Equal Pay Directive: obligations and challenges for employers

12 March 2025 | Knowledge, News, The Right Focus

The Directive[i] to strengthen the principle of equal pay for equal work or work of equal value between men and women through pay transparency and enforcement mechanisms entered into force on 6 June 2023.

Member States, including Poland, are obliged to transpose it by adopting national implementing legislation by 7 June 2026 at the latest.

The Directive does not directly confer any specific rights or impose any obligations on the parties to an employment relationship. Such obligations must be derived from the legislation adopted by each country.

Elimination of the pay gap and greater pay transparency

The Directive has two main objectives.

The first is to eliminate the gender pay gap, i.e. to structure the pay system so as to ensure equal pay.

The elimination of pay discrimination is to be achieved by:

  • Establishing transparent, accurate and fair pay-setting mechanisms and pay rules
  • Public disclosure of information on pay rates offered for a given job
  • Monitoring of employers by public authorities with regard to the existence of the pay gap
  • Requiring employers to take corrective action where a pay gap is identified

The second objective of the Directive is to introduce greater transparency and openness in pay for all employees, regardless of gender.

However, the aim of the new rules is not to standardise pay.

The principle of equality does not aim to set identical salaries for all employees in the same positions, regardless of other factors (criteria) such as professional experience or skills. The Directive allows for discrepancies in salaries, provided that any differences are based on objective criteria that are independent of an employee’s gender.

Who will be covered by the Equal Pay Directive

The Directive will cover:

  • Job applicants
  • Employers in the public and private sectors (regardless of the size of their workforce)
  • All workers who have a contract of employment, including workers:
      • working part time
      • employed on a fixed-term contract
      • employed by temporary work agencies
      • trainees
      • apprentices
      • employed otherwise than under a contract of employment
      • in management positions
      • in an employment relationship as defined by national law

* The employment relationship will be proven by the facts showing its actual existence, not by the way the parties describe their contractual relationship.

Employers’ main obligations under the Directive

Establish and apply mechanisms for comparing (valuing) work

The employer should formally evaluate the work, i.e. check which positions are related to the same, comparable or different work.

This comparison should be based on objective and gender-neutral criteria set out in the Directive, i.e.:

  • Skills
  • Effort
  • Responsibility
  • Working conditions
  • Other factors which are relevant to the specific job or position (provided they are not directly or indirectly discriminatory)
  • Soft skills

As some pay components are awarded for periods longer than one month (e.g. quarterly bonus, annual bonus based on achievement of targets, etc.), equal pay will be assessed on an annual basis.

Ensure easy access to the criteria and mechanisms used to determine the pay structure and the rules for pay progression

The employer will be obliged to give employees access to the principles on which the pay structure has been developed.

In practice, this means access to information on the criteria used to compare jobs, as well as on pay levels and pay progression.

Employers with fewer than 50 employees may, but do not have to, be exempt from this obligation.

Inform employees about their pay level and their rights

Employees have the right to request information and the employer is obliged to provide a written response on their individual pay level and the average pay levels, broken down by sex, in relation to categories of workers performing the same work or work of equal value.

Once a year, the employer will have to inform employees of their right to such information and explain how to obtain it.

Ban on confidentiality clauses

Employers will not be allowed to include pay confidentiality clauses in contracts.

In practice, this means that employees will be free to disclose information about their pay, but only for the purpose of enforcing equal pay.

Obligation to disclose salary at the recruitment stage

Applicants will have the right to ask their prospective employer about the salary level or initial salary range offered for a particular position and the relevant collective agreement/remuneration regulations/pay policy provisions relating to that position.

Obligation to report on the gender pay gap

Employers will be required to submit reports including on whether there is a gender pay gap in their organisation.

Companies with up to 99 employees will not be subject to the reporting obligation, although national law may introduce such an obligation or propose voluntary reporting.

Monitoring obligations (joint pay assessment)

Obligations to remedy imbalances if pay inequalities are identified

Consequences for the employer in the event of non-compliance

The employee’s right to compensation or reparation

An employee who has suffered pay discrimination is entitled to back pay, including bonuses, payments in kind, interest on arrears and compensation for lost opportunities.

Financial sanctions on the employer

Financial sanctions can include a fine, as well as a ban on access to public subsidies, financial relief or credit relief.

Summary

Given the amount of work required to implement a transparent equal pay policy, it is worth starting to prepare now, for example by checking whether the current system meets the requirements of the directive or whether it may need to be changed. We are here to help if you have any problems.

