Shareholders’ agreements – what is their purpose

14 February 2023 | Knowledge, News

The articles of association of a limited liability company or a joint-stock company cover corporate governance issues and mutual relations between shareholders. Sometimes, however, these are not detailed enough. As a result, shareholders’ agreements are increasingly being used to cover the above issues in more detail.

Subject matter of shareholders’ agreements

Basically, shareholders’ agreements can deal with any aspect of company operations and relations between shareholders.

The decision-making process at a general meeting is a key issue for both shareholders and the company itself.

Shareholders’ agreements should therefore contain rules on how resolutions are passed. For this reason, it is important to specify:

  • A list of reserved matters on which a resolution of the meeting is required
  • The majority required to pass a resolution on a particular matter – the Code provides for an absolute majority of votes, but unanimity or a qualified majority may be required for certain matters, e.g. an increase in share capital, the granting of a guarantee or suretyship by a company
  • A quorum, i.e. the amount of capital that must be represented (present) at a general meeting in order for the meeting to be held and for resolutions to be passed.

With regard to a limited liability company, there is also the possibility of granting individual power to a shareholder, which amounts to the need to obtain their consent to pass a certain resolution, e.g. with regard to the disposal of real estate owned by the company. However, this does not seem to be permissible in a joint-stock company.

Shareholders’ agreements – what else should be covered

Other important elements that shareholders’ agreements should cover are rules for the conduct of company operations and the appointment of members of company bodies. In this respect, it is very common to grant individual powers to appoint a certain number of members, depending on the shareholding represented by a particular shareholder.

One area that can be a source of conflict between shareholders is the way in which company profits are distributed – it is therefore possible and sensible to address this matter in shareholders’ agreements. It is common practice to provide for at least a minimum percentage of the profits made in a given financial year to be distributed to shareholders, with the remainder being allocated to company investments or a legal reserve.

It is important that shareholders’ agreements contain appropriate:

  • Clauses ensuring that the rights and interests of minority shareholders are respected in a manner also taking into account the shareholding they represent
  • Share disposal rules
  • Dispute resolution procedures in case of a deadlock between shareholders.

Summary

In recent years, shareholders’ agreements have become an increasingly common and positive phenomenon in commercial transactions. However, these do not always define the rights and obligations of the parties in sufficient detail, which can lead to a deadlock or disputes, with negative consequences for company operations.

It is therefore necessary to clearly and precisely set out the rights and obligations of shareholders and to include appropriate provisions on key issues.

Any questions? Contact:

Rafał Rapala

Dominik Karkoszka

Source: Rzeczpospolita

Date: 12.01.2023

 

Latest Knowledge

The new National Cybersecurity System

The amendment to the Act on the National Cybersecurity System (UKSC) is one of the most significant regulatory reforms in recent years. Its main objective is to align Polish law with Directive (EU) 2022/2555 of the European Parliament and of the Council. The directive, also known as NIS2, substantially raises digital security requirements across the Union. The Polish Act on the National Cybersecurity System has undergone a thorough overhaul, covering more organisations (with estimates suggesting nearly 40,000 entities), introducing more demanding obligations, statutory personal liability for management board members, and even more stringent rules for imposing financial penalties. In the case of the most serious violations, these penalties can reach 100 million PLN.

‘Made in Europe’ is no longer just a slogan. It is becoming law

Until recently, ‘Made in Europe’ was just a label. While it was useful for marketing purposes, it lacked any hard, normative content. This may soon change. On 4 March, the European Commission published a proposal for the Industrial Accelerator Act, stipulating that, from 2027 onwards, the Union origin of components will be a prerequisite for participating in renewable energy auctions, accessing public funding, and for being eligible to participate in public procurement procedures. The slogan ‘Buy European’ could become a concrete instrument for supporting local production and controlling foreign investment.

Non-obvious cases of transferring an establishment to a new employer

The transfer of all or part of an establishment (zakład pracy) is a special concept in labour law relating to changes in ownership. Put simply, it is the automatic transfer of all the rights and obligations of the employer from one entity to another, without the need for any additional actions or consents from the parties involved. However, this must be preceded by the fulfilment of a range of informing obligations by both the new and former employers. Let’s take a look at what the process should involve.

Protecting yourself against tax risks in the deposit-return system

The deposit-return system has been in place since October 2025, raising significant tax concerns from the outset. Although the regulations came into force, it was unclear for a long time how to apply them in practice. Some of the regulations needed clarification, some solutions were missing and the published explanations did not cover all the key issues. Consequently, the market began to develop its own operating standards.

Banking sector overview | Banking today and tomorrow | March 2026

On 12 February 2026, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) issued a judgment concerning the use of the WIBOR index in loan agreements. The CJEU judges confirmed that, in consumer cases, courts cannot examine the correctness of the WIBOR calculation. The banks had correctly informed their clients about the reference rate in accordance with national and EU law.

The issue of the National Labour Inspectorate reform has resurfaced

A new draft law proposing changes to the way the National Labour Inspectorate operates has been submitted to the Sejm. During its first reading on 25 February, the draft was not rejected and was therefore referred to the Social Policy and Family Committee for further consideration. Despite the concerns and controversies raised so far, including by businesses, the legislature continues to pursue the thorough modernisation of Poland’s employment model, which involves increased supervision of the labour market and curbing the abuse of civil law contracts. In this article, we will take a look at the proposals included in the new draft and explain what they mean for businesses.

Polish AI boom

According to the latest data, nearly 15,000 companies dealing with artificial intelligence were registered in Poland in 2025.[1] This testifies to an undoubted boom in AI, as well as to the dynamic changes related to the development of this technology. However, amid the rush to implement AI, do companies consider the most important issue: securing the outcomes of their work and protecting themselves against competitors? In this article, we explore this issue and suggest ways to avoid costly problems.

Length of service now includes periods of self-employment

The length of service no longer depends solely on work carried out under a contract of employment. The amendment to the Labour Code introduces significant changes, as work carried out under civil law contracts or as part of business activity will now also be included when calculating service, which affects employees’ rights. What will this mean for employees and employers?

Contact us:

Rafał Rapala

Rafał Rapala

Attorney-at-law / Partner / Head of Corporate Law and Corporate Litigation / M&A and Private Equity Transactions

+48 608 444 650

r.rapala@kochanski.pl