The first-year pitfall – reporting on the separate collection rate under the deposit-return system for 2025

16 March 2026 | Knowledge, News

The deposit-return system came into operation on 1 October 2025. Some businesses joined immediately, while others opted to do so at a later date. At first glance, this may seem like a mere organisational matter. In practice, however, the timing of joining the system can significantly affect the outcome of accounting for the separate collection rate in 2025.

Reporting on compliance with the obligation to achieve the collection target is made on an annual basis, and the deadline for paying the product fee (if applicable) for 2025 is 15 March 2026.

Did you join late? The system can reflect this

From the wording of the regulations, it can be inferred that, when calculating the separate collection rate, only beverage packaging placed on the market from 1 October 2025 will be taken into account.

Additionally, packaging collection can only be reported from the moment a business joins the deposit-return system.

In practice, this can mean that:

  • The collection rate is calculated taking into account the weight of packaging placed on the market since the system was launched
  • The collection of packaging reported in the system only covers the period during which the business operator participated in the system

Consequently, some packaging may contribute to the base used to calculate the collection rate even if the business was not participating in the system when the packaging was placed on the market.

This interpretation of the regulations could mean that the later a company joined the system, the lower the level of separate collection shown in its annual report.

An additional factor in the first year: unmarked containers

In practice, reporting for 2025 is further complicated by yet another factor.

The Act stipulates that packaging being part of the deposit-return system must bear an appropriate mark that also indicates the deposit amount. During the transitional period, however, the sale of existing stocks of products in unmarked containers was permitted.

This means that, in 2025, the following could be traded simultaneously:

  • Packaging bearing the deposit-return system mark
  • Packaging placed on the market earlier that does not bear such a mark

The regulations themselves do not clearly specify how to account for unmarked packaging when reporting separate collection rates. In practice, this may require a detailed analysis of how the packaging was placed on the market and its status within the deposit-return system.

It is important to note that the absence of a deposit-return system mark on a container does not determine whether the container has been placed on the market within the meaning of the regulations.

Failing to pay on time? The consequences could get worse

The statutory mechanism provides for a clear sequence of events:

  • If the required collection rate is not achieved, a product fee is payable, calculated using the following formula: M × (P_wym − P_osiąg) × S [weight x (required rate – achieved rate) x fee rate]
  • If the fee is not paid or is underpaid, the province marshal may issue a decision specifying the amount of the arrears
  • If this decision is not complied with, an additional fee of 50% of the unpaid amount may be imposed

Although the fee rates are relatively low in 2025 (e.g. PLN 0.10/kg for PET bottles and metal cans), they can amount to significant sums when dealing with large volumes of packaging. Bear in mind that these rates will increase tenfold in 2026 and fiftyfold from 2027 onwards.

The Act leaves several questions unanswered

Calculating the fee is only the first step. In practice, businesses face a number of interpretative uncertainties, including the following:

  • How to calculate the collection rate when joining the system after the start of the quarter
  • Whether and how to account for packaging placed on the market before joining the system
  • How to distinguish, in the records, between packaging covered by the system and packaging sold during the transitional period without any marking

An error in this area may result not only in additional product fee being charged, but also in administrative procedures being initiated.

2025 reporting is not the time for experiments

We have advised businesses operating under the deposit-return system since its inception – on regulatory, tax and operational matters.

For the 2025 reporting, we can assist you with various tasks, including:

  • Verifying whether a product fee is due, and if so, calculating the amount
  • Analysing the impact of the date of joining the system on collection rates
  • Assessing packaging records and system documentation
  • Correctly calculating and reporting the fee
  • Preparing recommendations for the system’s operation in future years

Would you like to find out where your company stands? Get in touch with us

Latest Knowledge

Banking sector overview | Banking today and tomorrow | July 2026

Under the draft legislation, banks will be required to offer existing borrowers a switch from WIBOR-based to POLSTR-based interest rates, a mechanism intended to speed up the voluntary transition of financial instruments to the new benchmark. The banking sector has responded positively to the proposal, according to Tadeusz Białek, President of the Polish Bank Association.

“Withdraw from contract here” – what next for the new button in online shops, on trading platforms and in mobile apps?

From 19 June, national legislation was to require businesses in the European Union entering into distance contracts with consumers via an online interface to provide consumers with the option to withdraw from the contract via a dedicated function/button. However, due to Poland’s delay in transposing Directive 2023/2673, which requires the use of such a button, this obligation has been postponed in our country. We look at what remote contract withdrawal entails and which transactions the new feature will apply to.

Municipal master plans – new deadline, same old challenges

On 11 June 2026, the President signed into law a bill extending the deadline for municipalities to adopt their master plans (plany ogólne). The key deadline for adopting master plans was moved from 30 June to 31 August 2026. We examine the reasons behind this change and consider what the absence of a master plan might mean for potential investors and their future projects.

Record fines and the upcoming 21st sanctions package – what should businesses expect?

The past year has brought a series of enforcement actions that clearly signal a tightening approach by the Polish customs and revenue authorities towards breaches of the sanctions regime. Importantly, businesses should already be preparing for further changes, as the European Union has announced its 21st sanctions package and updated the list of designated persons and entities. We examine the key developments and offer guidance on how to minimise the risk of non-compliance.

A sea change in the rules governing board members’ liability for a company’s tax arrears

The bill amending the General Tax Code (No. UC138) fundamentally overhauls the rules governing the tax liability of third parties for capital companies’ tax arrears.  It comes in response to recent CJEU judgments, the Ombudsman’s February statement and the post-audit report of the Supreme Chamber of Audit (NIK) of December 2025. We examine what’s changing, who will be affected by the new rules and what steps are worth taking right now.

Partner in name, but only if male: the linguistic trap in Polish corporate law

One of the structures available under Polish law is the ‘spółka partnerska’ (professional partnership), modelled on the Anglo-Saxon Limited Liability Partnership. As defined in the Polish Commercial Companies Code, this is a vehicle for individuals practising liberal professions, such as doctors, architects and accountants. And yet, the provisions governing professional partnerships make no mention of their applicability to women. We therefore examine whether there is no room for female partners, feminine-gendered forms, or simply linguistic empathy.

Can you sue over words aimed at an entire community?

A damaging public statement does not necessarily refer to a specific individual. Sometimes, the author attributes negative characteristics to a whole group of people, portrays them as a threat or uses language that could be seen as demeaning. Statements of this kind frequently concern LGBTQ+ people. This raises the question: can a member of the targeted community bring a lawsuit seeking compensation or an apology, even if they were not named directly? We decided to look into this.

Banking sector overview | Banking today and tomorrow | June 2026

According to a statement published by GPW Benchmark, the reference rate administrator, and the Polish Financial Supervision Authority (KNF), which oversees the administrator, 31 December 2036 will be the last day on which the WIBID and WIBOR rates will be provided for all key fixing periods: 1 month (1M), 3 months (3M) and 6 months (6M).

How to correctly calculate length of service from 1 May 2026

New rules for calculating length of service have applied to private sector employers since the beginning of May 2026. With companies continuing to express concerns about the new framework, the Ministry of Family, Labour and Social Policy has addressed the most common questions. We look at the issues that are (still) troubling employers and how we can help.

Contact us:

Sławomir Wnuczek

Sławomir Wnuczek

Advocate / Associate / Tax Law

+48 784 084 522

s.wnuczek@kochanski.pl