Defence-side litigation finance

17 November 2023 | Knowledge, News, The Right Focus

Third-party funding (TPF) has been used successfully in arbitration and litigation for many years, and in our experience, has recently been increasingly used by Polish companies. What is it all about? In a nutshell, TPF is the payment by a specialised investment fund of costs related to the proceedings.

Third-party funding in practice

Before deciding whether or not to fund a case, the fund considers the risks involved in the dispute and assesses the likelihood of winning. If it decides that the likelihood of winning is high and the risk is limited, it will cover the costs of the proceedings in return for an agreed fee (which may be a multiple of the amount invested or a percentage of the amount awarded).

Third-party funding minimises the economic risk for the company in dispute. In fact, the company does not bear the costs of the litigation, even if it loses.

Funding also has another important benefit. Often the mere information that litigation funding has been obtained can induce the opponent to change its position and settle.

Third-party funding is most often considered from the perspective of the claimant, i.e. the entity initiating the proceedings.

This is because the claimant, when deciding to commence a dispute, takes into account the need to incur costs and secures its own funds in advance or makes use of external funding.

The situation is very different for the defendant, who is often surprised by the prospect of years of expensive litigation. Regardless of whether the other party’s claim is justified, the defendant must quickly find the resources to successfully defend its rights.

Litigation funds – support for the defendant

Defence-side litigation funding, although increasingly common, is still the exception rather than the rule. There are two reasons for this.

The first is a lack of awareness – defendant companies simply are not aware of the possibility of obtaining funding from litigation funds.

The second is that defendants have to meet additional conditions. This is because it is not enough for the fund to believe that the chances of a successful defence outweigh the risk of losing the case. The funding structure is somewhat more complicated and requires more creativity in identifying potential sources of profit for the fund.

Who can benefit from third-party funding

In what situations can defence-side funding be used? Most commonly, when the fund will be able to receive remuneration as a result of monetising the defendant’s success. There are many examples of such situations.

In our experience, funding can be obtained by a defendant who has a legitimate and substantial counterclaim against the claimant.

Another example would be disputes over revenue-generating assets and rights, such as property leases or intellectual property rights.

Funding may also be available, for example, in disputes over shareholdings in companies, multi-year exclusive distribution agreements, energy supply contracts or intellectual property rights.

Funds are also interested in disputes over the establishment of rights to an asset of significant value.

Questions? Contact me

Dominika Durchowska

Latest Knowledge

GLI – AI, Machine Learning & Big Data 2026: The Polish perspective on artificial intelligence law

Global Legal Insights (GLI) is a series of international publications by the Global Legal Group (GLG), authored by legal practitioners from around the world. It offers an up-to-date and highly practical guide to the applicable regulatory landscape, complemented by expert commentary on specific areas of law across different jurisdictions. In short: legislation and actionable know-how in one place.

Banking sector overview | Banking today and tomorrow | May 2026

“The end of the dream of free housing” – this is how the Polish Bank Association (Związek Banków Polskich) has characterised Thursday’s judgments of the Court of Justice of the European Union in cases concerning whether the claims of financial institutions against CHF mortgage borrowers have become time-barred.

Return deposits like VAT? The elephant in the room: the risks of the deposit-return system

The deposit-return system was supposed to be simple. Eco-friendly. Leak-proof. Tax-neutral. However, it took just a few months for serious doubts to emerge. The first loopholes are no longer just theoretical, they are in plain sight. The mechanisms for abuse can be described quite precisely, and the scale of potential losses may be much greater than anticipated. Below, we examine where the system is losing control and how this can be addressed.

NZIA – “Made in Europe” becomes a condition of market participation in the energy sector

The European Union has adopted a strategic course aimed at building its own production capacity in key technology sectors, including energy technologies. This policy is embodied in the Net-Zero Industry Act (NZIA), which redefines the rules of competitiveness, inter alia, in the renewable energy sector. In tenders, auctions and public support schemes, price is no longer the sole criterion for selecting a supplier. The NZIA imposes on contracting authorities and entities administering support schemes an obligation to evaluate bids also on the basis of the origin of the technology and other criteria specified in the Regulation. This change is systemic in nature and will affect all market participants – both producers and purchasers of energy technologies. In this article, I analyse how the new EU regulations will translate into business practice for companies operating in the European market.

WHT – Obligation to verify the beneficial owner status when paying dividends. An advance tax ruling by the Director of the National Revenue Administration Information Centre vs. explanations by the Minister of Finance

A Polish company paying dividends to a foreign parent company based in the EU may be exempt from withholding tax (WHT). When verifying eligibility for this exemption, is the company required to check whether the recipient of the dividend is its beneficial owner (BO)? It transpires that the Director of the National Revenue Administration Information Centre (KIS) and the Minister of Finance offer completely different answers to this question. What does this mean in practice? Let’s take a look.

Banking in 2026: technology, regulation and the new market landscape

The year 2026 will see the banking sector undergo its most dynamic transformation in a decade. The trends identified in Accenture’s Top Banking Trends FY26 report suggest that the sector is entering a phase in which technology and regulation will be inseparable, driving all aspects of change. However, it is regulation that determines the boundaries, pace and manner of implementation for new solutions. We take a look at what else the experts are focusing on.