Death of a shareholder in a limited liability company and succession of shares

20 November 2024 | Knowledge, News, The Right Focus

Given that the limited liability company is currently one of the most popular forms of business organisation and that the shareholders are in many cases natural persons, it is worth considering how the death of one of them will affect the company’s operation. Therefore, let’s take a look at what system and tools can be introduced into the articles of association to protect the company and remaining shareholders from undesirable situations.

Shares in a company are a property right subject to inheritance in accordance with the general rules of law.

The rights attaching to shares acquired by more than one person through inheritance are exercised by the joint representative until the distribution of the estate.

On the death of an individual who is a shareholder in a limited liability company, their shares are transferred to their heirs, unless the articles of association provide otherwise.

However, the mere fact of inheritance does not mean that the heir or heirs are automatically entitled to exercise the rights of the deceased shareholder.

Indeed, the shareholders may have already decided and written in the articles of association to restrict or exclude the entry of heirs into the company.

Restrictions and exclusions on the ability of a shareholder’s heirs to join a limited liability company

In the articles of association, the shareholders may introduce various mechanisms to regulate and restrict the transferability of shares to other persons, e.g. in the event of the death of a shareholder and the related succession.

As a rule, the heirs inherit the shares, unless the articles of association contain restrictions in this respect.

For example, shareholders can restrict or exclude the possibility of shareholders’ heirs joining the company by including clauses in the articles of association that:

  • Require the approval of the Management Board/Supervisory Board/Shareholders’ Meeting for an heir to join the company. This gives shareholders control over who joins the company. If the heir or heirs receive approval, they will become entitled to hold the shares
  • Require the heirs to have certain qualifications or professional qualities
  • Restrict the entry of heirs engaged in competitive activities
  • Restrict the possibility of heirs from a certain circle of persons joining the company. For example, the articles may provide that only the spouse or children of the deceased shareholder may join the company, thereby excluding other persons
  • Stipulate that only heirs who already have a share in the company can join
  • Completely exclude the possibility of heirs joining the company in place of deceased shareholders

It is understood that such restriction or exclusion applies to either testamentary heirs, intestate heirs and legatees.

Obligation to specify the conditions for the satisfaction of heirs

It should be emphasised that the foregoing also requires that the articles of association include provisions for the satisfaction of heirs. In fact, the exclusion or restriction of their accession to the company must not involve depriving them of the value of their shares.

If these conditions are not specified, the restriction or exclusion will be ineffective and the heir will become a shareholder of the company.

Although the law does not lay down any minimum requirements for the conditions for the satisfaction of heirs, it cannot be taken in a completely discretionary manner. It should be noted that an heir who does not join the company should, within a reasonable period of time, receive as satisfaction an amount calculated according to the fair value of the shares of the deceased shareholder.

Furthermore, in addition to a clause restricting or excluding the possibility of the heirs joining the company, the rules for dealing with the shares of the deceased shareholder should also be regulated, in addition to the rules for the satisfaction of the heirs. For example, the articles of association may stipulate that the shares will be redeemed.

Exclusions or restrictions on the distribution of shares among heirs

The articles of association may also exclude the possibility of distributing the share(s) of a deceased shareholder among the heirs of the company. Importantly, this can be done regardless of whether the system for dividing the share capital is based on a division into equal or unequal shares, and thus also in a situation where shareholders are entitled to one share each. The purpose of this is to avoid the risk of undesirable fragmentation of the company’s shares.

Conclusion

Shareholders who wish to restrict the ability of heirs to join the company or limit the possibility of fragmentation of the company’s shareholding should plan ahead and amend the articles of association in good time.

It will not be possible to restrict or exclude the possibility of inheriting shares in a limited liability company after the death of a shareholder, and the heirs will become shareholders (in the case of a single heir) or joint holders of shares (if there is more than one heir).

