Energy En

Electricity distribution licences – the most common problems and application mistakes

20 November 2024 | Knowledge, News, The Right Focus

Companies applying for an electricity distribution licence (Polish: DEE) face various challenges in obtaining it. Very often, the reason for the refusal of such a licence is the submission of inappropriate connection conditions.

This is because, in practice, the President of the Energy Regulatory Office (ERO) requires the submission of an agreement/conditions for the connection of the distribution network to the transmission network of a TSO or to the distribution network of the relevant DSO.

This implies two possible scenarios:

  • Submission of a correct application to the TSO or the relevant DSO for the issuing of conditions for the connection of the distribution network to the transmission network or the distribution network, as the case may be, or;
  • If the conversion of the receiving/generating system to the company’s distribution network takes place after the connection to the facility has already been made, a new application for connection conditions must be submitted and a new agreement concluded. Alternatively, an attempt can be made to resolve the matter by way of an agreement. In such a situation, the course of action will largely depend on the decision of the relevant DSO or TSO.

In certain cases, the President of the ERO will recognise agreements between the parties regulating the issue of changing the type of connected system and the related settlements. However, such an agreement should clearly indicate the boundary between the receiving/generating system and the distribution network.

It should be borne in mind that a change in the type of connection may also entail a change in the fee for that connection.

Therefore, there is a further risk that, in the event of a change of connection from a receiving or generating system to a distribution network, due to the connection of a new type of facility (network), there will be an obligation to pay the network connection fee (with a possible deduction of the amount already paid when the system was first connected).

Consequences of submitting an improperly prepared DEE licence application

The submission of documents in the form of a connection agreement for the connection of a facility other than a distribution network should result in the entrepreneur being requested to remedy formal deficiencies and present the agreement for the connection of the distribution network to the grid within the deadline set by the President of the ERO.

In the case of a completed connection, there is a risk that the DSO or TSO and the prospective licensee will not be able to reach an agreement on a change in the nature of the connection within the deadline set by the President of the ERO. It is therefore advisable to negotiate this issue before submitting the licence application. A mistake at this stage, i.e. submitting the application without the relevant annex, may result in the licence being refused on the grounds that the deadline for remedying formal deficiencies has not been met.

It should also be noted that a change in the type of connection (a network instead of a facility) may result in a change in the fee. Entrepreneurs deciding to develop or implement a new business should take this into account in their plans.

Any questions? Contact us

Milena Kazanowska-Kędzierska

Latest Knowledge

Dual-use items: how broad will the CJEU’s definition be?

A training aircraft designed for civilian purposes can also qualify as a military item. That’s a conclusion emerging from the Advocate General’s Opinion in Case C-538/25 (Flugzeugherstellerin) before the Court of Justice of the European Union. What does this mean for companies exporting goods from the EU?

Workplace harassment and discrimination: new regulations for employers

The Sejm has passed an amendment to the Labour Code concerning workplace harassment and discrimination. The changes introduce a broader definition of the concept itself, new forms of harassment, clearer definitions of what constitutes, for example, sexual harassment, and new rules governing the handling of such cases, including the reversal of the burden of proof, higher compensation awards, and the jurisdiction of district courts. The provisions will enter into force on 5 November 2026. We examine what will change and how much time remains to adapt company documents, policies, and the organisation as a whole.

ESG Roadmap. How to identify which regulations apply to your business and build a strategy

As we know, ESG in business is a roadmap made up of numerous obligations arising from different regulatory frameworks. That is why the right question is not “how do I meet all the requirements?” but rather “which of them apply to my business?”. This is a crucial distinction. We explain how to correctly diagnose your regulatory profile and build an effective ESG strategy – one that actually works and gives you a competitive edge.

Announcement of Income Tax Reform

On 19 August, during a press conference, the Prime Minister announced a package of tax changes planned for next year. According to the announcement, the reform is intended, on the one hand, to ease the burden on the middle class and, on the other, to shift a greater fiscal burden onto the wealthiest individuals and the largest companies. We take a look at the proposals included in the announced package and explain what they might mean for taxpayers.

Family foundations and the tax authorities: what draft bill UD447 proposes and why this is not the end of the troubles

Family foundations were intended to provide entrepreneurs with a stable framework for intergenerational wealth management. Yet not even four years have passed since the first such foundations were established, and the rules governing their taxation are set to be changed once again. This is because the scale of interest and the practical problems uncovered have overwhelmed the drafters of the legislation, as best illustrated by the figures – 927 applications for individual tax rulings and 77 opinions issued from the Head of the National Revenue Administration. This does not, however, mean that family foundations are being used on a massive scale for aggressive tax optimisation. A significant proportion of the queries concerned simply how to correctly apply the complex regulations.

Banking today and tomorrow | Financial sector overview | August 2026

Poland’s banking sector has reacted with concern to recent remarks by Katarzyna Pełczyńska-Nałęcz, the Minister of Development Funds and Regional Policy, who announced plans to put forward a proposal for a further increase in CIT levied on banks. The Minister’s reasoning, however, rests on a flawed conflation of the sector’s liquidity with its profitability, revealing a fundamental misunderstanding of how the banking sector operates and how its financial health is assessed. What is more, it feeds into a worrying trend of replacing substantive debate with simplistic, populist messaging which may be politically appealing but is not underpinned by either facts or economic analysis.

NIS2 and the National Cybersecurity System Act in transport: what you need to do before October 2026

The amended Act on the National Cybersecurity System (UKSC) has been in force since 3 April 2026. For transport sector undertakings, this means a specific compliance timeline, including an obligation to register with the National Cybersecurity System (KSC) registry by 3 October 2026. Failure to do so may result in substantial financial penalties, coupled with the risk of personal liability for senior management. Not every undertaking, however, automatically falls within the scope of the new regime. Read on to find out whether your organisation is affected and what you need to do before the deadline for preparation.

Family foundations: the government has done the maths and presented the bill

Three years. That’s how long we’ve been waiting for what the Council of Ministers had seen in the data from the outset – and has now disclosed in its review of the Family Foundation Act. The document not only diagnoses the problems, but also previews substantial changes to rules that founders and their advisers treated as settled and stable. And therein lies a problem that goes far beyond tax matters. If the rules of the game are changed while the game is being played, there can be neither planning stability nor trust in the law. It is no coincidence that one of the greatest concerns among entrepreneurs considering setting up a foundation is not the level of taxation, but the stability of the legal framework – which today is once again being called into question.