2024 Under the sign of ESG – The Taxonomy and its delegated acts

18 March 2024 | Knowledge, News, The Right Focus

The year 2024 will be marked by increased corporate preparation for sustainability reporting. In addition to the much-discussed requirements of the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) and the related European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS), the obligations under EU Regulation 2020/852 on the establishment of a framework to facilitate sustainable investment (Taxonomy Regulation) should not be forgotten.

Taxonomy Regulation – what obligations and challenges await businesses

The Regulation was developed as part of the European Green Deal to direct business activities and investments towards greater environmental sustainability, in line with the EU’s 2030 climate and energy targets.

According to the Taxonomy Regulation, for an activity to qualify as environmentally sustainable, it must:

Tabelka En

Detailed assessments of whether an activity contributes to or harms environmental objectives are made in accordance with technical screening criteria set out in Delegated Acts that have been developed and implemented in recent years.

In 2022, a delegated act covering the first two environmental objectives, i.e. climate change mitigation and adaptation, entered into force.

And since 1 January 2024, acts have been in force to establish additional technical screening criteria for the remaining four environmental objectives (Regulation 2023/2486) and to extend the list of activities covered by the taxonomy (Regulation 2023/2485).

Who is covered by the EU Taxonomy

The entities required to report are:

  • Large undertakings which are public interest entities such as listed companies, banks, insurance companies, or parent undertakings of a large group with more than 500 employees, and are subject to the obligation to disclose non-financial data in accordance with the requirements of Directive 2014/95/EU (NFRD, which was transposed into Polish law in 2017 as part of the amendment to the Accounting Act)
  • Entities in the financial sector that offer investment products described as sustainable
  • From financial year 2024, companies obliged to provide sustainability information in accordance with the updated CSRD

Under the CSRD, some companies (and more in subsequent years) will have to start reporting as early as 2025, depending on their size and on whether they meet certain criteria. And this is not just about taxonomic issues, but also about more detailed sustainability information, including climate aspects and topics that have not been required so far, such as:

  • Presenting the organisation’s plans of transformation and transition towards a low-carbon future,
  • Presenting due diligence mechanisms on the organisation’s environmental impacts,
  • Reporting on double materiality – the impact of climate change and physical risks on the organisation’s financial performance and situation
  • Reporting on the organisation’s impact on the environment

This means that the necessary solutions should be prepared and developed immediately.

At the same time, the range of reportable activities has expanded with the adoption of new delegated acts. The EU Taxonomy Regulation and delegated acts in the area of environmental objectives cover dozens of business activities or types of investment that have the greatest impact on climate change, including in the energy, manufacturing, forestry and transport sectors. In addition, taxonomy reporting includes an obligation to indicate the percentage of revenue, capital expenditure (CAPEX) and operating expenditure (OPEX) related to environmentally sustainable products and services.

In practice, CSRD obligations will also include taxonomy reporting. The two pillars of corporate ‘greening’ – Taxonomy and ESG reporting – will thus meet in one place. Taxonomy reports, prepared on the basis of delegated acts, will become part of CSRD reporting and their scope will be extended to other groups progressively covered by the Directive.

In addition, financial institutions are required to report the share of their investment portfolios that are Taxonomy-eligible and Taxonomy-aligned. These portfolios include both companies that are required to make taxonomy reports and those that are not. Financial institutions can therefore ask non-reporting companies about their Taxonomy eligibility and alignment, irrespective of the requirement to publicly report this information. Voluntary reporting can give a company a competitive advantage with investors.

Benefits of reporting

The expanding range of Taxonomy-reported activities and market expectations make it necessary to adapt to regulatory requirements, and to do so well in advance.

The effect of taxonomy reporting is that the business environment (customers, suppliers, investors) has access to structured data presented by the company according to standardised criteria, identifying sustainable activities. Taxonomy reporting shows not only what sustainable activities a company is currently engaged in, but also how it plans to increase sustainability in the future.

With this in mind, companies should already be taking the necessary steps to align or improve their processes in line with the reporting requirements associated with the EU Taxonomy.