Any questions? Contact us

Angelika Stańko

 

 

 

[i] Directive (EU) 2023/970 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 10 May 2023

Latest Knowledge

Dual-use items: how broad will the CJEU’s definition be?

A training aircraft designed for civilian purposes can also qualify as a military item. That’s a conclusion emerging from the Advocate General’s Opinion in Case C-538/25 (Flugzeugherstellerin) before the Court of Justice of the European Union. What does this mean for companies exporting goods from the EU?

Workplace harassment and discrimination: new regulations for employers

The Sejm has passed an amendment to the Labour Code concerning workplace harassment and discrimination. The changes introduce a broader definition of the concept itself, new forms of harassment, clearer definitions of what constitutes, for example, sexual harassment, and new rules governing the handling of such cases, including the reversal of the burden of proof, higher compensation awards, and the jurisdiction of district courts. The provisions will enter into force on 5 November 2026. We examine what will change and how much time remains to adapt company documents, policies, and the organisation as a whole.

ESG Roadmap. How to identify which regulations apply to your business and build a strategy

As we know, ESG in business is a roadmap made up of numerous obligations arising from different regulatory frameworks. That is why the right question is not “how do I meet all the requirements?” but rather “which of them apply to my business?”. This is a crucial distinction. We explain how to correctly diagnose your regulatory profile and build an effective ESG strategy – one that actually works and gives you a competitive edge.

Announcement of Income Tax Reform

On 19 August, during a press conference, the Prime Minister announced a package of tax changes planned for next year. According to the announcement, the reform is intended, on the one hand, to ease the burden on the middle class and, on the other, to shift a greater fiscal burden onto the wealthiest individuals and the largest companies. We take a look at the proposals included in the announced package and explain what they might mean for taxpayers.

Family foundations and the tax authorities: what draft bill UD447 proposes and why this is not the end of the troubles

Family foundations were intended to provide entrepreneurs with a stable framework for intergenerational wealth management. Yet not even four years have passed since the first such foundations were established, and the rules governing their taxation are set to be changed once again. This is because the scale of interest and the practical problems uncovered have overwhelmed the drafters of the legislation, as best illustrated by the figures – 927 applications for individual tax rulings and 77 opinions issued from the Head of the National Revenue Administration. This does not, however, mean that family foundations are being used on a massive scale for aggressive tax optimisation. A significant proportion of the queries concerned simply how to correctly apply the complex regulations.

Banking today and tomorrow | Financial sector overview | August 2026

Poland’s banking sector has reacted with concern to recent remarks by Katarzyna Pełczyńska-Nałęcz, the Minister of Development Funds and Regional Policy, who announced plans to put forward a proposal for a further increase in CIT levied on banks. The Minister’s reasoning, however, rests on a flawed conflation of the sector’s liquidity with its profitability, revealing a fundamental misunderstanding of how the banking sector operates and how its financial health is assessed. What is more, it feeds into a worrying trend of replacing substantive debate with simplistic, populist messaging which may be politically appealing but is not underpinned by either facts or economic analysis.

NIS2 and the National Cybersecurity System Act in transport: what you need to do before October 2026

The amended Act on the National Cybersecurity System (UKSC) has been in force since 3 April 2026. For transport sector undertakings, this means a specific compliance timeline, including an obligation to register with the National Cybersecurity System (KSC) registry by 3 October 2026. Failure to do so may result in substantial financial penalties, coupled with the risk of personal liability for senior management. Not every undertaking, however, automatically falls within the scope of the new regime. Read on to find out whether your organisation is affected and what you need to do before the deadline for preparation.

Family foundations: the government has done the maths and presented the bill

Three years. That’s how long we’ve been waiting for what the Council of Ministers had seen in the data from the outset – and has now disclosed in its review of the Family Foundation Act. The document not only diagnoses the problems, but also previews substantial changes to rules that founders and their advisers treated as settled and stable. And therein lies a problem that goes far beyond tax matters. If the rules of the game are changed while the game is being played, there can be neither planning stability nor trust in the law. It is no coincidence that one of the greatest concerns among entrepreneurs considering setting up a foundation is not the level of taxation, but the stability of the legal framework – which today is once again being called into question.

Contact us:

Angelika Stańko

Angelika Stańko

Attorney-at-law / Senior Associate / Labour Law

+48 539 874 154

a.stanko@kochanski.pl