Foreign investments in companies from strategic sectors under state protection

8 September 2025 | Knowledge, News, The Right Focus

On 24 July 2025, amendments to the Act on the control of certain investments came into force, including the removal of the time limitation of the provisions relating to the control of certain investments prior to foreign acquisition. These regulations were introduced during the COVID-19 pandemic and were valid for a specific period.

Act on the control of certain investments

Provisions that specify the mechanism for controlling investments in strategic sectors, such as

  • Energy
  • Defence
  • Fuel production, storage and transmission
  • Telecommunications

were introduced by the Act in 2015.

The list of protected entities is included in the Annex to the Council of Ministers’ ordinance and is subject to ongoing updates.

In accordance with the Act, any intention to purchase, acquire a significant shareholding in, or take control of a protected company requires prior notification to the relevant authority, which may object to the transaction in cases specified in the Act.

Carrying out the transaction without the required notification or in spite of an objection from the relevant authority, is subject to a nullity penalty. Such action may also result in criminal liability in the form of a fine of up to PLN 100,000,000.00 or imprisonment for between six months and five years.

Additional control mechanism introduced with the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic

In 2020, due to the outbreak of the pandemic, foreign investment control regulations were supplemented with an additional temporary control mechanism, operating alongside the original, applicable to investors from outside the European Union/European Economic Area and the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.

The new mechanism was initially intended to be applied for 24 months. However, in 2022, its validity was extended to 60 months (i.e. until 24 July 2025), due to various factors, including the outbreak of war in Ukraine.

This mechanism applies to a separate list of protected entities that is broader than the original one, including, without limitation:

  • Public companies listed in Poland
  • Entities that own property disclosed in the uniform list of facilities, installations, equipment and services that constitute critical infrastructure
  • Entities that develop or modify software for controlling, managing or operating selected strategic and important areas listed in the Act
  • Entities that provide cloud computing, data collection or processing services
  • Entities operating in strategic sectors listed in the Act, such as energy, fuel extraction and production, telecommunications, security and public health

The above entities are subject to protection if they exceed the revenue thresholds for the sale of goods and services specified in the Act. The entities effecting the transactions must verify in each case whether they have exceeded the thresholds, as the new provisions do not contain an exhaustive list of undertakings subject to control.

Despite certain similarities, such as the requirement to notify the relevant authority of a planned transaction and the authority’s ability to object to such a transaction, the two mechanisms are regulated differently. This is particularly evident in the procedures for notification and objection, as well as the consequences of carrying out a transaction without the necessary notification or in spite of an objection raised by the competent authority.

Circumstances and context of changes effective from 24 July 2025

The amendment to the Act, which came into force on 24 July 2025, removed the time limit on applying the provisions introduced during the pandemic. This means that the additional mechanism for controlling strategic investments has become permanent.

Furthermore, the authority to which notifications must be submitted under the second mechanism has changed.

Previously, this was the President of the Office of Competition and Consumer Protection (UOKiK), and since 24 July 2025 has been the minister responsible for the economy. The President of the UOKiK remains responsible for conducting and concluding procedures initiated and not completed before the Amendment came into force.

Another change introduced by the Amendment is the exclusion of certain provisions of the Act from applying to acquisitions by the State Treasury, except for indirect acquisitions. For example, the State Treasury is not required to notify its intention to acquire, or to achieve significant shareholding in or control, entities protected under the Act.

Conclusions and summary

The Amendment’s main effect is to remove the expiry date of the mechanism for controlling certain investments, which was introduced during the pandemic as a temporary solution.

The protection mechanism in question has been maintained indefinitely, as a result of which the Act now contains two parallel, separate protection mechanisms. The first covers selected entities that operate in strategic sectors and are enumerated in the annex to the ordinance. The second covers transactions carried out by entities from outside the EU, EEA and OECD  concerning protected strategic entities, which are defined by the nature of their activity and a minimum revenue threshold for the sale of goods and services.

The amendment may significantly impact investments in entities operating in strategic sectors. In particular, it may prolong and complicate the transaction process due to the obligation to notify the relevant authority and await their decision.

It is worth noting that the grounds on which the relevant authority can object to the intended transaction are mostly worded in an open-ended manner, giving the authority considerable discretion.

