The year 2025 from an IP perspective

29 January 2025 | Knowledge, News, The Right Focus

The beginning of the year is a time for implementing new plans and projects. In 2025, companies that value protection of their intellectual property rights should also ensure that new applications are made and the existing rights are properly protected. At the same time, they must not forget to stay alert, as the number of fraud attempts by scammers impersonating national and EU offices is growing rapidly.

IP protection funding support

2024 was marked by significant EU support for micro, small and medium-sized enterprises, which, thanks to the continuation of the SME Fund program, including the IP SCAN service, had a chance to among other things significantly strengthen their IP rights protection.

Let’s keep in mind that the EU SME Fund program, which provided subsidies for the protection of IP rights, was very popular, as the available funds had all been used two months before the deadline. Companies from Poland were ranked 2nd in the entire EU in terms of the number of applications submitted for such subsidies.

And from February 3, it will be possible to submit applications for grants for intellectual property protection under this year’s edition of the program.

However, those making applications for the protection of their marks and designs must stay alert, and the possibility of obtaining support should not blind them to the simple principle of limited trust. Unfortunately, cases of fraud attempts by scammers impersonating national and EU offices are on the rise.

Fake letters are being sent on a large scale, with such letters looking more and more alike official letters, containing data of specialists actually employed in a particular institution, with the sole detail indicating a fraud attempt being the wrong currency or the wrong account number for the transfer.

If you receive such a request, it is therefore worthwhile contacting a professional attorney. This will help you avoid potential losses, which can be very severe, running into tens of thousands of zlotys.

Do not delay with obtaining IP protection

According to current EUIPO data, the number of trademark oppositions, annulments and revocation proceedings is growing every year.

This means that there is an increasing number of disputes where a given entrepreneur’s mark is infringed by another entrepreneur by filing an application for a similar or identical mark, or worse, by a prior registration of a mark originally owned by another entity. In any of these situations, rights should be asserted as soon as such infringement is detected.

EUIPO statistics are also confirmed by our observations.

Indeed, recent years have seen an increase in the number of disputes, especially claims for annulment of already registered rights and trademarks. These most often occur as a result of “hostile” registration of marks by distributors selling the product of an entrepreneur or manufacturer and wishing to usurp their place in the market.

How to ensure effective protection against such a situation?

Above all – don’t delay. First, do not delay in identifying your own rights, such as trademarks or industrial designs, and second, in obtaining protection for your intellectual property rights.

Any kind of commercial activity, specially manufacturing and distribution, without well thought-out IP protection tactics may end up in a dispute over private label protection.

Let’s also recall what we stated at the very beginning. There are programs that support entrepreneurs in obtaining protection for trademarks, designs or patents, which also assist in terms of co-financing the costs of such a process. Practice and business confirm that it is worth taking advantage of them.

Any questions? Get in touch with us

Tomasz Szambelan

Latest Knowledge

GLI – AI, Machine Learning & Big Data 2026: The Polish perspective on artificial intelligence law

Global Legal Insights (GLI) is a series of international publications by the Global Legal Group (GLG), authored by legal practitioners from around the world. It offers an up-to-date and highly practical guide to the applicable regulatory landscape, complemented by expert commentary on specific areas of law across different jurisdictions. In short: legislation and actionable know-how in one place.

Banking sector overview | Banking today and tomorrow | May 2026

“The end of the dream of free housing” – this is how the Polish Bank Association (Związek Banków Polskich) has characterised Thursday’s judgments of the Court of Justice of the European Union in cases concerning whether the claims of financial institutions against CHF mortgage borrowers have become time-barred.

Return deposits like VAT? The elephant in the room: the risks of the deposit-return system

The deposit-return system was supposed to be simple. Eco-friendly. Leak-proof. Tax-neutral. However, it took just a few months for serious doubts to emerge. The first loopholes are no longer just theoretical, they are in plain sight. The mechanisms for abuse can be described quite precisely, and the scale of potential losses may be much greater than anticipated. Below, we examine where the system is losing control and how this can be addressed.

NZIA – “Made in Europe” becomes a condition of market participation in the energy sector

The European Union has adopted a strategic course aimed at building its own production capacity in key technology sectors, including energy technologies. This policy is embodied in the Net-Zero Industry Act (NZIA), which redefines the rules of competitiveness, inter alia, in the renewable energy sector. In tenders, auctions and public support schemes, price is no longer the sole criterion for selecting a supplier. The NZIA imposes on contracting authorities and entities administering support schemes an obligation to evaluate bids also on the basis of the origin of the technology and other criteria specified in the Regulation. This change is systemic in nature and will affect all market participants – both producers and purchasers of energy technologies. In this article, I analyse how the new EU regulations will translate into business practice for companies operating in the European market.

WHT – Obligation to verify the beneficial owner status when paying dividends. An advance tax ruling by the Director of the National Revenue Administration Information Centre vs. explanations by the Minister of Finance

A Polish company paying dividends to a foreign parent company based in the EU may be exempt from withholding tax (WHT). When verifying eligibility for this exemption, is the company required to check whether the recipient of the dividend is its beneficial owner (BO)? It transpires that the Director of the National Revenue Administration Information Centre (KIS) and the Minister of Finance offer completely different answers to this question. What does this mean in practice? Let’s take a look.

Banking in 2026: technology, regulation and the new market landscape

The year 2026 will see the banking sector undergo its most dynamic transformation in a decade. The trends identified in Accenture’s Top Banking Trends FY26 report suggest that the sector is entering a phase in which technology and regulation will be inseparable, driving all aspects of change. However, it is regulation that determines the boundaries, pace and manner of implementation for new solutions. We take a look at what else the experts are focusing on.

Contact us:

Tomasz Szambelan

Tomasz Szambelan

Advocate / Counsel / Intellectual and Industrial Property Law

+48 608 593 042

t.szambelan@kochanski.pl