IP in ESG reporting

16 October 2024 | Knowledge, News, The Right Focus

An ESG report should include detailed information on a company’s environmental, social and governance impacts. However, companies often forget to include aspects related to intellectual property rights. Let’s take a look at what IP specifically means in corporate governance.

Identifying and securing IP rights

An ESG report should be a source of reliable information on the company’s ESG strategy, objectives and progress towards them. However, it is often the case that a report’s authors do not include IP-related aspects, which also leads to a failure to assess the company’s IP assets and thus miss opportunities that exist in this area.   

The place of IP in ESG reporting is ‘G’, or corporate governance. The definition and implementation of IP policies and the commercialisation of rights undoubtedly have a significant impact on the effective management of a company in the spirit of sustainable development.

What if a company has not yet analysed the IP aspect of its business?

In this case, the reporting process can also be used to identify IP rights and develop internal IP-related procedures in line with sustainability principles.

Why can IP reporting benefit a company?

Implementing appropriate IP procedures and policies certainly demonstrates adherence to the highest standards of corporate governance. This can also be a driver for a company’s position in the industry.

Reporting must not harm IP

When preparing a report, it is important to remember that the European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS) do not require the reporting of confidential or sensitive information.

This applies to intellectual property rights, the disclosure of which could harm the company. Therefore, any know-how, patent applications or unpublished designs, the premature disclosure of which could prevent them from obtaining protection, may be omitted from the reports.

Major companies invest in IP

The importance of identifying and protecting intellectual property rights is clearly demonstrated by recent reports from the largest listed companies. This is particularly true in the IT, automotive and pharmaceutical industries.

CD Projekt, one of the largest gaming companies in the world, explicitly states that it is constantly securing its rights as part of its business, and that the protection and management of intellectual property is handled by a dedicated Business & IP team within the company’s legal department. Their report also highlights the importance of cybersecurity.

Toyota’s latest report also describes in great detail how important the protection and use of intellectual property rights is to the organisation as a whole. The report highlights the company’s focus on continuous research and development to raise the level of technological sophistication and competitiveness of Toyota-branded products. The company also describes the structure of the organisation dealing with IP issues and details the number of patent rights held, using the US and Japan as examples.

Pfizer, the global pharmaceutical giant, also explicitly mentions its IP policy on the use of generic medicines in the poorest countries and on sustainable development. A recent report by the company also mentions its sponsorship of the World Intellectual Property Organisation’s Inventor Assistance Programme.

It is therefore worth taking a leaf out of the book of the biggest companies and starting to position yourself as an organisation with a high level of governance and awareness of IP protection, implementation and commercialisation.

Are you interested in effectively securing your company’s IP rights in the spirit of sustainable development? Please do not hesitate to contact us.

Tomasz Szambelan

Latest Knowledge

Announcement of Income Tax Reform

On 19 August, during a press conference, the Prime Minister announced a package of tax changes planned for next year. According to the announcement, the reform is intended, on the one hand, to ease the burden on the middle class and, on the other, to shift a greater fiscal burden onto the wealthiest individuals and the largest companies. We take a look at the proposals included in the announced package and explain what they might mean for taxpayers.

Family foundations and the tax authorities: what draft bill UD447 proposes and why this is not the end of the troubles

Family foundations were intended to provide entrepreneurs with a stable framework for intergenerational wealth management. Yet not even four years have passed since the first such foundations were established, and the rules governing their taxation are set to be changed once again. This is because the scale of interest and the practical problems uncovered have overwhelmed the drafters of the legislation, as best illustrated by the figures – 927 applications for individual tax rulings and 77 opinions issued from the Head of the National Revenue Administration. This does not, however, mean that family foundations are being used on a massive scale for aggressive tax optimisation. A significant proportion of the queries concerned simply how to correctly apply the complex regulations.

NIS2 and the National Cybersecurity System Act in transport: what you need to do before October 2026

The amended Act on the National Cybersecurity System (UKSC) has been in force since 3 April 2026. For transport sector undertakings, this means a specific compliance timeline, including an obligation to register with the National Cybersecurity System (KSC) registry by 3 October 2026. Failure to do so may result in substantial financial penalties, coupled with the risk of personal liability for senior management. Not every undertaking, however, automatically falls within the scope of the new regime. Read on to find out whether your organisation is affected and what you need to do before the deadline for preparation.

Family foundations: the government has done the maths and presented the bill

Three years. That’s how long we’ve been waiting for what the Council of Ministers had seen in the data from the outset – and has now disclosed in its review of the Family Foundation Act. The document not only diagnoses the problems, but also previews substantial changes to rules that founders and their advisers treated as settled and stable. And therein lies a problem that goes far beyond tax matters. If the rules of the game are changed while the game is being played, there can be neither planning stability nor trust in the law. It is no coincidence that one of the greatest concerns among entrepreneurs considering setting up a foundation is not the level of taxation, but the stability of the legal framework – which today is once again being called into question.

What the new swiss franc act means for banks

We now have a new Act on Special Measures for the Adjudication of Cases Concerning Loan Agreements Denominated in or Indexed to the Swiss Franc. The provisions come into force 14 days after publication. So now is a good time to look at what lies ahead and what banks should be doing today.

New draft Pay Transparency Act – what has changed since December 2025?

A second version of the draft act on strengthening the application of the right to equal pay for equal work or work of equal value between men and women has now been published. It refines procedures and deadlines and introduces a new supervisory body. We have already discussed the changes affecting the recruitment stage and the three pillars of the forthcoming pay transparency framework, noting that Poland will miss the EU transposition deadline of 7 June 2026. Now, we take a closer look at the further changes, new developments and risks that have emerged in the latest, April version of the draft.

Payment Services Regulation (PSR) – between consumer protection and due diligence

The draft Payment Services Regulation (PSR) is one of the most significant elements of the reform of the EU legal framework for payment services. Its principal aim is to enhance the security of cashless transactions and to reduce the scale of financial fraud, in particular that arising from the growth of digital channels. At the same time, the new rules are intended to introduce a liability model that will not result in risk being transferred entirely to financial institutions, whilst retaining an important role for independent due diligence on the part of the user.

Energy deregulation – key changes for businesses and energy consumers

The President has now signed the Energy Deregulation Act (UDER92). The new provisions cover both the relationships between energy undertakings and consumers, and matters relating to investment, district heating, and the administrative obligations of energy market participants. The Act introduces changes in the areas of billing, communication with consumers, grid connection, and the operations of undertakings in the energy and district heating sectors. We set out the key points to note.

Banking sector overview | Banking today and tomorrow | July 2026

Under the draft legislation, banks will be required to offer existing borrowers a switch from WIBOR-based to POLSTR-based interest rates, a mechanism intended to speed up the voluntary transition of financial instruments to the new benchmark. The banking sector has responded positively to the proposal, according to Tadeusz Białek, President of the Polish Bank Association.

Contact us:

Tomasz Szambelan

Tomasz Szambelan

Advocate / Counsel / Intellectual and Industrial Property Law

+48 608 593 042

t.szambelan@kochanski.pl