Any questions? Contact us

Weronika Duchnowska

Latest Knowledge

NIS2 and the National Cybersecurity System Act in transport: what you need to do before October 2026

The amended Act on the National Cybersecurity System (UKSC) has been in force since 3 April 2026. For transport sector undertakings, this means a specific compliance timeline, including an obligation to register with the National Cybersecurity System (KSC) registry by 3 October 2026. Failure to do so may result in substantial financial penalties, coupled with the risk of personal liability for senior management. Not every undertaking, however, automatically falls within the scope of the new regime. Read on to find out whether your organisation is affected and what you need to do before the deadline for preparation.

Family foundations: the government has done the maths and presented the bill

Three years. That’s how long we’ve been waiting for what the Council of Ministers had seen in the data from the outset – and has now disclosed in its review of the Family Foundation Act. The document not only diagnoses the problems, but also previews substantial changes to rules that founders and their advisers treated as settled and stable. And therein lies a problem that goes far beyond tax matters. If the rules of the game are changed while the game is being played, there can be neither planning stability nor trust in the law. It is no coincidence that one of the greatest concerns among entrepreneurs considering setting up a foundation is not the level of taxation, but the stability of the legal framework – which today is once again being called into question.

What the new swiss franc act means for banks

We now have a new Act on Special Measures for the Adjudication of Cases Concerning Loan Agreements Denominated in or Indexed to the Swiss Franc. The provisions come into force 14 days after publication. So now is a good time to look at what lies ahead and what banks should be doing today.

New draft Pay Transparency Act – what has changed since December 2025?

A second version of the draft act on strengthening the application of the right to equal pay for equal work or work of equal value between men and women has now been published. It refines procedures and deadlines and introduces a new supervisory body. We have already discussed the changes affecting the recruitment stage and the three pillars of the forthcoming pay transparency framework, noting that Poland will miss the EU transposition deadline of 7 June 2026. Now, we take a closer look at the further changes, new developments and risks that have emerged in the latest, April version of the draft.

Payment Services Regulation (PSR) – between consumer protection and due diligence

The draft Payment Services Regulation (PSR) is one of the most significant elements of the reform of the EU legal framework for payment services. Its principal aim is to enhance the security of cashless transactions and to reduce the scale of financial fraud, in particular that arising from the growth of digital channels. At the same time, the new rules are intended to introduce a liability model that will not result in risk being transferred entirely to financial institutions, whilst retaining an important role for independent due diligence on the part of the user.

Energy deregulation – key changes for businesses and energy consumers

The President has now signed the Energy Deregulation Act (UDER92). The new provisions cover both the relationships between energy undertakings and consumers, and matters relating to investment, district heating, and the administrative obligations of energy market participants. The Act introduces changes in the areas of billing, communication with consumers, grid connection, and the operations of undertakings in the energy and district heating sectors. We set out the key points to note.

Banking sector overview | Banking today and tomorrow | July 2026

Under the draft legislation, banks will be required to offer existing borrowers a switch from WIBOR-based to POLSTR-based interest rates, a mechanism intended to speed up the voluntary transition of financial instruments to the new benchmark. The banking sector has responded positively to the proposal, according to Tadeusz Białek, President of the Polish Bank Association.

“Withdraw from contract here” – what next for the new button in online shops, on trading platforms and in mobile apps?

From 19 June, national legislation was to require businesses in the European Union entering into distance contracts with consumers via an online interface to provide consumers with the option to withdraw from the contract via a dedicated function/button. However, due to Poland’s delay in transposing Directive 2023/2673, which requires the use of such a button, this obligation has been postponed in our country. We look at what remote contract withdrawal entails and which transactions the new feature will apply to.

Municipal master plans – new deadline, same old challenges

On 11 June 2026, the President signed into law a bill extending the deadline for municipalities to adopt their master plans (plany ogólne). The key deadline for adopting master plans was moved from 30 June to 31 August 2026. We examine the reasons behind this change and consider what the absence of a master plan might mean for potential investors and their future projects.

Contact us:

Weronika Duchnowska

Weronika Duchnowska

Advocate / Associate / Corporate Law

+48 882 393 610

w.duchnowska@kochanski.pl

Rafał Rapala

Rafał Rapala

Attorney-at-law / Partner / Head of Corporate Law and Corporate Litigation / M&A, Private Equity

+48 608 444 650

r.rapala@kochanski.pl