Share transfer restrictions in shareholders’ agreements

27 January 2023 | Knowledge, News

The imposition of restrictions on the transferability of shares and the introduction of relevant related procedures are among the most important issues to be negotiated prior to the conclusion of shareholders’ agreements.

The following is an overview of the most common types of clauses restricting the ability to dispose of company shares.

Consent to disposal

Shareholders’ agreements often contain provisions making the disposal of shares subject to a company’s consent or other restriction (similarly to solutions that can be introduced into the articles of association, in accordance with relevant provisions of the Commercial Companies Code).

Consent to the disposal of shares, which must be given by the company management board, is the most common of these. However, the following entities are often indicated as authorised to give such consent:

  • another body (e.g. the supervisory board or the general meeting),
  • a majority shareholder,
  • a third party.

The right of first offer and the right of first refusal

Both the right of first offer (Polish: prawo pierwokupu) and the right of first refusal (Polish:  prawo pierwszeństwa) contained in a shareholders’ agreement entitle the entity concerned to acquire the shares of another shareholder if the latter intends to sell them to a third party.

Importantly, the right of first refusal is broader than the right of first offer, since it applies to any sale of shares and not only to a sale under a conditional SPA.

Drag-along and tag-along clauses

Drag-along clauses are becoming increasingly common in the Polish market. Thanks to their introduction, in the event of a desire to sell shares to a potential external investor, who is often interested in acquiring 100% of the shares, a person who has reached an agreement with the investor on the disposal of his/her own assets may require the other shareholders to sell their shares on analogous terms and conditions.

A tag-along clause is a kind of a reverse mechanism that allows shareholders to require the one who has attracted an external investor to cause that investor to make an offer for acquiring their shares on identical terms and conditions.

Call option

A call option grants the right for a potential buyer to demand a particular transaction to be performed.

If the call option is exercised, the buyer will be able to purchase shares from their seller at a specific price and time, with the latter being obliged to transfer the shares to the buyer on request or upon the fulfilment of certain conditions indicated in the agreement.

Lock-up

Lock-up clauses in shareholders’ agreements prevent certain shareholders from disposing of their shares for a specific period of time.

The purpose of such clauses is to obtain a guarantee by an investor that a particular person will remain in a company for a certain period of time. Most often, such a clause applies to company founders or key employees who also hold shares in the company.

Summary

Share transfer restrictions in shareholders’ agreements are a solution that effectively safeguards the interests of shareholders.

If such restrictions are imposed, however, due care must be taken to ensure that they function properly.

 

Source: Rzeczpospolita

Date: 22.12.2022

Any questions? Contact us

Rafał Rapala

Dominik Karkoszka

Adam Czarnota

 

Latest Knowledge

Dual-use items: how broad will the CJEU’s definition be?

A training aircraft designed for civilian purposes can also qualify as a military item. That’s a conclusion emerging from the Advocate General’s Opinion in Case C-538/25 (Flugzeugherstellerin) before the Court of Justice of the European Union. What does this mean for companies exporting goods from the EU?

Workplace harassment and discrimination: new regulations for employers

The Sejm has passed an amendment to the Labour Code concerning workplace harassment and discrimination. The changes introduce a broader definition of the concept itself, new forms of harassment, clearer definitions of what constitutes, for example, sexual harassment, and new rules governing the handling of such cases, including the reversal of the burden of proof, higher compensation awards, and the jurisdiction of district courts. The provisions will enter into force on 5 November 2026. We examine what will change and how much time remains to adapt company documents, policies, and the organisation as a whole.

ESG Roadmap. How to identify which regulations apply to your business and build a strategy

As we know, ESG in business is a roadmap made up of numerous obligations arising from different regulatory frameworks. That is why the right question is not “how do I meet all the requirements?” but rather “which of them apply to my business?”. This is a crucial distinction. We explain how to correctly diagnose your regulatory profile and build an effective ESG strategy – one that actually works and gives you a competitive edge.

Announcement of Income Tax Reform

On 19 August, during a press conference, the Prime Minister announced a package of tax changes planned for next year. According to the announcement, the reform is intended, on the one hand, to ease the burden on the middle class and, on the other, to shift a greater fiscal burden onto the wealthiest individuals and the largest companies. We take a look at the proposals included in the announced package and explain what they might mean for taxpayers.

Family foundations and the tax authorities: what draft bill UD447 proposes and why this is not the end of the troubles

Family foundations were intended to provide entrepreneurs with a stable framework for intergenerational wealth management. Yet not even four years have passed since the first such foundations were established, and the rules governing their taxation are set to be changed once again. This is because the scale of interest and the practical problems uncovered have overwhelmed the drafters of the legislation, as best illustrated by the figures – 927 applications for individual tax rulings and 77 opinions issued from the Head of the National Revenue Administration. This does not, however, mean that family foundations are being used on a massive scale for aggressive tax optimisation. A significant proportion of the queries concerned simply how to correctly apply the complex regulations.

Banking today and tomorrow | Financial sector overview | August 2026

Poland’s banking sector has reacted with concern to recent remarks by Katarzyna Pełczyńska-Nałęcz, the Minister of Development Funds and Regional Policy, who announced plans to put forward a proposal for a further increase in CIT levied on banks. The Minister’s reasoning, however, rests on a flawed conflation of the sector’s liquidity with its profitability, revealing a fundamental misunderstanding of how the banking sector operates and how its financial health is assessed. What is more, it feeds into a worrying trend of replacing substantive debate with simplistic, populist messaging which may be politically appealing but is not underpinned by either facts or economic analysis.

NIS2 and the National Cybersecurity System Act in transport: what you need to do before October 2026

The amended Act on the National Cybersecurity System (UKSC) has been in force since 3 April 2026. For transport sector undertakings, this means a specific compliance timeline, including an obligation to register with the National Cybersecurity System (KSC) registry by 3 October 2026. Failure to do so may result in substantial financial penalties, coupled with the risk of personal liability for senior management. Not every undertaking, however, automatically falls within the scope of the new regime. Read on to find out whether your organisation is affected and what you need to do before the deadline for preparation.

Family foundations: the government has done the maths and presented the bill

Three years. That’s how long we’ve been waiting for what the Council of Ministers had seen in the data from the outset – and has now disclosed in its review of the Family Foundation Act. The document not only diagnoses the problems, but also previews substantial changes to rules that founders and their advisers treated as settled and stable. And therein lies a problem that goes far beyond tax matters. If the rules of the game are changed while the game is being played, there can be neither planning stability nor trust in the law. It is no coincidence that one of the greatest concerns among entrepreneurs considering setting up a foundation is not the level of taxation, but the stability of the legal framework – which today is once again being called into question.

Contact us:

Rafał Rapala

Rafał Rapala

Attorney-at-law / Partner / Head of Corporate Law and Corporate Litigation / M&A, Private Equity

+48 608 444 650

r.rapala@kochanski.pl

Adam Czarnota

Adam Czarnota

Advocate / Senior Associate / Corporate Law / Mergers & Acquisitions

+48 787 389 207

a.czarnota@kochanski.pl