M&A trends in the AI industry

3 April 2025 | Knowledge, News

Over the past two years, we have seen a significant increase in the number of M&A deals involving companies based on artificial intelligence or using AI components.

First of all, at the global level, both the number and value of transactions involving AI companies are growing. Even in our domestic market, the highest ranking of the top 10 Polish start-ups in 2024 were AI-related companies. This shows the dominance of such companies in the market, notes Natalia Kotłowska-Wochna, attorney at law and Head of the New Tech M&A Practice.

According to Aventis Advisors, in 2025, the number of AI acquisitions will exceed 400, with a cumulative annual growth rate of 26%. The US accounts for approximately 38% of all global acquisitions in the AI sector (2022-2024), due to the concentration of major innovators and technology companies in this market.

In terms of the number of large acquisitions, the situation in Poland is similar to the global one, but Polish managers show a less ambitious approach. According to PWC’s “CEO Survey. Time for Reinvention”, as many as 46% of Polish CEOs are not planning any acquisitions in the next three years. By comparison, the global figure is 30%.

Impact of the AI Act on investment decisions

Will new regulations such as the AI Act affect investor interest in companies using artificial intelligence?

I think that for the time being, the regulatory risks associated with AI do not have a determining influence on the decisions of private equity funds. Of course, this is one of the elements taken into account, but is not the main factor, emphasises Natalia Kotłowska-Wochna.

In addition to the standard company assessment, which includes regulatory and technological issues (such as personal data protection, cyber security and intellectual property), there is now a completely new element – compliance with the AI Act.

AI in transaction processes

Artificial intelligence is not only the subject of transactions, but also a tool used in M&A processes.

According to DealRoom, within the next three years, 80% of M&A processes will use AI at various stages of the transaction – from identifying potential targets, through due diligence and financial analysis, to post-merger integration.

Polish law implementing the AI Act

In February, the Ministry of Digital Affairs presented an amended draft of the Artificial Intelligence Systems Act, which includes changes to the rules for monitoring the safety of products and services, as well as solutions to support innovation. The new draft also provides for the establishment of a regulatory sandbox, i.e. a space for testing new solutions.

I think the amendments to the AI Systems Act are going in the right direction, and the final regulations are expected to be published in the first quarter of this year. We have a lot of experience, for example in the context of personal data protection, where regulations have already been introduced in a similar way […]. So I think these regulations will also be positive. Nevertheless, it is worth waiting for the final versions of the drafts, which will be published soon, comments Natalia Kotłowska-Wochna.

Companies’ preparation for new regulations

How are Polish businesses preparing to comply with new regulations?

It seems that the degree of readiness varies and depends on the size of the companies:

  • Large companies (especially those with foreign capital) – advanced preparation, in line with the company’s overarching policy
  • Smaller companies – slower process, preparation of documents and procedures and implementation of compliance is not a priority

At this point, I think there will still be a lot of companies that will not be fully prepared for these regulations, especially since we still don’t know exactly what approach the regulators will take – says the head of our New Tech M&A Practice.

Mapping responsibilities in light of the AI Act

Under the AI Act, any company that develops, sells, uses or provides an artificial intelligence system must comply with certain requirements. Each company should therefore map its responsibilities in this regard by:

  • identifying tools that have an AI component
  • assessing tools to determine whether they meet the definition of an AI system
  • classifying tools according to risk level (prohibited, high, limited or minimal)
  • determining the scope of responsibilities and adapting to those responsibilities

The definition of an AI system is a key issue that we as lawyers are now focusing on. It contains six mandatory requirements and an optional one. It can be difficult to assess whether a given tool is an AI system because the definition is based on technical aspects such as the degree of autonomy or automation, explains Natalia Kotłowska-Wochna.

Challenges and opportunities for start-ups

For innovative start-ups, which often develop new AI tools themselves, the regulations represent both a challenge and an opportunity:

Start-ups that want to launch AI-based tools on the market need to be properly prepared in terms of procedures and documentation. In particular, if such start-ups want to attract investment, they must be prepared to have their system audited for compliance with regulations that will come into force in the near future, emphasises Natalia Kotłowska-Wochna.

