Kochanski Malskyy Ukraine

Over EUR 600 billion today – and the value of war loss in Ukraine is rising

28 July 2022 | Knowledge, News

Since 24 February, the day the Russian aggression began, nearly 50,000 people have died in Ukraine, with more than 15 million also having to flee their homes to save their lives. Current material losses are estimated at more than EUR 600 billion, and despite the war continuing, these estimates are already stimulating plans for the rebuilding the country.

Since Poland is not only a neighbour and friend of Ukraine, but also its major business partner, it is natural that one of the focal points of this long-term planning is located here. And this is also where the loudest debate about key needs, strategic directions, the most pressing problems and possible solutions is taking place. As a law firm, we have been committed from the very beginning to helping Ukraine, and therefore are an active initiator and facilitator of the debate.

Anna Yurchenko, Deputy Minister of Infrastructure of Ukraine, discusses the needs, risks and war reparations

It is difficult to imagine the enormity of the damage suffered by Ukraine as a result of the Russian onslaught. It is even more difficult to estimate its value, especially since almost all the figures we know today are rapidly becoming obsolete as the damage continues to be inflicted. Therefore, in order to understand the level of financial needs in the context of rebuilding Ukraine, we spoke to Anna Yurchenko, Deputy Minister of Infrastructure of Ukraine, who estimated that the value of destroyed property has already exceeded EUR 600 billion.

The dilapidated infrastructure needs more than just money  

In terms of material damage, the greatest devastation can be seen in the infrastructure sector. Since the beginning of the Russian aggression, hundreds of bridges have been demolished, tens of thousands of roads have been ruined, and this is in addition to the lost railway networks and civilian airports. The municipal sector, i.e. city streets, public transport fleets, residential buildings, economic and social infrastructure facilities, has also suffered extensive destruction.

If we assume that the current calculations are accurate, the amount needed to rebuild Ukraine’s infrastructure alone reaches almost half a trillion PLN as of today. Of this, almost half should be spent on transport infrastructure alone. It should also be borne in mind that Ukraine’s infrastructural reconstruction is not only about obtaining the necessary funds.

“Speaking of infrastructure reconstruction, we are facing overwhelming logistical problems (broken chains of supply of construction materials, especially bitumen), material and technical problems (destroyed road construction equipment), personnel deficiencies (specialists have gone abroad or joined the Ukrainian Armed Forces) and other problems (the need for demining, fuel shortages, constant shelling, etc.). Restoring traffic on highways and railways will not be enough to solve the problem of agricultural and industrial exports. To ensure proper imports of critically important products to Ukraine, unblocking the Black Sea ports is also necessary,” stresses Anna Yurchenko, Deputy Minister of Infrastructure of Ukraine.

Effectively collecting and documenting Ukraine’s material damage

The systematic collection of the most accurate data possible on the damage and a thorough analysis and documentation of the losses are among the most important tasks facing the Ukrainian administration today. This gives the country a chance to successfully claim the return of lost state and social property in the context of reparation payments by the Russian Federation. Therefore, Ukraine is doing its utmost to monitor the material losses incurred.

“Back in March, the Government of Ukraine took a decision obliging all ministries and offices to put in place methods to determine the losses incurred in various sectors of the economy, including economic losses. At the end of May, the Government set up a special commission to investigate the damage caused to Ukraine as a result of the armed aggression of the Russian Federation. The Commission’s main tasks include preparing, reviewing and approving normative and legal acts concerning the audit of losses caused by military operations. Leading national and foreign expert institutions are involved in Commission works. In addition, the Ministry of the Economy of Ukraine has already developed a draft methodology for determining the scope and amount of losses and damage caused to enterprises, institutions and organisations of all forms of ownership in connection with the destruction of or damage to their property caused by the armed aggression of the Russian Federation, as well as lost benefits as a result of the impossibility or hindrance of doing business,” says Anna Yurchenko.

Up to EUR 1.3 trillion in losses due to the Russian aggression

According to analysts and economic experts, Ukraine could eventually suffer losses of up to EUR 1.3 trillion in 2014-2026. Assuming a favourable scenario under which the Russian Federation would pay war reparations, it will still not have sufficient financial capacity to cover even a greater part of this amount. Therefore, the priority for Ukraine should be strategic economic cooperation with European Union Member States.

To meet this goal, a number of operators are already announcing their economic support. As a law firm, we have been actively engaged in this process, by organising events, meetings and webinars during which lawyers and international experts discuss possible investment directions, sources of funding and potential war mitigation scenarios. We also provide substantive knowledge and support to Polish and Ukrainian enterprises eager to take an active part in the process.

This article has been prepared based on an interview conducted by Markiyan Malskyy with Anna Yurchenko, Deputy Minister of Infrastructure of Ukraine.

