Equal Pay Directive: obligations and challenges for employers

12 March 2025 | Knowledge, News, The Right Focus

The Directive[i] to strengthen the principle of equal pay for equal work or work of equal value between men and women through pay transparency and enforcement mechanisms entered into force on 6 June 2023.

Member States, including Poland, are obliged to transpose it by adopting national implementing legislation by 7 June 2026 at the latest.

The Directive does not directly confer any specific rights or impose any obligations on the parties to an employment relationship. Such obligations must be derived from the legislation adopted by each country.

Elimination of the pay gap and greater pay transparency

The Directive has two main objectives.

The first is to eliminate the gender pay gap, i.e. to structure the pay system so as to ensure equal pay.

The elimination of pay discrimination is to be achieved by:

  • Establishing transparent, accurate and fair pay-setting mechanisms and pay rules
  • Public disclosure of information on pay rates offered for a given job
  • Monitoring of employers by public authorities with regard to the existence of the pay gap
  • Requiring employers to take corrective action where a pay gap is identified

The second objective of the Directive is to introduce greater transparency and openness in pay for all employees, regardless of gender.

However, the aim of the new rules is not to standardise pay.

The principle of equality does not aim to set identical salaries for all employees in the same positions, regardless of other factors (criteria) such as professional experience or skills. The Directive allows for discrepancies in salaries, provided that any differences are based on objective criteria that are independent of an employee’s gender.

Who will be covered by the Equal Pay Directive

The Directive will cover:

  • Job applicants
  • Employers in the public and private sectors (regardless of the size of their workforce)
  • All workers who have a contract of employment, including workers:
      • working part time
      • employed on a fixed-term contract
      • employed by temporary work agencies
      • trainees
      • apprentices
      • employed otherwise than under a contract of employment
      • in management positions
      • in an employment relationship as defined by national law

* The employment relationship will be proven by the facts showing its actual existence, not by the way the parties describe their contractual relationship.

Employers’ main obligations under the Directive

Establish and apply mechanisms for comparing (valuing) work

The employer should formally evaluate the work, i.e. check which positions are related to the same, comparable or different work.

This comparison should be based on objective and gender-neutral criteria set out in the Directive, i.e.:

  • Skills
  • Effort
  • Responsibility
  • Working conditions
  • Other factors which are relevant to the specific job or position (provided they are not directly or indirectly discriminatory)
  • Soft skills

As some pay components are awarded for periods longer than one month (e.g. quarterly bonus, annual bonus based on achievement of targets, etc.), equal pay will be assessed on an annual basis.

Ensure easy access to the criteria and mechanisms used to determine the pay structure and the rules for pay progression

The employer will be obliged to give employees access to the principles on which the pay structure has been developed.

In practice, this means access to information on the criteria used to compare jobs, as well as on pay levels and pay progression.

Employers with fewer than 50 employees may, but do not have to, be exempt from this obligation.

Inform employees about their pay level and their rights

Employees have the right to request information and the employer is obliged to provide a written response on their individual pay level and the average pay levels, broken down by sex, in relation to categories of workers performing the same work or work of equal value.

Once a year, the employer will have to inform employees of their right to such information and explain how to obtain it.

Ban on confidentiality clauses

Employers will not be allowed to include pay confidentiality clauses in contracts.

In practice, this means that employees will be free to disclose information about their pay, but only for the purpose of enforcing equal pay.

Obligation to disclose salary at the recruitment stage

Applicants will have the right to ask their prospective employer about the salary level or initial salary range offered for a particular position and the relevant collective agreement/remuneration regulations/pay policy provisions relating to that position.

Obligation to report on the gender pay gap

Employers will be required to submit reports including on whether there is a gender pay gap in their organisation.

Companies with up to 99 employees will not be subject to the reporting obligation, although national law may introduce such an obligation or propose voluntary reporting.

Monitoring obligations (joint pay assessment)

Obligations to remedy imbalances if pay inequalities are identified

Consequences for the employer in the event of non-compliance

The employee’s right to compensation or reparation

An employee who has suffered pay discrimination is entitled to back pay, including bonuses, payments in kind, interest on arrears and compensation for lost opportunities.

Financial sanctions on the employer

Financial sanctions can include a fine, as well as a ban on access to public subsidies, financial relief or credit relief.

