Workplace harassment and discrimination: new regulations for employers

14 September 2026 | Knowledge, News, The Right Focus

The Sejm has passed an amendment to the Labour Code concerning workplace harassment and discrimination.

The changes introduce a broader definition of the concept itself, new forms of harassment, clearer definitions of what constitutes, for example, sexual harassment, and new rules governing the handling of such cases, including the reversal of the burden of proof, higher compensation awards, and the jurisdiction of district courts.

The provisions will enter into force on 5 November 2026. We examine what will change and how much time remains to adapt company documents, policies, and the organisation as a whole.

A broader definition of workplace harassment will be introduced

The Act[1] fundamentally overhauls the existing definition of workplace harassment (mobbing). It still refers to persistent — that is, repetitive, recurring, or continuous — harassment of an employee, which may include, amongst other things, humiliation, disparagement, intimidation, undervaluing of professional competence, unjustified criticism, belittling or ridiculing, isolation within a team, or hindering the employee’s ability to perform their duties.

A significant change is that certain conduct may be classified as mobbing even where its purpose was not to persistently harass an employee, as what matters is the effect itself. Harassment may be perpetrated not only by a line manager, but also by a co-worker, a subordinate, or a person working on a basis other than an employment contract, whether acting alone or as part of a group.

New forms of discrimination

The Labour Code will introduce two new concepts:

  • Discrimination by assumption — where an employer wrongly attributes a particular characteristic to an employee
  • Discrimination by association — where a person is treated less favourably because of their connection to another person

Employers will also be required to systematically prevent breaches of the principle of equal treatment, just as they are already required to do in the case of workplace harassment.

A more precise definition of harassment will be introduced

The amendment also refines the definition of harassment (molestowanie).

It will be defined as any unwanted conduct whose purpose or effect is to violate the dignity of an employee and to create an intimidating, hostile, degrading, humiliating, or offensive environment for that person. Such conduct may consist of physical, verbal, or non-verbal elements.

Reversal of the burden of proof in discrimination cases

An employee will only be required to establish a prima facie case of a breach. It will then fall to the employer to prove before the court that no discrimination actually took place.

Importantly, this change does not apply to claims of workplace harassment. The evidentiary rules in such cases remain unchanged.

Protection against retaliation

The amendment also introduces protection against retaliation.

The fact that an employee exercises rights arising from a breach of employment law must not constitute grounds for any unfavourable treatment or result in negative consequences, including termination of their contract.

This protection also extends to anyone who has provided support to a person asserting their rights. In the event of a breach of these rules, the employee concerned is entitled to compensation of an amount no less than the national minimum wage, or to damages.

Mandatory anti-harassment policy

Companies employing at least 10 persons will be required to introduce rules and procedures to prevent:

  • Violations of an employee’s dignity and other personal rights
  • Violations of the principle of equal treatment in employment, as well as discrimination and workplace harassment

These rules may be incorporated into a collective labour agreement, workplace regulations (regulamin pracy), or a separate set of regulations issued pursuant to Article 94[3a] of the Labour Code.

The regulations must be agreed with the trade unions or employee representatives. If no agreement is reached within 30 days, the employer shall determine the content of the regulations independently, taking into account any prior arrangements reached with the in-house trade union organisations or employee representatives in the course of the consultation process.

Higher compensation and right of recourse

The minimum compensation award for workplace harassment will increase to six times the national minimum wage.

Such compensation will also be introduced in discrimination cases and will be no less than the national minimum wage; in cases of repeated infringements, it will be no less than three times that amount.

An employer who pays compensation on this basis will be entitled to claim reimbursement from the perpetrator for the loss suffered, in an amount corresponding to the respective degrees of fault of the perpetrator and the employer in bringing about that loss.

Cases will be heard by district courts

Civil procedure will also change.

Cases concerning workplace harassment, discrimination, and infringement of an employee’s personal rights will be assigned to district courts (sądy rejonowe), regardless of the value of the claim. Furthermore, the court will not be able to dismiss a claim on the grounds that the facts of the case would suggest a legal basis for the claim other than that invoked by the employee.

How much time does your company have?

The Act enters into force on 5 November 2026. From that date, employers will have six months (i.e. until 5 May 2027) to amend their workplace regulations.

Please note: the new provisions will also apply to situations that commenced before the entry into force of the Act but continue beyond that date.

