Pharma Review – Amendment to address the shortage of medicines in the European Union

12 May 2025 | Knowledge, News, The Right Focus

In 2023, the European Commission proposed changes to pharmaceutical legislation. One of the main objectives of these proposals is to ensure a high level of public health by guaranteeing the quality, safety and efficacy of medicines provided to patients across the EU. In particular, the changes aim to ensure timely and equitable access to safe, effective and affordable medicines, while creating an attractive, innovation- and competitiveness-friendly environment for research, development and production of medicines in Europe.

We take a look at the changes the pharmaceutical industry should prepare for.

Revolutions and evolutions in pharmaceutical regulation

A word of caution at the outset: the proposed changes, while comprehensive, focus only on the specific objectives mentioned above. They therefore do not include provisions on advertising, falsified medicinal products or homeopathic and traditional herbal medicinal products.

Understandably, the proposals that are causing the most controversy or doubt have been most widely discussed in the public sphere.

These include:

  • Shorter periods of protection (data exclusivity and market exclusivity) for innovative medicines
  • The possibility for innovative pharmaceutical companies to benefit from longer regulatory protection, but on the condition that they carry out their research on new medicines in Europe

However, it is worth looking at other, perhaps less controversial, proposals that are equally interesting and in some ways quite innovative.

In fact, the explanatory memoranda to the legislative acts of the pharmaceutical law reform contain one of the key concepts of this reform in the context of insufficient patient access to innovative and promising therapies, which “do not always reach the patient, and patients in the EU have differing levels of access” and the fact that “scientific and technological developments and digitalisation are not fully exploited”.  

This is the concept of unmet medical needs.

Unmet medical needs of EU patients underpin new legislation

One of the proposed changes, designed to better exploit scientific potential and improve patient access to innovative and promising therapies to better meet their health needs, is the possibility of submitting significant non-clinical or clinical evidence for a new therapeutic indication that addresses an unmet medical need of patients.

Such evidence may be submitted, either to the European Medicines Agency or to the competent authority of a Member State, by an entity not engaged in an economic activity (a not-for-profit entity), i.e. not related to the marketing authorisation holder.

As a next step, at the request of a Member State, the European Commission or on its own initiative, the EMA will scientifically assess, on the basis of all available evidence, the benefit-risk balance of the product in the new therapeutic indication.

If the opinion is positive, the marketing authorisation holders of all medicinal products containing the active substance concerned will be obliged to request that the information on their products (such as the summary of product characteristics and package leaflet) be supplemented to include the new therapeutic indication.

The key points of this solution are:

  • Entities other than the marketing authorisation holders will be allowed to conduct studies independently
  • No regulatory data protection period for new therapeutic indications (data exclusivity)
  • Applicable only to existing marketing authorisations and not to registration procedures for obtaining a marketing authorisation for the first time

The impact of the changes on patients

An ‘unmet medical need’ is defined in Article 83(1) of the revised Directive 2001/83.

In accordance with this provision, a medicinal product is considered as addressing an unmet medical need if at least one of its therapeutic indications relates to a life threatening or severely debilitating disease and the following conditions are also met:

  • There is no medicinal product authorised in the Union for such disease, or, where despite medicinal products being authorised for such disease in the Union, the disease is associated with a remaining high morbidity or mortality, and
  • The use of the medicinal product results in a meaningful reduction in disease morbidity or mortality for the relevant patient population

The proposed solution appears to be highly beneficial from the patients’ perspective.

However, the requirement to meet the following two conditions will be important:

  • Fulfilling the definition of an entity not engaged in an economic activity (not-for-profit entity) presenting research results for a new indication
  • Documenting that this indication addresses an unmet medical need

It remains to be seen in practice whether this provision will provide a real improvement in access to new therapies or whether it will remain only a theoretical possibility.

Any questions? Contact us

Katarzyna Sabiłło

Latest Knowledge

Dual-use items: how broad will the CJEU’s definition be?

