable, driving all aspects of change. However, it is regulation that determines the boundaries, pace and manner of implementation for new solutions. We take a look at what else the experts are focusing on.

The new National Cybersecurity System

The amendment to the Act on the National Cybersecurity System (UKSC) is one of the most significant regulatory reforms in recent years. Its main objective is to align Polish law with Directive (EU) 2022/2555 of the European Parliament and of the Council. The directive, also known as NIS2, substantially raises digital security requirements across the Union. The Polish Act on the National Cybersecurity System has undergone a thorough overhaul, covering more organisations (with estimates suggesting nearly 40,000 entities), introducing more demanding obligations, statutory personal liability for management board members, and even more stringent rules for imposing financial penalties. In the case of the most serious violations, these penalties can reach 100 million PLN.

Contact us:

Wojciech Śliż

Wojciech Śliż

Tax Advisor / Partner / Tax Law

+48 539 110 037

w.sliz@kochanski.pl