Contractual penalties and the correct completion of the European Single Procurement Document

29 November 2022 | Knowledge, News

The Public Procurement Office has published a legal opinion outlining the rules for the correct completion of the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD) with regard to the grounds for exclusion from the procedure due to non-performance or improper performance of a contract. The Office stated that economic operators are not obliged to inform the contracting authority of every contractual penalty imposed on them in the past. So which penalties must be mentioned in the ESPD, and which may be omitted?

Contractual penalties – how they relate to bidding for public contracts

Economic operators interested in participating in tenders must demonstrate that there are no grounds for their exclusion from a public procurement procedure.

Such grounds are either mandatory, i.e. statutory (the contracting authority has no control over their application in the procedure), or optional, i.e. depending on the discretion of the contracting authority.

The opinion of the Public Procurement Office refers to one of the optional grounds for exclusion, whereby the bid of an economic operator is to be rejected from the procedure if the economic operator “has failed to perform or has improperly performed, to a significant degree or extent, or has been improperly performing for a long period of time, any material obligation arising from a previous public procurement or concession contract, which led to termination of or withdrawal from the contract, to compensation, substitute performance or the exercise of rights under a statutory warranty for defects”. The Office considered whether this provision also covered contractual penalties and if so, in what situations an economic operation should disclose in the ESPD the fact that such penalties have been charged on it.

Disclosure of contractual penalties – compensatory penalties only

The Office confirmed that the compensation referred to above also includes contractual penalties accrued in the past as a result of the non-performance or improper performance of a public contract or concession. However, it emphasised that such penalties may have different functions, not only compensatory.

In the Office’s view, in the ESPD, economic operators should disclose compensatory penalties only, i.e. those intended to compensate for damage caused by the economic operator’s breach of contractual obligations.

How to complete the European Single Procurement Document without risking exclusion

The opinion of the Public Procurement Office raises many questions. Its practical application will require economic operators to analyse each case in which contractual penalties have been charged by the contracting authority and assess whether these penalties were compensatory.

The matter is all the more complicated as in many cases these penalties are a surrogate for compensation, even though their amount may be unrelated to the actual extent of the damage suffered by the contracting authority. However, the Office has not identified any criteria for distinguishing a compensatory contractual penalty from other contractual penalties.

How we help with the bidding process in a public procurement procedure

  • Assist with the completion of tender documents, including the ESPD,
  • Assist in the self-cleaning procedure,
  • Represent economic operators before the National Appeal Chamber (KIO) in case of bid rejection and exclusion.

Any questions? Contact the authors:

dr Jakub Krysa

Michał Waraksa


See also

Withdrawal from and termination of a contract – latest recommendations of the State Treasury Solicitors’ Office

Latest Knowledge

Act Amending the Labour Code or Poland’s response to the Equal Pay Directive

On 3 April 2025, a new draft Act Amending the Labour Code appeared on the website of the Sejm. Prepared by the Extraordinary Committee for Codification Amendments, it differs significantly from the original parliamentary draft implementing the Directive (print no. 934), the first reading of which took place on 6 February 2025. On 9 May 2025, the Sejm adopted the bill without amendments.

How a family foundation can protect itself from ‘black sheep’

Every family may unfortunately have members who can be confrontational, aggressive and uncooperative, who are in addition convinced that they are always right and that the world is always against them. They can create chaos and confusion, are a source of constant conflict or simply do not fit into the overall harmony. Sometimes we call them ‘black sheep’ because they cause difficult situations, place stress on relations or fail to meet expectations.

Key changes in tax scheme reporting (MDR)

The significant changes in the tax environment and the growing expectations for fiscal transparency have prompted the legislature to streamline the existing provisions on the system for reporting tax schemes (MDR), thereby eliminating some procedural ambiguities. According to ministerial announcements, the main aim of the amendments is to improve the readability, clarity and consistency of the reporting system and more closely align it with that in force in the wider EU.

Amendments to the General Tax Code

The Polish tax system could be in for a revolution. The Ministry of Finance has announced draft changes aimed at simplifying, streamlining and, in some areas, tightening the rules for dealing with the tax authorities.

Contact us:

Jakub Krysa, PhD

Jakub Krysa, PhD

Attorney at Law, Of Counsel, Public Procurement

+48 784 084 522

j.krysa@kochanski.pl