The new National Cybersecurity System

11 March 2026 | Knowledge, News, The Right Focus

The amendment to the Act on the National Cybersecurity System (UKSC) is one of the most significant regulatory reforms in recent years. Its main objective is to align Polish law with Directive (EU) 2022/2555 of the European Parliament and of the Council. The directive, also known as NIS2, substantially raises digital security requirements across the Union.

The Polish Act on the National Cybersecurity System has undergone a thorough overhaul, covering more organisations (with estimates suggesting nearly 40,000 entities)[1], introducing more demanding obligations, statutory personal liability for management board members, and even more stringent rules for imposing financial penalties. In the case of the most serious violations, these penalties can reach 100 million PLN.

Essential and important entities. And even more companies subject to new obligations

One of the amendment’s key features is the expansion of the list of entities subject to cybersecurity obligations. The previous distinction between operators of essential services and digital service providers has been replaced by a broader classification covering essential entities and important entities.

The amended UKSC now covers 18 sectors and industries, all of which must prepare to meet the new requirements. These include energy, transport, healthcare, postal services, waste management, the chemical industry, the space sector, the manufacture of equipment and machinery, digital infrastructure, and the production and distribution of food.

The amendment requires businesses to conduct a thorough analysis of their activities to determine whether they meet the criteria for classification into one of the entity categories. Rather than passively awaiting individual decisions from state authorities, companies should assess for themselves whether they meet the criteria and prepare for mandatory entry into the list.

For many organisations, especially SMEs, this will be their first experience of formal cybersecurity procedures. Consequently, it may be necessary for them to develop policies, implement manuals and procedures, conduct audits, and ensure that these activities are properly documented.

The obligation to create a comprehensive information security management system

One of the most important aspects of the amendment is the obligation to establish a comprehensive information security management system. This system must be proportionate to the level of risk assessed and must, first and foremost, include:

  • Risk analysis and assessment
  • Technical and organisational measures (including encryption, multi-factor authentication (MFA), access control, and physical protection of systems)
  • Ensuring business continuity and crisis management, including disaster recovery plans and backup testing
  • Monitoring, reporting and responding to incidents
  • Supply chain security management

Computer Security Incident Response Teams (CSIRTs) are to play a key role in responding to threats, gathering knowledge and educating entities within specific sectors.

The personal responsibility of board members for implementing cybersecurity requirements

One significant change that could impact the management of organisations is the introduction of personal responsibility of board members for ensuring that the company’s activities comply with the UKSC.

This means that, in the event of serious violations or omissions relating to cybersecurity, the legal and financial consequences could affect not only the company itself, but also the members of its management bodies. It is important to note that responsibility for oversight in this area cannot be fully delegated to lower organisational levels or specialised technical units.

If an organisation fails to clearly allocate responsibilities and designate individuals accountable for specific tasks, all members of the management board will be held jointly and severally liable for any negligence. This signals to the market that cybersecurity management is becoming a fundamental corporate governance responsibility.

Strengthening the country’s entire protection system

The ministers responsible for specific sectors, the Financial Supervision Authority (KNF) and the President of the Office of Electronic Communications (UKE) have been given the tools to oversee and penalise certain services, and even to issue decisions ordering their discontinuation. They can also request audits, issue warnings, monitor compliance, and take preventive action both before and after a breach occurs.

From a market perspective, the new regulations mark the next stage in the development of national cyber resilience. Rather than merely imposing formal requirements on businesses, the Act aims to foster a mature security culture within organisations. Consequently, the amendment is set to become one of the most important tools for modernising the Polish digital economy.

It should be noted that when signing the Act, the President decided to refer certain provisions concerning, among other things, the rules for assessing and approving high-risk suppliers to the Constitutional Tribunal for an a posteriori review. However, this means that the Act has been promulgated and will enter into force in its entirety, so businesses must comply with the obligations it imposes.

Any questions? Contact us

 

[1] https://edgp.gazetaprawna.pl/prawo/prawo-internetu-i-ochrony-danych/artykuly/10594833,czy-uksc-obejmie-najwieksza-liczbe-podmiotow-w-ue.html

Latest Knowledge

Dual-use items: how broad will the CJEU’s definition be?

