Defence-side litigation finance

17 November 2023 | Knowledge, News, The Right Focus

Third-party funding (TPF) has been used successfully in arbitration and litigation for many years, and in our experience, has recently been increasingly used by Polish companies. What is it all about? In a nutshell, TPF is the payment by a specialised investment fund of costs related to the proceedings.

Third-party funding in practice

Before deciding whether or not to fund a case, the fund considers the risks involved in the dispute and assesses the likelihood of winning. If it decides that the likelihood of winning is high and the risk is limited, it will cover the costs of the proceedings in return for an agreed fee (which may be a multiple of the amount invested or a percentage of the amount awarded).

Third-party funding minimises the economic risk for the company in dispute. In fact, the company does not bear the costs of the litigation, even if it loses.

Funding also has another important benefit. Often the mere information that litigation funding has been obtained can induce the opponent to change its position and settle.

Third-party funding is most often considered from the perspective of the claimant, i.e. the entity initiating the proceedings.

This is because the claimant, when deciding to commence a dispute, takes into account the need to incur costs and secures its own funds in advance or makes use of external funding.

The situation is very different for the defendant, who is often surprised by the prospect of years of expensive litigation. Regardless of whether the other party’s claim is justified, the defendant must quickly find the resources to successfully defend its rights.

Litigation funds – support for the defendant

Defence-side litigation funding, although increasingly common, is still the exception rather than the rule. There are two reasons for this.

The first is a lack of awareness – defendant companies simply are not aware of the possibility of obtaining funding from litigation funds.

The second is that defendants have to meet additional conditions. This is because it is not enough for the fund to believe that the chances of a successful defence outweigh the risk of losing the case. The funding structure is somewhat more complicated and requires more creativity in identifying potential sources of profit for the fund.

Who can benefit from third-party funding

In what situations can defence-side funding be used? Most commonly, when the fund will be able to receive remuneration as a result of monetising the defendant’s success. There are many examples of such situations.

In our experience, funding can be obtained by a defendant who has a legitimate and substantial counterclaim against the claimant.

Another example would be disputes over revenue-generating assets and rights, such as property leases or intellectual property rights.

Funding may also be available, for example, in disputes over shareholdings in companies, multi-year exclusive distribution agreements, energy supply contracts or intellectual property rights.

Funds are also interested in disputes over the establishment of rights to an asset of significant value.

Questions? Contact me

Dominika Durchowska

Latest Knowledge

Eco Focus #4

Milena Kazanowska-Kędzierska and Aleksandra Pinkas look at how Polish companies are preparing for the implementation of the European Union Deforestation Regulation (EUDR), which aims to counteract the ongoing degradation of forests.

Increase in the minimum wage

On 12 September 2024, following negotiations in the Social Dialogue Council, the Council of Ministers adopted the Ordinance on the minimum wage and the minimum hourly rate for 2025.

Eco Focus #3

Milena Kazanowska-Kędzierska dispels doubts about EU deforestation regulation.

The sanction of free credit

There are already around 10,000 cases before the Polish courts in which borrowers claim that banks have violated the Consumer Credit Act. As a result of these lawsuits, the sanction of free credit could be applied.

Eco Focus #2

Milena Kazanowska-Kędzierska answers questions about the EU Deforestation Regulation (EUDR), this time focusing on the consequences for non-compliant companies and the monitoring system.