Remote work and sobriety testing – what changes await in the draft amendment to the Labor Code

1 December 2022 | Knowledge, News

Remote work and sobriety testing provisions are the main thrust of the draft amendment to the Labour Code, being currently worked on by the Extraordinary Committee for Codification Amendments after the second reading in the Sejm.

Sobriety testing by employers

The draft allows the employer to check the sobriety of employees with the proviso that this is done with the intention to ensure the protection of life and health or the protection of property. Such testing must respect the dignity of employees and not infringe their personal rights.

Provisions specifying the groups of employees to be tested and the manner of testing, including the type of testing device used by employers, and the frequency and purpose of testing should be introduced in collective bargaining agreements or work regulations – or in a notice if employers are not obliged to introduce work regulations, and made known to employees no later than 2 weeks before the start of testing.

The above information should be provided in paper or electronic form to new hires who will be subject to sobriety testing prior to their starting work.

The draft also sets out rules for the processing of personal data and information obtained in connection with conducted employee sobriety testing. Among other things, such data must be kept in employee personal file for a period not exceeding one year from the date of its collection, and only if necessary for the protection of life and health of employees or other persons, or the protection of property. This period shall be extended in the event that the data is used in connection with the incurring of a disciplinary sanction or used as evidence in proceedings.

New regulations on remote work

The draft defines remote work as “work performed wholly or partially at a place designated by the employee and agreed with the employer on a case-by-case basis, including at the employee’s home address, in particular using means of remote communication.”

Remote work arrangements may be introduced at the conclusion of an employment contract or in the course of employment – either at the initiative of the employer or at the request of an employee.

The draft also allows employers to introduce remote work during states of epidemic or epidemic threat and 3 months after their lifting, and when they are unable to ensure a safe and hygienic working environment due to force majeure.

At an employee’s request, it will also be possible to work remotely on an occasional basis for up to 24 days per calendar year. The employer will then be released from certain obligations, including the obligation to cover the costs of remote work.

Unless not possible due to the organisation of work or the type of work performed by the employee, the draft requires employers to grant the request to work remotely in the case of:

  • Employees who are the parents of children with a certificate of disability or a certificate of a moderate or significant degree of disability
  • Employees who are the parents of children with an opinion on the need for early development support, a statement of special educational needs, or statements on the need for remedial classes
  • Pregnant employees
  • Employees raising a child to the age of 4
  • Employees caring for another member of their immediate family or another person remaining in the same household, who has a certificate of disability or a certificate of a significant degree of disability.

If the request is refused, the employer must inform the employee on paper or electronically of reasons for refusal within 7 working days of such request being made.

Rules for remote work

The rules on the performance of remote work should be set out by the employer in consultation with a trade union organisation or organisations, if present. If no organisations are present at the employer, remote working rules will be introduced into employment regulations after consultations with employee representatives selected according to the standard procedure at that employer.

When introducing remote working, the employer should specify, in particular:

  • The group of employees who may be covered by remote working
  • Costs and payment rules
  • Testing rules
  • The means of communication with the employee, including the method of confirming attendance at work
  • Personal data protection and training rules.

The draft requires employers to provide relevant equipment and materials needed for remote work, including installation, service and maintenance of equipment, and cover costs of electricity and telecommunications services and other costs related to the performance of remote work.

Employees may perform work remotely after submitting a statement on paper or electronically, confirming that safe and hygienic working conditions are present at the remote work site, as agreed with the employer.

The draft also introduces a list of types of work that may not be performed remotely, including:

  • Particularly hazardous work
  • Work which results in permissible standards for physical agents laid down for living quarters being exceeded
  • Work involving the use or release of harmful biological agents, radioactive substances, or substances causing heavy soiling.

Remote work inspections

The employer, in consultation with the employee, will be able to conduct inspections of the remote work site. The following may be inspected: occupational health and safety or compliance with information security and protection requirements, including data protection procedures. The inspections must take place during the employee’s working hours.