A training aircraft designed for civilian purposes can also qualify as a military item. That’s a conclusion emerging from the Advocate General’s Opinion in Case C-538/25 (Flugzeugherstellerin) before the Court of Justice of the European Union. What does this mean for companies exporting goods from the EU?

Workplace harassment and discrimination: new regulations for employers

The Sejm has passed an amendment to the Labour Code concerning workplace harassment and discrimination. The changes introduce a broader definition of the concept itself, new forms of harassment, clearer definitions of what constitutes, for example, sexual harassment, and new rules governing the handling of such cases, including the reversal of the burden of proof, higher compensation awards, and the jurisdiction of district courts. The provisions will enter into force on 5 November 2026. We examine what will change and how much time remains to adapt company documents, policies, and the organisation as a whole.

ESG Roadmap. How to identify which regulations apply to your business and build a strategy

As we know, ESG in business is a roadmap made up of numerous obligations arising from different regulatory frameworks. That is why the right question is not “how do I meet all the requirements?” but rather “which of them apply to my business?”. This is a crucial distinction. We explain how to correctly diagnose your regulatory profile and build an effective ESG strategy – one that actually works and gives you a competitive edge.

Announcement of Income Tax Reform

On 19 August, during a press conference, the Prime Minister announced a package of tax changes planned for next year. According to the announcement, the reform is intended, on the one hand, to ease the burden on the middle class and, on the other, to shift a greater fiscal burden onto the wealthiest individuals and the largest companies. We take a look at the proposals included in the announced package and explain what they might mean for taxpayers.

Family foundations and the tax authorities: what draft bill UD447 proposes and why this is not the end of the troubles

Family foundations were intended to provide entrepreneurs with a stable framework for intergenerational wealth management. Yet not even four years have passed since the first such foundations were established, and the rules governing their taxation are set to be changed once again. This is because the scale of interest and the practical problems uncovered have overwhelmed the drafters of the legislation, as best illustrated by the figures – 927 applications for individual tax rulings and 77 opinions issued from the Head of the National Revenue Administration. This does not, however, mean that family foundations are being used on a massive scale for aggressive tax optimisation. A significant proportion of the queries concerned simply how to correctly apply the complex regulations.

Banking today and tomorrow | Financial sector overview | August 2026

Poland’s banking sector has reacted with concern to recent remarks by Katarzyna Pełczyńska-Nałęcz, the Minister of Development Funds and Regional Policy, who announced plans to put forward a proposal for a further increase in CIT levied on banks. The Minister’s reasoning, however, rests on a flawed conflation of the sector’s liquidity with its profitability, revealing a fundamental misunderstanding of how the banking sector operates and how its financial health is assessed. What is more, it feeds into a worrying trend of replacing substantive debate with simplistic, populist messaging which may be politically appealing but is not underpinned by either facts or economic analysis.

NIS2 and the National Cybersecurity System Act in transport: what you need to do before October 2026

The amended Act on the National Cybersecurity System (UKSC) has been in force since 3 April 2026. For transport sector undertakings, this means a specific compliance timeline, including an obligation to register with the National Cybersecurity System (KSC) registry by 3 October 2026. Failure to do so may result in substantial financial penalties, coupled with the risk of personal liability for senior management. Not every undertaking, however, automatically falls within the scope of the new regime. Read on to find out whether your organisation is affected and what you need to do before the deadline for preparation.

Family foundations: the government has done the maths and presented the bill

Three years. That’s how long we’ve been waiting for what the Council of Ministers had seen in the data from the outset – and has now disclosed in its review of the Family Foundation Act. The document not only diagnoses the problems, but also previews substantial changes to rules that founders and their advisers treated as settled and stable. And therein lies a problem that goes far beyond tax matters. If the rules of the game are changed while the game is being played, there can be neither planning stability nor trust in the law. It is no coincidence that one of the greatest concerns among entrepreneurs considering setting up a foundation is not the level of taxation, but the stability of the legal framework – which today is once again being called into question.