Summary

Given the amount of work required to implement a transparent equal pay policy, it is worth starting to prepare now, for example by checking whether the current system meets the requirements of the directive or whether it may need to be changed. We are here to help if you have any problems.

Any questions? Contact us

Angelika Stańko

 

 

 

[i] Directive (EU) 2023/970 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 10 May 2023

Latest Knowledge

Payment Services Regulation (PSR) – between consumer protection and due diligence

The draft Payment Services Regulation (PSR) is one of the most significant elements of the reform of the EU legal framework for payment services. Its principal aim is to enhance the security of cashless transactions and to reduce the scale of financial fraud, in particular that arising from the growth of digital channels. At the same time, the new rules are intended to introduce a liability model that will not result in risk being transferred entirely to financial institutions, whilst retaining an important role for independent due diligence on the part of the user.

Energy deregulation – key changes for businesses and energy consumers

The President has now signed the Energy Deregulation Act (UDER92). The new provisions cover both the relationships between energy undertakings and consumers, and matters relating to investment, district heating, and the administrative obligations of energy market participants. The Act introduces changes in the areas of billing, communication with consumers, grid connection, and the operations of undertakings in the energy and district heating sectors. We set out the key points to note.

Banking sector overview | Banking today and tomorrow | July 2026

Under the draft legislation, banks will be required to offer existing borrowers a switch from WIBOR-based to POLSTR-based interest rates, a mechanism intended to speed up the voluntary transition of financial instruments to the new benchmark. The banking sector has responded positively to the proposal, according to Tadeusz Białek, President of the Polish Bank Association.

“Withdraw from contract here” – what next for the new button in online shops, on trading platforms and in mobile apps?

From 19 June, national legislation was to require businesses in the European Union entering into distance contracts with consumers via an online interface to provide consumers with the option to withdraw from the contract via a dedicated function/button. However, due to Poland’s delay in transposing Directive 2023/2673, which requires the use of such a button, this obligation has been postponed in our country. We look at what remote contract withdrawal entails and which transactions the new feature will apply to.

Municipal master plans – new deadline, same old challenges

On 11 June 2026, the President signed into law a bill extending the deadline for municipalities to adopt their master plans (plany ogólne). The key deadline for adopting master plans was moved from 30 June to 31 August 2026. We examine the reasons behind this change and consider what the absence of a master plan might mean for potential investors and their future projects.

Record fines and the upcoming 21st sanctions package – what should businesses expect?

The past year has brought a series of enforcement actions that clearly signal a tightening approach by the Polish customs and revenue authorities towards breaches of the sanctions regime. Importantly, businesses should already be preparing for further changes, as the European Union has announced its 21st sanctions package and updated the list of designated persons and entities. We examine the key developments and offer guidance on how to minimise the risk of non-compliance.

A sea change in the rules governing board members’ liability for a company’s tax arrears

The bill amending the General Tax Code (No. UC138) fundamentally overhauls the rules governing the tax liability of third parties for capital companies’ tax arrears.  It comes in response to recent CJEU judgments, the Ombudsman’s February statement and the post-audit report of the Supreme Chamber of Audit (NIK) of December 2025. We examine what’s changing, who will be affected by the new rules and what steps are worth taking right now.

Partner in name, but only if male: the linguistic trap in Polish corporate law

One of the structures available under Polish law is the ‘spółka partnerska’ (professional partnership), modelled on the Anglo-Saxon Limited Liability Partnership. As defined in the Polish Commercial Companies Code, this is a vehicle for individuals practising liberal professions, such as doctors, architects and accountants. And yet, the provisions governing professional partnerships make no mention of their applicability to women. We therefore examine whether there is no room for female partners, feminine-gendered forms, or simply linguistic empathy.

Can you sue over words aimed at an entire community?

A damaging public statement does not necessarily refer to a specific individual. Sometimes, the author attributes negative characteristics to a whole group of people, portrays them as a threat or uses language that could be seen as demeaning. Statements of this kind frequently concern LGBTQ+ people. This raises the question: can a member of the targeted community bring a lawsuit seeking compensation or an apology, even if they were not named directly? We decided to look into this.

Contact us:

Angelika Stańko

Angelika Stańko

Attorney-at-law / Senior Associate / Labour Law

+48 539 874 154

a.stanko@kochanski.pl