A training aircraft designed for civilian purposes can also qualify as a military item. That’s a conclusion emerging from the Advocate General’s Opinion in Case C-538/25 (Flugzeugherstellerin) before the Court of Justice of the European Union. What does this mean for companies exporting goods from the EU?

Workplace harassment and discrimination: new regulations for employers

The Sejm has passed an amendment to the Labour Code concerning workplace harassment and discrimination. The changes introduce a broader definition of the concept itself, new forms of harassment, clearer definitions of what constitutes, for example, sexual harassment, and new rules governing the handling of such cases, including the reversal of the burden of proof, higher compensation awards, and the jurisdiction of district courts. The provisions will enter into force on 5 November 2026. We examine what will change and how much time remains to adapt company documents, policies, and the organisation as a whole.

ESG Roadmap. How to identify which regulations apply to your business and build a strategy

As we know, ESG in business is a roadmap made up of numerous obligations arising from different regulatory frameworks. That is why the right question is not “how do I meet all the requirements?” but rather “which of them apply to my business?”. This is a crucial distinction. We explain how to correctly diagnose your regulatory profile and build an effective ESG strategy – one that actually works and gives you a competitive edge.

Announcement of Income Tax Reform

On 19 August, during a press conference, the Prime Minister announced a package of tax changes planned for next year. According to the announcement, the reform is intended, on the one hand, to ease the burden on the middle class and, on the other, to shift a greater fiscal burden onto the wealthiest individuals and the largest companies. We take a look at the proposals included in the announced package and explain what they might mean for taxpayers.

Family foundations and the tax authorities: what draft bill UD447 proposes and why this is not the end of the troubles

Family foundations were intended to provide entrepreneurs with a stable framework for intergenerational wealth management. Yet not even four years have passed since the first such foundations were established, and the rules governing their taxation are set to be changed once again. This is because the scale of interest and the practical problems uncovered have overwhelmed the drafters of the legislation, as best illustrated by the figures – 927 applications for individual tax rulings and 77 opinions issued from the Head of the National Revenue Administration. This does not, however, mean that family foundations are being used on a massive scale for aggressive tax optimisation. A significant proportion of the queries concerned simply how to correctly apply the complex regulations.

Banking today and tomorrow | Financial sector overview | August 2026

Poland’s banking sector has reacted with concern to recent remarks by Katarzyna Pełczyńska-Nałęcz, the Minister of Development Funds and Regional Policy, who announced plans to put forward a proposal for a further increase in CIT levied on banks. The Minister’s reasoning, however, rests on a flawed conflation of the sector’s liquidity with its profitability, revealing a fundamental misunderstanding of how the banking sector operates and how its financial health is assessed. What is more, it feeds into a worrying trend of replacing substantive debate with simplistic, populist messaging which may be politically appealing but is not underpinned by either facts or economic analysis.

NIS2 and the National Cybersecurity System Act in transport: what you need to do before October 2026

The amended Act on the National Cybersecurity System (UKSC) has been in force since 3 April 2026. For transport sector undertakings, this means a specific compliance timeline, including an obligation to register with the National Cybersecurity System (KSC) registry by 3 October 2026. Failure to do so may result in substantial financial penalties, coupled with the risk of personal liability for senior management. Not every undertaking, however, automatically falls within the scope of the new regime. Read on to find out whether your organisation is affected and what you need to do before the deadline for preparation.

Family foundations: the government has done the maths and presented the bill

Three years. That’s how long we’ve been waiting for what the Council of Ministers had seen in the data from the outset – and has now disclosed in its review of the Family Foundation Act. The document not only diagnoses the problems, but also previews substantial changes to rules that founders and their advisers treated as settled and stable. And therein lies a problem that goes far beyond tax matters. If the rules of the game are changed while the game is being played, there can be neither planning stability nor trust in the law. It is no coincidence that one of the greatest concerns among entrepreneurs considering setting up a foundation is not the level of taxation, but the stability of the legal framework – which today is once again being called into question.

Contact us:

Robert Brodzik

Robert Brodzik

Advocate / Counsel / NewTech / Data Protection and Cybersecurity

+48 532 206 479

r.brodzik@kochanski.pl