Source: Polska Agencja Prasowa

Date: 14.03.2025

Any questions? Get in touch with us

Natalia Kotłowska-Wochna

Latest Knowledge

Workplace harassment and discrimination: new regulations for employers

The Sejm has passed an amendment to the Labour Code concerning workplace harassment and discrimination. The changes introduce a broader definition of the concept itself, new forms of harassment, clearer definitions of what constitutes, for example, sexual harassment, and new rules governing the handling of such cases, including the reversal of the burden of proof, higher compensation awards, and the jurisdiction of district courts. The provisions will enter into force on 5 November 2026. We examine what will change and how much time remains to adapt company documents, policies, and the organisation as a whole.

ESG Roadmap. How to identify which regulations apply to your business and build a strategy

As we know, ESG in business is a roadmap made up of numerous obligations arising from different regulatory frameworks. That is why the right question is not “how do I meet all the requirements?” but rather “which of them apply to my business?”. This is a crucial distinction. We explain how to correctly diagnose your regulatory profile and build an effective ESG strategy – one that actually works and gives you a competitive edge.

Announcement of Income Tax Reform

On 19 August, during a press conference, the Prime Minister announced a package of tax changes planned for next year. According to the announcement, the reform is intended, on the one hand, to ease the burden on the middle class and, on the other, to shift a greater fiscal burden onto the wealthiest individuals and the largest companies. We take a look at the proposals included in the announced package and explain what they might mean for taxpayers.

Family foundations and the tax authorities: what draft bill UD447 proposes and why this is not the end of the troubles

Family foundations were intended to provide entrepreneurs with a stable framework for intergenerational wealth management. Yet not even four years have passed since the first such foundations were established, and the rules governing their taxation are set to be changed once again. This is because the scale of interest and the practical problems uncovered have overwhelmed the drafters of the legislation, as best illustrated by the figures – 927 applications for individual tax rulings and 77 opinions issued from the Head of the National Revenue Administration. This does not, however, mean that family foundations are being used on a massive scale for aggressive tax optimisation. A significant proportion of the queries concerned simply how to correctly apply the complex regulations.

NIS2 and the National Cybersecurity System Act in transport: what you need to do before October 2026

The amended Act on the National Cybersecurity System (UKSC) has been in force since 3 April 2026. For transport sector undertakings, this means a specific compliance timeline, including an obligation to register with the National Cybersecurity System (KSC) registry by 3 October 2026. Failure to do so may result in substantial financial penalties, coupled with the risk of personal liability for senior management. Not every undertaking, however, automatically falls within the scope of the new regime. Read on to find out whether your organisation is affected and what you need to do before the deadline for preparation.

Family foundations: the government has done the maths and presented the bill

Three years. That’s how long we’ve been waiting for what the Council of Ministers had seen in the data from the outset – and has now disclosed in its review of the Family Foundation Act. The document not only diagnoses the problems, but also previews substantial changes to rules that founders and their advisers treated as settled and stable. And therein lies a problem that goes far beyond tax matters. If the rules of the game are changed while the game is being played, there can be neither planning stability nor trust in the law. It is no coincidence that one of the greatest concerns among entrepreneurs considering setting up a foundation is not the level of taxation, but the stability of the legal framework – which today is once again being called into question.

What the new swiss franc act means for banks

We now have a new Act on Special Measures for the Adjudication of Cases Concerning Loan Agreements Denominated in or Indexed to the Swiss Franc. The provisions come into force 14 days after publication. So now is a good time to look at what lies ahead and what banks should be doing today.

New draft Pay Transparency Act – what has changed since December 2025?

A second version of the draft act on strengthening the application of the right to equal pay for equal work or work of equal value between men and women has now been published. It refines procedures and deadlines and introduces a new supervisory body. We have already discussed the changes affecting the recruitment stage and the three pillars of the forthcoming pay transparency framework, noting that Poland will miss the EU transposition deadline of 7 June 2026. Now, we take a closer look at the further changes, new developments and risks that have emerged in the latest, April version of the draft.

Payment Services Regulation (PSR) – between consumer protection and due diligence

The draft Payment Services Regulation (PSR) is one of the most significant elements of the reform of the EU legal framework for payment services. Its principal aim is to enhance the security of cashless transactions and to reduce the scale of financial fraud, in particular that arising from the growth of digital channels. At the same time, the new rules are intended to introduce a liability model that will not result in risk being transferred entirely to financial institutions, whilst retaining an important role for independent due diligence on the part of the user.

Contact us:

Natalia Kotłowska-Wochna

Natalia Kotłowska-Wochna

Attorney-at-Law / Partner/ New Tech, IP, Trade & Logistics Practice Group / Head of New Tech M&A

+48 606 689 185

n.kotlowska@kochanski.pl