2024 Under the sign of ESG – The Taxonomy and its delegated acts

18 March 2024 | Knowledge, News, The Right Focus

The year 2024 will be marked by increased corporate preparation for sustainability reporting. In addition to the much-discussed requirements of the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) and the related European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS), the obligations under EU Regulation 2020/852 on the establishment of a framework to facilitate sustainable investment (Taxonomy Regulation) should not be forgotten.

Taxonomy Regulation – what obligations and challenges await businesses

The Regulation was developed as part of the European Green Deal to direct business activities and investments towards greater environmental sustainability, in line with the EU’s 2030 climate and energy targets.

According to the Taxonomy Regulation, for an activity to qualify as environmentally sustainable, it must:

Tabelka En

Detailed assessments of whether an activity contributes to or harms environmental objectives are made in accordance with technical screening criteria set out in Delegated Acts that have been developed and implemented in recent years.

In 2022, a delegated act covering the first two environmental objectives, i.e. climate change mitigation and adaptation, entered into force.

And since 1 January 2024, acts have been in force to establish additional technical screening criteria for the remaining four environmental objectives (Regulation 2023/2486) and to extend the list of activities covered by the taxonomy (Regulation 2023/2485).

Who is covered by the EU Taxonomy

The entities required to report are:

  • Large undertakings which are public interest entities such as listed companies, banks, insurance companies, or parent undertakings of a large group with more than 500 employees, and are subject to the obligation to disclose non-financial data in accordance with the requirements of Directive 2014/95/EU (NFRD, which was transposed into Polish law in 2017 as part of the amendment to the Accounting Act)
  • Entities in the financial sector that offer investment products described as sustainable
  • From financial year 2024, companies obliged to provide sustainability information in accordance with the updated CSRD

Under the CSRD, some companies (and more in subsequent years) will have to start reporting as early as 2025, depending on their size and on whether they meet certain criteria. And this is not just about taxonomic issues, but also about more detailed sustainability information, including climate aspects and topics that have not been required so far, such as:

  • Presenting the organisation’s plans of transformation and transition towards a low-carbon future,
  • Presenting due diligence mechanisms on the organisation’s environmental impacts,
  • Reporting on double materiality – the impact of climate change and physical risks on the organisation’s financial performance and situation
  • Reporting on the organisation’s impact on the environment

This means that the necessary solutions should be prepared and developed immediately.

At the same time, the range of reportable activities has expanded with the adoption of new delegated acts. The EU Taxonomy Regulation and delegated acts in the area of environmental objectives cover dozens of business activities or types of investment that have the greatest impact on climate change, including in the energy, manufacturing, forestry and transport sectors. In addition, taxonomy reporting includes an obligation to indicate the percentage of revenue, capital expenditure (CAPEX) and operating expenditure (OPEX) related to environmentally sustainable products and services.

In practice, CSRD obligations will also include taxonomy reporting. The two pillars of corporate ‘greening’ – Taxonomy and ESG reporting – will thus meet in one place. Taxonomy reports, prepared on the basis of delegated acts, will become part of CSRD reporting and their scope will be extended to other groups progressively covered by the Directive.

In addition, financial institutions are required to report the share of their investment portfolios that are Taxonomy-eligible and Taxonomy-aligned. These portfolios include both companies that are required to make taxonomy reports and those that are not. Financial institutions can therefore ask non-reporting companies about their Taxonomy eligibility and alignment, irrespective of the requirement to publicly report this information. Voluntary reporting can give a company a competitive advantage with investors.

Benefits of reporting

The expanding range of Taxonomy-reported activities and market expectations make it necessary to adapt to regulatory requirements, and to do so well in advance.

The effect of taxonomy reporting is that the business environment (customers, suppliers, investors) has access to structured data presented by the company according to standardised criteria, identifying sustainable activities. Taxonomy reporting shows not only what sustainable activities a company is currently engaged in, but also how it plans to increase sustainability in the future.

With this in mind, companies should already be taking the necessary steps to align or improve their processes in line with the reporting requirements associated with the EU Taxonomy.

Questions? Contact us

Latest Knowledge

Protecting yourself against tax risks in the deposit-return system

The deposit-return system has been in place since October 2025, raising significant tax concerns from the outset. Although the regulations came into force, it was unclear for a long time how to apply them in practice. Some of the regulations needed clarification, some solutions were missing and the published explanations did not cover all the key issues. Consequently, the market began to develop its own operating standards.

Banking sector overview | Banking today and tomorrow | March 2026

On 12 February 2026, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) issued a judgment concerning the use of the WIBOR index in loan agreements. The CJEU judges confirmed that, in consumer cases, courts cannot examine the correctness of the WIBOR calculation. The banks had correctly informed their clients about the reference rate in accordance with national and EU law.

The issue of the National Labour Inspectorate reform has resurfaced

A new draft law proposing changes to the way the National Labour Inspectorate operates has been submitted to the Sejm. During its first reading on 25 February, the draft was not rejected and was therefore referred to the Social Policy and Family Committee for further consideration. Despite the concerns and controversies raised so far, including by businesses, the legislature continues to pursue the thorough modernisation of Poland’s employment model, which involves increased supervision of the labour market and curbing the abuse of civil law contracts. In this article, we will take a look at the proposals included in the new draft and explain what they mean for businesses.

Polish AI boom

According to the latest data, nearly 15,000 companies dealing with artificial intelligence were registered in Poland in 2025.[1] This testifies to an undoubted boom in AI, as well as to the dynamic changes related to the development of this technology. However, amid the rush to implement AI, do companies consider the most important issue: securing the outcomes of their work and protecting themselves against competitors? In this article, we explore this issue and suggest ways to avoid costly problems.

Length of service now includes periods of self-employment

The length of service no longer depends solely on work carried out under a contract of employment. The amendment to the Labour Code introduces significant changes, as work carried out under civil law contracts or as part of business activity will now also be included when calculating service, which affects employees’ rights. What will this mean for employees and employers?

Banking sector overview | Banking today and tomorrow | February 2026

The Polish banking sector is undergoing intense reshuffling on a scale not seen for years. Large banks are changing owners, foreign players are shifting their strategies and new investors are entering the market. The question is whether these are just temporary shifts in capital or the beginning of lasting change in the industry’s balance of power.

31 January. Don’t forget about the DAC7 Directive

The deadline for meeting the obligations under the DAC7 directive and the Polish regulations implementing it is fast approaching. Online platform operators must fulfil their reporting obligations by 31 January 2026 at the latest with regard to 2025 data. For many, this is the final opportunity not only to prepare the required information, but also to verify whether DAC7 obligations apply to them and, if so, to what extent.

Contact us:

Lukasz Mlynarkiewicz, PhD

Lukasz Mlynarkiewicz, PhD

Attorney-at-law / Partner / Head of the Infrastructure, Energy, Environment and ESG Practice Group / Nuclear Energy

+48 788 260 125

l.mlynarkiewicz@kochanski.pl