Pharma Review – Amendment to address the shortage of medicines in the European Union

12 May 2025 | Knowledge, News, The Right Focus

In 2023, the European Commission proposed changes to pharmaceutical legislation. One of the main objectives of these proposals is to ensure a high level of public health by guaranteeing the quality, safety and efficacy of medicines provided to patients across the EU. In particular, the changes aim to ensure timely and equitable access to safe, effective and affordable medicines, while creating an attractive, innovation- and competitiveness-friendly environment for research, development and production of medicines in Europe.

We take a look at the changes the pharmaceutical industry should prepare for.

Revolutions and evolutions in pharmaceutical regulation

A word of caution at the outset: the proposed changes, while comprehensive, focus only on the specific objectives mentioned above. They therefore do not include provisions on advertising, falsified medicinal products or homeopathic and traditional herbal medicinal products.

Understandably, the proposals that are causing the most controversy or doubt have been most widely discussed in the public sphere.

These include:

  • Shorter periods of protection (data exclusivity and market exclusivity) for innovative medicines
  • The possibility for innovative pharmaceutical companies to benefit from longer regulatory protection, but on the condition that they carry out their research on new medicines in Europe

However, it is worth looking at other, perhaps less controversial, proposals that are equally interesting and in some ways quite innovative.

In fact, the explanatory memoranda to the legislative acts of the pharmaceutical law reform contain one of the key concepts of this reform in the context of insufficient patient access to innovative and promising therapies, which “do not always reach the patient, and patients in the EU have differing levels of access” and the fact that “scientific and technological developments and digitalisation are not fully exploited”.  

This is the concept of unmet medical needs.

Unmet medical needs of EU patients underpin new legislation

One of the proposed changes, designed to better exploit scientific potential and improve patient access to innovative and promising therapies to better meet their health needs, is the possibility of submitting significant non-clinical or clinical evidence for a new therapeutic indication that addresses an unmet medical need of patients.

Such evidence may be submitted, either to the European Medicines Agency or to the competent authority of a Member State, by an entity not engaged in an economic activity (a not-for-profit entity), i.e. not related to the marketing authorisation holder.

As a next step, at the request of a Member State, the European Commission or on its own initiative, the EMA will scientifically assess, on the basis of all available evidence, the benefit-risk balance of the product in the new therapeutic indication.

If the opinion is positive, the marketing authorisation holders of all medicinal products containing the active substance concerned will be obliged to request that the information on their products (such as the summary of product characteristics and package leaflet) be supplemented to include the new therapeutic indication.

The key points of this solution are:

  • Entities other than the marketing authorisation holders will be allowed to conduct studies independently
  • No regulatory data protection period for new therapeutic indications (data exclusivity)
  • Applicable only to existing marketing authorisations and not to registration procedures for obtaining a marketing authorisation for the first time

The impact of the changes on patients

An ‘unmet medical need’ is defined in Article 83(1) of the revised Directive 2001/83.

In accordance with this provision, a medicinal product is considered as addressing an unmet medical need if at least one of its therapeutic indications relates to a life threatening or severely debilitating disease and the following conditions are also met:

  • There is no medicinal product authorised in the Union for such disease, or, where despite medicinal products being authorised for such disease in the Union, the disease is associated with a remaining high morbidity or mortality, and
  • The use of the medicinal product results in a meaningful reduction in disease morbidity or mortality for the relevant patient population

The proposed solution appears to be highly beneficial from the patients’ perspective.

However, the requirement to meet the following two conditions will be important:

  • Fulfilling the definition of an entity not engaged in an economic activity (not-for-profit entity) presenting research results for a new indication
  • Documenting that this indication addresses an unmet medical need

It remains to be seen in practice whether this provision will provide a real improvement in access to new therapies or whether it will remain only a theoretical possibility.

Any questions? Contact us

Katarzyna Sabiłło

Latest Knowledge

GLI – AI, Machine Learning & Big Data 2026: The Polish perspective on artificial intelligence law

Global Legal Insights (GLI) is a series of international publications by the Global Legal Group (GLG), authored by legal practitioners from around the world. It offers an up-to-date and highly practical guide to the applicable regulatory landscape, complemented by expert commentary on specific areas of law across different jurisdictions. In short: legislation and actionable know-how in one place.

Banking sector overview | Banking today and tomorrow | May 2026

“The end of the dream of free housing” – this is how the Polish Bank Association (Związek Banków Polskich) has characterised Thursday’s judgments of the Court of Justice of the European Union in cases concerning whether the claims of financial institutions against CHF mortgage borrowers have become time-barred.

Return deposits like VAT? The elephant in the room: the risks of the deposit-return system

The deposit-return system was supposed to be simple. Eco-friendly. Leak-proof. Tax-neutral. However, it took just a few months for serious doubts to emerge. The first loopholes are no longer just theoretical, they are in plain sight. The mechanisms for abuse can be described quite precisely, and the scale of potential losses may be much greater than anticipated. Below, we examine where the system is losing control and how this can be addressed.

NZIA – “Made in Europe” becomes a condition of market participation in the energy sector

The European Union has adopted a strategic course aimed at building its own production capacity in key technology sectors, including energy technologies. This policy is embodied in the Net-Zero Industry Act (NZIA), which redefines the rules of competitiveness, inter alia, in the renewable energy sector. In tenders, auctions and public support schemes, price is no longer the sole criterion for selecting a supplier. The NZIA imposes on contracting authorities and entities administering support schemes an obligation to evaluate bids also on the basis of the origin of the technology and other criteria specified in the Regulation. This change is systemic in nature and will affect all market participants – both producers and purchasers of energy technologies. In this article, I analyse how the new EU regulations will translate into business practice for companies operating in the European market.

WHT – Obligation to verify the beneficial owner status when paying dividends. An advance tax ruling by the Director of the National Revenue Administration Information Centre vs. explanations by the Minister of Finance

A Polish company paying dividends to a foreign parent company based in the EU may be exempt from withholding tax (WHT). When verifying eligibility for this exemption, is the company required to check whether the recipient of the dividend is its beneficial owner (BO)? It transpires that the Director of the National Revenue Administration Information Centre (KIS) and the Minister of Finance offer completely different answers to this question. What does this mean in practice? Let’s take a look.

Banking in 2026: technology, regulation and the new market landscape

The year 2026 will see the banking sector undergo its most dynamic transformation in a decade. The trends identified in Accenture’s Top Banking Trends FY26 report suggest that the sector is entering a phase in which technology and regulation will be inseparable, driving all aspects of change. However, it is regulation that determines the boundaries, pace and manner of implementation for new solutions. We take a look at what else the experts are focusing on.

Contact us:

Katarzyna Sabiłło, M.SC., MBA

Katarzyna Sabiłło, M.SC., MBA

Senior Associate, Head of Pharma and Life Sciences

+48 22 326 9600

k.sabillo@kochanski.pl