Eco Focus #3

14 November 2024 | Eco Focus, Knowledge, News

Milena Kazanowska-Kędzierska dispels doubts about the EU deforestation regulation.

What are the main challenges and concerns for companies?

Many questions about the EUDR relate to due diligence. Companies are also looking for practical ways to simplify procedures.

So our expert explains what the new obligations are, who they affect and whether there are ways to make things easier for companies.

What is the obligation of due diligence?

Milena Kazanowska-Kędzierska

Under the Regulation, companies acting as operators or traders are subject to the obligation to exercise due diligence. This is an obligation to demonstrate that the relevant commodities and products that the company places or makes available on the market or exports from the EU meet three basic requirements:

  • Their production has not contributed to deforestation
  • They have been produced in accordance with the legislation of the country of origin
  • They are covered by a due diligence statement

In practice, companies should, among other things, put in place and review at least annually a due diligence system, i.e. a set of procedures and measures to ensure on an ongoing basis that their products are ‘safe’ in the regulatory sense.

Such a system consists of three main components:

The first is the collection of relevant information, data and documents, including:

  • Product details (what it is, where it comes from)
  • Supplier details
  • Evidence that the product is compliant

The second part of the system is risk assessment, i.e.:

  • Checking whether there is a risk of infringement
  • Identifying vulnerabilities in the supply chain

The final piece of the puzzle consists of security measures and actions, i.e.:

  • Implementing risk-reducing procedures
  • Regular checks on suppliers
  • Documenting all actions

It is also important to remember that the duty of care applies to all relevant products supplied by a particular supplier.

Does the EUDR provide for simplifications in the implementation of due diligence?

Yes, if companies can demonstrate that their goods originate from a ‘safe place’, i.e. a low risk country,[i] they can exercise the so-called ‘simplified due diligence’. In this situation, they are not required to comply with the obligations to assess and mitigate the risk of infringement.

A list of low, standard and high risk countries is to be drawn up by the European Commission by 30 December 2024.

Worth remembering

If a company suspects that the commodities or products it is dealing with do not comply with the EUDR, it should revert to complete control and communicate any relevant information to the competent authorities.[ii]

See also:

Eco Focus #2 on the penalties and consequences for companies that do not comply with the regulations and the system of checks.

Eco Focus #1 on the basic concepts and the list of products covered by the new regulations.

Any questions? Contact us

Milena Kazanowska-Kędzierska

 

[i] In accordance with Article 29 of Regulation 2023/1115.

[ii] or that the Regulation is circumvented, the operator shall fulfil all of the obligations under Articles 10 and 11 and shall immediately communicate any relevant information to the competent authority. Where a competent authority is made aware of any information that would point to a risk of circumvention of this Regulation, including in cases in which relevant commodities or relevant products produced in a standard-risk or high-risk country or a part thereof are subsequently processed in a low-risk country or a part thereof from where they are placed on or leave the market, the competent authority shall take immediate action in accordance with Article 17(1) and, where necessary, adopt interim measures in accordance with Article 23.

Latest Knowledge

GLI – AI, Machine Learning & Big Data 2026: The Polish perspective on artificial intelligence law

Global Legal Insights (GLI) is a series of international publications by the Global Legal Group (GLG), authored by legal practitioners from around the world. It offers an up-to-date and highly practical guide to the applicable regulatory landscape, complemented by expert commentary on specific areas of law across different jurisdictions. In short: legislation and actionable know-how in one place.

Banking sector overview | Banking today and tomorrow | May 2026

“The end of the dream of free housing” – this is how the Polish Bank Association (Związek Banków Polskich) has characterised Thursday’s judgments of the Court of Justice of the European Union in cases concerning whether the claims of financial institutions against CHF mortgage borrowers have become time-barred.

Return deposits like VAT? The elephant in the room: the risks of the deposit-return system

The deposit-return system was supposed to be simple. Eco-friendly. Leak-proof. Tax-neutral. However, it took just a few months for serious doubts to emerge. The first loopholes are no longer just theoretical, they are in plain sight. The mechanisms for abuse can be described quite precisely, and the scale of potential losses may be much greater than anticipated. Below, we examine where the system is losing control and how this can be addressed.

NZIA – “Made in Europe” becomes a condition of market participation in the energy sector

The European Union has adopted a strategic course aimed at building its own production capacity in key technology sectors, including energy technologies. This policy is embodied in the Net-Zero Industry Act (NZIA), which redefines the rules of competitiveness, inter alia, in the renewable energy sector. In tenders, auctions and public support schemes, price is no longer the sole criterion for selecting a supplier. The NZIA imposes on contracting authorities and entities administering support schemes an obligation to evaluate bids also on the basis of the origin of the technology and other criteria specified in the Regulation. This change is systemic in nature and will affect all market participants – both producers and purchasers of energy technologies. In this article, I analyse how the new EU regulations will translate into business practice for companies operating in the European market.

WHT – Obligation to verify the beneficial owner status when paying dividends. An advance tax ruling by the Director of the National Revenue Administration Information Centre vs. explanations by the Minister of Finance

A Polish company paying dividends to a foreign parent company based in the EU may be exempt from withholding tax (WHT). When verifying eligibility for this exemption, is the company required to check whether the recipient of the dividend is its beneficial owner (BO)? It transpires that the Director of the National Revenue Administration Information Centre (KIS) and the Minister of Finance offer completely different answers to this question. What does this mean in practice? Let’s take a look.

Banking in 2026: technology, regulation and the new market landscape

The year 2026 will see the banking sector undergo its most dynamic transformation in a decade. The trends identified in Accenture’s Top Banking Trends FY26 report suggest that the sector is entering a phase in which technology and regulation will be inseparable, driving all aspects of change. However, it is regulation that determines the boundaries, pace and manner of implementation for new solutions. We take a look at what else the experts are focusing on.

Contact us:

Milena Kazanowska – Kędzierska

Milena Kazanowska – Kędzierska

Attorney-at-law / Senior Associate / Energy, Infrastructure, Environment Protection, ESG

+48 539 908 918

m.kazanowska@kochanski.pl