Any questions? Contact us

Latest Knowledge

Dual-use items: how broad will the CJEU’s definition be?

A training aircraft designed for civilian purposes can also qualify as a military item. That’s a conclusion emerging from the Advocate General’s Opinion in Case C-538/25 (Flugzeugherstellerin) before the Court of Justice of the European Union. What does this mean for companies exporting goods from the EU?

Workplace harassment and discrimination: new regulations for employers

The Sejm has passed an amendment to the Labour Code concerning workplace harassment and discrimination. The changes introduce a broader definition of the concept itself, new forms of harassment, clearer definitions of what constitutes, for example, sexual harassment, and new rules governing the handling of such cases, including the reversal of the burden of proof, higher compensation awards, and the jurisdiction of district courts. The provisions will enter into force on 5 November 2026. We examine what will change and how much time remains to adapt company documents, policies, and the organisation as a whole.

ESG Roadmap. How to identify which regulations apply to your business and build a strategy

As we know, ESG in business is a roadmap made up of numerous obligations arising from different regulatory frameworks. That is why the right question is not “how do I meet all the requirements?” but rather “which of them apply to my business?”. This is a crucial distinction. We explain how to correctly diagnose your regulatory profile and build an effective ESG strategy – one that actually works and gives you a competitive edge.

Announcement of Income Tax Reform

On 19 August, during a press conference, the Prime Minister announced a package of tax changes planned for next year. According to the announcement, the reform is intended, on the one hand, to ease the burden on the middle class and, on the other, to shift a greater fiscal burden onto the wealthiest individuals and the largest companies. We take a look at the proposals included in the announced package and explain what they might mean for taxpayers.

Family foundations and the tax authorities: what draft bill UD447 proposes and why this is not the end of the troubles

Family foundations were intended to provide entrepreneurs with a stable framework for intergenerational wealth management. Yet not even four years have passed since the first such foundations were established, and the rules governing their taxation are set to be changed once again. This is because the scale of interest and the practical problems uncovered have overwhelmed the drafters of the legislation, as best illustrated by the figures – 927 applications for individual tax rulings and 77 opinions issued from the Head of the National Revenue Administration. This does not, however, mean that family foundations are being used on a massive scale for aggressive tax optimisation. A significant proportion of the queries concerned simply how to correctly apply the complex regulations.

Banking today and tomorrow | Financial sector overview | August 2026

Poland’s banking sector has reacted with concern to recent remarks by Katarzyna Pełczyńska-Nałęcz, the Minister of Development Funds and Regional Policy, who announced plans to put forward a proposal for a further increase in CIT levied on banks. The Minister’s reasoning, however, rests on a flawed conflation of the sector’s liquidity with its profitability, revealing a fundamental misunderstanding of how the banking sector operates and how its financial health is assessed. What is more, it feeds into a worrying trend of replacing substantive debate with simplistic, populist messaging which may be politically appealing but is not underpinned by either facts or economic analysis.

NIS2 and the National Cybersecurity System Act in transport: what you need to do before October 2026

The amended Act on the National Cybersecurity System (UKSC) has been in force since 3 April 2026. For transport sector undertakings, this means a specific compliance timeline, including an obligation to register with the National Cybersecurity System (KSC) registry by 3 October 2026. Failure to do so may result in substantial financial penalties, coupled with the risk of personal liability for senior management. Not every undertaking, however, automatically falls within the scope of the new regime. Read on to find out whether your organisation is affected and what you need to do before the deadline for preparation.

Family foundations: the government has done the maths and presented the bill

Three years. That’s how long we’ve been waiting for what the Council of Ministers had seen in the data from the outset – and has now disclosed in its review of the Family Foundation Act. The document not only diagnoses the problems, but also previews substantial changes to rules that founders and their advisers treated as settled and stable. And therein lies a problem that goes far beyond tax matters. If the rules of the game are changed while the game is being played, there can be neither planning stability nor trust in the law. It is no coincidence that one of the greatest concerns among entrepreneurs considering setting up a foundation is not the level of taxation, but the stability of the legal framework – which today is once again being called into question.

Contact us:

Weronika Duchnowska

Weronika Duchnowska

Advocate / Associate / Corporate Law

+48 882 393 610

w.duchnowska@kochanski.pl