What you should do now

  • Review existing anti-harassment and anti-discrimination policies
  • Draft or update the internal regulations pursuant to Article 94(3a) of the Labour Code
  • Schedule consultations with trade unions or employee representatives
  • Train management and HR teams to recognise workplace harassment
  • Implement procedures for reporting and investigating employee complaints, so as to minimise the risk of litigation

The amendment significantly increases the financial and litigation exposure of employers, and the six-month implementation window may prove insufficient if companies delay taking action until after the Act enters into force.

It is therefore advisable to review current procedures today and prepare a set of regulations that comply with the new requirements.

Have questions? Contact us

 

[1] Act of 19 June 2026 amending the Labour Code and the Code of Civil Procedure (Journal of Laws 2026, item 1046)

Latest Knowledge

ESG Roadmap. How to identify which regulations apply to your business and build a strategy

As we know, ESG in business is a roadmap made up of numerous obligations arising from different regulatory frameworks. That is why the right question is not “how do I meet all the requirements?” but rather “which of them apply to my business?”. This is a crucial distinction. We explain how to correctly diagnose your regulatory profile and build an effective ESG strategy – one that actually works and gives you a competitive edge.

Announcement of Income Tax Reform

On 19 August, during a press conference, the Prime Minister announced a package of tax changes planned for next year. According to the announcement, the reform is intended, on the one hand, to ease the burden on the middle class and, on the other, to shift a greater fiscal burden onto the wealthiest individuals and the largest companies. We take a look at the proposals included in the announced package and explain what they might mean for taxpayers.

Family foundations and the tax authorities: what draft bill UD447 proposes and why this is not the end of the troubles

Family foundations were intended to provide entrepreneurs with a stable framework for intergenerational wealth management. Yet not even four years have passed since the first such foundations were established, and the rules governing their taxation are set to be changed once again. This is because the scale of interest and the practical problems uncovered have overwhelmed the drafters of the legislation, as best illustrated by the figures – 927 applications for individual tax rulings and 77 opinions issued from the Head of the National Revenue Administration. This does not, however, mean that family foundations are being used on a massive scale for aggressive tax optimisation. A significant proportion of the queries concerned simply how to correctly apply the complex regulations.

Banking today and tomorrow | Financial sector overview | August 2026

Poland’s banking sector has reacted with concern to recent remarks by Katarzyna Pełczyńska-Nałęcz, the Minister of Development Funds and Regional Policy, who announced plans to put forward a proposal for a further increase in CIT levied on banks. The Minister’s reasoning, however, rests on a flawed conflation of the sector’s liquidity with its profitability, revealing a fundamental misunderstanding of how the banking sector operates and how its financial health is assessed. What is more, it feeds into a worrying trend of replacing substantive debate with simplistic, populist messaging which may be politically appealing but is not underpinned by either facts or economic analysis.

NIS2 and the National Cybersecurity System Act in transport: what you need to do before October 2026

The amended Act on the National Cybersecurity System (UKSC) has been in force since 3 April 2026. For transport sector undertakings, this means a specific compliance timeline, including an obligation to register with the National Cybersecurity System (KSC) registry by 3 October 2026. Failure to do so may result in substantial financial penalties, coupled with the risk of personal liability for senior management. Not every undertaking, however, automatically falls within the scope of the new regime. Read on to find out whether your organisation is affected and what you need to do before the deadline for preparation.

Family foundations: the government has done the maths and presented the bill

Three years. That’s how long we’ve been waiting for what the Council of Ministers had seen in the data from the outset – and has now disclosed in its review of the Family Foundation Act. The document not only diagnoses the problems, but also previews substantial changes to rules that founders and their advisers treated as settled and stable. And therein lies a problem that goes far beyond tax matters. If the rules of the game are changed while the game is being played, there can be neither planning stability nor trust in the law. It is no coincidence that one of the greatest concerns among entrepreneurs considering setting up a foundation is not the level of taxation, but the stability of the legal framework – which today is once again being called into question.

What the new swiss franc act means for banks

We now have a new Act on Special Measures for the Adjudication of Cases Concerning Loan Agreements Denominated in or Indexed to the Swiss Franc. The provisions come into force 14 days after publication. So now is a good time to look at what lies ahead and what banks should be doing today.