TPF En

Third-party litigation funding

20 February 2024 | Knowledge, News

Although they impose a heavy financial burden on the companies involved, disputes are an integral part of doing business. And what effectively enables parties to meet the costs associated with litigation is third-party funding, or TPF.

Who is third-party funding for

Third-party funding is a good solution not only for those who do not have sufficient funds to engage in lengthy litigation, but also for all participants in court or arbitration proceedings.

TPF makes it possible to minimise the economic risk of conducting protracted litigation and removes the requirement to pay for the costs of the proceedings, even if the funded party loses.

Moreover, TPF can be used by both the claimant and the defendant. It should be noted, however, that the availability of funding depends on the possibility for the fund to recoup its investment if the case is won.

TPF in practice

Third-party litigation funding can be attractive for a number of reasons.

Firstly, it enables the use of the best lawyers and experts.

Secondly, it allows for a sound assessment of the merits of the claim by an independent body, usually before the case even starts.

Finally, it can influence the attitude of the litigant’s opponent by encouraging them to settle.

The fund usually charges a percentage of the amount awarded in return for its support. In addition, access to external funding may be subject to certain conditions, such as consent to settle or reporting requirements.

The main disadvantage of TPFs is their limited availability, as they tend to be allocated to support high-value cases. However, in each case funding bodies will analyse the potential return on investment.

How TPF works in the European Union

 The litigation finance market remains largely unregulated.

In 2022, the European Parliament adopted a resolution calling on the European Commission to regulate TPF in the EU. However, this initiative has been put on hold while the Commission conducts an in-depth study of the litigation funding market.

As a result, there is no uniform law on TPF in the Union, which means that these issues are regulated at the national level.

In Poland, too, there is no specific legislation on TPF and the domestic courts deal with the issue only sporadically. There are, however, a few isolated court judgments declaring TPF admissible.

Recently, we have seen that third-party funding has started to be used for lower value disputes, which opens up new opportunities, particularly for those whose claims would previously have been insufficient, for example in the case of class action.

Third-party funding is becoming more common in Europe, both in litigation and arbitration.

According to Burford Capital, the European TPF market reached a value of approximately EUR 2.8 billion in 2023, an increase of 21.7 percent compared to the previous year.

TPF for non-profit organisations

The growing popularity of third-party litigation funding for non-profit organisations (NFP-TPF) is also noteworthy.

This is likely to be a significant phenomenon in the near future in environmental, social and corporate responsibility disputes, particularly in the context of the growing importance of ESG reporting.

Source: Rzeczpospolita

Date: 2.02.2024

Latest Knowledge

The new National Cybersecurity System

The amendment to the Act on the National Cybersecurity System (UKSC) is one of the most significant regulatory reforms in recent years. Its main objective is to align Polish law with Directive (EU) 2022/2555 of the European Parliament and of the Council. The directive, also known as NIS2, substantially raises digital security requirements across the Union. The Polish Act on the National Cybersecurity System has undergone a thorough overhaul, covering more organisations (with estimates suggesting nearly 40,000 entities), introducing more demanding obligations, statutory personal liability for management board members, and even more stringent rules for imposing financial penalties. In the case of the most serious violations, these penalties can reach 100 million PLN.

‘Made in Europe’ is no longer just a slogan. It is becoming law

Until recently, ‘Made in Europe’ was just a label. While it was useful for marketing purposes, it lacked any hard, normative content. This may soon change. On 4 March, the European Commission published a proposal for the Industrial Accelerator Act, stipulating that, from 2027 onwards, the Union origin of components will be a prerequisite for participating in renewable energy auctions, accessing public funding, and for being eligible to participate in public procurement procedures. The slogan ‘Buy European’ could become a concrete instrument for supporting local production and controlling foreign investment.

Non-obvious cases of transferring an establishment to a new employer

The transfer of all or part of an establishment (zakład pracy) is a special concept in labour law relating to changes in ownership. Put simply, it is the automatic transfer of all the rights and obligations of the employer from one entity to another, without the need for any additional actions or consents from the parties involved. However, this must be preceded by the fulfilment of a range of informing obligations by both the new and former employers. Let’s take a look at what the process should involve.

Protecting yourself against tax risks in the deposit-return system

The deposit-return system has been in place since October 2025, raising significant tax concerns from the outset. Although the regulations came into force, it was unclear for a long time how to apply them in practice. Some of the regulations needed clarification, some solutions were missing and the published explanations did not cover all the key issues. Consequently, the market began to develop its own operating standards.

Banking sector overview | Banking today and tomorrow | March 2026

On 12 February 2026, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) issued a judgment concerning the use of the WIBOR index in loan agreements. The CJEU judges confirmed that, in consumer cases, courts cannot examine the correctness of the WIBOR calculation. The banks had correctly informed their clients about the reference rate in accordance with national and EU law.

The issue of the National Labour Inspectorate reform has resurfaced

A new draft law proposing changes to the way the National Labour Inspectorate operates has been submitted to the Sejm. During its first reading on 25 February, the draft was not rejected and was therefore referred to the Social Policy and Family Committee for further consideration. Despite the concerns and controversies raised so far, including by businesses, the legislature continues to pursue the thorough modernisation of Poland’s employment model, which involves increased supervision of the labour market and curbing the abuse of civil law contracts. In this article, we will take a look at the proposals included in the new draft and explain what they mean for businesses.

Polish AI boom

According to the latest data, nearly 15,000 companies dealing with artificial intelligence were registered in Poland in 2025.[1] This testifies to an undoubted boom in AI, as well as to the dynamic changes related to the development of this technology. However, amid the rush to implement AI, do companies consider the most important issue: securing the outcomes of their work and protecting themselves against competitors? In this article, we explore this issue and suggest ways to avoid costly problems.