Voluntary reporting in light of amendments to the CSRD – the importance of choosing simplified reporting standards

21 April 2026 | Knowledge, News, The Right Focus

The changes to EU sustainability reporting legislation introduced in 2025 have significantly reshaped companies’ responsibilities in this area. This is because, following the update to the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD), only the largest entities are now subject to a mandatory obligation to report on ESG issues.

At the same time, a large proportion of companies that do not exceed the new thresholds for employment and turnover now fall into the group of those that may report on a voluntary basis. Many organisations must therefore decide whether to prepare ESG reports and, if so, based on what rules and standards.

Simplified ESRS

In March 2026, organisations representing the interests of the financial sector, the capital markets and stakeholders involved in responsible development agreed that simplified European reporting standards would be the best solution for large organisations.

This is because these standards are tailored to the specific nature of such undertakings, striking a balance between the obligation to provide high-quality data and the need to keep administrative burdens at a reasonable level. They have been designed to facilitate practical application – the number of required disclosures has been reduced and the language simplified, whilst the structure of the material makes it easier to prepare coherent and transparent reports.

These standards are based on rules that are widely accepted within the European reporting framework, such as the double materiality assessment and the requirement to provide a faithful representation of the undertaking’s situation in the context of sustainable development. This means that reports prepared on this basis remain reliable and reflect both the company’s impact on the environment and society, and the significance of ESG issues for its operations and strategy.

An additional advantage of the simplified ESRS is their compatibility with global reporting frameworks, such as the IFRS international sustainability standards or the GRI guidelines. This enables large organisations operating within value chains across different markets to produce reports that meet the expectations of a wide range of users, including foreign investors.

Recommendations for large companies

It is also important that the simplified standards are aligned with the European legal framework. In accordance with the act transposing the CSRD into Polish law, ESG reports must be prepared based on uniform European standards, and are subject to mandatory assurance by statutory auditors.

The act also stipulates that sustainability reports must be a separate component of companies’ annual reports, prepared electronically in accordance with a standard template and submitted to the European Single Access Point.

It is worth noting that the implementation of the CSRD in Poland has also raised the thresholds used to classify undertakings as micro, small, medium-sized or large. This change allows a greater number of entities to benefit from simplified accounting rules, without abolishing ESG reporting obligations for those companies that exceed the new thresholds.

This means that the reporting system has been tailored to the real needs of the economy, and voluntary reporting by large companies should be based on standards that reflect their structure and complexity.

The aspect of ESG data verification is also significant.

The act transposing the CSRD requires reports to be subject to assurance by statutory auditors, which enhances the reliability of the information and, in practice, ensures that the reports are of adequate quality and complete.

The simplified ESRS have been designed to facilitate assessment – they are in line with the verification standards applied in Poland and intended for further development at the EU level.

The common position of business organisations and the direction set by the Polish legislation implementing the CSRD lead to a clear conclusion.

If a large company decides to undertake voluntary ESG reporting, the simplified ESRS represent the most appropriate and forward-looking solution. These standards enable companies to meet market expectations, ensure compliance with EU law, and ensure that the reported information will be reliable, comparable and relevant in the eyes of investors and stakeholders.

Any questions? Contact us

Latest Knowledge

Banking sector overview | Banking today and tomorrow | May 2026

“The end of the dream of free housing” – this is how the Polish Bank Association (Związek Banków Polskich) has characterised Thursday’s judgments of the Court of Justice of the European Union in cases concerning whether the claims of financial institutions against CHF mortgage borrowers have become time-barred.

Return deposits like VAT? The elephant in the room: the risks of the deposit-return system

The deposit-return system was supposed to be simple. Eco-friendly. Leak-proof. Tax-neutral. However, it took just a few months for serious doubts to emerge. The first loopholes are no longer just theoretical, they are in plain sight. The mechanisms for abuse can be described quite precisely, and the scale of potential losses may be much greater than anticipated. Below, we examine where the system is losing control and how this can be addressed.

NZIA – “Made in Europe” becomes a condition of market participation in the energy sector

The European Union has adopted a strategic course aimed at building its own production capacity in key technology sectors, including energy technologies. This policy is embodied in the Net-Zero Industry Act (NZIA), which redefines the rules of competitiveness, inter alia, in the renewable energy sector. In tenders, auctions and public support schemes, price is no longer the sole criterion for selecting a supplier. The NZIA imposes on contracting authorities and entities administering support schemes an obligation to evaluate bids also on the basis of the origin of the technology and other criteria specified in the Regulation. This change is systemic in nature and will affect all market participants – both producers and purchasers of energy technologies. In this article, I analyse how the new EU regulations will translate into business practice for companies operating in the European market.

WHT – Obligation to verify the beneficial owner status when paying dividends. An advance tax ruling by the Director of the National Revenue Administration Information Centre vs. explanations by the Minister of Finance

A Polish company paying dividends to a foreign parent company based in the EU may be exempt from withholding tax (WHT). When verifying eligibility for this exemption, is the company required to check whether the recipient of the dividend is its beneficial owner (BO)? It transpires that the Director of the National Revenue Administration Information Centre (KIS) and the Minister of Finance offer completely different answers to this question. What does this mean in practice? Let’s take a look.

Banking in 2026: technology, regulation and the new market landscape

The year 2026 will see the banking sector undergo its most dynamic transformation in a decade. The trends identified in Accenture’s Top Banking Trends FY26 report suggest that the sector is entering a phase in which technology and regulation will be inseparable, driving all aspects of change. However, it is regulation that determines the boundaries, pace and manner of implementation for new solutions. We take a look at what else the experts are focusing on.

The new National Cybersecurity System

The amendment to the Act on the National Cybersecurity System (UKSC) is one of the most significant regulatory reforms in recent years. Its main objective is to align Polish law with Directive (EU) 2022/2555 of the European Parliament and of the Council. The directive, also known as NIS2, substantially raises digital security requirements across the Union. The Polish Act on the National Cybersecurity System has undergone a thorough overhaul, covering more organisations (with estimates suggesting nearly 40,000 entities), introducing more demanding obligations, statutory personal liability for management board members, and even more stringent rules for imposing financial penalties. In the case of the most serious violations, these penalties can reach 100 million PLN.

‘Made in Europe’ is no longer just a slogan. It is becoming law

Until recently, ‘Made in Europe’ was just a label. While it was useful for marketing purposes, it lacked any hard, normative content. This may soon change. On 4 March, the European Commission published a proposal for the Industrial Accelerator Act, stipulating that, from 2027 onwards, the Union origin of components will be a prerequisite for participating in renewable energy auctions, accessing public funding, and for being eligible to participate in public procurement procedures. The slogan ‘Buy European’ could become a concrete instrument for supporting local production and controlling foreign investment.

Contact us:

Joanna Barbrich

Joanna Barbrich

Associate / Chief Sustainability Officer

+48 728 432 408

j.barbrich@kochanski.pl