Eco En (2)

Eco Focus #3

14 November 2024 | Eco Focus, Knowledge, News

Milena Kazanowska-Kędzierska dispels doubts about the EU deforestation regulation.

What are the main challenges and concerns for companies?

Many questions about the EUDR relate to due diligence. Companies are also looking for practical ways to simplify procedures.

So our expert explains what the new obligations are, who they affect and whether there are ways to make things easier for companies.

What is the obligation of due diligence?

Milena Kazanowska-Kędzierska

Under the Regulation, companies acting as operators or traders are subject to the obligation to exercise due diligence. This is an obligation to demonstrate that the relevant commodities and products that the company places or makes available on the market or exports from the EU meet three basic requirements:

  • Their production has not contributed to deforestation
  • They have been produced in accordance with the legislation of the country of origin
  • They are covered by a due diligence statement

In practice, companies should, among other things, put in place and review at least annually a due diligence system, i.e. a set of procedures and measures to ensure on an ongoing basis that their products are ‘safe’ in the regulatory sense.

Such a system consists of three main components:

The first is the collection of relevant information, data and documents, including:

  • Product details (what it is, where it comes from)
  • Supplier details
  • Evidence that the product is compliant

The second part of the system is risk assessment, i.e.:

  • Checking whether there is a risk of infringement
  • Identifying vulnerabilities in the supply chain

The final piece of the puzzle consists of security measures and actions, i.e.:

  • Implementing risk-reducing procedures
  • Regular checks on suppliers
  • Documenting all actions

It is also important to remember that the duty of care applies to all relevant products supplied by a particular supplier.

Does the EUDR provide for simplifications in the implementation of due diligence?

Yes, if companies can demonstrate that their goods originate from a ‘safe place’, i.e. a low risk country,[i] they can exercise the so-called ‘simplified due diligence’. In this situation, they are not required to comply with the obligations to assess and mitigate the risk of infringement.

A list of low, standard and high risk countries is to be drawn up by the European Commission by 30 December 2024.

Worth remembering

If a company suspects that the commodities or products it is dealing with do not comply with the EUDR, it should revert to complete control and communicate any relevant information to the competent authorities.[ii]

See also:

Eco Focus #2 on the penalties and consequences for companies that do not comply with the regulations and the system of checks.

Eco Focus #1 on the basic concepts and the list of products covered by the new regulations.

Any questions? Contact us

Milena Kazanowska-Kędzierska

 

[i] In accordance with Article 29 of Regulation 2023/1115.

[ii] or that the Regulation is circumvented, the operator shall fulfil all of the obligations under Articles 10 and 11 and shall immediately communicate any relevant information to the competent authority. Where a competent authority is made aware of any information that would point to a risk of circumvention of this Regulation, including in cases in which relevant commodities or relevant products produced in a standard-risk or high-risk country or a part thereof are subsequently processed in a low-risk country or a part thereof from where they are placed on or leave the market, the competent authority shall take immediate action in accordance with Article 17(1) and, where necessary, adopt interim measures in accordance with Article 23.

Latest Knowledge

Announcement of Income Tax Reform

On 19 August, during a press conference, the Prime Minister announced a package of tax changes planned for next year. According to the announcement, the reform is intended, on the one hand, to ease the burden on the middle class and, on the other, to shift a greater fiscal burden onto the wealthiest individuals and the largest companies. We take a look at the proposals included in the announced package and explain what they might mean for taxpayers.

Family foundations and the tax authorities: what draft bill UD447 proposes and why this is not the end of the troubles

Family foundations were intended to provide entrepreneurs with a stable framework for intergenerational wealth management. Yet not even four years have passed since the first such foundations were established, and the rules governing their taxation are set to be changed once again. This is because the scale of interest and the practical problems uncovered have overwhelmed the drafters of the legislation, as best illustrated by the figures – 927 applications for individual tax rulings and 77 opinions issued from the Head of the National Revenue Administration. This does not, however, mean that family foundations are being used on a massive scale for aggressive tax optimisation. A significant proportion of the queries concerned simply how to correctly apply the complex regulations.

NIS2 and the National Cybersecurity System Act in transport: what you need to do before October 2026

The amended Act on the National Cybersecurity System (UKSC) has been in force since 3 April 2026. For transport sector undertakings, this means a specific compliance timeline, including an obligation to register with the National Cybersecurity System (KSC) registry by 3 October 2026. Failure to do so may result in substantial financial penalties, coupled with the risk of personal liability for senior management. Not every undertaking, however, automatically falls within the scope of the new regime. Read on to find out whether your organisation is affected and what you need to do before the deadline for preparation.

Family foundations: the government has done the maths and presented the bill

Three years. That’s how long we’ve been waiting for what the Council of Ministers had seen in the data from the outset – and has now disclosed in its review of the Family Foundation Act. The document not only diagnoses the problems, but also previews substantial changes to rules that founders and their advisers treated as settled and stable. And therein lies a problem that goes far beyond tax matters. If the rules of the game are changed while the game is being played, there can be neither planning stability nor trust in the law. It is no coincidence that one of the greatest concerns among entrepreneurs considering setting up a foundation is not the level of taxation, but the stability of the legal framework – which today is once again being called into question.

What the new swiss franc act means for banks

We now have a new Act on Special Measures for the Adjudication of Cases Concerning Loan Agreements Denominated in or Indexed to the Swiss Franc. The provisions come into force 14 days after publication. So now is a good time to look at what lies ahead and what banks should be doing today.

New draft Pay Transparency Act – what has changed since December 2025?

A second version of the draft act on strengthening the application of the right to equal pay for equal work or work of equal value between men and women has now been published. It refines procedures and deadlines and introduces a new supervisory body. We have already discussed the changes affecting the recruitment stage and the three pillars of the forthcoming pay transparency framework, noting that Poland will miss the EU transposition deadline of 7 June 2026. Now, we take a closer look at the further changes, new developments and risks that have emerged in the latest, April version of the draft.

Payment Services Regulation (PSR) – between consumer protection and due diligence

The draft Payment Services Regulation (PSR) is one of the most significant elements of the reform of the EU legal framework for payment services. Its principal aim is to enhance the security of cashless transactions and to reduce the scale of financial fraud, in particular that arising from the growth of digital channels. At the same time, the new rules are intended to introduce a liability model that will not result in risk being transferred entirely to financial institutions, whilst retaining an important role for independent due diligence on the part of the user.

Energy deregulation – key changes for businesses and energy consumers

The President has now signed the Energy Deregulation Act (UDER92). The new provisions cover both the relationships between energy undertakings and consumers, and matters relating to investment, district heating, and the administrative obligations of energy market participants. The Act introduces changes in the areas of billing, communication with consumers, grid connection, and the operations of undertakings in the energy and district heating sectors. We set out the key points to note.

Banking sector overview | Banking today and tomorrow | July 2026

Under the draft legislation, banks will be required to offer existing borrowers a switch from WIBOR-based to POLSTR-based interest rates, a mechanism intended to speed up the voluntary transition of financial instruments to the new benchmark. The banking sector has responded positively to the proposal, according to Tadeusz Białek, President of the Polish Bank Association.