Questions? Contact us

Latest Knowledge

Payment Services Regulation (PSR) – between consumer protection and due diligence

The draft Payment Services Regulation (PSR) is one of the most significant elements of the reform of the EU legal framework for payment services. Its principal aim is to enhance the security of cashless transactions and to reduce the scale of financial fraud, in particular that arising from the growth of digital channels. At the same time, the new rules are intended to introduce a liability model that will not result in risk being transferred entirely to financial institutions, whilst retaining an important role for independent due diligence on the part of the user.

Energy deregulation – key changes for businesses and energy consumers

The President has now signed the Energy Deregulation Act (UDER92). The new provisions cover both the relationships between energy undertakings and consumers, and matters relating to investment, district heating, and the administrative obligations of energy market participants. The Act introduces changes in the areas of billing, communication with consumers, grid connection, and the operations of undertakings in the energy and district heating sectors. We set out the key points to note.

Banking sector overview | Banking today and tomorrow | July 2026

Under the draft legislation, banks will be required to offer existing borrowers a switch from WIBOR-based to POLSTR-based interest rates, a mechanism intended to speed up the voluntary transition of financial instruments to the new benchmark. The banking sector has responded positively to the proposal, according to Tadeusz Białek, President of the Polish Bank Association.

“Withdraw from contract here” – what next for the new button in online shops, on trading platforms and in mobile apps?

From 19 June, national legislation was to require businesses in the European Union entering into distance contracts with consumers via an online interface to provide consumers with the option to withdraw from the contract via a dedicated function/button. However, due to Poland’s delay in transposing Directive 2023/2673, which requires the use of such a button, this obligation has been postponed in our country. We look at what remote contract withdrawal entails and which transactions the new feature will apply to.

Municipal master plans – new deadline, same old challenges

On 11 June 2026, the President signed into law a bill extending the deadline for municipalities to adopt their master plans (plany ogólne). The key deadline for adopting master plans was moved from 30 June to 31 August 2026. We examine the reasons behind this change and consider what the absence of a master plan might mean for potential investors and their future projects.

Record fines and the upcoming 21st sanctions package – what should businesses expect?

The past year has brought a series of enforcement actions that clearly signal a tightening approach by the Polish customs and revenue authorities towards breaches of the sanctions regime. Importantly, businesses should already be preparing for further changes, as the European Union has announced its 21st sanctions package and updated the list of designated persons and entities. We examine the key developments and offer guidance on how to minimise the risk of non-compliance.

A sea change in the rules governing board members’ liability for a company’s tax arrears

The bill amending the General Tax Code (No. UC138) fundamentally overhauls the rules governing the tax liability of third parties for capital companies’ tax arrears.  It comes in response to recent CJEU judgments, the Ombudsman’s February statement and the post-audit report of the Supreme Chamber of Audit (NIK) of December 2025. We examine what’s changing, who will be affected by the new rules and what steps are worth taking right now.

Partner in name, but only if male: the linguistic trap in Polish corporate law

One of the structures available under Polish law is the ‘spółka partnerska’ (professional partnership), modelled on the Anglo-Saxon Limited Liability Partnership. As defined in the Polish Commercial Companies Code, this is a vehicle for individuals practising liberal professions, such as doctors, architects and accountants. And yet, the provisions governing professional partnerships make no mention of their applicability to women. We therefore examine whether there is no room for female partners, feminine-gendered forms, or simply linguistic empathy.

Can you sue over words aimed at an entire community?

A damaging public statement does not necessarily refer to a specific individual. Sometimes, the author attributes negative characteristics to a whole group of people, portrays them as a threat or uses language that could be seen as demeaning. Statements of this kind frequently concern LGBTQ+ people. This raises the question: can a member of the targeted community bring a lawsuit seeking compensation or an apology, even if they were not named directly? We decided to look into this.

Contact us:

Lukasz Mlynarkiewicz, PhD

Lukasz Mlynarkiewicz, PhD

Attorney-at-law / Partner / Head of the Infrastructure, Energy, Environment and ESG Practice Group / Nuclear Energy

+48 788 260 125

l.mlynarkiewicz@kochanski.pl