The first-year pitfall – reporting on the separate collection rate under the deposit-return system for 2025

16 March 2026 | Knowledge, News

The deposit-return system came into operation on 1 October 2025. Some businesses joined immediately, while others opted to do so at a later date. At first glance, this may seem like a mere organisational matter. In practice, however, the timing of joining the system can significantly affect the outcome of accounting for the separate collection rate in 2025.

Reporting on compliance with the obligation to achieve the collection target is made on an annual basis, and the deadline for paying the product fee (if applicable) for 2025 is 15 March 2026.

Did you join late? The system can reflect this

From the wording of the regulations, it can be inferred that, when calculating the separate collection rate, only beverage packaging placed on the market from 1 October 2025 will be taken into account.

Additionally, packaging collection can only be reported from the moment a business joins the deposit-return system.

In practice, this can mean that:

  • The collection rate is calculated taking into account the weight of packaging placed on the market since the system was launched
  • The collection of packaging reported in the system only covers the period during which the business operator participated in the system

Consequently, some packaging may contribute to the base used to calculate the collection rate even if the business was not participating in the system when the packaging was placed on the market.

This interpretation of the regulations could mean that the later a company joined the system, the lower the level of separate collection shown in its annual report.

An additional factor in the first year: unmarked containers

In practice, reporting for 2025 is further complicated by yet another factor.

The Act stipulates that packaging being part of the deposit-return system must bear an appropriate mark that also indicates the deposit amount. During the transitional period, however, the sale of existing stocks of products in unmarked containers was permitted.

This means that, in 2025, the following could be traded simultaneously:

  • Packaging bearing the deposit-return system mark
  • Packaging placed on the market earlier that does not bear such a mark

The regulations themselves do not clearly specify how to account for unmarked packaging when reporting separate collection rates. In practice, this may require a detailed analysis of how the packaging was placed on the market and its status within the deposit-return system.

It is important to note that the absence of a deposit-return system mark on a container does not determine whether the container has been placed on the market within the meaning of the regulations.

Failing to pay on time? The consequences could get worse

The statutory mechanism provides for a clear sequence of events:

  • If the required collection rate is not achieved, a product fee is payable, calculated using the following formula: M × (P_wym − P_osiąg) × S [weight x (required rate – achieved rate) x fee rate]
  • If the fee is not paid or is underpaid, the province marshal may issue a decision specifying the amount of the arrears
  • If this decision is not complied with, an additional fee of 50% of the unpaid amount may be imposed

Although the fee rates are relatively low in 2025 (e.g. PLN 0.10/kg for PET bottles and metal cans), they can amount to significant sums when dealing with large volumes of packaging. Bear in mind that these rates will increase tenfold in 2026 and fiftyfold from 2027 onwards.

The Act leaves several questions unanswered

Calculating the fee is only the first step. In practice, businesses face a number of interpretative uncertainties, including the following:

  • How to calculate the collection rate when joining the system after the start of the quarter
  • Whether and how to account for packaging placed on the market before joining the system
  • How to distinguish, in the records, between packaging covered by the system and packaging sold during the transitional period without any marking

An error in this area may result not only in additional product fee being charged, but also in administrative procedures being initiated.

2025 reporting is not the time for experiments

We have advised businesses operating under the deposit-return system since its inception – on regulatory, tax and operational matters.

For the 2025 reporting, we can assist you with various tasks, including:

  • Verifying whether a product fee is due, and if so, calculating the amount
  • Analysing the impact of the date of joining the system on collection rates
  • Assessing packaging records and system documentation
  • Correctly calculating and reporting the fee
  • Preparing recommendations for the system’s operation in future years

Would you like to find out where your company stands? Get in touch with us

Latest Knowledge

Banking in 2026: technology, regulation and the new market landscape

The year 2026 will see the banking sector undergo its most dynamic transformation in a decade. The trends identified in Accenture’s Top Banking Trends FY26 report suggest that the sector is entering a phase in which technology and regulation will be inseparable, driving all aspects of change. However, it is regulation that determines the boundaries, pace and manner of implementation for new solutions. We take a look at what else the experts are focusing on.

The new National Cybersecurity System

The amendment to the Act on the National Cybersecurity System (UKSC) is one of the most significant regulatory reforms in recent years. Its main objective is to align Polish law with Directive (EU) 2022/2555 of the European Parliament and of the Council. The directive, also known as NIS2, substantially raises digital security requirements across the Union. The Polish Act on the National Cybersecurity System has undergone a thorough overhaul, covering more organisations (with estimates suggesting nearly 40,000 entities), introducing more demanding obligations, statutory personal liability for management board members, and even more stringent rules for imposing financial penalties. In the case of the most serious violations, these penalties can reach 100 million PLN.

‘Made in Europe’ is no longer just a slogan. It is becoming law

Until recently, ‘Made in Europe’ was just a label. While it was useful for marketing purposes, it lacked any hard, normative content. This may soon change. On 4 March, the European Commission published a proposal for the Industrial Accelerator Act, stipulating that, from 2027 onwards, the Union origin of components will be a prerequisite for participating in renewable energy auctions, accessing public funding, and for being eligible to participate in public procurement procedures. The slogan ‘Buy European’ could become a concrete instrument for supporting local production and controlling foreign investment.

Non-obvious cases of transferring an establishment to a new employer

The transfer of all or part of an establishment (zakład pracy) is a special concept in labour law relating to changes in ownership. Put simply, it is the automatic transfer of all the rights and obligations of the employer from one entity to another, without the need for any additional actions or consents from the parties involved. However, this must be preceded by the fulfilment of a range of informing obligations by both the new and former employers. Let’s take a look at what the process should involve.

Protecting yourself against tax risks in the deposit-return system

The deposit-return system has been in place since October 2025, raising significant tax concerns from the outset. Although the regulations came into force, it was unclear for a long time how to apply them in practice. Some of the regulations needed clarification, some solutions were missing and the published explanations did not cover all the key issues. Consequently, the market began to develop its own operating standards.

Banking sector overview | Banking today and tomorrow | March 2026

On 12 February 2026, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) issued a judgment concerning the use of the WIBOR index in loan agreements. The CJEU judges confirmed that, in consumer cases, courts cannot examine the correctness of the WIBOR calculation. The banks had correctly informed their clients about the reference rate in accordance with national and EU law.

The issue of the National Labour Inspectorate reform has resurfaced

A new draft law proposing changes to the way the National Labour Inspectorate operates has been submitted to the Sejm. During its first reading on 25 February, the draft was not rejected and was therefore referred to the Social Policy and Family Committee for further consideration. Despite the concerns and controversies raised so far, including by businesses, the legislature continues to pursue the thorough modernisation of Poland’s employment model, which involves increased supervision of the labour market and curbing the abuse of civil law contracts. In this article, we will take a look at the proposals included in the new draft and explain what they mean for businesses.

Polish AI boom

According to the latest data, nearly 15,000 companies dealing with artificial intelligence were registered in Poland in 2025.[1] This testifies to an undoubted boom in AI, as well as to the dynamic changes related to the development of this technology. However, amid the rush to implement AI, do companies consider the most important issue: securing the outcomes of their work and protecting themselves against competitors? In this article, we explore this issue and suggest ways to avoid costly problems.

Contact us:

Sławomir Wnuczek

Sławomir Wnuczek

Advocate / Associate / Tax Law

+48 784 084 522

s.wnuczek@kochanski.pl