Eco En

Eco Focus #1

16 October 2024 | Eco Focus, Knowledge, News

All you need to know about the EU Deforestation Regulation (EUDR) in questions from companies and answers from Milena Kazanowska-Kędzierska, who examines the state of Polish businesses’ preparation for the new regulations on production based on the use of cattle, cocoa, coffee, oil palm, rubber, soya and wood… That is, activities causing deforestation.

Deforestation – Polish and European companies face challenges

The business community agrees that this is one of the most demanding pieces of legislation to which they will have to adapt, and they expect it to be a long, challenging and intensive process. We want to make it easier by answering the most common questions, clarifying difficult issues, dispelling doubts and providing examples of successful implementation and best practice, so that Polish companies are ready to compete with the best in Europe and the world.

The EUDR distinguishes between two categories of entities subject to it: ‘operators’ and ‘traders’. What is the difference?

Milena Kazanowska-Kędzierska:

The main difference is that an ‘operator’ is responsible for the initial placing on the EU market or export of a product, whereas a ‘trader’ deals with the further making available of products which are already placed on the market.

Looking at this in more detail, the EUDR imposes new obligations on:

Operators – i.e. any natural or legal person who, in the course of a commercial activity (i.e. for the purpose of processing, for distribution to commercial or non-commercial consumers, or for use in their own business or that of a trader):

  • Places relevant products on the market, makes relevant commodities or products available on the Union market for the first time, which means “the first transaction involving a product, subsequent transactions no longer being covered by the concept in question, so that placing on the market should be understood to mean the first introduction of goods to the market by the manufacturer or importer”, or
  • Exports relevant products, i.e. takes them out of the EU customs territory (in accordance with Regulation 952/2013)

Traders – meaning any person in the supply chain other than an operator, who, in the course of a commercial activity:

  • makes relevant products available on the market, which means any supply of a relevant product for distribution, consumption or use on the Union market in the course of a commercial activity, whether in return for payment or free of charge

It should be noted that where the relevant products are placed on the market by a non-EU natural or legal person, the first natural or legal person established in the EU who makes these relevant products available on the EU market is considered to be the OPERATOR.

Which products are covered by the EUDR? In other words, transactions in which products will fall under the EUDR?

Milena Kazanowska-Kędzierska:

These are the relevant commodities and products related to deforestation and forest degradation as listed in Annex 1 of the EUDR, which are:

  • Placed on the EU market
  • Exported from the Union
  • Made available on the EU market

It is worth noting that this list may be expanded in the future to include other products if they are deemed to cause deforestation.

Relevant commodities include cattle, cocoa, coffee, oil palm, soy, rubber and timber, while relevant products are those that:

  • Contain relevant commodities
  • Have been fed with relevant commodities
  • Have been made using relevant commodities

A list of such commodities can be found here.

Example:

Company A produces chocolates in Poland, which it then sells (places on the market), inter alia, to Company B, which sells them on the EU market in the course of its commercial activity.

Company A – OPERATOR

Company B – TRADER

Chocolates – RELEVANT PRODUCT [1806] Chocolate and other food preparations containing cocoa

When will the EUDR become applicable?

The Regulation entered into force on 29 June 2023, but will only be applicable from 30 December 2024.

It should be noted that on 2 October, the European Commission made a proposal to extend this deadline, but no binding decision has yet been taken.

The Commission proposes to give concerned parties additional time to prepare. If approved by the European Parliament and the Council, it would make the law applicable on 30 December 2025 for large companies and 30 June 2026 for micro- and small enterprises.

This means that companies should prepare for the implementation of the due diligence regime, taking into account the current deadlines.

Any questions? Contact us

Milena Kazanowska-Kędzierska

Latest Knowledge

Payment Services Regulation (PSR) – between consumer protection and due diligence

The draft Payment Services Regulation (PSR) is one of the most significant elements of the reform of the EU legal framework for payment services. Its principal aim is to enhance the security of cashless transactions and to reduce the scale of financial fraud, in particular that arising from the growth of digital channels. At the same time, the new rules are intended to introduce a liability model that will not result in risk being transferred entirely to financial institutions, whilst retaining an important role for independent due diligence on the part of the user.

Energy deregulation – key changes for businesses and energy consumers

The President has now signed the Energy Deregulation Act (UDER92). The new provisions cover both the relationships between energy undertakings and consumers, and matters relating to investment, district heating, and the administrative obligations of energy market participants. The Act introduces changes in the areas of billing, communication with consumers, grid connection, and the operations of undertakings in the energy and district heating sectors. We set out the key points to note.

Banking sector overview | Banking today and tomorrow | July 2026

Under the draft legislation, banks will be required to offer existing borrowers a switch from WIBOR-based to POLSTR-based interest rates, a mechanism intended to speed up the voluntary transition of financial instruments to the new benchmark. The banking sector has responded positively to the proposal, according to Tadeusz Białek, President of the Polish Bank Association.

“Withdraw from contract here” – what next for the new button in online shops, on trading platforms and in mobile apps?

From 19 June, national legislation was to require businesses in the European Union entering into distance contracts with consumers via an online interface to provide consumers with the option to withdraw from the contract via a dedicated function/button. However, due to Poland’s delay in transposing Directive 2023/2673, which requires the use of such a button, this obligation has been postponed in our country. We look at what remote contract withdrawal entails and which transactions the new feature will apply to.

Municipal master plans – new deadline, same old challenges

On 11 June 2026, the President signed into law a bill extending the deadline for municipalities to adopt their master plans (plany ogólne). The key deadline for adopting master plans was moved from 30 June to 31 August 2026. We examine the reasons behind this change and consider what the absence of a master plan might mean for potential investors and their future projects.

Record fines and the upcoming 21st sanctions package – what should businesses expect?

The past year has brought a series of enforcement actions that clearly signal a tightening approach by the Polish customs and revenue authorities towards breaches of the sanctions regime. Importantly, businesses should already be preparing for further changes, as the European Union has announced its 21st sanctions package and updated the list of designated persons and entities. We examine the key developments and offer guidance on how to minimise the risk of non-compliance.

A sea change in the rules governing board members’ liability for a company’s tax arrears

The bill amending the General Tax Code (No. UC138) fundamentally overhauls the rules governing the tax liability of third parties for capital companies’ tax arrears.  It comes in response to recent CJEU judgments, the Ombudsman’s February statement and the post-audit report of the Supreme Chamber of Audit (NIK) of December 2025. We examine what’s changing, who will be affected by the new rules and what steps are worth taking right now.

Partner in name, but only if male: the linguistic trap in Polish corporate law

One of the structures available under Polish law is the ‘spółka partnerska’ (professional partnership), modelled on the Anglo-Saxon Limited Liability Partnership. As defined in the Polish Commercial Companies Code, this is a vehicle for individuals practising liberal professions, such as doctors, architects and accountants. And yet, the provisions governing professional partnerships make no mention of their applicability to women. We therefore examine whether there is no room for female partners, feminine-gendered forms, or simply linguistic empathy.

Can you sue over words aimed at an entire community?

A damaging public statement does not necessarily refer to a specific individual. Sometimes, the author attributes negative characteristics to a whole group of people, portrays them as a threat or uses language that could be seen as demeaning. Statements of this kind frequently concern LGBTQ+ people. This raises the question: can a member of the targeted community bring a lawsuit seeking compensation or an apology, even if they were not named directly? We decided to look into this.