IP in ESG reporting

16 October 2024 | Knowledge, News, The Right Focus

An ESG report should include detailed information on a company’s environmental, social and governance impacts. However, companies often forget to include aspects related to intellectual property rights. Let’s take a look at what IP specifically means in corporate governance.

Identifying and securing IP rights

An ESG report should be a source of reliable information on the company’s ESG strategy, objectives and progress towards them. However, it is often the case that a report’s authors do not include IP-related aspects, which also leads to a failure to assess the company’s IP assets and thus miss opportunities that exist in this area.   

The place of IP in ESG reporting is ‘G’, or corporate governance. The definition and implementation of IP policies and the commercialisation of rights undoubtedly have a significant impact on the effective management of a company in the spirit of sustainable development.

What if a company has not yet analysed the IP aspect of its business?

In this case, the reporting process can also be used to identify IP rights and develop internal IP-related procedures in line with sustainability principles.

Why can IP reporting benefit a company?

Implementing appropriate IP procedures and policies certainly demonstrates adherence to the highest standards of corporate governance. This can also be a driver for a company’s position in the industry.

Reporting must not harm IP

When preparing a report, it is important to remember that the European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS) do not require the reporting of confidential or sensitive information.

This applies to intellectual property rights, the disclosure of which could harm the company. Therefore, any know-how, patent applications or unpublished designs, the premature disclosure of which could prevent them from obtaining protection, may be omitted from the reports.

Major companies invest in IP

The importance of identifying and protecting intellectual property rights is clearly demonstrated by recent reports from the largest listed companies. This is particularly true in the IT, automotive and pharmaceutical industries.

CD Projekt, one of the largest gaming companies in the world, explicitly states that it is constantly securing its rights as part of its business, and that the protection and management of intellectual property is handled by a dedicated Business & IP team within the company’s legal department. Their report also highlights the importance of cybersecurity.

Toyota’s latest report also describes in great detail how important the protection and use of intellectual property rights is to the organisation as a whole. The report highlights the company’s focus on continuous research and development to raise the level of technological sophistication and competitiveness of Toyota-branded products. The company also describes the structure of the organisation dealing with IP issues and details the number of patent rights held, using the US and Japan as examples.

Pfizer, the global pharmaceutical giant, also explicitly mentions its IP policy on the use of generic medicines in the poorest countries and on sustainable development. A recent report by the company also mentions its sponsorship of the World Intellectual Property Organisation’s Inventor Assistance Programme.

It is therefore worth taking a leaf out of the book of the biggest companies and starting to position yourself as an organisation with a high level of governance and awareness of IP protection, implementation and commercialisation.

Are you interested in effectively securing your company’s IP rights in the spirit of sustainable development? Please do not hesitate to contact us.

Tomasz Szambelan

Latest Knowledge

The new National Cybersecurity System

The amendment to the Act on the National Cybersecurity System (UKSC) is one of the most significant regulatory reforms in recent years. Its main objective is to align Polish law with Directive (EU) 2022/2555 of the European Parliament and of the Council. The directive, also known as NIS2, substantially raises digital security requirements across the Union. The Polish Act on the National Cybersecurity System has undergone a thorough overhaul, covering more organisations (with estimates suggesting nearly 40,000 entities), introducing more demanding obligations, statutory personal liability for management board members, and even more stringent rules for imposing financial penalties. In the case of the most serious violations, these penalties can reach 100 million PLN.

‘Made in Europe’ is no longer just a slogan. It is becoming law

Until recently, ‘Made in Europe’ was just a label. While it was useful for marketing purposes, it lacked any hard, normative content. This may soon change. On 4 March, the European Commission published a proposal for the Industrial Accelerator Act, stipulating that, from 2027 onwards, the Union origin of components will be a prerequisite for participating in renewable energy auctions, accessing public funding, and for being eligible to participate in public procurement procedures. The slogan ‘Buy European’ could become a concrete instrument for supporting local production and controlling foreign investment.

Non-obvious cases of transferring an establishment to a new employer

The transfer of all or part of an establishment (zakład pracy) is a special concept in labour law relating to changes in ownership. Put simply, it is the automatic transfer of all the rights and obligations of the employer from one entity to another, without the need for any additional actions or consents from the parties involved. However, this must be preceded by the fulfilment of a range of informing obligations by both the new and former employers. Let’s take a look at what the process should involve.

Protecting yourself against tax risks in the deposit-return system

The deposit-return system has been in place since October 2025, raising significant tax concerns from the outset. Although the regulations came into force, it was unclear for a long time how to apply them in practice. Some of the regulations needed clarification, some solutions were missing and the published explanations did not cover all the key issues. Consequently, the market began to develop its own operating standards.

Banking sector overview | Banking today and tomorrow | March 2026

On 12 February 2026, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) issued a judgment concerning the use of the WIBOR index in loan agreements. The CJEU judges confirmed that, in consumer cases, courts cannot examine the correctness of the WIBOR calculation. The banks had correctly informed their clients about the reference rate in accordance with national and EU law.

The issue of the National Labour Inspectorate reform has resurfaced

A new draft law proposing changes to the way the National Labour Inspectorate operates has been submitted to the Sejm. During its first reading on 25 February, the draft was not rejected and was therefore referred to the Social Policy and Family Committee for further consideration. Despite the concerns and controversies raised so far, including by businesses, the legislature continues to pursue the thorough modernisation of Poland’s employment model, which involves increased supervision of the labour market and curbing the abuse of civil law contracts. In this article, we will take a look at the proposals included in the new draft and explain what they mean for businesses.

Polish AI boom

According to the latest data, nearly 15,000 companies dealing with artificial intelligence were registered in Poland in 2025.[1] This testifies to an undoubted boom in AI, as well as to the dynamic changes related to the development of this technology. However, amid the rush to implement AI, do companies consider the most important issue: securing the outcomes of their work and protecting themselves against competitors? In this article, we explore this issue and suggest ways to avoid costly problems.

Length of service now includes periods of self-employment

The length of service no longer depends solely on work carried out under a contract of employment. The amendment to the Labour Code introduces significant changes, as work carried out under civil law contracts or as part of business activity will now also be included when calculating service, which affects employees’ rights. What will this mean for employees and employers?

Contact us:

Tomasz Szambelan

Tomasz Szambelan

Advocate / Counsel / Intellectual and Industrial Property Law

+48 608 593 042

t.szambelan@kochanski.pl