When the Labour Code amendment comes into force

The amendment will enter into force 14 days after the date of publication, except for the remote working provisions, which will become effective two months after the publication date.

Any questions? Contact the authors

Monika Politowska-Bar

Aleksandra Orlik

Latest Knowledge

Payment Services Regulation (PSR) – between consumer protection and due diligence

The draft Payment Services Regulation (PSR) is one of the most significant elements of the reform of the EU legal framework for payment services. Its principal aim is to enhance the security of cashless transactions and to reduce the scale of financial fraud, in particular that arising from the growth of digital channels. At the same time, the new rules are intended to introduce a liability model that will not result in risk being transferred entirely to financial institutions, whilst retaining an important role for independent due diligence on the part of the user.

Energy deregulation – key changes for businesses and energy consumers

The President has now signed the Energy Deregulation Act (UDER92). The new provisions cover both the relationships between energy undertakings and consumers, and matters relating to investment, district heating, and the administrative obligations of energy market participants. The Act introduces changes in the areas of billing, communication with consumers, grid connection, and the operations of undertakings in the energy and district heating sectors. We set out the key points to note.

Banking sector overview | Banking today and tomorrow | July 2026

Under the draft legislation, banks will be required to offer existing borrowers a switch from WIBOR-based to POLSTR-based interest rates, a mechanism intended to speed up the voluntary transition of financial instruments to the new benchmark. The banking sector has responded positively to the proposal, according to Tadeusz Białek, President of the Polish Bank Association.

“Withdraw from contract here” – what next for the new button in online shops, on trading platforms and in mobile apps?

From 19 June, national legislation was to require businesses in the European Union entering into distance contracts with consumers via an online interface to provide consumers with the option to withdraw from the contract via a dedicated function/button. However, due to Poland’s delay in transposing Directive 2023/2673, which requires the use of such a button, this obligation has been postponed in our country. We look at what remote contract withdrawal entails and which transactions the new feature will apply to.

Municipal master plans – new deadline, same old challenges

On 11 June 2026, the President signed into law a bill extending the deadline for municipalities to adopt their master plans (plany ogólne). The key deadline for adopting master plans was moved from 30 June to 31 August 2026. We examine the reasons behind this change and consider what the absence of a master plan might mean for potential investors and their future projects.

Record fines and the upcoming 21st sanctions package – what should businesses expect?

The past year has brought a series of enforcement actions that clearly signal a tightening approach by the Polish customs and revenue authorities towards breaches of the sanctions regime. Importantly, businesses should already be preparing for further changes, as the European Union has announced its 21st sanctions package and updated the list of designated persons and entities. We examine the key developments and offer guidance on how to minimise the risk of non-compliance.

A sea change in the rules governing board members’ liability for a company’s tax arrears

The bill amending the General Tax Code (No. UC138) fundamentally overhauls the rules governing the tax liability of third parties for capital companies’ tax arrears.  It comes in response to recent CJEU judgments, the Ombudsman’s February statement and the post-audit report of the Supreme Chamber of Audit (NIK) of December 2025. We examine what’s changing, who will be affected by the new rules and what steps are worth taking right now.

Partner in name, but only if male: the linguistic trap in Polish corporate law

One of the structures available under Polish law is the ‘spółka partnerska’ (professional partnership), modelled on the Anglo-Saxon Limited Liability Partnership. As defined in the Polish Commercial Companies Code, this is a vehicle for individuals practising liberal professions, such as doctors, architects and accountants. And yet, the provisions governing professional partnerships make no mention of their applicability to women. We therefore examine whether there is no room for female partners, feminine-gendered forms, or simply linguistic empathy.

Can you sue over words aimed at an entire community?

A damaging public statement does not necessarily refer to a specific individual. Sometimes, the author attributes negative characteristics to a whole group of people, portrays them as a threat or uses language that could be seen as demeaning. Statements of this kind frequently concern LGBTQ+ people. This raises the question: can a member of the targeted community bring a lawsuit seeking compensation or an apology, even if they were not named directly? We decided to look into this.