Source: Wirtualna Polska
Date: 13 July 2022

Find out what the main goals of Ukraine’s reconstruction are today.

Reconstruction is a chance for Ukraine to move away from inefficient post-Soviet solutions and introduce modern, green technologies and know-how – read more in the article by Markiyan Malskyy, Partner and Head of our Ukrainian Desk.

Any questions? Contact us

Markiyan Malskyy

Latest Knowledge

Workplace harassment and discrimination: new regulations for employers

The Sejm has passed an amendment to the Labour Code concerning workplace harassment and discrimination. The changes introduce a broader definition of the concept itself, new forms of harassment, clearer definitions of what constitutes, for example, sexual harassment, and new rules governing the handling of such cases, including the reversal of the burden of proof, higher compensation awards, and the jurisdiction of district courts. The provisions will enter into force on 5 November 2026. We examine what will change and how much time remains to adapt company documents, policies, and the organisation as a whole.

ESG Roadmap. How to identify which regulations apply to your business and build a strategy

As we know, ESG in business is a roadmap made up of numerous obligations arising from different regulatory frameworks. That is why the right question is not “how do I meet all the requirements?” but rather “which of them apply to my business?”. This is a crucial distinction. We explain how to correctly diagnose your regulatory profile and build an effective ESG strategy – one that actually works and gives you a competitive edge.

Announcement of Income Tax Reform

On 19 August, during a press conference, the Prime Minister announced a package of tax changes planned for next year. According to the announcement, the reform is intended, on the one hand, to ease the burden on the middle class and, on the other, to shift a greater fiscal burden onto the wealthiest individuals and the largest companies. We take a look at the proposals included in the announced package and explain what they might mean for taxpayers.

Family foundations and the tax authorities: what draft bill UD447 proposes and why this is not the end of the troubles

Family foundations were intended to provide entrepreneurs with a stable framework for intergenerational wealth management. Yet not even four years have passed since the first such foundations were established, and the rules governing their taxation are set to be changed once again. This is because the scale of interest and the practical problems uncovered have overwhelmed the drafters of the legislation, as best illustrated by the figures – 927 applications for individual tax rulings and 77 opinions issued from the Head of the National Revenue Administration. This does not, however, mean that family foundations are being used on a massive scale for aggressive tax optimisation. A significant proportion of the queries concerned simply how to correctly apply the complex regulations.

NIS2 and the National Cybersecurity System Act in transport: what you need to do before October 2026

The amended Act on the National Cybersecurity System (UKSC) has been in force since 3 April 2026. For transport sector undertakings, this means a specific compliance timeline, including an obligation to register with the National Cybersecurity System (KSC) registry by 3 October 2026. Failure to do so may result in substantial financial penalties, coupled with the risk of personal liability for senior management. Not every undertaking, however, automatically falls within the scope of the new regime. Read on to find out whether your organisation is affected and what you need to do before the deadline for preparation.

Family foundations: the government has done the maths and presented the bill

Three years. That’s how long we’ve been waiting for what the Council of Ministers had seen in the data from the outset – and has now disclosed in its review of the Family Foundation Act. The document not only diagnoses the problems, but also previews substantial changes to rules that founders and their advisers treated as settled and stable. And therein lies a problem that goes far beyond tax matters. If the rules of the game are changed while the game is being played, there can be neither planning stability nor trust in the law. It is no coincidence that one of the greatest concerns among entrepreneurs considering setting up a foundation is not the level of taxation, but the stability of the legal framework – which today is once again being called into question.

What the new swiss franc act means for banks

We now have a new Act on Special Measures for the Adjudication of Cases Concerning Loan Agreements Denominated in or Indexed to the Swiss Franc. The provisions come into force 14 days after publication. So now is a good time to look at what lies ahead and what banks should be doing today.

New draft Pay Transparency Act – what has changed since December 2025?

A second version of the draft act on strengthening the application of the right to equal pay for equal work or work of equal value between men and women has now been published. It refines procedures and deadlines and introduces a new supervisory body. We have already discussed the changes affecting the recruitment stage and the three pillars of the forthcoming pay transparency framework, noting that Poland will miss the EU transposition deadline of 7 June 2026. Now, we take a closer look at the further changes, new developments and risks that have emerged in the latest, April version of the draft.

Payment Services Regulation (PSR) – between consumer protection and due diligence

The draft Payment Services Regulation (PSR) is one of the most significant elements of the reform of the EU legal framework for payment services. Its principal aim is to enhance the security of cashless transactions and to reduce the scale of financial fraud, in particular that arising from the growth of digital channels. At the same time, the new rules are intended to introduce a liability model that will not result in risk being transferred entirely to financial institutions, whilst retaining an important role for independent due diligence on the part of the user.