IP in ESG reporting

16 October 2024 | Knowledge, News, The Right Focus

An ESG report should include detailed information on a company’s environmental, social and governance impacts. However, companies often forget to include aspects related to intellectual property rights. Let’s take a look at what IP specifically means in corporate governance.

Identifying and securing IP rights

An ESG report should be a source of reliable information on the company’s ESG strategy, objectives and progress towards them. However, it is often the case that a report’s authors do not include IP-related aspects, which also leads to a failure to assess the company’s IP assets and thus miss opportunities that exist in this area.   

The place of IP in ESG reporting is ‘G’, or corporate governance. The definition and implementation of IP policies and the commercialisation of rights undoubtedly have a significant impact on the effective management of a company in the spirit of sustainable development.

What if a company has not yet analysed the IP aspect of its business?

In this case, the reporting process can also be used to identify IP rights and develop internal IP-related procedures in line with sustainability principles.

Why can IP reporting benefit a company?

Implementing appropriate IP procedures and policies certainly demonstrates adherence to the highest standards of corporate governance. This can also be a driver for a company’s position in the industry.

Reporting must not harm IP

When preparing a report, it is important to remember that the European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS) do not require the reporting of confidential or sensitive information.

This applies to intellectual property rights, the disclosure of which could harm the company. Therefore, any know-how, patent applications or unpublished designs, the premature disclosure of which could prevent them from obtaining protection, may be omitted from the reports.

Major companies invest in IP

The importance of identifying and protecting intellectual property rights is clearly demonstrated by recent reports from the largest listed companies. This is particularly true in the IT, automotive and pharmaceutical industries.

CD Projekt, one of the largest gaming companies in the world, explicitly states that it is constantly securing its rights as part of its business, and that the protection and management of intellectual property is handled by a dedicated Business & IP team within the company’s legal department. Their report also highlights the importance of cybersecurity.

Toyota’s latest report also describes in great detail how important the protection and use of intellectual property rights is to the organisation as a whole. The report highlights the company’s focus on continuous research and development to raise the level of technological sophistication and competitiveness of Toyota-branded products. The company also describes the structure of the organisation dealing with IP issues and details the number of patent rights held, using the US and Japan as examples.

Pfizer, the global pharmaceutical giant, also explicitly mentions its IP policy on the use of generic medicines in the poorest countries and on sustainable development. A recent report by the company also mentions its sponsorship of the World Intellectual Property Organisation’s Inventor Assistance Programme.

It is therefore worth taking a leaf out of the book of the biggest companies and starting to position yourself as an organisation with a high level of governance and awareness of IP protection, implementation and commercialisation.

Are you interested in effectively securing your company’s IP rights in the spirit of sustainable development? Please do not hesitate to contact us.

Tomasz Szambelan

Latest Knowledge

Banking sector overview | Banking today and tomorrow | June 2026

According to a statement published by GPW Benchmark, the reference rate administrator, and the Polish Financial Supervision Authority (KNF), which oversees the administrator, 31 December 2036 will be the last day on which the WIBID and WIBOR rates will be provided for all key fixing periods: 1 month (1M), 3 months (3M) and 6 months (6M).

How to correctly calculate length of service from 1 May 2026

New rules for calculating length of service have applied to private sector employers since the beginning of May 2026. With companies continuing to express concerns about the new framework, the Ministry of Family, Labour and Social Policy has addressed the most common questions. We look at the issues that are (still) troubling employers and how we can help.

Tax settlement agreement: A new tool in the General Tax Code

A draft bill amending the General Tax Code (No. UDER110) has been submitted for consideration by the Council of Ministers. The bill introduces the tax settlement agreement, a new form of amicable dispute resolution between taxpayers and the tax authority. The draft is open for inter-ministerial review and public consultation until 19 June, with the proposed date of entry into force being 1 January 2028. Below, we examine who may apply for a settlement agreement, when, and on what terms, and how the process may work in practice.

A revolutionary reform of Poland’s capital market – ETFs and the Qualified Investment Fund

Poland’s capital market is on the cusp of one of the most significant reforms in recent years, which will fundamentally reshape the regulatory framework for ETFs and introduce an entirely new investment vehicle: the Qualified Investment Fund (QIF/KFI). This is a response to market demands and presents an opportunity for Poland to close the gap with countries such as Luxembourg and Ireland, with the overarching objective of boosting competitiveness and stemming the outflow of investment capital abroad. The new regulations aim to deliver greater flexibility for investors and fund managers alike, while also aligning with current market trends and European standards. We examine what is changing in practice and what it means for all market participants.

Directive 2024/825 – the European Union’s response to greenwashing

Greenwashing poses one of the most significant challenges to the consumer protection framework in the European Union. As customers become increasingly environmentally conscious, brands are ever more inclined to leverage this interest by invoking the language of environmental protection, sustainable development and climate neutrality. Yet these claims do not always reflect the actual characteristics of their products or services. The EU has sought to bring systemic order to this area by clarifying the information obligations of traders and broadening the list of practices deemed unfair. We consider what these changes mean for businesses in practice.

GLI – AI, Machine Learning & Big Data 2026: The Polish perspective on artificial intelligence law

Global Legal Insights (GLI) is a series of international publications by the Global Legal Group (GLG), authored by legal practitioners from around the world. It offers an up-to-date and highly practical guide to the applicable regulatory landscape, complemented by expert commentary on specific areas of law across different jurisdictions. In short: legislation and actionable know-how in one place.

Banking sector overview | Banking today and tomorrow | May 2026

“The end of the dream of free housing” – this is how the Polish Bank Association (Związek Banków Polskich) has characterised Thursday’s judgments of the Court of Justice of the European Union in cases concerning whether the claims of financial institutions against CHF mortgage borrowers have become time-barred.

Return deposits like VAT? The elephant in the room: the risks of the deposit-return system

The deposit-return system was supposed to be simple. Eco-friendly. Leak-proof. Tax-neutral. However, it took just a few months for serious doubts to emerge. The first loopholes are no longer just theoretical, they are in plain sight. The mechanisms for abuse can be described quite precisely, and the scale of potential losses may be much greater than anticipated. Below, we examine where the system is losing control and how this can be addressed.

Contact us:

Tomasz Szambelan

Tomasz Szambelan

Advocate / Counsel / Intellectual and Industrial Property Law

+48 608 593 042

t.szambelan@kochanski.pl